Well, you are quite wrong and quite partisan in your lame defense of Biden.That was then. This is now.
This is what matters
What matters to voters is politicians shifting statements over time. They are accountable......always.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, you are quite wrong and quite partisan in your lame defense of Biden.That was then. This is now.
This is what matters
Uh no. What matters is the here and now.Well, you are quite wrong and quite partisan in your lame defense of Biden.
What matters to voters is politicians shifting statements over time. They are accountable......always.
Unless you're talking about a Republican, of course.Uh no. What matters is the here and now.
No one is going after SS and Medicare.Uh no. What matters is the here and now.
And here and now it is Republicans who want to do damage to social security and Dems who are trying to protect and strengthen it.
Regardless of your total bullshit
Except the GOPNo one is going after SS and Medicare.
Sounds like a good plan - when SS was created, the average US life expectancy was about 62.And while Lee said in a tweeted statement on Wednesday that, during his 12 years as a senator, he has not called for “abolishing” Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid benefits, only for “solutions to improve those programs and move them toward solvency,” he has supported benefit cuts. For example, he has endorsed various proposals over the years to raise the Social Security retirement age.
BSExcept the GOP
Biden walked it back.And while Lee said in a tweeted statement on Wednesday that, during his 12 years as a senator, he has not called for “abolishing” Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid benefits, only for “solutions to improve those programs and move them toward solvency,” he has supported benefit cuts. For example, he has endorsed various proposals over the years to raise the Social Security retirement age.
Who is going to do the looking and judging? Im cool if that job is up to the GOP.Every program in the Fed Govt has to be looked at freshly at least once every four years to determine if it is still needed
Lee is still talking about cutsBS
Biden walked it back.
Lee walked it back.
Who is going to do the looking and judging? Im cool if that job is up to the GOP.![]()
Largely because infant mortality was so high back then. Kinda doesn’t affect SS. Does it…Sounds like a good plan - when SS was created, the average US life expectancy was about 62.
Now, its a little over 77.
Why -not- raise it to 70?
Current link would help you immensely.Lee is still talking about cuts
I think he meant a congressional vote.That would be interesting. But that would basically turn us into a direct democracy if we voted on every single program.
you have it completely backwards as usual.Uh no. What matters is the here and now.
And here and now it is Republicans who want to do damage to social security and Dems who are trying to protect and strengthen it.
Regardless of your total bullshit
Post 266. Keep upCurrent link would help you immensely.
Which, of course, does nothing to change the fact people live much longer now.Largely because infant mortality was so high back then. Kinda doesn’t affect SS. Does it…
Because for the vast majority...when you hit 66 you're physically doneWhich, of course, does nothing to change the fact people live much longer now.
So, again:
Why -not- raise it to 70?
True.Because for the vast majority...when you hit 66 you're physically done
LOL.............all your references are from 2011, 2012.....like I previously pointed out.....Oooops.Post 266. Keep up