Yeah, this about sums Trump up

[busybee01]

Labrov Trolls and Threatens the Orange Trollop Trump :

SeanSpicer's Mic @Spicerlies
Lavrov is a seasoned diplomat, the distain/contempt he displayed in this interview.
Stunning. Menacing. Vulgar

Warning shot to Trump

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/888359468207091712 …


7:55 AM - 21 Jul 2017


Trump and Putin May Have Met More Times Says Russias Sergei Lavro
Source: NBC News


MOSCOW — President Donald Trump may have held more meetings with Vladimir Putin at the G-20 summit earlier this month, Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Friday — but he shrugged off the importance of the encounters.

“They might have met even much more than just three times,” he told NBC News’ Keir Simmons in an exclusive interview, dismissing speculation about the leaders' meetings.

... snip

“After the dinner was over…I was not there…President Trump apparently went to pick up his wife and spent some minutes with President Putin…so what?” he said.



Read more: EXCLUSIVE: Russia's Lavrov Says Trump May Have Met Putin More Times

OMG OMG OMG! The POTUS having meetings with the President of Russia! No President should be allowed to have meeting with foreigners! It's treason I tell ya TREASON!

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

obstructing what? name a crime.

you obstruct an INVESTIGATION, dum dum.

go. back to school. seriously.

He isn't obstructing an investigation you dolt, he's getting rid of the guy who is ******* it up. there isn't any crime, so the investigation is looking for one. If the head of it is not doing his job, and Mueller certainly isn't, he needs to be removed. No crime no obstructing. Why is something so simple still out of your reach?

BULLSHIT!! It is obstruction of Justice. Mueller is not ******* anything up. He clearly is taking this seriously and doing a thorough investigation. Since you are a Trump supporter, you put the interests of Trump above the interests of the country. It is not about "America First", it is "Trump First. America Second".

 

[jc456]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

Firing an investigator investigating him is a sign of his guilt.

his business financials aren't him. it's his business. he has staff that runs it. wow

 

[Darkwind]

You think that putting GOP donors on Mueller's team will create a cover up?

Yes, I do.

So, you have already convicted Trump ahead of any findings. You do realize that means that Mueller's findings are now no longer credible. Still, you must think that putting GOP donors on Mueller's team means that they would have ulterior motives. This means you think that Trump might be cleared if don't get your inquisition panel.

I think it's stupid to put people who actively worked to elect Trump on the team of investigators looking into Trump's collusion with Russia to get elected, yes. And if you don't think that's stupid, then you're stupid.

You won't even make a counter that Mueller's staff should be neutral in order for this investigation to be independent.

I have the full faith in Mueller that he will pick the best investigators to assist him in his pursuit of the truth. Trump also must have thought that, which is why Mueller was chosen by Trump's Deputy AG.

You don't want an independent investigation, do you? You want a conviction and you don't care how its achieved.

This is an independent investigation. Mueller was chosen by Trump's Deputy AG.

You do, so now you understand why the right does not think that there can be a fair investigation when the team is loaded up with Democrats.

This is now a partisan investigation, not an independent one.

I think it is stupid to put people who actively worked to keep Trump from being elected to a team tasked with investigating him. If you don't think that is stupid, then you're stupid.

You have full faith in Mueller to pick the best investigators, and he has already proven to you to have picked partisan hacks as investigators. Your faith makes you look stupid.

IT is NOT an independent investigation. An "Independent" investigation would have a team of investigators who were not partisan and did not have a record of rooting for one side or the other.

As I said, Mueller's report is already tainted before he even publishes it. He cannot be trusted to get to the truth.

This is a partisan witch hunt.

/thread

 

[jc456]

Labrov Trolls and Threatens the Orange Trollop Trump :

SeanSpicer's Mic @Spicerlies
Lavrov is a seasoned diplomat, the distain/contempt he displayed in this interview.
Stunning. Menacing. Vulgar

Warning shot to Trump

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/888359468207091712 …


7:55 AM - 21 Jul 2017


Trump and Putin May Have Met More Times Says Russias Sergei Lavro
Source: NBC News


MOSCOW — President Donald Trump may have held more meetings with Vladimir Putin at the G-20 summit earlier this month, Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Friday — but he shrugged off the importance of the encounters.

“They might have met even much more than just three times,” he told NBC News’ Keir Simmons in an exclusive interview, dismissing speculation about the leaders' meetings.

... snip

“After the dinner was over…I was not there…President Trump apparently went to pick up his wife and spent some minutes with President Putin…so what?” he said.



Read more: EXCLUSIVE: Russia's Lavrov Says Trump May Have Met Putin More Times

OMG OMG OMG! The POTUS having meetings with the President of Russia! No President should be allowed to have meeting with foreigners! It's treason I tell ya TREASON!

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

obstructing what? name a crime.

you obstruct an INVESTIGATION, dum dum.

go. back to school. seriously.

He isn't obstructing an investigation you dolt, he's getting rid of the guy who is ******* it up. there isn't any crime, so the investigation is looking for one. If the head of it is not doing his job, and Mueller certainly isn't, he needs to be removed. No crime no obstructing. Why is something so simple still out of your reach?

BULLSHIT!! It is obstruction of Justice. Mueller is not ******* anything up. He clearly is taking this seriously and doing a thorough investigation. Since you are a Trump supporter, you put the interests of Trump above the interests of the country. It is not about "America First", it is "Trump First. America Second".

no it's not. one of the most highly touted lawyer says it isn't Alan Dertshowitz. so when you have someone with his qualifications to back your accusation I'll listen.

 

[jc456]

You think that putting GOP donors on Mueller's team will create a cover up?

Yes, I do.

So, you have already convicted Trump ahead of any findings. You do realize that means that Mueller's findings are now no longer credible. Still, you must think that putting GOP donors on Mueller's team means that they would have ulterior motives. This means you think that Trump might be cleared if don't get your inquisition panel.

I think it's stupid to put people who actively worked to elect Trump on the team of investigators looking into Trump's collusion with Russia to get elected, yes. And if you don't think that's stupid, then you're stupid.

You won't even make a counter that Mueller's staff should be neutral in order for this investigation to be independent.

I have the full faith in Mueller that he will pick the best investigators to assist him in his pursuit of the truth. Trump also must have thought that, which is why Mueller was chosen by Trump's Deputy AG.

You don't want an independent investigation, do you? You want a conviction and you don't care how its achieved.

This is an independent investigation. Mueller was chosen by Trump's Deputy AG.

You do, so now you understand why the right does not think that there can be a fair investigation when the team is loaded up with Democrats.

This is now a partisan investigation, not an independent one.

I think it is stupid to put people who actively worked to keep Trump from being elected to a team tasked with investigating him. If you don't think that is stupid, then you're stupid.

You have full faith in Mueller to pick the best investigators, and he has already proven to you to have picked partisan hacks as investigators. Your faith makes you look stupid.

IT is NOT an independent investigation. An "Independent" investigation would have a team of investigators who were not partisan and did not have a record of rooting for one side or the other.

As I said, Mueller's report is already tainted before he even publishes it. He cannot be trusted to get to the truth.

This is a partisan witch hunt.

/thread

 

[busybee01]

sorry dude, your poop sure is flying and hitting nothing

Denial is not the same thing as coming up empty. You are in denial. You don't even think hacking is a crime. That's how ******* evil you are.

well it isn't. I read your article, hacking is not a crime. they move it to something else to prosecute. but hacking isn't a crime or there'd be an actual statute for it.

Hacking is not a crime? What fantasy world do you come from?

In March 2017, the DOJ indicted 4 people for hacking attacks on Yahoo. 2 of them work for the Russian FSB.

DOJ: 2 Russian spies indicted in Yahoo hack - CNNPolitics.com

 

[jc456]

You think that putting GOP donors on Mueller's team will create a cover up?

Yes, I do.

So, you have already convicted Trump ahead of any findings. You do realize that means that Mueller's findings are now no longer credible. Still, you must think that putting GOP donors on Mueller's team means that they would have ulterior motives. This means you think that Trump might be cleared if don't get your inquisition panel.

I think it's stupid to put people who actively worked to elect Trump on the team of investigators looking into Trump's collusion with Russia to get elected, yes. And if you don't think that's stupid, then you're stupid.

You won't even make a counter that Mueller's staff should be neutral in order for this investigation to be independent.

I have the full faith in Mueller that he will pick the best investigators to assist him in his pursuit of the truth. Trump also must have thought that, which is why Mueller was chosen by Trump's Deputy AG.

You don't want an independent investigation, do you? You want a conviction and you don't care how its achieved.

This is an independent investigation. Mueller was chosen by Trump's Deputy AG.

You do, so now you understand why the right does not think that there can be a fair investigation when the team is loaded up with Democrats.

This is now a partisan investigation, not an independent one.

I think it is stupid to put people who actively worked to keep Trump from being elected to a team tasked with investigating him. If you don't think that is stupid, then you're stupid.

You have full faith in Mueller to pick the best investigators, and he has already proven to you to have picked partisan hacks as investigators. Your faith makes you look stupid.

IT is NOT an independent investigation. An "Independent" investigation would have a team of investigators who were not partisan and did not have a record of rooting for one side or the other.

As I said, Mueller's report is already tainted before he even publishes it. He cannot be trusted to get to the truth.

This is a partisan witch hunt.

/thread

it was never supposed to be independent. that's why there shouldn't be any special prosecutor, it can't be impartial. never can. The federal judges can't even be impartial. I mean fk, it's hilarious watching the desperation of the left. really is.

 

[The Derp]

Hacking is not a crime? What fantasy world do you come from?

It's called Conservatardia.

 

[busybee01]

Labrov Trolls and Threatens the Orange Trollop Trump :

SeanSpicer's Mic @Spicerlies
Lavrov is a seasoned diplomat, the distain/contempt he displayed in this interview.
Stunning. Menacing. Vulgar

Warning shot to Trump

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/888359468207091712 …


7:55 AM - 21 Jul 2017


Trump and Putin May Have Met More Times Says Russias Sergei Lavro
Source: NBC News


MOSCOW — President Donald Trump may have held more meetings with Vladimir Putin at the G-20 summit earlier this month, Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Friday — but he shrugged off the importance of the encounters.

“They might have met even much more than just three times,” he told NBC News’ Keir Simmons in an exclusive interview, dismissing speculation about the leaders' meetings.

... snip

“After the dinner was over…I was not there…President Trump apparently went to pick up his wife and spent some minutes with President Putin…so what?” he said.



Read more: EXCLUSIVE: Russia's Lavrov Says Trump May Have Met Putin More Times

OMG OMG OMG! The POTUS having meetings with the President of Russia! No President should be allowed to have meeting with foreigners! It's treason I tell ya TREASON!

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

obstructing what? name a crime.

you obstruct an INVESTIGATION, dum dum.

go. back to school. seriously.

He isn't obstructing an investigation you dolt, he's getting rid of the guy who is ******* it up. there isn't any crime, so the investigation is looking for one. If the head of it is not doing his job, and Mueller certainly isn't, he needs to be removed. No crime no obstructing. Why is something so simple still out of your reach?

BULLSHIT!! It is obstruction of Justice. Mueller is not ******* anything up. He clearly is taking this seriously and doing a thorough investigation. Since you are a Trump supporter, you put the interests of Trump above the interests of the country. It is not about "America First", it is "Trump First. America Second".

no it's not. one of the most highly touted lawyer says it isn't Alan Dertshowitz. so when you have someone with his qualifications to back your accusation I'll listen.

There are people who are just as credentialed as Dershowitrz who disagree with him.

 

[PredFan]

Is your problem that you didn't read my post or that you can't read?

No, the problem is that you're too chickenshit to actually say what you're thinking. So you play dumb instead. Nice strategy, there.

So, which is it?

 

[The Derp]

his business financials aren't him. it's his business. he has staff that runs it. wow

So he's not responsible for his own company? Wow.

 

[jc456]

sorry dude, your poop sure is flying and hitting nothing

Denial is not the same thing as coming up empty. You are in denial. You don't even think hacking is a crime. That's how ******* evil you are.

well it isn't. I read your article, hacking is not a crime. they move it to something else to prosecute. but hacking isn't a crime or there'd be an actual statute for it.

Hacking is not a crime? What fantasy world do you come from?

In March 2017, the DOJ indicted 4 people for hacking attacks on Yahoo. 2 of them work for the Russian FSB.

DOJ: 2 Russian spies indicted in Yahoo hack - CNNPolitics.com

so post up the court findings.

 

[jc456]

his business financials aren't him. it's his business. he has staff that runs it. wow

So he's not responsible for his own company? Wow.

responsible for what?

 

[PredFan]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

Yup that's the standard by which I want to judge my president. "Not illegal? Full speed ahead!"

That is entirely a fabrication.

 

[The Derp]

You do, so now you understand why the right does not think that there can be a fair investigation when the team is loaded up with Democrats.

Mueller chose the best people he thought would lead the best investigation. If those people happen to be Dmeocrats, it's only because Conservatives are ******* terrible, unreliable, and untrustworthy. Otherwise, he would put them on his team. Also, it's looking more and more like Conservatives in general were colluding with Russia alongside Trump.

This is now a partisan investigation, not an independent one.

Gaslighting 101.

I think it is stupid to put people who actively worked to keep Trump from being elected to a team tasked with investigating him. If you don't think that is stupid, then you're stupid.

Did they, though? You gotta prove that.

IYou have full faith in Mueller to pick the best investigators, and he has already proven to you to have picked partisan hacks as investigators. Your faith makes you look stupid.

So you jsut don't like who he picked because who he picked isn't inclined to take Trump at his word. Well, that begs the question; why do you take Trump at his word?

 

[The Derp]

it was never supposed to be independent.

THEN WHY THE **** DID TRUMP PICK MUELLER?????

 

[jc456]

You do, so now you understand why the right does not think that there can be a fair investigation when the team is loaded up with Democrats.

Mueller chose the best people he thought would lead the best investigation. If those people happen to be Dmeocrats, it's only because Conservatives are ******* terrible, unreliable, and untrustworthy. Otherwise, he would put them on his team. Also, it's looking more and more like Conservatives in general were colluding with Russia alongside Trump.

This is now a partisan investigation, not an independent one.

Gaslighting 101.

I think it is stupid to put people who actively worked to keep Trump from being elected to a team tasked with investigating him. If you don't think that is stupid, then you're stupid.

Did they, though? You gotta prove that.

IYou have full faith in Mueller to pick the best investigators, and he has already proven to you to have picked partisan hacks as investigators. Your faith makes you look stupid.

So you jsut don't like who he picked because who he picked isn't inclined to take Trump at his word. Well, that begs the question; why do you take Trump at his word?

dude it's supposed to be an impartial investigation. would you think it could be impartial with all GOP investigators? let me laugh at you for one moment prior to your answer.

 

[The Derp]

responsible for what?

For what we were talking about. Read the thread, idiot.

 

[busybee01]

so jilly you don't know the supposed crime? after you said that one only starts an investigation to check out the supposed crime. so if there is no supposed crime, then any investigation can be stopped without repercussion.

Don't worry jc Mueller will show you his cards soon enough No need to now let trump and his clan piss in their pants

I have no worries eddie, none at all. It is the left that is worried. there is but a nothing burger and now the panic has set in. It is now time to wander into la,la, land to find something that hasn't a thing to do with interference to our election. BTW, the interference was all on the left.

If you weren't worried, you wouldn't be promulgating lies about Mueller. It is Trump who is dragging this out. Let Mueller do his job and see where it goes. Did you have any problems with Ken Starr's investigation of Clinton? I had none just as I have no issues with Mueller.

 

[The Derp]

dude it's supposed to be an impartial investigation. would you think it could be impartial with all GOP investigators? let me laugh at you for one moment prior to your answer.

It is an independent investigation. Just because you don't like the conclusions the investigation will inevitably produce, doesn't mean it's not impartial.

Also, TRUMP PICKED MUELLER.