Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WE were in support of an independent investigator. We now see that Mueller is not.Given the people he has surrounded himself with, he is not an independent investigator.
Well that's a flip-flop because at the time of his announcement, you all were supportive of it. Only now, when Mueller won't aid in the cover up of Trump's crimes do you begin the gaslighting.
well friend, we learned he is best buds with comey. and donated to hitlery. he is now in a conflict of interest. just like sessions. he must recuse himself or suffer his fate at a firing.Given the people he has surrounded himself with, he is not an independent investigator.
Well that's a flip-flop because at the time of his announcement, you all were supportive of it. Only now, when Mueller won't aid in the cover up of Trump's crimes do you begin the gaslighting.
you pull out the piece that fits your statement. I'll wait.
sorry dude, your poop sure is flying and hitting nothingno it isn't, you have to have a fking crime you stoop!!!!
Colluding to hack is a crime.
WE were in support of an independent investigator. We now see that Mueller is not.
However, he will get to the conviction of Trump if he has to hire the entire campaign staff of Hillary Clinton to do it!
Yup that's the standard by which I want to judge my president. "Not illegal? Full speed ahead!"Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.
Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president
Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.
who did it come from? I'll wait. dude, I don't read things without knowing what you want me to read. so pull out the piece that supports your statement. fk dude. it's part of the rules in here.you pull out the piece that fits your statement. I'll wait.
Are you ******* stupid? The name of the report is literally “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections”
You think that putting GOP donors on Mueller's team will create a cover up? So, you have already convicted Trump ahead of any findings. You do realize that means that Mueller's findings are now no longer credible. Still, you must think that putting GOP donors on Mueller's team means that they would have ulterior motives. This means you think that Trump might be cleared if don't get your inquisition panel.WE were in support of an independent investigator. We now see that Mueller is not.
You're only saying he's not because he won't aid Trump and the Conservatives' cover-up.
However, he will get to the conviction of Trump if he has to hire the entire campaign staff of Hillary Clinton to do it!
If you think those people working for Mueller have ulterior motives, then that's really just a projection on your part because YOU have ulterior motives. So what are you trying to hide?
that's a lie and you know it. that is a polly parrot. show me outside the DOJ and the FBI any other agency claim to that. I'll wait.
So tell us all where the "justice" is in a political witch hunt that's gone on for 11 months now and found nothing, and is veering off in directions that's got nothing to do with COLLUSION?Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.
Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president
Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.
there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...
obstruction of justice is illegal.
high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...
you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.
You think that putting GOP donors on Mueller's team will create a cover up?
So, you have already convicted Trump ahead of any findings. You do realize that means that Mueller's findings are now no longer credible. Still, you must think that putting GOP donors on Mueller's team means that they would have ulterior motives. This means you think that Trump might be cleared if don't get your inquisition panel.
You won't even make a counter that Mueller's staff should be neutral in order for this investigation to be independent.
You don't want an independent investigation, do you? You want a conviction and you don't care how its achieved.
Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.
Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president
Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.
well it isn't. I read your article, hacking is not a crime. they move it to something else to prosecute. but hacking isn't a crime or there'd be an actual statute for it.sorry dude, your poop sure is flying and hitting nothing
Denial is not the same thing as coming up empty. You are in denial. You don't even think hacking is a crime. That's how ******* evil you are.