Yeah, this about sums Trump up

[jc456]

well my company was doing business in russia! did we commit a crime? I'm in telecommunication and we sold them network equipment.

If it violated the sanctions, yes.

well how do you know trump's business did?

 

[The Derp]

well how do you know trump's business did?

The point is we don't know because he won't release his tax returns.

 

[jc456]

or only republicans can't be impartial?

Given how deep the Russian influence is in the GOP, I don't think so.

see,

so only dems can be impartial because they want trump gone. gotcha!!!

 

[busybee01]

sorry dude, your poop sure is flying and hitting nothing

Denial is not the same thing as coming up empty. You are in denial. You don't even think hacking is a crime. That's how fucking evil you are.

well it isn't. I read your article, hacking is not a crime. they move it to something else to prosecute. but hacking isn't a crime or there'd be an actual statute for it.

Hacking is not a crime? What fantasy world do you come from?

In March 2017, the DOJ indicted 4 people for hacking attacks on Yahoo. 2 of them work for the Russian FSB.

DOJ: 2 Russian spies indicted in Yahoo hack - CNNPolitics.com

so post up the court findings.

Doesn't matter. The DOJ does not indict people unless a law was broken. The court proceedings only determine whether a person is guilty or not. It puts the lie to your claim that hacking is not a crime. Two of the people indicted shows the hacks were committed by Russia.

 

[jc456]

well how do you know trump's business did?

The point is we don't know because he won't release his tax returns.

but his personal income tax isn't his business tax. so now you're all over the place confused.

 

[jc456]

sorry dude, your poop sure is flying and hitting nothing

Denial is not the same thing as coming up empty. You are in denial. You don't even think hacking is a crime. That's how fucking evil you are.

well it isn't. I read your article, hacking is not a crime. they move it to something else to prosecute. but hacking isn't a crime or there'd be an actual statute for it.

Hacking is not a crime? What fantasy world do you come from?

In March 2017, the DOJ indicted 4 people for hacking attacks on Yahoo. 2 of them work for the Russian FSB.

DOJ: 2 Russian spies indicted in Yahoo hack - CNNPolitics.com

so post up the court findings.

Doesn't matter. The DOJ does not indict people unless a law was broken. The court proceedings only determine whether a person is guilty or not. It puts the lie to your claim that hacking is not a crime. Two of the people indicted shows the hacks were committed by Russia.

well right. shooting a gun isn't a crime, until it is. right?

 

[busybee01]

or only republicans can't be impartial?

Given how deep the Russian influence is in the GOP, I don't think so.

see,

so only dems can be impartial because they want trump gone. gotcha!!!

Two of the lawyers involved work for the Trump DOJ. I guess since they work for a Republican, they are Republicans.

 

[The Derp]

so only dems can be impartial because they want trump gone. gotcha!!!

I would like nothing more than for Trump to be vindicated and that he didn't collude with Russia. Because I am absolutely loathe to the idea that a foreign nation could subvert our democracy. I don't want it to be true, but it's hard to deny at this point.

 

[jc456]

or only republicans can't be impartial?

Given how deep the Russian influence is in the GOP, I don't think so.

see,

so only dems can be impartial because they want trump gone. gotcha!!!

Two of the lawyers involved work for the Trump DOJ. I guess since they work for a Republican, they are Republicans.

or not. all I've read is that it is all democrats. now feel free to post something that backs they are republican.

 

[The Derp]

but his personal income tax isn't his business tax. so now you're all over the place confused.

Exactly! We don't know what he is counting as personal and what he is counting as business. Only releasing his tax returns can clear that up. Why won't he release them? What's he hiding?

 

[jc456]

so only dems can be impartial because they want trump gone. gotcha!!!

I would like nothing more than for Trump to be vindicated and that he didn't collude with Russia. Because I am absolutely loathe to the idea that a foreign nation could subvert our democracy. I don't want it to be true, but it's hard to deny at this point.

well then why don't you demand evidence that they did this supposed interference. The american people have asked for that evidence, and we got a nothing burger in return.

 

[The Derp]

all I've read is that it is all democrats

And that's the problem. You only read that which validates you and ignore everything else. Typical Conservative.

 

[jc456]

but his personal income tax isn't his business tax. so now you're all over the place confused.

Exactly! We don't know what he is counting as personal and what he is counting as business. Only releasing his tax returns can clear that up. Why won't he release them? What's he hiding?

well maybe that's why the IRS is auditing him. ask them

 

[jc456]

all I've read is that it is all democrats

And that's the problem. You only read that which validates you and ignore everything else. Typical Conservative.

well post the names of those who are republican. I'm good with that.

 

[The Derp]

well then why don't you demand evidence that they did this supposed interference.

For the THOUSANDTH time, the point of an investigation is to find evidence. Otherwise, there wouldn't be a need to investigate if they already had the evidence.

Seriously, are you really this obtuse or is it an act?

 

[The Derp]

well maybe that's why the IRS is auditing him. ask them

He's not under any audit. That is another lie from you. How many is that today?

 

[jc456]

well then why don't you demand evidence that they did this supposed interference.

For the THOUSANDTH time, the point of an investigation is to find evidence. Otherwise, there wouldn't be a need to investigate if they already had the evidence.

Seriously, are you really this obtuse or is it an act?

well what is the crime for the thousandth time. one must have a crime to produce evidence.

 

[easyt65]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

WTF do snowflakes know about 'Lawless Presidents'?

Barak Obama stepped into office and immediately declared he was violating the oath of office he had just taken by ordering his criminal DOJ not to enforce a law legislation that had been passed by the Executive Branch and signed into law BECAUSE HE DID NOT LIKE THE LAW. Forget the fact that there was / is a legal process for challenging laws, Obama set the tone of his Presidency by saying 'f* the law, I am going to do what I want to do'.
-- By rights Obama should have been Impeached for that right off the bat...but the near super-majority controlled Democratic Party Congress would never have allowed it.

Obama went on for 8 years to repeatedly violate both the Constitution and Law, aiding terrorists, running weapons to Mexican Drug cartels, illegally spying on Americans/Congress/the USSC, illegally using the IRS as a weapon against the American people who threatened his re-election, to even committing Felony Espionage in an attempt to undermine / overthrow President Trump.

Obama set a new record for criminally refusing to comply with FOIA Requests, ran his own personal drone assassination program with which he illegally killed US citizens abroad while denying their Constitutional right of their day in court - which he insisted terrorists have, and dragged the united States into 2 Un-Constitutional, Un-Authorized wars to help terrorists, one to help the terrorists who slaughtered 3,000 Americans on 9/11/01 secure their own safe haven.

The Democrats made themselves a shield to ensure Obama was able to do anything he wanted, legal or not, without fear of Impeachment. They raised the requirement necessary to Impeach a President so high nothing short of shooting an American citizen in the head on live TV would have resulted in his Impeachment...and the gutless GOP were more afraid of angering the nation and potentially losing their jobs than they were interested in doing what was in the best interest of the nation.

Now, the butt-hurt snowflakes who ran the worst candidate in US history, losing to the likes of Donald Trump, seek to lower the standards required for Impeachment for Trump to him basically him breathing, as evident by their calls for his impeachment immediately after he was announced as having been elected the new President, before ever getting into the WH.

I have no delusions about Trump. I never have. I do not mind snowflakes suggesting Trump, as a millionaire international real estate businessman cut corners and broke some laws. What disgusts me is how the worst of the radical, lying, delusional snowflakes try to deny that Barak Obama and Hillary Clinton have not violated the Constitution, broken laws, jeopardized national security, etc.... I am disgusted by their hypocrisy and their partisan intellectual dishonesty.

 

[busybee01]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

So tell us all where the "justice" is in a political witch hunt that's gone on for 11 months now and found nothing, and is veering off in directions that's got nothing to do with COLLUSION?

The Mueller investigation is proceeding in a logical manner. They are examining Trump's ties to Russia which include business ties. Your idea of justice is a cover-up.

It is not a crime for a business man to do business with another country. There is no crime, there is no obstruction. How dense are you assholes really?

Unless they are doing business to funnel money to someone. That is called bribery. Why are you so afraid to find out? It seems you are expecting them to find something. On the other hand, I don't know.

 

[jc456]

well maybe that's why the IRS is auditing him. ask them

He's not under any audit. That is another lie from you. How many is that today?

well sure he is. look it up. here is one link.

Donald Trump says he’s being audited by the IRS, but he hasn’t released the letter that could prove it

"To back up the contention that he is being audited, Trump’s campaign earlier this year released a letter from his tax lawyers stating that he was under audit. "