Woman fired from Century 21 for expressing Trump support (rudely)

Illegal immigrant isn't a race.
Ain't that a fact.

She was being a good old fashioned asshole, something you applaud when one of your demdrones does it.
I thought maybe the OP might choke on the words in his link that "No one deserves this kind of disrespect" especially after GIVING that kind of disrespect and worse to Trump, his supporters and anyone else who didn't take the Covid jab, for the past 9 years.
 
Good for Century 21.

Century 21 Realtor expresses her Trump love by writing "I hope President Trump deports you" to her Mexican restaurant waiter on the credit card receipt.

Stephanie Lovins has now been fired from Century 21

Realty Company Dumps Ohio Woman For Writing 'I Hope Trump Deports You' On Mexican Restaurant Receipt

"Thank you for bringing this to our attention. The CENTURY 21 brand does not condone acts of discrimination and is taking this situation seriously. We have looked into it and the agent in question is no longer associated with the brand," a representative wrote in a follow-up comment.


When her crowd fund account opens up let me know so I can give generously please.
Thank you
 
When her crowd fund account opens up let me know so I can give generously please.
Thank you
They are using VENMO. Her user name is Citygator1.
 
The restaurant exercised their free speech. If she experienced harm, thats not the restaurants problem.

You have no right to limit other people’s speech because it would cause you harm.

The hell you don't lol. That's what defamation lawsuits are all about. That's what libel laws are all about. The restaurant is liable for the actions of its employees.
 
The hell you don't lol. That's what defamation lawsuits are all about. That's what libel laws are all about. The restaurant is liable for the actions of its employees.
Defamation and libel don’t cover speech that is factually true. There is no liability for telling the truth.
 
Defamation and libel don’t cover speech that is factually true. There is no liability for telling the truth.

No but it shows that speech can litigated

If you do or say something that causes harm to someone else, you can be held liable for that. That's like if I worked for an business and they did something I didn't like, that doesn't give me the right to release their personal information online.

Sorry, you don't get to hurt people just because they made you made.

Besides, her writing that is HER FREE SPEECH...so....
 
No but it shows that speech can litigated

If you do or say something that causes harm to someone else, you can be held liable for that. That's like if I worked for an business and they did something I didn't like, that doesn't give me the right to release their personal information online.

Sorry, you don't get to hurt people just because they made you made.

Besides, her writing that is HER FREE SPEECH...so....
No one deprived her of free speech. They didn’t hurt her. All they did is tell people about her actions.

What personal information did release online?
 
No one deprived her of free speech.

What personal information did release online?

They released a video of her which caused people to be able to find out who she is and caused her to lose her job.

Again, she exercised free speech and the people at the restaurant tried to hurt her for it..and wete successful. The staff was in the wrong and the restaurant is responsible for their actions
 
They released a video of her which caused people to be able to find out who she is and caused her to lose her job.

Again, she exercised free speech and the people at the restaurant tried to hurt her for it..and wete successful. The staff was in the wrong and the restaurant is responsible for their actions
She was in a public space. She has no expectation of privacy. The video is not private information.
 
She was in a public space. She has no expectation of privacy. The video is not private information.
Correct, but what they did with the video is what opens them up to problems. They posted the video online. It wouldn't be hard to show nefarious intent
 
Correct, but what they did with the video is what opens them up to problems. They posted the video online. It wouldn't be hard to show nefarious intent
Doesn’t matter their intent. The video is not personal or private. Releasing public information to the public can’t create liability.
 
Doesn’t matter their intent. The video is not personal or private. Releasing public information to the public can’t create liability.
It can be if your intent is to hurt someone....

Or even if the unintended affects is that it does hurt someone.
 
It can be if your intent is to hurt someone....

Or even if the unintended affects is that it does hurt someone.
No, it doesn’t matter if your intent is to hurt someone. You can’t be held liable for making public information that is public and that is true.

It’s actually pretty absurd to suggest otherwise.

Lying about someone? Bad.
Revealing private information? Could be bad but that’s pretty specific.

Public information that is true? Nope. That’s freedom of speech.
 
No, it doesn’t matter if your intent is to hurt someone. You can’t be held liable for making public information that is public and that is true.

It’s actually pretty absurd to suggest otherwise.

Lying about someone? Bad.
Revealing private information? Could be bad but that’s pretty specific.

Public information that is true? Nope. That’s freedom of speech.

If you make me mad and I do something that causes you to be harmed, am I not liable, no matter what it is? You don't have the right to hurt someone just because they made you mad. They recorded this person without her permission and then took that information and put it online with an accusation against her that caused her to lose her job.

Look at it like this, most businesses have a policy against retaliation within their own company, I'm sure it would equally extend to their customers.
 
15th post
If you make me mad and I do something that causes you to be harmed, am I not liable, no matter what it is?
Depends.
You don't have the right to hurt someone just because they made you mad
The restaurant didn’t hurt her. They merely told the truth about her actions. The restaurant can’t fire her.
They recorded this person without her permission and then took that information and put it online with an accusation against her that caused her to lose her job
It’s their property. They have every right to record people in their restaurant.
Look at it like this, most businesses have a policy against retaliation within their own company, I'm sure it would equally extend to their customers.
That’s up to the restaurant to decide.
 
C21 not dragged into it. Local broker might be but how does C21 even get involved with what a person wrote on a receipt?? The answer is They Don’t. Posters opining Once Again on what the know nothing about. Did her church find out and kick her out??
 

On what? You're suggesting I have the right to do anything I want to you if you are in my restaurant.


The restaurant didn’t hurt her. They merely told the truth about her actions. The restaurant can’t fire her.

The employees of the restaurant did, this what makes the restaurant liable.

it doesn't matter that they told the truth of her actions, the employees of that restaurant took an action that lead to harm to her.

It’s their property. They have every right to record people in their restaurant.

But not to release the information with intent to harm her.

Interesting where your line of thought is going though. So according to you, if I take an action, that may be within my legal right, if I take that action knowing it could bring harm to you, either financially or even physically....I'm completely free and clear of any responsibility.

That....is interesting.
 
The “write a note on receipt for waitress” news story is boring as shit.

I think 90% of them are just made up by hack writers
 
Back
Top Bottom