martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 102,678
- 53,503
- 2,615
I give zero *****. Freedom of speech. Asshole.
Well that makes no sense.
The 2nd biggest douche contrarian on the board being a douche contrarian.
Lame.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I give zero *****. Freedom of speech. Asshole.
Ain't that a fact.Illegal immigrant isn't a race.
I thought maybe the OP might choke on the words in his link that "No one deserves this kind of disrespect" especially after GIVING that kind of disrespect and worse to Trump, his supporters and anyone else who didn't take the Covid jab, for the past 9 years.She was being a good old fashioned asshole, something you applaud when one of your demdrones does it.
Good for Century 21.
Century 21 Realtor expresses her Trump love by writing "I hope President Trump deports you" to her Mexican restaurant waiter on the credit card receipt.
Stephanie Lovins has now been fired from Century 21
Realty Company Dumps Ohio Woman For Writing 'I Hope Trump Deports You' On Mexican Restaurant Receipt
"Thank you for bringing this to our attention. The CENTURY 21 brand does not condone acts of discrimination and is taking this situation seriously. We have looked into it and the agent in question is no longer associated with the brand," a representative wrote in a follow-up comment.
They are using VENMO. Her user name is Citygator1.When her crowd fund account opens up let me know so I can give generously please.
Thank you
It's poetry in motion..
And "stupid MAGAT" is not hateful bigotry?
.
The restaurant exercised their free speech. If she experienced harm, thats not the restaurants problem.
You have no right to limit other people’s speech because it would cause you harm.
Defamation and libel don’t cover speech that is factually true. There is no liability for telling the truth.The hell you don't lol. That's what defamation lawsuits are all about. That's what libel laws are all about. The restaurant is liable for the actions of its employees.
Defamation and libel don’t cover speech that is factually true. There is no liability for telling the truth.
No one deprived her of free speech. They didn’t hurt her. All they did is tell people about her actions.No but it shows that speech can litigated
If you do or say something that causes harm to someone else, you can be held liable for that. That's like if I worked for an business and they did something I didn't like, that doesn't give me the right to release their personal information online.
Sorry, you don't get to hurt people just because they made you made.
Besides, her writing that is HER FREE SPEECH...so....
No one deprived her of free speech.
What personal information did release online?
She was in a public space. She has no expectation of privacy. The video is not private information.They released a video of her which caused people to be able to find out who she is and caused her to lose her job.
Again, she exercised free speech and the people at the restaurant tried to hurt her for it..and wete successful. The staff was in the wrong and the restaurant is responsible for their actions
Correct, but what they did with the video is what opens them up to problems. They posted the video online. It wouldn't be hard to show nefarious intentShe was in a public space. She has no expectation of privacy. The video is not private information.
Doesn’t matter their intent. The video is not personal or private. Releasing public information to the public can’t create liability.Correct, but what they did with the video is what opens them up to problems. They posted the video online. It wouldn't be hard to show nefarious intent
It can be if your intent is to hurt someone....Doesn’t matter their intent. The video is not personal or private. Releasing public information to the public can’t create liability.
No, it doesn’t matter if your intent is to hurt someone. You can’t be held liable for making public information that is public and that is true.It can be if your intent is to hurt someone....
Or even if the unintended affects is that it does hurt someone.
No, it doesn’t matter if your intent is to hurt someone. You can’t be held liable for making public information that is public and that is true.
It’s actually pretty absurd to suggest otherwise.
Lying about someone? Bad.
Revealing private information? Could be bad but that’s pretty specific.
Public information that is true? Nope. That’s freedom of speech.
Depends.If you make me mad and I do something that causes you to be harmed, am I not liable, no matter what it is?
The restaurant didn’t hurt her. They merely told the truth about her actions. The restaurant can’t fire her.You don't have the right to hurt someone just because they made you mad
It’s their property. They have every right to record people in their restaurant.They recorded this person without her permission and then took that information and put it online with an accusation against her that caused her to lose her job
That’s up to the restaurant to decide.Look at it like this, most businesses have a policy against retaliation within their own company, I'm sure it would equally extend to their customers.
Depends.
The restaurant didn’t hurt her. They merely told the truth about her actions. The restaurant can’t fire her.
It’s their property. They have every right to record people in their restaurant.