who are you??
Was this in Washington state?It is called cyberstalking. It is not called cyber talking. The law also includes monitoring people electronically without their knowledge. It includes a lot of stuff. It is basically up to the judge's discretion. My lawyer told me it was ridiculous and was an easy win. He was wrong.
She was an elected official. So was I.
make me,,I have already told you once to stop writing stuff to me or about me on this forum you thick headed numb skulled disgusting filthy psychopath. If you respond to this message then you just committing cyberstalking. So STOP writing stuff to me or about me on this forum.
make me,,
government is an inanimate object and cant do anything,, its the people in government thats doing it,,Is this an academic endeavor? I ask because government, which is supposed to protect the rights of the people as spelled out in the Bill of Rights/Constitution, is doing the opposite.
no its not,, if you left the forum and I came at you on your personal tech after you filed a restraining order then you would have something,,Congratulations. You just committed cyberstalking. Do you see how easy that was? I actually respect your Constitutional rights to say whatever you want. I was convicted of exactly what you just did. Ciao
You should not be discussing even thinking about killing someone on a public message board. You're just setting yourself up for more grief in the event this situation escalates beyond what it has.I like that video. It is correct. My old self is dead. This lady went after me from every direction imaginable. I said to her, "I don't know why you care. You don't even live here." I told her to send anything she said to me by mail and I gave her my address.
I know morally speaking I should kill her but I'm not going to. It isn't worth it. She filed criminal charges against me. I was only charged with one. She filed a sexual harrassment claim against me that was denied. She appealed and the appeal was denied. She filed a restraining order against me. She convinced the Board of Education to remove me from office. I lost over $10,000 in income. She is suing me for $300,000.
I know morally speaking I should kill her for these major disruptions in my life but I won't. It isn't worth it. I just have to believe she will get what she deserves and I have to just let it go. She is a disgusting sack of shit and I'm not. So at least I have that going for me. I'm not going to kill her though. Was that your advice?
I'm just saying that you committed cyberstalking and you did. If you didn't then I didn't.no its not,, if you left the forum and I came at you on your personal tech after you filed a restraining order then you would have something,,
until then youre just another whiney little bitch on the internet,,
You should not be discussing even thinking about killing someone on a public message board. You're just setting yourself up for more grief in the event this situation escalates beyond what it has.
Which state are you in?no its not,, if you left the forum and I came at you on your personal tech after you filed a restraining order then you would have something,,
until then youre just another whiney little bitch on the internet,,
Which state are you in?
Was this in Washington state?
I'm just telling you that you shouldn't even be saying that on a public internet message board because it can be used against you, especially since you now have a criminal conviction (?) for cyberstalking.I am not going to kill her. I'm just saying it is probably the right thing to do.
It does.No. Does Washington State have cyberstalking laws?
There are a lot of innocent people in prisons. The jury is made up of men and women that are humans, humans make mistakes.Is it true that your Constitutional rights cannot be violated at all? or
Is it true that your Constitutional rights cannot be violated without due process?
This is just something I have started considering recently. Is there even a difference between these two concepts? To me one says your Constitutional rights can never be violated. One says that your Constitutional rights can only be violated by a judge. Has anybody ever considered what "without due process" actually means?
.No. Does Washington State have cyberstalking laws?
So if is ok for a judge to make a bad ruling and subsequent judges to use that bad ruling to make future bad rulings? or is the judge obligated to only consider the constitution and ignore those past bad rulings?
Nobody taught us in school about the great power of case law that apparently has more power than the words of the constitution.
no I didnt,, youre just making shit up because youre a useless tool,,I'm just saying that you committed cyberstalking and you did. If you didn't then I didn't.
the state of confusion,,Which state are you in?
