Adam's Apple
Senior Member
- Apr 25, 2004
- 4,092
- 452
- 48
Pacifists Vs Peace
By Thomas Stovall, The Conservative Voice
July 21, 2006
One of the many failings of our educational system is that it sends out into the world people who cannot tell rhetoric from reality. They have learned no systematic way to analyze ideas, derive their implications and test those implications against hard facts.
"Peace" movements are among those who take advantage of this
widespread inability to see beyond rhetoric to realities. Few people even
seem interested in the actual track record of so-called "peace" movements --
that is, whether such movements actually produce peace or war.
Take the Middle East. People are calling for a cease-fire in the interests of peace. But there have been more cease-fires in the Middle East than anywhere else. If cease-fires actually promoted peace, the Middle East would be the most peaceful region on the face of the earth instead of the most violent.
Was World War II ended by cease-fires or by annihilating much of
Germany and Japan? Make no mistake about it, innocent civilians died in the
process. Indeed, American prisoners of war died when we bombed Germany.
There is a reason why General Sherman said "war is hell" more
than a century ago. But he helped end the Civil War with his devastating
march through Georgia -- not by cease fires or bowing to "world opinion" and
there were no corrupt busybodies like the United Nations to demand replacing
military force with diplomacy.
for full article:
http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/16313.html
By Thomas Stovall, The Conservative Voice
July 21, 2006
One of the many failings of our educational system is that it sends out into the world people who cannot tell rhetoric from reality. They have learned no systematic way to analyze ideas, derive their implications and test those implications against hard facts.
"Peace" movements are among those who take advantage of this
widespread inability to see beyond rhetoric to realities. Few people even
seem interested in the actual track record of so-called "peace" movements --
that is, whether such movements actually produce peace or war.
Take the Middle East. People are calling for a cease-fire in the interests of peace. But there have been more cease-fires in the Middle East than anywhere else. If cease-fires actually promoted peace, the Middle East would be the most peaceful region on the face of the earth instead of the most violent.
Was World War II ended by cease-fires or by annihilating much of
Germany and Japan? Make no mistake about it, innocent civilians died in the
process. Indeed, American prisoners of war died when we bombed Germany.
There is a reason why General Sherman said "war is hell" more
than a century ago. But he helped end the Civil War with his devastating
march through Georgia -- not by cease fires or bowing to "world opinion" and
there were no corrupt busybodies like the United Nations to demand replacing
military force with diplomacy.
for full article:
http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/16313.html
