Allegations of 'Muslim Ban' were leveled by Washington - State, not "the Government" as per the definitions set out by the court in prior pages.
Page 19 - The Government has not shown that it is likely to succeed on appeal on its arguments about, at least, the States’ Due Process Clause claim, and we also note the serious nature of the allegations the States have raised with respect to their religious discrimination claims. We express no view as to any of the States’ other claims.
Re page 25 comment - They should be because that was a false narrative created by the media. Trump's statement and platform was /always/ that a temporary ban should be instated until one can figure out the vetting system that works. This fact is made undeniable by his campaign platform on the subject and as reported widely by the non-msm - "Trump proposed “extreme vetting” of immigrants, a temporary suspension of immigration from “dangerous and volatile” regions, and the creation of new alliances, including with Russia, to combat ISIS." -
Trump Targets Terrorism in Latest Campaign Reboot | RealClearPolitics! (just as an example)
Re Page 6 comment - "serious allegations"
Re page 28 &29 comment - "freedom from discrimination"
Those are both direct reflections