Jack4jill
Senior Member
- Apr 17, 2016
- 3,599
- 170
- 50
- Banned
- #21
Walmart is very dangerous? More of this all in your head thing. With that many stores if they were very dangerous it would be all over the news. The constant stream of people actually makes them very safe. If you want danger, drop by a 7-11 at 3AM when only drunks or criminals are around.Let's be real, Target has just lost Thousands of customers. Walmart especially, has benefited greatly from its bizarre decision. And Target couldn't afford to lose a single customer to Walmart. I think Target's decision was meant to be a nice PC gimmick, but it's clearly backfiring.
However that being said, you're completely out of your mind if you sit your buttocks on a Target or Walmart toilet. Target's not quite as bad, but Walmart? My God, talk about 'Russian Roulette?' Be safe, hold it in. You wont get any unexpected STD surprises, or deal with creepy dudes hangin out in the ladies room.
Wal-Mart has had enough problems with criminals and security issues in their parking lots.
Maybe the idea of adding security guards is needed inside the store as well!
Thank you, paulitician
Money. Walmart won't spring for extra security. I have a relative who works in Management there. Walmart is a notorious criminal hangout. It's a 24/7 store with very limited security. Criminals love it. Walmart's theft rate is astronomical. Its prices are gonna begin to inch up as a result.
But aside from that, i don't get why anyone would willingly sit their buttocks on a Walmart toilet. I mean, disease-ridden homeless folks actually live in Walmart bathrooms. Sitting on its toilets really is playing 'Russian Roulette.' Who knows what disease you'll pick up? YUCKY.
Sure, of course the cost is a factor for any business paulitician
There are ways to make the added security affordable.
There are grants and nonprofits that help with creating jobs for Vets,
and some for excons who are turning their lives around. If you pair
up a Vet with an excon, that's a win win situation. I'd recommend having
an extra pair of security guards anyway. Lives would be saved by avoiding
one on one confrontations, where two people on patrol makes all the difference.
If the point is for the federal govt to offer protections, why not offer tax breaks
for creating jobs for security. Perhaps the deterrence effect and other benefits
would be worth the investment.
Walmart's not too concerned about it. It's rakin in $Billions. It's decided not to spring for extra security. Walmarts are actually very dangerous places at certain times of the day.
Like i said, it's a notorious criminal hangout. But as long as millions of folks keep showing up to buy more cheap shitty Chinese-made shite, Walmart's just fine with the current set-up.
With all your fears and paranoia, you must live in a bunker.