i think the point is they should give the extra assistance for the baby, regardless.
there is nothing unusual with government fostering certain societal mores. it's why there is a tax benefit to marriage.
but if there's a value on children, then the children should be cared for.
people aren't going to stop bonking if you a) make abortion illegal; and then b) starve the women and their kids.
or do you want to create a permanent underclass?
Speaking for myself, I am getting pretty damn tired of carrying the burden for people too selfish, stupid or ignorant to not create life that they cannot afford and then get all pissy because some of us feel it is not our job to go to work to support their arrogant expectations.
I am not addressing children produced from rape.
I won't even get into the miserable lives some of these children must endure with women who were too selfish to stop and think before making a baby. Sometimes they make a baby not just once but over and over.
I am no morality cop until a person decides I should pay for their choices.
yeah, well... i'm tired of paying for unnecessary wars
and i'm tired of financing corporate welfare
i have no problem with helping people in need.
want to guess which part of our budget is larger?
it's like this...either...birth control is readily available and kids are taught about safe sex and abortion is readily available
or... we should offer assistance for forcing people to carry a pregnancy to term that they don't want.
those are our choices as society. there is no, 'make the rabble stop bonking' option and it is immoral to starve people.