WTC-7 Was A Controlled Demolition Inside Job

[Modbert]

yes, great job terral, at proving what delusional fucks you troofers are

The troof is out there. *Cue music*

 

[eots]

i'm wondering how a "controlled demolition" creates a bulge from the 10th to 13th floors over two hours before it happens.

i'm also wondering how a controlled demolition causes creaking and groaning sounds hours before the controlled demolition happens.

in order for your controlled demolition theory to be valid at all these need to be accounted for first. otherwise, your controlled demolition theory fails miserably.

if you speaking of wtc 7 although I am aware that a fire chief gave an account to popular mechanics about bulging and creaking .. there are however many more first responder reports of no such noises or instability and of explosions

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUfiLbXMa64[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kOIvwThj-U&feature=related[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXD3bAbZCow&feature=related[/ame]

 

[eots]

yes, great job terral, at proving what delusional fucks you troofers are

The troof is out there. *Cue music*

I see your television ..programing... has been successful and it has become your point of relativity and now shapes and forms your opinions for you...congratulations

 

[Fizz]

if you speaking of wtc 7 although I am aware that a fire chief gave an account to popular mechanics about bulging and creaking .. there are however many more first responder reports of no such noises or instability and of explosions

you are hilarious, dude. you just provided a video in which a guy describes being on the 8th floor of WTC7 and hearing an explosion.

this guy apparently lived (i think we can agree on that).

so you are saying that a controlled demolition collapsed building seven but allowed enough time for people to escape?

seriously, do you have ANYTHING that refutes reports of the building bulging from the 10th to the 13th floors for up to two hours before your controlled demolition is supposed to have taken place?

 

[DiveCon]

if you speaking of wtc 7 although I am aware that a fire chief gave an account to popular mechanics about bulging and creaking .. there are however many more first responder reports of no such noises or instability and of explosions

you are hilarious, dude. you just provided a video in which a guy describes being on the 8th floor of WTC7 and hearing an explosion.

this guy apparently lived (i think we can agree on that).

so you are saying that a controlled demolition collapsed building seven but allowed enough time for people to escape?

seriously, do you have ANYTHING that refutes reports of the building bulging from the 10th to the 13th floors for up to two hours before your controlled demolition is supposed to have taken place?

the building had been evacuated for HOURS before it collapsed
so hearing an "explosion" at that time could have been ANYTHING from a CRT to a battery backup to even a refrigerator(the expansion tanks for the refrigerant)

 

[Modbert]

Dive, I have to ask, what kind of pleasure do you receive from this?

 

[DiveCon]

Dive, I have to ask, what kind of pleasure do you receive from this?

you actually have to ask?

 

[Modbert]

you actually have to ask?

No, but it's just so much more amusing to do so.

You in this thread just remind me of the one guy at the Carnival who wouldn't stop playing the whack-a-mole machine.

And I say that with deep respect.

 

[eots]

Dr. Quintiere also expressed his frustration at NIST’s failure to provide a report on the third skyscraper that collapsed on 9/11, World Trade Center Building 7. “And that building was not hit by anything,” noted Dr. Quintiere. “It’s more important to take a look at that. Maybe there was damage by the debris falling down that played a significant role. But other than that you had fires burning a long time without fire department intervention. And firefighters were in that building. I have yet to see any kind of story about what they saw. What was burning? Were photographs taken? Nothing!”
OpEdNews - Article: Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation

 

[eots]

if you speaking of wtc 7 although I am aware that a fire chief gave an account to popular mechanics about bulging and creaking .. there are however many more first responder reports of no such noises or instability and of explosions

you are hilarious, dude. you just provided a video in which a guy describes being on the 8th floor of WTC7 and hearing an explosion.

this guy apparently lived (i think we can agree on that).

so you are saying that a controlled demolition collapsed building seven but allowed enough time for people to escape?

seriously, do you have ANYTHING that refutes reports of the building bulging from the 10th to the 13th floors for up to two hours before your controlled demolition is supposed to have taken place?

he was trapped in he building for hours so what about this supposed raging inferno and if the building was bulging on the 13Th floor why did the collapse initiate with the penthouse then collapse in a controlled fashion



[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STbD9XMCOho&feature=related[/ame]

 

[eots]

The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue.
WTC7.net the hidden story of Building 7: FEMA's WTC Building Performance Study

 

[Fizz]

you are hilarious, dude. you just provided a video in which a guy describes being on the 8th floor of WTC7 and hearing an explosion.

this guy apparently lived (i think we can agree on that).

so you are saying that a controlled demolition collapsed building seven but allowed enough time for people to escape?

seriously, do you have ANYTHING that refutes reports of the building bulging from the 10th to the 13th floors for up to two hours before your controlled demolition is supposed to have taken place?

he was trapped in he building for hours so what about this supposed raging inferno and if the building was bulging on the 13Th floor why did the collapse initiate with the penthouse then collapse in a controlled fashion

there is no "if" in the building was bulging from the 10th to 13th floors. how does your demolition theory account for that? asking why the collapse started at the penthouse (it didnt, but i will argue that point later) does not explain why there was a bulge in the building from the 10th to 13th floors. if you wish to argue your point then please address. you replying that a guy was trapped for hours in a building by a raging fire actually helps my point and hurts yours. after you answer the bulge question we can ask how it is possible for demolition experts to run through a huge building in a raging inferno and set explosive demolition charges but first you need to answer the simple question...

again i ask you, HOW DOES A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION CREATE A BULGE IN THE 10th TO 13th FLOORS HOURS BEFORE THE DEMOLITION TAKES PLACE?

 

[LA RAM FAN]

if you speaking of wtc 7 although I am aware that a fire chief gave an account to popular mechanics about bulging and creaking .. there are however many more first responder reports of no such noises or instability and of explosions

you are hilarious, dude. you just provided a video in which a guy describes being on the 8th floor of WTC7 and hearing an explosion.

this guy apparently lived (i think we can agree on that).

so you are saying that a controlled demolition collapsed building seven but allowed enough time for people to escape?

seriously, do you have ANYTHING that refutes reports of the building bulging from the 10th to the 13th floors for up to two hours before your controlled demolition is supposed to have taken place?

he was trapped in he building for hours so what about this supposed raging inferno and if the building was bulging on the 13Th floor why did the collapse initiate with the penthouse then collapse in a controlled fashion



[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STbD9XMCOho&feature=related[/ame]

this video pretty much ends the debate and proves explosives brought the towers down.of course the Bush dupes wont watch it since they only see what they WANT to see.this video is the smoking gun they cant get around.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

since this thread is the TRUTH and I havent posted this post here on this thread yet,I will do so now.this post is WHY this whole discussion is irrelevent and mute cause knowing THESE facts below,only a moron would STILL defend the official version that the fires caused the collapse of the buildings lol. You all STILL going to make yourselfs look like morons saying it wasnt a controlled demolition? lol. psyche op agents candycorn,sfc ollie,gam and ditzcon will since thats what their paid to do,how bout the rest of you Bush/Obama dupes? lol.

QUOTE=9/11 inside job;1677848]
I think you MEANT to say his job is to prove that it didnt collapse CD style in its own footprint Terral? which of of course the Bush dupe cant do that.He has made pathetic attempts to convince us that it didnt fall at 6.5 seconds freefall speed to no avail and also satalite photos taken a week after the towers collapsed showed heat temperatures still going with temps that were far too hot and intense to be office fires.

the fires had been hosed down everyday for that whole week.so much so one firefighter said it was like a lake because there was so much water sprayed down on the fires.impossible for office fires to STILL be burning at that point.

However molten metal which many rescue workers spotted underneath all three towers at the bottom of the towers which was still burning despite all the fires put on it,IS a consistant sign of thermite.Not to mention that 7 of the most renowed scientists discovered through samples taken that nano thermite was found. office fires would have been put out several days ago being thermite though and molten metal still burning at high intense temps after that period of time days later is consistant with explosives being used.which pretty much ends this debate and why this whole discussion is mute at this point. this is also a smoking gun they cant get around.

 

[Terral]

Hi Fizz with Gam mentioned:

OMG! We have yet another "Official Cover Story" Operative working this USMB Board!

there is no "if" in the building was bulging from the 10th to 13th floors. how does your demolition theory account for that?

Gam has an Official "Building Fires Did It" Cover Story partner who really thinks that asking a myriad of STUPID QUESTIONS makes his case. Here is what you do Mr. Fizz: Write a sufficient number of "I'm a newb" posts, until you can post links like everybody else. Then, start your "Building Fires Brought Down WTC-7" Topic and show us 'your' evidence to support that silly hypothesis. BTW, the Controlled Demolition Explanation (my Topic) appears at AE911Truth.org if anybody is interested.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A&feature=player_embedded]WTC-7 Controlled Demolition Implosion[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73qK4j32iuo]WTC-7 Side-By-Side Controlled Demolition Implosion[/ame]

asking why the collapse started at the penthouse (it didnt, but i will argue that point later) does not explain why there was a bulge in the building from the 10th to 13th floors.

Hey Fizz! There are only 'two' (count them) explanations for what took WTC-7 down in 6.6 seconds:

1. Controlled Demolition. << The ONLY Answer That Makes Sense (#3)
2. Building Fires/Debris. << Official Govt Cover Story LIE

Asking stupid questions cuckoo is merely asking stupid questions, so please start 'your' Building Fires Did It Topic ASAP. We all need a good laugh . . .

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2THs3oNooM]The DoD Sent Gam Some Disinfo Agent Assistance ...[/ame]

BTW, most Americans will believe just about anything (#9) . . .

GL,

Terral

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Hi Fizz with Gam mentioned:

OMG! We have yet another "Official Cover Story" Operative working this USMB Board!

there is no "if" in the building was bulging from the 10th to 13th floors. how does your demolition theory account for that?

Gam has an Official "Building Fires Did It" Cover Story partner who really thinks that asking a myriad of STUPID QUESTIONS makes his case. Here is what you do Mr. Fizz: Write a sufficient number of "I'm a newb" posts, until you can post links like everybody else. Then, start your "Building Fires Brought Down WTC-7" Topic and show us 'your' evidence to support that silly hypothesis. BTW, the Controlled Demolition Explanation (my Topic) appears at AE911Truth.org if anybody is interested.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A&feature=player_embedded]WTC-7 Controlled Demolition Implosion[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73qK4j32iuo]WTC-7 Side-By-Side Controlled Demolition Implosion[/ame]

asking why the collapse started at the penthouse (it didnt, but i will argue that point later) does not explain why there was a bulge in the building from the 10th to 13th floors.

Hey Fizz! There are only 'two' (count them) explanations for what took WTC-7 down in 6.6 seconds:

1. Controlled Demolition. << The ONLY Answer That Makes Sense (#3)
2. Building Fires/Debris. << Official Govt Cover Story LIE

Asking stupid questions cuckoo is merely asking stupid questions, so please start 'your' Building Fires Did It Topic ASAP. We all need a good laugh . . .

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2THs3oNooM]The DoD Sent Gam Some Disinfo Agent Assistance ...[/ame]

BTW, most Americans will believe just about anything (#9) . . .

GL,

Terral

these government plants keep coming in by the droves.they are really getting desperate now to coverup the truth.

 

[Fizz]

i see. i must be a government plant now!!

we arent allowed to critisize theories NOT supplied by the government. we can only critisize theories that are supplied by the government. is that what is going on here?

it's actually a really simple question. i dont know why nobody can answer it. if the buildings were brought down by explosives then why was there a bulge in the building reported between the 10th and 13th floors hours before?

i'm trying to be open minded but this really needs to be addressed before i can believe that the collapse was caused by explosives. there are problems with the governments version and there are problems with the explosives version. right now neither one seems right to me. the title of the thread states that it was an inside job. so i am asking for some simple proof of the claim.

 

[DiveCon]

i see. i must be a government plant now!!

we arent allowed to critisize theories NOT supplied by the government. we can only critisize theories that are supplied by the government. is that what is going on here?

it's actually a really simple question. i dont know why nobody can answer it. if the buildings were brought down by explosives then why was there a bulge in the building reported between the 10th and 13th floors hours before?

i'm trying to be open minded but this really needs to be addressed before i can believe that the collapse was caused by explosives. there are problems with the governments version and there are problems with the explosives version. right now neither one seems right to me. the title of the thread states that it was an inside job. so i am asking for some simple proof of the claim.

anyone that doesnt buy into their delusions is a government agent

LOL

 

[eots]

i see. i must be a government plant now!!

we arent allowed to critisize theories NOT supplied by the government. we can only critisize theories that are supplied by the government. is that what is going on here?

it's actually a really simple question. i dont know why nobody can answer it. if the buildings were brought down by explosives then why was there a bulge in the building reported between the 10th and 13th floors hours before?

i'm trying to be open minded but this really needs to be addressed before i can believe that the collapse was caused by explosives. there are problems with the governments version and there are problems with the explosives version. right now neither one seems right to me. the title of the thread states that it was an inside job. so i am asking for some simple proof of the claim

Nist says that building fires caused the collapse of wtc 7...can you provide a link for NIST that states this bulge was confirmed or plays a significant role in their collapse theory ?

NIST WTC 7 Investigation Finds Building Fires Caused Collapse, 08/21/08



Dr. Quintiere also expressed his frustration at NIST&#8217;s failure to provide a report on the third skyscraper that collapsed on 9/11, World Trade Center Building 7. &#8220;And that building was not hit by anything,&#8221; noted Dr. Quintiere. &#8220;It&#8217;s more important to take a look at that. Maybe there was damage by the debris falling down that played a significant role. But other than that you had fires burning a long time without fire department intervention. And firefighters were in that building. I have yet to see any kind of story about what they saw. What was burning? Were photographs taken? Nothing!&#8221;

NIST used computer models that they said have never been used in such an application before and are the state of the art. For this they should be commended for their skill. But the validation of these modeling results is in question. Others have computed aspects with different conclusions on the cause mechanism of the collapse. Moreover, it is common in fire investigation to compute a time-line and compare it to known events. NIST has not done that.


OpEdNews - Article: Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation

 

[Fizz]

anyone that doesnt buy into their delusions is a government agent

LOL

the funny part is that last week i was out near area51 taking pictures of aircraft flying around. the government wasnt too happy i was there and i got buzzed a few times. the people accusing me of being a government plant couldnt be further from the truth!!