Would Hillary vote for war with Iran?

[Obiwan]

I'm not sure but he was a senator before he was president.

So you just made that shit up.

He probably heard it from a Democrat, since they make shit up all the time.

So a guy makes some shit up, and you still try to blame it on Democrats.

This is ******* fascinating! Seriously.

Well, I sure haven't heard any Repub saying it. Have you?

Dude, super dem is to the right of reason.

But as to the ambiguous OP, Hillary made it very clear that she was game on with bombing Iran unless it put aside the centrifuges necessary for a nuke. Like her or not, she was the one, and the only one, who cobbled together the sanctions that have accomplished that.

But Iran gets the centrifuges necessary for a nuke under the agreement. So the question is, will she bomb them???

 

[g5000]

Bombing Iran's nuclear weapons-making program into extinction would require hundreds, if not thousands of sorties.

The American people are in no mood for another war in the Middle East. I am willing to bet they will be more willing to live with a nuclear Iran than go to war again.

 

[Desperado]

i really think that Obama has a lot of support because he has made it obvious that he will not go to war with other countries. He was one of the FEW democrats that broke with there party and did not vote to authorize to give bush authority to go to war with Iraq. It is my opinion that is why he has so much popularity with the Democratic Party and won two elections. It's just my opinion this is one of the reasons why Obama got into office.

Now if Hillary was to win the election and be president would she go to war with Iran? Why wouldn't she? She already voted for the Iraq war so why would she change now?

If Israel told her to do it, she would only ask conventional or nuclear

 

[g5000]

The fearmongers would have you believe Iran would nuke Israel the day after acquiring the Bomb, and the pants shitters believe them.

It's bullshit. Iran wants a nuke for the same reason every other country wants one; as a deterrent. And the more we chant "bomb-bomb-bomb Iran", the more they want that deterrent to ensure the Great Satan will never invade.

We lived with a nuclear USSR, and made treaties with them even though they constantly violated them and rattled their sabers at us and threatened global thermonuclear war. The USSR was an existential threat to the US. Iran is not.

We lived with a nuclear USSR because we knew the more righteous would triumph in the end. So it will be with the theocratic regime of Iran. They will fall one day, and we will be there dancing on their graves, opening a McDonald's in Tehran.

 

[Obiwan]

Bombing Iran's nuclear weapons-making program into extinction would require hundreds, if not thousands of sorties.

The American people are in no mood for another war in the Middle East. I am willing to bet they will be more willing to live with a nuclear Iran than go to war again.

And a possible strike against us ( not to mention more Americans killed in terrorist attacks)????? That may explain why 2/3 of Americans are against the deal, according to recent polls.

 

[Obiwan]

The fearmongers would have you believe Iran would nuke Israel the day after acquiring the Bomb, and the pants shitters believe them.

It's bullshit. Iran wants a nuke for the same reason every other country wants one; as a deterrent. And the more we chant "bomb-bomb-bomb Iran", the more they want that deterrent to ensure the Great Satan will never invade.

We lived with a nuclear USSR, and made treaties with them even though they constantly violated them and rattled their sabers at us and threatened global thermonuclear war. The USSR was an existential threat to the US. Iran is not.

We lived with a nuclear USSR because we knew the more righteous would triumph in the end. So it will be with the theocratic regime of Iran. They will fall one day, and we will be there dancing on their graves.

Yeah, but the Ruskies suppressed religion, so they weren't nutcases trying to set the stage for the return of the 12th Iman.

 

[g5000]

But Iran gets the centrifuges necessary for a nuke under the agreement.

No they do not.

Iran currently has 20,000 centrifuges, and under the agreement this is cut to 5,060 of the oldest and least efficient centrifuges.

Key Excerpts

 

[JakeStarkey]

America will not go to war over Iran in almost any situation.

Americans do not want another ME war.

 

[Obiwan]

But Iran gets the centrifuges necessary for a nuke under the agreement.

No they do not.

Iran currently has 19,000 centrifuges, and under the agreement this is cut to 5,060 of the oldest and least efficient centrifuges.

Key Excerpts

Due to the quantity of uranium involved, it takes less centrifuges for a bomb than the number needed to feed a reactor. Iran gets enough for a bomb, not enough to feed a reactor.

 

[g5000]

The fearmongers would have you believe Iran would nuke Israel the day after acquiring the Bomb, and the pants shitters believe them.

It's bullshit. Iran wants a nuke for the same reason every other country wants one; as a deterrent. And the more we chant "bomb-bomb-bomb Iran", the more they want that deterrent to ensure the Great Satan will never invade.

We lived with a nuclear USSR, and made treaties with them even though they constantly violated them and rattled their sabers at us and threatened global thermonuclear war. The USSR was an existential threat to the US. Iran is not.

We lived with a nuclear USSR because we knew the more righteous would triumph in the end. So it will be with the theocratic regime of Iran. They will fall one day, and we will be there dancing on their graves.

Yeah, but the Ruskies suppressed religion, so they weren't nutcases trying to set the stage for the return of the 12th Iman.

Wait a second. Are you really so stupid that you believe since they weren't religious the Soviets didn't want to take over the planet?

How old are you?

 

[JakeStarkey]

The headline is wrong. "Republicans strongly oppose the deal brokered by the Obama administration, 86 to 3 percent, while Democrats support the top second-term foreign policy agenda item for President Obama, 52 to 32 percent.

A majority of Americans disapprove the way Obama is handling the situation in Iran (56 percent), compared with 35 percent who approve. A majority (58 percent) also thinks the deal makes the world less safe.

The Obama administration has worked to sell the deal, reached between the U.S., France, Germany, Britain, Russia and China with Iran, to a deeply skeptical American public and Congress."

Poll Americans oppose Iran deal by 2-1 margin TheHill

 

[g5000]

But Iran gets the centrifuges necessary for a nuke under the agreement.

No they do not.

Iran currently has 19,000 centrifuges, and under the agreement this is cut to 5,060 of the oldest and least efficient centrifuges.

Key Excerpts

Due to the quantity of uranium involved, it takes less centrifuges for a bomb than the number needed to feed a reactor. Iran gets enough for a bomb, not enough to feed a reactor.

You have that exactly backwards. You are talking out of your ass.

It takes a much higher level of enrichment to make weapons-grade fissile material than it does to make reactor fuel. And that means it requires a shit ton more centrifuges to make weapons-grade fissile material than it does to make reactor fuel.

Under the agreement, Iran is limited to enriching its uranium to 3.67%, which is good enough for a reactor but nowhere near good enough for a weapon.

Up to now, Iran has been enriching its uranium to almost 20 percent.

 

[JakeStarkey]

But Iran gets the centrifuges necessary for a nuke under the agreement.

No they do not.

Iran currently has 19,000 centrifuges, and under the agreement this is cut to 5,060 of the oldest and least efficient centrifuges.

Key Excerpts

Due to the quantity of uranium involved, it takes less centrifuges for a bomb than the number needed to feed a reactor. Iran gets enough for a bomb, not enough to feed a reactor.

Obiwan, the nuclear physicist.

 

[g5000]

But Iran gets the centrifuges necessary for a nuke under the agreement.

No they do not.

Iran currently has 19,000 centrifuges, and under the agreement this is cut to 5,060 of the oldest and least efficient centrifuges.

Key Excerpts

Due to the quantity of uranium involved, it takes less centrifuges for a bomb than the number needed to feed a reactor. Iran gets enough for a bomb, not enough to feed a reactor.

Obiwan, the nuclear physicist.

He must be getting his information from a Democrat.

 

[HenryBHough]

Hillary? War with Iran?

Yeah! If there were one she'd be first to take an imaginary trip there and then write her memoirs of how she came under fire.

 

[g5000]

The fearmongers would have you believe Iran would nuke Israel the day after acquiring the Bomb, and the pants shitters believe them.

It's bullshit. Iran wants a nuke for the same reason every other country wants one; as a deterrent. And the more we chant "bomb-bomb-bomb Iran", the more they want that deterrent to ensure the Great Satan will never invade.

We lived with a nuclear USSR, and made treaties with them even though they constantly violated them and rattled their sabers at us and threatened global thermonuclear war. The USSR was an existential threat to the US. Iran is not.

We lived with a nuclear USSR because we knew the more righteous would triumph in the end. So it will be with the theocratic regime of Iran. They will fall one day, and we will be there dancing on their graves.

Yeah, but the Ruskies suppressed religion, so they weren't nutcases trying to set the stage for the return of the 12th Iman.

Wait a second. Are you really so stupid that you believe since they weren't religious the Soviets didn't want to take over the planet?

How old are you?

Old enough to know the Soviets weren't trying to get

Trying to get what?

Careful. You are talking to a Cold Warrior, and someone who knows a lot about nukes and nuclear power.

 

[Obiwan]

But Iran gets the centrifuges necessary for a nuke under the agreement.

No they do not.

Iran currently has 19,000 centrifuges, and under the agreement this is cut to 5,060 of the oldest and least efficient centrifuges.

Key Excerpts

Due to the quantity of uranium involved, it takes less centrifuges for a bomb than the number needed to feed a reactor. Iran gets enough for a bomb, not enough to feed a reactor.

Obiwan, the nuclear physicist.

He must be getting his information from a Democrat.

Nope, I don't trust lying Democrats...
The odd reality of Iran s centrifuges Enough for a bomb not power PunditFact
The odd reality of Iran's centrifuges: Enough for a bomb, not power

 

[g5000]

No one, Republican or Democrat, will go to war with Iran over Iran getting a nuke.

 

[Obiwan]

The fearmongers would have you believe Iran would nuke Israel the day after acquiring the Bomb, and the pants shitters believe them.

It's bullshit. Iran wants a nuke for the same reason every other country wants one; as a deterrent. And the more we chant "bomb-bomb-bomb Iran", the more they want that deterrent to ensure the Great Satan will never invade.

We lived with a nuclear USSR, and made treaties with them even though they constantly violated them and rattled their sabers at us and threatened global thermonuclear war. The USSR was an existential threat to the US. Iran is not.

We lived with a nuclear USSR because we knew the more righteous would triumph in the end. So it will be with the theocratic regime of Iran. They will fall one day, and we will be there dancing on their graves.

Yeah, but the Ruskies suppressed religion, so they weren't nutcases trying to set the stage for the return of the 12th Iman.

Wait a second. Are you really so stupid that you believe since they weren't religious the Soviets didn't want to take over the planet?

How old are you?

Old enough to know the Soviets weren't trying to get

Trying to get what?

Careful. You are talking to a Cold Warrior, and someone who knows a lot about nukes and nuclear power.

The Ruskies weren't trying to get into paradise, so MAD worked.... In the case of the Iranians, we're at a disadvantage.

 

[g5000]

But Iran gets the centrifuges necessary for a nuke under the agreement.

No they do not.

Iran currently has 19,000 centrifuges, and under the agreement this is cut to 5,060 of the oldest and least efficient centrifuges.

Key Excerpts

Due to the quantity of uranium involved, it takes less centrifuges for a bomb than the number needed to feed a reactor. Iran gets enough for a bomb, not enough to feed a reactor.

Obiwan, the nuclear physicist.

He must be getting his information from a Democrat.

Nope, I don't trust lying Democrats...
The odd reality of Iran s centrifuges Enough for a bomb not power PunditFact
The odd reality of Iran's centrifuges: Enough for a bomb, not power

It would take Iran a long time to produce enough bomb material with just 5,060 centrifuges. They would be caught long before that.