Within a few short years, homosexuals have gone from persecuted to persecutors...

[bodecea]

Homos think they can impregnate fecal matter

I decided to support the LGBTFAG cause, so I bought a lamp with a lesbian electric plug. I tried plugging into the wall outlet. I'm sure it's just my ignorance, but I couldn't get the lamp to work.

I love it when the silly morons try to use the "electric plug analogy when talking about human beings.....

 

[emilynghiem]

Libtards have absolutely equated sexuality with race. They won't talk about homosexuality without equating it with a race. This is where they get their self-righteous authority to impose their morality on others.

It's a blatantly racist argument that they persist in making—suggesting that being a morally- and psychiatrically-defective sexual pervert is equivalent to being of an ethnic minority.

Dear Bob Blaylock
I find it's a case of the shoe being on the other foot.
For too long it's the Christians criticized for judging others and for projecting their beliefs on others and through govt.

Liberals and LGBT could not see how any of this was by good intent but imagined it was all for hatred.

Now when they are caught doing the same things with their LGBT beliefs, judging others and insisting on imposing their beliefs through govt, suddenly the tables are turned.


If their intentions are good, what about Christian's whose intentions are good? If Christian's aren't allowed to incorporate their beliefs expressions and rituals through govt, who are the LGBT advocates to take their beliefs and force everyone to comply through govt?

This is to give the liberals a chance to stand and walk in the same shoes of those they criticize. They can either learn how this happens even if the intent was good, or they can decide both cases are wrong and neither sides beliefs belong in govt / public policy but should remain private free choice of belief without govt endorsement regulation or other interference

 

[toobfreak]

<snip> So many I am sure unintentionally hilarious and ironic things in that two sentences.....well that just demonstrates how hilariously ignorant you are about religion.

Hilariously ignorant about religion . . . . except that I've written a book on the subject . . . have you? And at least I know English well enough to know that it is in /THOSE/ two sentences (possessive pronoun) and not in "that" two sentences. You shouldn't mix the singular tense with the plural.

When you can communicate in at least the 8th grade level, get back to us with your ruminations on the finer points of religion.

 

[Montrovant]

<snip> So many I am sure unintentionally hilarious and ironic things in that two sentences.....well that just demonstrates how hilariously ignorant you are about religion.

Hilariously ignorant about religion . . . . except that I've written a book on the subject . . . have you? And at least I know English well enough to know that it is in /THOSE/ two sentences (possessive pronoun) and not in "that" two sentences. You shouldn't mix the singular tense with the plural.

When you can communicate in at least the 8th grade level, get back to us with your ruminations on the finer points of religion.

Did you write a book about religion in which you claimed Islam is more than 2000 years old? You made that claim in the post he was quoting, when you said:

the Bible condemns homosexuality as a perversion, 2000 years ago, the Muslims even longer and still to this day

Everything I've ever read about Islam says that it began in the 7th century AD, much less than 2000 years ago. How could Muslims have been condemning homosexuality as a perversion longer than 2000 years ago if Islam did not even exist that far back?

You're certainly correct that 'that' should not have been used in Syriusly's sentence, however. Of course, you made your own tense error when you said "the Bible condemns homosexuality as a perversion, 2000 years ago." Condemned would be the right word to use when describing something from 2000 years ago. That entire sentence seems to have some questionable grammar, if you want to bring that sort of thing up.

 

[toobfreak]

Did you write a book about religion in which you claimed Islam is more than 2000 years old? Everything I've ever read about Islam says that it began in the 7th century AD,

Please look for the substance rather than the literal. My book is not about general religion much less Islamic faith and I never said that Islam was over 2000 years old. I was saying that while Christian views have softened on the matter, Islamic views have not. BTW, Muhammad is believed to have been born in 570CE.

Of course, you made your own tense error when you said "the Bible condemns homosexuality as a perversion, 2000 years ago." Condemned would be the right word to use when describing something from 2000 years ago.

The Bible /condemns/ sexual perversion, it did not "condemn" it. You are mistaking something as a discreet textural post action which is over that happened at a given time and date with a word which is living, organic, ongoing, eternal, and whose word continues to condemn it with the same weight and validity as when originally spoken. Tense is correct.

 

[Syriusly]

Right now, the Supreme Court is hearing a case of a baker who has had his business shut down because he didn't want to be forced to make art affirming same-sex relations.

Well that's not true. The case before the SCOTUS is Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. The incident where Mr. Phillips refused service occurred on in July 2012. The case was heard just this month by the SCOTUS for oral arguments.

The government has taken no action to "shut down" Mr. Phillips's cakeshop and it is still open for business and doing just fine. -->> MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP | great cakes since 1993 | 303.763.5754


>>>>

. Anyway, if the Supreme Court doesn't liberate this man from libtard tyranny, his choice will be to allow himself to be raped, or to go out of business.

Wow- which public accommodations law requires business owners to get raped?

You poor little snowflakes.....after 50 years of laws being in place that requires anyone to serve a Christian- regardless of whether or not they despise Christians- when Christians are told that they have to follow the same law- well to Christians that means they are being raped.

You poor little snowflakes.

 

[Syriusly]

Yes....they haven't been taught bigotry yet.

Hope they get taught the difference between a rectum and a vagina.

And you seriously want anyone to believe you’re straight?

You cannot make this shit up!

I don't really give a flying ****. Think what you want, if you think at all.

I know the difference between a rectum and a vagina..

To Pops, the difference between a rectum and a vagina is that a rectum is what Pop talks out of, and a vagina is a mythical destination that he dreams of someday reaching.

 

[Syriusly]

Did you write a book about religion in which you claimed Islam is more than 2000 years old? Everything I've ever read about Islam says that it began in the 7th century AD,

Please look for the substance rather than the literal. My book is not about general religion much less Islamic faith and I never said that Islam was over 2000 years old.

Well its a good thing that your 'book' isn't about religion- though why you seem to have need to brag about some book you claim to have written on some unannounced topic- but yes you did claim that Muslims have been condemning homosexuality for more than 2,000 years

Quote you:
the Bible condemns homosexuality as a perversion, 2000 years ago, the Muslims even longer

There were no Muslims 2,000 years ago.

Not a single one.

Which was why I found your claim to be rather amusing.

But do be proud about your book, and bring it up often as an example of your intellectual superiority- and tell us more about those Muslims condemning homosexuality more than 2,000 years ago.

LOL

 

[Syriusly]

Yes....they haven't been taught bigotry yet.

Hope they get taught the difference between a rectum and a vagina.

Tell us how you told your kids the difference between a rectum and a vagina?

All straight. Nuff said.

So you told your 5 year olds the difference between a rectum and a vagina by saying:

"All straight. Nuff said'

Well that does seem like typical Contard sex ed.

It’s a bit like asking when you taught your child to breath.

So when did ya sport?

What sport?

Our sex talk with our kid was more than "All Straight, Nuff said".

 

[Syriusly]

Homos think they can impregnate fecal matter

I decided to support the LGBTFAG cause, so I bought a lamp with a lesbian electric plug. I tried plugging into the wall outlet. I'm sure it's just my ignorance, but I couldn't get the lamp to work.

Poor little contard.

But I bet that the lamp shop got a good laugh when he came in asking for a lesbian electric plug.

Or hell- if it was a Christian lamp shop- maybe they quickly locked the doors and put the closed sign out

 

[Syriusly]

American Men Are Still Being Arrested for Sodomy

One example includes a string of about a dozen undercover arrests by East Baton Rouge Parish police targeting gay men in a park. The arrests, which stretched over a 10 year period until 2013, demonstrate how problematic state laws can be when they contradict court rulings.


“Cops would sit in public parks in unmarked cars, propositioning [men] for sex, then when the men agreed, the police would arrest them for attempted crimes against nature,” says Matt Patterson, managing director of Equality Louisiana. “People were being arrested for agreeing to have sex in private at a future time.”

I call solid digestive waste from a male bovine.

I note that you are citing a ****** source, which any rational person would recognize as uncredible. And aside from that, the manner in which this is being claimed to have been done would constitute entrapment on the part of the officers, an illegal practice that would get them fired at the very least, and any charges thus raised thrown out of court.

In short, the source which you quote is—as is all that it is capable of doing—flat-out lying.

Arkansas and Indiana banned gays from teaching in public schools- and you folks tried to ban them from teaching in California Briggs Initiative - Wikipedia

That's just plain common sense and common decency. Dangerous, mentally- and morally-defective sexual perverts should never be put in position of power an authority over children. Why is it that those on your side are so eager to hand children over to these sick perverts? Anyone who would willingly have any part in that belongs in prison, or at the end of a rope.

Different source. Although it cites the Advocate, that would be the Baton Rouge newspaper, and it also quotes a statement from the East Baton Rouge Sheriff's Office: EBRSO under fire after park arrest, nat'l criticism from gay community

Here's an article about 2 men arrested for crimes against nature, also in Louisiana, in 2015: 2 men charged with a crime against nature | The Sanchez Law Firm, LLC

Here's the LA Times talking about this as well: Sodomy laws that won't die

And here is another article from allchristiannews.com about the Louisiana arrests: Anti-Sodomy Law: LA Police Target and Arrests Gay Men Who Agreed To $ex With Undercover Agents - Christian Blog

Just to try to counter the idea that it is about the "****** source."

I am pretty sure Bob just considers all of them to be '****** sources' regardless.

 

[Syriusly]

That is not the same as public accommodations at a company storefront open to the public.

The law says it is, and that you can't discriminate on the basis of sexuality any more than you can skin color.

And this bothers you? All of it, or just the gay part?

So, I guess we will have to hire convicted child molesters as school teachers.

Sigh- Little Nipper once again demonstrating her amazing ability to not have a clue about the law.

Does the law say that you can't discriminate against child sex molesters in school hiring?

No.

Are convicted sex offenders (in most states if not all) prevented by law from working at schools?

Yes.

Is Little Nipper a flaming idiot?

Yes.

 

[Syriusly]

A person cannot change his natural skin color. There is no sexual activity I know of that a person cannot live without. (see the above)

Sexual attraction of malleable. It's denial of reality to insist homosexuals can't change

Homosexuals- and heterosexuals- can indeed have sex with genders that they aren't attracted to.

Sexual attraction itself is a rather mysterious thing. Not 'malleable' but often not just binary. But there is no proven way to 'change' sexual attraction. Despite the best efforts of Christians to drive the gay out of people through everything from torture to electric shock treatments to castration.

 

[Syriusly]

Libtards have absolutely equated sexuality with race. They won't talk about homosexuality without equating it with a race. This is where they get their self-righteous authority to impose their morality on others.

It's a blatantly racist argument that they persist in making—suggesting that being a morally- and psychiatrically-defective sexual pervert is equivalent to being of an ethnic minority.

The interesting thing is that pretty much most people who are racist against blacks- are also flaming homophobic bigots also.

 

[Syriusly]

I decided to support the LGBTFAG cause, so I bought a lamp with a lesbian electric plug. I tried plugging into the wall outlet. I'm sure it's just my ignorance, but I couldn't get the lamp to work.

View attachment 167358

 

[Syriusly]

Did you write a book about religion in which you claimed Islam is more than 2000 years old? Everything I've ever read about Islam says that it began in the 7th century AD,

Please look for the substance rather than the literal.

How ironic coming from the grammar police....

 

[Syriusly]

To swing back to the poor little snowflakes who are being persecuted by being told that they have to follow the same laws that protect them from discrimination.....

For 200 years Christian Conservatives actually persecuted gays in America- passing laws that could throw gays in jail, passing laws to have gays banned from employment, passing laws against even publishing anything that mentioned gays.

For the snowflakes to call being held to the same law that says a Jew can't refuse to sell to a Christian- 'persecution' is just an insult to not only gays- but to every other minority in America who has also suffered actual persecution.

 

[Pop23]

Hope they get taught the difference between a rectum and a vagina.

And you seriously want anyone to believe you’re straight?

You cannot make this shit up!

I don't really give a flying ****. Think what you want, if you think at all.

I know the difference between a rectum and a vagina..

To Pops, the difference between a rectum and a vagina is that a rectum is what Pop talks out of, and a vagina is a mythical destination that he dreams of someday reaching.

Lol, you make me laugh.

To you the sight of anus is heaven on earth.

 

[Pop23]

To swing back to the poor little snowflakes who are being persecuted by being told that they have to follow the same laws that protect them from discrimination.....

For 200 years Christian Conservatives actually persecuted gays in America- passing laws that could throw gays in jail, passing laws to have gays banned from employment, passing laws against even publishing anything that mentioned gays.

For the snowflakes to call being held to the same law that says a Jew can't refuse to sell to a Christian- 'persecution' is just an insult to not only gays- but to every other minority in America who has also suffered actual persecution.

The whole time they should have taxed you at 110%.

 

[Pop23]

Libtards have absolutely equated sexuality with race. They won't talk about homosexuality without equating it with a race. This is where they get their self-righteous authority to impose their morality on others.

It's a blatantly racist argument that they persist in making—suggesting that being a morally- and psychiatrically-defective sexual pervert is equivalent to being of an ethnic minority.

The interesting thing is that pretty much most people who are racist against blacks- are also flaming homophobic bigots also.

I find it funny how desperately you want to be equated with black discrimination, yet have zero in common with it