Billy_Kinetta
Paladin of the Lost Hour
- Mar 4, 2013
- 52,766
- 22,201
- 2,320
What a disgrace.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We saw how well that went for those US citizens.The government tried to confiscate guns once before, it was called the Massacre at Wounded Knee.
You have to question the sensibilities of someone when they decide to go against a successful Constitution that has allowed America to flourish for 200+ years. Do these fools believe that if they had a nation like Europe, Canada or some other lawless, unaccountable, neo-communist country, that they would have the level of success and human contribution they've enjoyed?
Short sighted, selfish and harmful. Rally the troops and their families, it's a vote on the 2nd Amendment! Trump might get that Red wave after all, considering how many have worked to undermine it's chances.
1st off those who want to repeal the 2nd amendment AREN'T the ones who have achieved success in the United States, so want US to be disarmed like the US Indians were, so then these liberal losers can take the land we worked hard for, and make it their own, like the Manifest Destiny did for the Democrat Andrew Jackson's voters. As long as the 2nd amendment stand for the people, those liberal murderers, rapist and thugs are held at bay.Do these fools believe that if they had a nation like Europe, Canada or some other lawless, unaccountable, neo-communist country, that they would have the level of success and human contribution they've enjoyed?
This is somehow a surprise? Of course. This guy HATES freedom. Look at his opinions. He is one of the worst justices to ever sit the bench. He deviated wildly from the original intent.Source: The Hill
Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens is calling for a repeal of the Second Amendment, decrying the right to bear arms as outdated and misunderstood. Note: Stevens was nominated for the Supreme Court by a Republican, Gerald Ford.
In an op-ed published by The New York Times, Stevens, a Republican, said that students and anti-gun violence advocates should press lawmakers to take on the amendment.
-snip-
"That support is a clear sign to lawmakers to enact legislation prohibiting civilian ownership of semiautomatic weapons, increasing the minimum age to buy a gun from 18 to 21 years old, and establishing more comprehensive background checks on all purchasers of firearms," Stevens wrote.
"But the demonstrators should seek more effective and more lasting reform," he continued. "They should demand a repeal of the Second Amendment."
-snip-
Read more: Former Supreme Court justice: ‘Repeal the Second Amendment’
His NYT op-ed is here:
Opinion | John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
Concern that a national standing army might pose a threat to the security of the separate states led to the adoption of that amendment, which provides that “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Today that concern is a relic of the 18th century.
For over 200 years after the adoption of the Second Amendment, it was uniformly understood as not placing any limit on either federal or state authority to enact gun control legislation. In 1939 the Supreme Court unanimously held that Congress could prohibit the possession of a sawed-off shotgun because that weapon had no reasonable relation to the preservation or efficiency of a “well regulated militia.”
Continue reading the main story
During the years when Warren Burger was our chief justice, from 1969 to 1986, no judge, federal or state, as far as I am aware, expressed any doubt as to the limited coverage of that amendment. When organizations like the National Rifle Association disagreed with that position and began their campaign claiming that federal regulation of firearms curtailed Second Amendment rights, Chief Justice Burger publicly characterized the N.R.A. as perpetrating “one of the greatest pieces of fraud, I repeat the word fraud, on the American public by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime.”
In 2008, the Supreme Court overturned Chief Justice Burger’s and others’ long-settled understanding of the Second Amendment’s limited reach by ruling, in District of Columbia v. Heller, that there was an individual right to bear arms. I was among the four dissenters.
Stevens goes on to say that Heller "has provided the N.R.A. with a propaganda weapon of immense power" -- but overturning the decision with a constitutional amendment to get rid of the 2nd Amendment "would be simple and would do more to weaken the N.R.A.’s ability to stymie legislative debate and block constructive gun control legislation than any other available option."
This guy gets it..the NRA baggers don't.![]()
Just as there's no political will for a new AWB, so too is there no political will to amend the Constitution to repeal the Second Amendment.
ya still think they're not comin for your guns?!
Opinion | John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment
Yes, it certainly is "a relic of the 18th century." It's confusing and obsolete. It's actually embarrassing.
Are you in a militia? A well-regulated militia?
![]()
![]()
Are you in a militia? A well-regulated militia?
![]()
![]()
Only problem with your meme is the guy on the right is on our side.
Only problem with your meme is the guy on the right is on our side.