Yeah, this about sums Trump up

[jc456]

it was never supposed to be independent.

THEN WHY THE FUCK DID TRUMP PICK MUELLER?????

he didn't stupid ass. hly fk. BTW, it's why he's pissed at sessions for recusing himself.

 

[PredFan]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

So tell us all where the "justice" is in a political witch hunt that's gone on for 11 months now and found nothing, and is veering off in directions that's got nothing to do with COLLUSION?

The Mueller investigation is proceeding in a logical manner. They are examining Trump's ties to Russia which include business ties. Your idea of justice is a cover-up.

It is not a crime for a business man to do business with another country. There is no crime, there is no obstruction. How dense are you assholes really?

 

[The Derp]

he didn't stupid ass. hly fk. BTW, it's why he's pissed at sessions for recusing himself.

Yes, he fucking did! He picked Sessions, who picked Rosenstein, who picked Mueller.

THE BUCK STOPS WHERE??????

 

[jc456]

so jilly you don't know the supposed crime? after you said that one only starts an investigation to check out the supposed crime. so if there is no supposed crime, then any investigation can be stopped without repercussion.

Don't worry jc Mueller will show you his cards soon enough No need to now let trump and his clan piss in their pants

I have no worries eddie, none at all. It is the left that is worried. there is but a nothing burger and now the panic has set in. It is now time to wander into la,la, land to find something that hasn't a thing to do with interference to our election. BTW, the interference was all on the left.

If you weren't worried, you wouldn't be promulgating lies about Mueller. It is Trump who is dragging this out. Let Mueller do his job and see where it goes. Did you have any problems with Ken Starr's investigation of Clinton? I had none just as I have no issues with Mueller.

I do actually, it wasn't what the investigation was for. BTW, for the record, there is a nothing burger, and my only concern is the waste of tax payer money for a false accusation made by the left to de-legitimize my vote.

 

[PredFan]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

Firing an investigator investigating him is a sign of his guilt.

People do not get put on trial for a sign dumbass. If it's his job to do that, he can do it.

 

[The Derp]

It is not a crime for a business man to do business with another country.

It certainly is if there were sanctions on that country. Which there were on Russia dating back to their invasion of Ukraine.

 

[jc456]

he didn't stupid ass. hly fk. BTW, it's why he's pissed at sessions for recusing himself.

Yes, he fucking did! He picked Sessions, who picked Rosenstein, who picked Mueller.

THE BUCK STOPS WHERE??????

rosenstein. and he can be fired.

 

[bripat9643]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

Yeah, it's been, what, 44 years since we had a Saturday Night Massacre.

That ended well for the other guy...

What's the difference?

 

[PredFan]

Labrov Trolls and Threatens the Orange Trollop Trump :

SeanSpicer's Mic @Spicerlies
Lavrov is a seasoned diplomat, the distain/contempt he displayed in this interview.
Stunning. Menacing. Vulgar

Warning shot to Trump

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/888359468207091712 …


7:55 AM - 21 Jul 2017


Trump and Putin May Have Met More Times Says Russias Sergei Lavro
Source: NBC News


MOSCOW — President Donald Trump may have held more meetings with Vladimir Putin at the G-20 summit earlier this month, Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Friday — but he shrugged off the importance of the encounters.

“They might have met even much more than just three times,” he told NBC News’ Keir Simmons in an exclusive interview, dismissing speculation about the leaders' meetings.

... snip

“After the dinner was over…I was not there…President Trump apparently went to pick up his wife and spent some minutes with President Putin…so what?” he said.



Read more: EXCLUSIVE: Russia's Lavrov Says Trump May Have Met Putin More Times

OMG OMG OMG! The POTUS having meetings with the President of Russia! No President should be allowed to have meeting with foreigners! It's treason I tell ya TREASON!

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

obstructing what? name a crime.

you obstruct an INVESTIGATION, dum dum.

go. back to school. seriously.

He isn't obstructing an investigation you dolt, he's getting rid of the guy who is fucking it up. there isn't any crime, so the investigation is looking for one. If the head of it is not doing his job, and Mueller certainly isn't, he needs to be removed. No crime no obstructing. Why is something so simple still out of your reach?

BULLSHIT!! It is obstruction of Justice. Mueller is not fucking anything up. He clearly is taking this seriously and doing a thorough investigation. Since you are a Trump supporter, you put the interests of Trump above the interests of the country. It is not about "America First", it is "Trump First. America Second".

You stupid butthurt twit. No crime, no obstruction.

 

[bripat9643]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

Man, you are fucking hilarious. If your IQ was 40 points higher you might even be dangerous.

 

[PredFan]

It is not a crime for a business man to do business with another country.

It certainly is if there were sanctions on that country. Which there were on Russia dating back to their invasion of Ukraine.

Yeah moron. Go look that up. See what the sanctions said. I'll wait here for your apology.

 

[jc456]

It is not a crime for a business man to do business with another country.

It certainly is if there were sanctions on that country. Which there were on Russia dating back to their invasion of Ukraine.

 

[busybee01]

You do, so now you understand why the right does not think that there can be a fair investigation when the team is loaded up with Democrats.

Mueller chose the best people he thought would lead the best investigation. If those people happen to be Dmeocrats, it's only because Conservatives are fucking terrible, unreliable, and untrustworthy. Otherwise, he would put them on his team. Also, it's looking more and more like Conservatives in general were colluding with Russia alongside Trump.

This is now a partisan investigation, not an independent one.

Gaslighting 101.

I think it is stupid to put people who actively worked to keep Trump from being elected to a team tasked with investigating him. If you don't think that is stupid, then you're stupid.

Did they, though? You gotta prove that.

IYou have full faith in Mueller to pick the best investigators, and he has already proven to you to have picked partisan hacks as investigators. Your faith makes you look stupid.

So you jsut don't like who he picked because who he picked isn't inclined to take Trump at his word. Well, that begs the question; why do you take Trump at his word?

dude it's supposed to be an impartial investigation. would you think it could be impartial with all GOP investigators? let me laugh at you for one moment prior to your answer.

There is no evidence that it isn't. Several members are currently working for the Trump Justice Department. They all have sterling reputations.

 

[Darkwind]

so jilly you don't know the supposed crime? after you said that one only starts an investigation to check out the supposed crime. so if there is no supposed crime, then any investigation can be stopped without repercussion.

Don't worry jc Mueller will show you his cards soon enough No need to now let trump and his clan piss in their pants

I have no worries eddie, none at all. It is the left that is worried. there is but a nothing burger and now the panic has set in. It is now time to wander into la,la, land to find something that hasn't a thing to do with interference to our election. BTW, the interference was all on the left.

If you weren't worried, you wouldn't be promulgating lies about Mueller. It is Trump who is dragging this out. Let Mueller do his job and see where it goes. Did you have any problems with Ken Starr's investigation of Clinton? I had none just as I have no issues with Mueller.

Did Ken Starr load his investigation up with Republicans? Were they all Bush donors?

 

[jc456]

It is not a crime for a business man to do business with another country.

It certainly is if there were sanctions on that country. Which there were on Russia dating back to their invasion of Ukraine.

well my company was doing business in russia! did we commit a crime? I'm in telecommunication and we sold them network equipment.

 

[Darkwind]

You do, so now you understand why the right does not think that there can be a fair investigation when the team is loaded up with Democrats.

Mueller chose the best people he thought would lead the best investigation. If those people happen to be Dmeocrats, it's only because Conservatives are fucking terrible, unreliable, and untrustworthy. Otherwise, he would put them on his team. Also, it's looking more and more like Conservatives in general were colluding with Russia alongside Trump.

This is now a partisan investigation, not an independent one.

Gaslighting 101.

I think it is stupid to put people who actively worked to keep Trump from being elected to a team tasked with investigating him. If you don't think that is stupid, then you're stupid.

Did they, though? You gotta prove that.

IYou have full faith in Mueller to pick the best investigators, and he has already proven to you to have picked partisan hacks as investigators. Your faith makes you look stupid.

So you jsut don't like who he picked because who he picked isn't inclined to take Trump at his word. Well, that begs the question; why do you take Trump at his word?

dude it's supposed to be an impartial investigation. would you think it could be impartial with all GOP investigators? let me laugh at you for one moment prior to your answer.

There is no evidence that it isn't. Several members are currently working for the Trump Justice Department. They all have sterling reputations.

What? There is ample evidence that the entire team is comprised of Democrat donors. You should pay attention.

 

[jc456]

You do, so now you understand why the right does not think that there can be a fair investigation when the team is loaded up with Democrats.

Mueller chose the best people he thought would lead the best investigation. If those people happen to be Dmeocrats, it's only because Conservatives are fucking terrible, unreliable, and untrustworthy. Otherwise, he would put them on his team. Also, it's looking more and more like Conservatives in general were colluding with Russia alongside Trump.

This is now a partisan investigation, not an independent one.

Gaslighting 101.

I think it is stupid to put people who actively worked to keep Trump from being elected to a team tasked with investigating him. If you don't think that is stupid, then you're stupid.

Did they, though? You gotta prove that.

IYou have full faith in Mueller to pick the best investigators, and he has already proven to you to have picked partisan hacks as investigators. Your faith makes you look stupid.

So you jsut don't like who he picked because who he picked isn't inclined to take Trump at his word. Well, that begs the question; why do you take Trump at his word?

dude it's supposed to be an impartial investigation. would you think it could be impartial with all GOP investigators? let me laugh at you for one moment prior to your answer.

There is no evidence that it isn't. Several members are currently working for the Trump Justice Department. They all have sterling reputations.

so again, my question, you'd be ok with all republicans then? or only republicans can't be impartial?

 

[The Derp]

well my company was doing business in russia! did we commit a crime? I'm in telecommunication and we sold them network equipment.

If it violated the sanctions, yes.

 

[The Derp]

or only republicans can't be impartial?

Given how deep the Russian influence is in the GOP, I don't think so.

 

[PredFan]

It is not a crime for a business man to do business with another country.

It certainly is if there were sanctions on that country. Which there were on Russia dating back to their invasion of Ukraine.

well my company was doing business in russia! did we commit a crime? I'm in telecommunication and we sold them network equipment.

He is the most accurately named member of this forum. Durp durp!