It’s only falsifying business records in the first degree if there is an underlying crime, and there was no underlying crime identified in the indictment.
Again...the underlying crimes were not in the indictment because Trump is not charged with those crimes.
The indictment only includes crimes Trump is accused of commiting...in this case falsifying business documents in the first degree.
Nope. Not mentioned until the corrupt judge came up with some possibilities when it was time for jury instructions,
Are you not able to open the document in post 88?
Trump lied to you.
Go to post 88. Click the link. Halfway down page 11 is "other crimes". Those crimes were discussed in detail for the defense prosecutors and the judge.
You didn’t answer my question. You speak of precedent, so name a case where…
The precedent for intent crimes is in post 90.
Some of the precedent cases are in post 56 that I linked to you already.
It's hard to have discussion with someone who ignores the evidence.
…a biased prosecutor seeks a crime to pin on a specific individual he has it out for, and
Thots and feels. Not relevant.
…. Resurrects something that may not have even been a misdemeanor but is long expired in any event, and claims it’s because it was done to conceal another underlying crime, and….
Yes. Enforcing the law. Trump is not above the law.
….the underlying crime is not identified in the indictment, and…
Yes it is. You were lied too and oddly you can't seem to come to grips with it. An interesting psychological profile indeed but does not refute the facts you have been provided.
… the judge tells the jury they don’t have to agree on the underlying crime, and…
They had to agree on the charged crimes IAW the constitution.
They did d not have to agree on the underlying crimes.
… we still don’t know what the underlying crime is that he’s been convicted for!
Good grief. He was not charged with the underlying crimes.
He was charged with falsifying business records in the first degree.
The predicate crimes I have already provided and Trump's team knew of them in February.
This convoluted sham of a charge and trial was designed to be able to brand Trump a “convicted felon” for the few months leading into the Election, and you’ve been so brainwashed you’re falling for it.
No. It was designed to charge criminals.
I am sorry Trump committed a felony. Certainly it is hard for you accept but it actually happened.
Trump committed a felony. Brainwashing has nothing to do with it.