mm
So you are making all sorts of excuses for why Hillary should be singled out for different treatment then any other FBI target of investigation. It's not human nature. It's corruption.
I am not making excuses, Hillary had baggage with the F.B.I for years. She was under two separate new investigations.
IDK coyote the older you get the more you realize everyone is just human after all.
I'm pretty old Bear
But there are no excuses for Comey's behavior...none. The FBI cleared her everytime. Don't you think that means there is nothing substantial there? I do. So why make a special pre-election exception and treat her completely differently then say Trump? So differently, in fact, that he defied precedent and rules to do so.
My personal opinion is that comey screwed up the first time by letting Hillary go publicly when it was not over and he caught heck for it.
He tried to make a wrong into a right
The wrong was treating her differently then other investigated people - we do not or should not base investigations on public opinion or decide to treat them differently based on that. Trump was investigated and every bit of it remained PRIVATE - they determined there was nothing criminal and that was all they said. They didn't flagilate him in public, they didn't give ANY details. Now compare that with how they handled Clinton and tell me if you think that is really right? Especially, when they announced - against all precedent, advice and possibly even the law - that they might - MIGHT - investigate again based on Weiner's emails right before the election. I don't see how anyone can't conclude that there is something way wrong in the way things were handled by Comey. The public is - burn her, she's a witch! But Comey is no calmer of the witch burning masses.
This, among other things, casts a shadow on the election's legitimacy. It might not have changed the outcome one iota, but we'll never know.