Yale Law Professor EXPOSES the UNCONSTITUTIONAL Trial Against TRUMP....

[Catsnmeters]

You’re very slow.

Were you bounced like a basketball at birth?

It is an injustice to be accused of a crime that doesn’t even exist.

Falsifying business records in the first degree does exist.

NYS Open Legislation | NYSenate.gov

www.nysenate.gov

Who lied and told you it didn't exist?

 

[BackAgain]

Falsifying business records does it exist.

Yes. It does. But in order to jack it up to a felony, the persecution needed to prove that Trump had an intent to commit or conceal some “other” crime. There was no other crime. Still isn’t.

Who lied and told you it didn't exist?

Nobody. I am telling you the truth. You dumbass.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Yes. It does. But in order to jack it up to a felony, the persecution needed to prove that Trump had an intent to commit or conceal some “other” crime. There was no other crime. Still isn’t.

Yes there were. 3 of them. Trump and his team have known of them since February.

You are being lied to. Stop being an easy mark.

Nobody. I am telling you the truth. You dumbass.

No. You may think you are telling the truth but you are actually repeating Trump's lies.

 

[SavannahMann]

Then why don't lawyers agree with you?

Some do. However you won’t listen to those who agree with the verdict. They’re part of the Deep State. Or something.

I’m a lawyer. Here’s what the Trump verdict says about America.

12 ordinary New Yorkers, complete strangers at the start of the trial, could do what the country can’t — reach a consensus.

www.tampabay.com

Trump found guilty: 5 key aspects of the trial explained by a law professor • Kansas Reflector

After the May 30, 2024, conviction of former President Donald Trump on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in New York, what comes next?

kansasreflector.com

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/05/31/how-trump-and-his-lawyers-blew-the-hush-money-trial-00161018

This last one is interesting. It covers the points, and discusses them. The biggest failure in the trial was Trump and his defense.

I know, you guys think everything Trump does is perfect, but nope. His defense was awful.

 

[0311]

Some do.

Is that anything, "Some people say", but when asked who those people are, you do not have an answer. Giant face plant on you.

 

[SavannahMann]

More bad news for the Orange Shit Gibbon's Cult Followers.

Trump's Appeal of Gag Order In "Hush Money" Case Dismissed By New York's Highest Court.

Trump's appeal of gag order in "hush money" case dismissed by New York's highest court

Former President Donald Trump's appeal of the gag order was dismissed "upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved," the court wrote.

www.cbsnews.com

New York's highest court ruled Tuesday that it will not consider former President Donald Trump's challenge to a gag order in the criminal case in which he was recently convicted of 34 felony counts.

The Court of Appeals wrote in a one-sentence decision that the appeal was dismissed "upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved."

Todd Blanche, an attorney for Trump, declined to comment on the decision.

Justice Juan Merchan issued the gag order March 26, barring Trump from making public comments about witnesses, jurors, court and prosecutor staff, and the relatives of any counsel or court staffer. He later updated the order to include members of his own family.


Is that anything, "Some people say", but when asked who those people you do not have an answer. Giant face plant on you.

I like how you cut out the rest of my response. Of course you won’t read or admit any other point of view exists. You are a Fanboy for Trump. Part of the Cult.

 

[0311]

I like how you cut out the rest of my response. Of course you won’t read or admit any other point of view exists. You are a Fanboy for Trump. Part of the Cult.

You post was pure bullshit. "Some" means nothing without the evidence to back it up, and so far you ain't got the evidence.

 

[San Souci]

A youtube vid ain't proof of jackshit. P01135809 broke the ******* and was found ******* guilty.

Yeah. And 6 Million Jews broke Nuremberg Law. Democrats are the 4th Reich.

 

[San Souci]

Yet Merchan has to base his ruling in judicial precedent. These precedents were discussed with Trump's team. They knew the precedents going in.

I suppose SCOTUS could overturn it but why? Why now? This is an old law. Been used numerous times. Why is Trump special?



Sure, maybe it will but on what grounds?



I didn't mean to imply it couldn't fail.

My point is nothing Merchan did was in appropriate. If it gets overturned then I guess a lot of people who falsified business records to cover other crimes will be happy.



If it you knew a judges role in these types of cases.



Sure it can. I just don't see why it would.

You have a reason? List it.



I still do not remember claiming it could not be overturned.

Can you show me that?



Correct. Maybe SCOTUS will overturn it.

Maybe SCOTUS will overturn any case of a convicted felon.

So what?


Your responses do nothing to negate the precedent used.

I suspect you will be disappointed but who knows? If it is overturned I will accept that decision.

In the interim, Trump is a sexual assaulter, fraudster and convicted felon.

No. He just takes his Orders from the DNC.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

When it is based on predicate crimes.

It isn't a secret. It's in the law.

Had you thought to maybe check it out instead of proclaiming your not sure how it works?

What was the predicate crime?

 

[Catsnmeters]

No. He just takes his Orders from the DNC.

You have proof?

Link please?

Proof...not conjecture.

 

[Catsnmeters]

What was the predicate crime?

Predicate crimes.

https://www.nycourts.gov/LegacyPDFS/press/PDFs/People-v-DonaldTrump2-15-24Decision.pdf

See "other crimes" halfway down page eleven for the documents Trump's team had last February...but Trump said he didn't know.

He lied.

 

[SavannahMann]

You post was pure bullshit. "Some" means nothing without the evidence to back it up, and so far you ain't got the evidence.

I posted three links in support. Three articles by lawyers who explained the decision. But of course you cut that out. Why? Can’t deal with reality?

 

[0311]

I posted three links in support. Three articles by lawyers who explained the decision. But of course you cut that out. Why? Can’t deal with reality?

You posted sources from conservative websites. Suspect websites Your research was slip-shod and unconvincing. Baiscally used sites you knew were and went there. Try stepping out of your comfort zone sometime.

 

[San Souci]

You have proof?

Link please?

Proof...not conjecture.

Don't need any . The PROOF is that Fake Judges conduct.

 

[Rawley]

What's the injustice?

Trump and his legal team were never informed of what the "another crime" he allegedly intended to cover up.

 

[Lisa558]

What was the predicate crime?

I’ve told you before! It was:

1. This,
2. That, or
3. The other

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I’ve told you before! It was:

1. This,
2. That, or
3. The other

Those are crimes only in a banana republic

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Predicate crimes.

https://www.nycourts.gov/LegacyPDFS/press/PDFs/People-v-DonaldTrump2-15-24Decision.pdf

See "other crimes" halfway down page eleven for the documents Trump's team had last February...but Trump said he didn't know.

He lied.

Oh so the predicate crime was a, b, or c
Federal crime is not a jurisdiction of a district court. And the other two are misdemeanors

 

[BackAgain]

Yes there were. 3 of them. Trump and his team have known of them since February.

You keep chittering the official line. But that’s exactly one of the appellate points.

I understand that you don’t know anything. But you are absolutely unimpressive and unpersuasive in your regurgitation of the ignorance you’ve been told to report as if it were meaningful. It isn’t.

You are being lied to. Stop being an easy mark.

No no. It’s you who keeps being lied to. And you simply don’t know any better.

No. You may think you are telling the truth

I am. It’s not a belief. It’s a fact.

but you are actually repeating Trump's lies.

Wrong again. If you knew anything about the law, which you clearly don’t, you wouldn’t need to rely on the government and liberal press lie-filled propaganda.