Yeah, this about sums Trump up

[busybee01]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

WTF do snowflakes know about 'Lawless Presidents'?

Barak Obama stepped into office and immediately declared he was violating the oath of office he had just taken by ordering his criminal DOJ not to enforce a law legislation that had been passed by the Executive Branch and signed into law BECAUSE HE DID NOT LIKE THE LAW. Forget the fact that there was / is a legal process for challenging laws, Obama set the tone of his Presidency by saying 'f* the law, I am going to do what I want to do'.
-- By rights Obama should have been Impeached for that right off the bat...but the near super-majority controlled Democratic Party Congress would never have allowed it.

Obama went on for 8 years to repeatedly violate both the Constitution and Law, aiding terrorists, running weapons to Mexican Drug cartels, illegally spying on Americans/Congress/the USSC, illegally using the IRS as a weapon against the American people who threatened his re-election, to even committing Felony Espionage in an attempt to undermine / overthrow President Trump.

Obama set a new record for criminally refusing to comply with FOIA Requests, ran his own personal drone assassination program with which he illegally killed US citizens abroad while denying their Constitutional right of their day in court - which he insisted terrorists have, and dragged the united States into 2 Un-Constitutional, Un-Authorized wars to help terrorists, one to help the terrorists who slaughtered 3,000 Americans on 9/11/01 secure their own safe haven.

The Democrats made themselves a shield to ensure Obama was able to do anything he wanted, legal or not, without fear of Impeachment. They raised the requirement necessary to Impeach a President so high nothing short of shooting an American citizen in the head on live TV would have resulted in his Impeachment...and the gutless GOP were more afraid of angering the nation and potentially losing their jobs than they were interested in doing what was in the best interest of the nation.

Now, the butt-hurt snowflakes who ran the worst candidate in US history, losing to the likes of Donald Trump, seek to lower the standards required for Impeachment for Trump to him basically him breathing, as evident by their calls for his impeachment immediately after he was announced as having been elected the new President, before ever getting into the WH.

I have no delusions about Trump. I never have. I do not mind snowflakes suggesting Trump, as a millionaire international real estate businessman cut corners and broke some laws. What disgusts me is how the worst of the radical, lying, delusional snowflakes try to deny that Barak Obama and Hillary Clinton have not violated the Constitution, broken laws, jeopardized national security, etc.... I am disgusted by their hypocrisy and their partisan intellectual dishonesty.

You don't seem to have any problem with lawless Presidents. Trump sent out a order that agencies work to undermine Obamacare. The IRS says you don't have to prove that you have insurance. The mandate was a statute passed by Congress. Yet Trump ignores the law. There is a legal process for challenging or changing the law.

I did not vote for Obama but he did not commit Felony Espionage. He did not spy on Americans. He did say that terrorism should be handled through the criminal justice system but that is not aiding terrorists. I am glad that Obama continued the drone strikes against terrorists. That was one of the few things that I agreed with him on.

You are a hypocrite and your partisan intellectual dishonesty stands out.

 

[The Derp]

Dude, your stupidity is boring me. Go play outside kid.

Are you really just some Conservative policy researcher who is tasked with going on message boards to try out various tactics? Because that's what it sure fucking looks like to me.

 

[jc456]

BTW, the emails from wikileaks didn't come from that server. D'oh!

Ummm....yes, they did. The hack that revealed how the DNC was tipping its hand to Hillary over Bernie most definitely came from the DNC servers.

You are completely lost and confused...that's a symptom of buying Conservative bullshit. It's not even a belief system anymore, it's a mental disorder.

1)do you even know the domain names on the emails? 2) do you know the domain name of the DNC server? answer honestly.

hey tree, you still got those emails?

 

[The Derp]

wow, bubba, it came out in the congressional hearings, no one has seen that server. not the DOJ and not the FBI, no one. look it fking up! gawd teaching you how to use the internet is cumbersome.

No. That is not what came out in the congressional hearings. Not even close.

 

[busybee01]

You do, so now you understand why the right does not think that there can be a fair investigation when the team is loaded up with Democrats.

Mueller chose the best people he thought would lead the best investigation. If those people happen to be Dmeocrats, it's only because Conservatives are fucking terrible, unreliable, and untrustworthy. Otherwise, he would put them on his team. Also, it's looking more and more like Conservatives in general were colluding with Russia alongside Trump.

This is now a partisan investigation, not an independent one.

Gaslighting 101.

I think it is stupid to put people who actively worked to keep Trump from being elected to a team tasked with investigating him. If you don't think that is stupid, then you're stupid.

Did they, though? You gotta prove that.

IYou have full faith in Mueller to pick the best investigators, and he has already proven to you to have picked partisan hacks as investigators. Your faith makes you look stupid.

So you jsut don't like who he picked because who he picked isn't inclined to take Trump at his word. Well, that begs the question; why do you take Trump at his word?

dude it's supposed to be an impartial investigation. would you think it could be impartial with all GOP investigators? let me laugh at you for one moment prior to your answer.

There is no evidence that it isn't. Several members are currently working for the Trump Justice Department. They all have sterling reputations.

What? There is ample evidence that the entire team is comprised of Democrat donors. You should pay attention.

There is no evidence. You should look through the partisan haze you see through.

 

[The Derp]

So why is Trump, shooting himself in the foot?

Because he's guilty and stupid.

 

[bripat9643]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

Man, you are fucking hilarious. If your IQ was 40 points higher you might even be dangerous.

Considering your IQ is a -40, you have no room to talk. You are a sad victim of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Wow, that is a devastating comeback!

Trump Derangement Syndrome is an affliction of those who despise Trump, not those who respect him.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Why? Nothing illegal about firing the SP.

 

[The Derp]

1)do you even know the domain names on the emails? 2) do you know the domain name of the DNC server? answer honestly.

This was all covered in the DNI report I gave you the link for, why didn't you bother to click on it?

 

[busybee01]

You do, so now you understand why the right does not think that there can be a fair investigation when the team is loaded up with Democrats.

Mueller chose the best people he thought would lead the best investigation. If those people happen to be Dmeocrats, it's only because Conservatives are fucking terrible, unreliable, and untrustworthy. Otherwise, he would put them on his team. Also, it's looking more and more like Conservatives in general were colluding with Russia alongside Trump.

This is now a partisan investigation, not an independent one.

Gaslighting 101.

I think it is stupid to put people who actively worked to keep Trump from being elected to a team tasked with investigating him. If you don't think that is stupid, then you're stupid.

Did they, though? You gotta prove that.

IYou have full faith in Mueller to pick the best investigators, and he has already proven to you to have picked partisan hacks as investigators. Your faith makes you look stupid.

So you jsut don't like who he picked because who he picked isn't inclined to take Trump at his word. Well, that begs the question; why do you take Trump at his word?

dude it's supposed to be an impartial investigation. would you think it could be impartial with all GOP investigators? let me laugh at you for one moment prior to your answer.

There is no evidence that it isn't. Several members are currently working for the Trump Justice Department. They all have sterling reputations.

so again, my question, you'd be ok with all republicans then? or only republicans can't be impartial?

I have no problem with the lawyers that Mueller has chosen. there are what you would consider Republicans on the team so to speak.

 

[The Derp]

Trump Derangement Syndrome is an affliction of those who despise Trump, not those who respect him.

The people who "respect" Trump suffer from Trump Denial Syndrome. Where you deny facts and reality because you have a fragile ego that needs preserving.

 

[bripat9643]

You do, so now you understand why the right does not think that there can be a fair investigation when the team is loaded up with Democrats.

Mueller chose the best people he thought would lead the best investigation. If those people happen to be Dmeocrats, it's only because Conservatives are fucking terrible, unreliable, and untrustworthy. Otherwise, he would put them on his team. Also, it's looking more and more like Conservatives in general were colluding with Russia alongside Trump.

This is now a partisan investigation, not an independent one.

Gaslighting 101.

I think it is stupid to put people who actively worked to keep Trump from being elected to a team tasked with investigating him. If you don't think that is stupid, then you're stupid.

Did they, though? You gotta prove that.

IYou have full faith in Mueller to pick the best investigators, and he has already proven to you to have picked partisan hacks as investigators. Your faith makes you look stupid.

So you jsut don't like who he picked because who he picked isn't inclined to take Trump at his word. Well, that begs the question; why do you take Trump at his word?

dude it's supposed to be an impartial investigation. would you think it could be impartial with all GOP investigators? let me laugh at you for one moment prior to your answer.

There is no evidence that it isn't. Several members are currently working for the Trump Justice Department. They all have sterling reputations.

What? There is ample evidence that the entire team is comprised of Democrat donors. You should pay attention.

There is no evidence. You should look through the partisan haze you see through.

Denial is not a river in Egypt:

The Democratic leanings of Bob Mueller's team​

1. James Quarles: Donated almost $33,000 to Democrats, including Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. He has also donated about $2,750 to Republicans — the only lawyer on Mueller's team to have done so.
2. Jeannie Rhee: Donated more than $16,000 since 2008 to Democrats, including the maximum donation possible to Clinton in both 2015 and 2016. Rhee has also donated to Obama.
3. Andrew Weissmann: Donated more than $4,000 to Obama in 2008 and $2,000 to the DNC in 2006.
4. Elizabeth Prelogar: Donated $250 each to Clinton in 2016 and Obama in 2012.

 

[The Derp]

Why? Nothing illegal about firing the SP.

Nope. But it heavily implies guilt, and it's what ultimately tripped up Nixon.

 

[The Derp]

Denial is not a river in Egypt:

The Democratic leanings of Bob Mueller's team​

1. James Quarles: Donated almost $33,000 to Democrats, including Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. He has also donated about $2,750 to Republicans — the only lawyer on Mueller's team to have done so.
2. Jeannie Rhee: Donated more than $16,000 since 2008 to Democrats, including the maximum donation possible to Clinton in both 2015 and 2016. Rhee has also donated to Obama.
3. Andrew Weissmann: Donated more than $4,000 to Obama in 2008 and $2,000 to the DNC in 2006.
4. Elizabeth Prelogar: Donated $250 each to Clinton in 2016 and Obama in 2012.

There are TWELVE people on Mueller's team.

What about the other 8?

 

[bripat9643]

You do, so now you understand why the right does not think that there can be a fair investigation when the team is loaded up with Democrats.

Mueller chose the best people he thought would lead the best investigation. If those people happen to be Dmeocrats, it's only because Conservatives are fucking terrible, unreliable, and untrustworthy. Otherwise, he would put them on his team. Also, it's looking more and more like Conservatives in general were colluding with Russia alongside Trump.

This is now a partisan investigation, not an independent one.

Gaslighting 101.

I think it is stupid to put people who actively worked to keep Trump from being elected to a team tasked with investigating him. If you don't think that is stupid, then you're stupid.

Did they, though? You gotta prove that.

IYou have full faith in Mueller to pick the best investigators, and he has already proven to you to have picked partisan hacks as investigators. Your faith makes you look stupid.

So you jsut don't like who he picked because who he picked isn't inclined to take Trump at his word. Well, that begs the question; why do you take Trump at his word?

dude it's supposed to be an impartial investigation. would you think it could be impartial with all GOP investigators? let me laugh at you for one moment prior to your answer.

There is no evidence that it isn't. Several members are currently working for the Trump Justice Department. They all have sterling reputations.

so again, my question, you'd be ok with all republicans then? or only republicans can't be impartial?

I have no problem with the lawyers that Mueller has chosen. there are what you would consider Republicans on the team so to speak.

Of course you don't, dumbass Why would you have a problem with a pack of DNC party apparatchiks? There are no Republicans.

 

[bripat9643]

Denial is not a river in Egypt:

The Democratic leanings of Bob Mueller's team​

1. James Quarles: Donated almost $33,000 to Democrats, including Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. He has also donated about $2,750 to Republicans — the only lawyer on Mueller's team to have done so.
2. Jeannie Rhee: Donated more than $16,000 since 2008 to Democrats, including the maximum donation possible to Clinton in both 2015 and 2016. Rhee has also donated to Obama.
3. Andrew Weissmann: Donated more than $4,000 to Obama in 2008 and $2,000 to the DNC in 2006.
4. Elizabeth Prelogar: Donated $250 each to Clinton in 2016 and Obama in 2012.

There are TWELVE people on Mueller's team.

What about the other 8?

They're all Democrats.

 

[The Derp]

Why would you have a problem with a pack of DNC party apparatchiks? There are no Republicans.

So you're saying people on Mueller's team also worked for the DNC? Proof?

 

[The Derp]

They're all Democrats.

NO! THEY'RE NOT! That's why I asked you about the other members of the team.

BTW - the FIRST PERSON you picked also donated to Republicans. That's what your stupid copy-and-paste says.

BTW - Trump also donated to Democrats, including Hillary Clinton. So I guess that means Trump is going after himself...?

 

[busybee01]

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

So tell us all where the "justice" is in a political witch hunt that's gone on for 11 months now and found nothing, and is veering off in directions that's got nothing to do with COLLUSION?

The Mueller investigation is proceeding in a logical manner. They are examining Trump's ties to Russia which include business ties. Your idea of justice is a cover-up.

It is not a crime for a business man to do business with another country. There is no crime, there is no obstruction. How dense are you assholes really?

Unless they are doing business to funnel money to someone. That is called bribery. Why are you so afraid to find out? It seems you are expecting them to find something. On the other hand, I don't know.

you seem to think he's guilty of something. why not present what it is you think he did and then let's go look to see if he took money. I'm good with that. now tell me what he did that is illegal.

That is what a investigation is for.

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

Man, you are fucking hilarious. If your IQ was 40 points higher you might even be dangerous.

Considering your IQ is a -40, you have no room to talk. You are a sad victim of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

well I know for a fact, he doesn't have trump derangement syndrome, he supports him, that term resides in the hands of snowflakes on the left.

He does have it as does you. That is why you say stupid things like hacking is not a crime.

well then why don't you demand evidence that they did this supposed interference.

For the THOUSANDTH time, the point of an investigation is to find evidence. Otherwise, there wouldn't be a need to investigate if they already had the evidence.

Seriously, are you really this obtuse or is it an act?

well what is the crime for the thousandth time. one must have a crime to produce evidence.

You don't necessarily have to have a crime. That is why you have a investigation.

no that's not correct, one has a crime and then one investigates that crime. one doesn't wake up one day and say let's go investigate something until we find a crime. that's called a witch hunt.

The crime is that Russia interfered in our elections. They clearly wanted Trump. Now we are investigating to find out what happened. The fact is that Trump's campaign had numerous ties to Russia.

 

[The Derp]

So if anyone donated to Democrats at some point, it means they're Democrats. Which would also mean Trump is a Democrat too since he donated to HRC. So according to right-wing logic, Trump simultaneously is the victim and perpetrator of his own investigation.

Stupid right-wing logic for the day.