I see you continue to chop up my posts instead of writing whole responses. It causes a disconnected conversation. But I have come to expect that from the right because the truth is always their menace that needs to be obscured. Also, wasn't it you who chastises for name calling? Better take your own advice windbag.
And I see that you continue to emulate Obama and blather on incoherently rather than address the points I am making. But I have come to expect that from the left because they have always believed that if they drown poeple in bullshit no one will notice that they are not actually saying anything. By the way, I never chastise anyone for name calling. In fact, when people call me on calling them names I usually point out that telling them that they are spouting talking points is not calling them names. I am quite capable of calling people names, and will do so, I just rarely do. If I called you one you deserved it, in my opinion, so stop whining.
If I am spouting everything Governor Walker says it must be because he is using the same facts I am to make his point. I have not read anything he is saying, nor have I listened to his speeches. Why should I? I am watching the very same battle being fought in California, and watching Democrats point out the facts.
Whatever happened in that phone conversation, Obama actually sent in troublemakers from across the country. The fact that I have not condemned him for using a tried and true political technique shows that I, at least, have honesty going for me. The fact that you condemn Walker for thinking about doing what Obama did, but say nothing about Obama doing, shows me you are a hack.
No, two wrongs do not make a right. However, one right, and another, more stance, do make a right. By the way, if you think only people who supported Obama have a right to be disappointed, I expect you to stop whining about everything Bush did, because I know you did not vote for him.
No it it not. Personal responsibility comes from one's actions. He admitted to thinking about sending in troublemakers, which would have been an acceptable, if sleazy, tactic. He did not do so. What, exactly, do you think I should hold him accountable for? Not doing something I personally consider sleazy? Would not that require me, if I was going to be intellectually honest, to hold Obama responsible for being sleazy, and not excuse it because he is not actually qualified to be in the position he is?
Interesting. But why are you blaming Walker for something I got from a newspaper story? Does calling Walker a liar for something I never said he said make you a liar?
Just a point that you might want to consider. Just because the rates are below the national average, that does not mean they are actually competitive in the state. The fact that an official worded his statement to mention national average, when the article I read mentions that the prices are high for Wisconsin, makes me suspicious. It would make you suspicious too if you were honest. I really love that the trust manages to compete with itself. How, exactly, do they do that?
No, I get to point out that they made a choice when they went to work for the government, and that, if they choose to make a career out of government work, they get better job security, and better benefits. Whining about the fact that they get paid less on top of that is nothing but greed.
That is how personal responsibility actually works, just so you know.
He is not slashing their pay, he is asking them to pay contribute more to future benefits. Even with their increased contributions, they will still pay less than any other group of state workers, or federal government workers, do. What, exactly, is your beef again? Do you really expect me to support unadulterated greed at the expense of the middle class in Wisconsin?
You really are stupid, aren't you? Teachers are free to work part time, and often take a teaching job so they can continue studying, at least the best ones do. Last time I looked, nurses were not state employees. As for snowplows, I understand they routinely wreck cars, because it is impossible to see them in snow drifts. Why should anyone pay top dollar to prevent the unpreventable?
It seems to me that what you want is to pay top dollar because you seem to think that no one will do these jobs unless you do. It does not work that way, and the best and the brightest will get better money elsewhere no matter how much you try to pay them. Personally, I would rather have people doing it that were there because that is what they want to be doing, not because they like the money.
You are right that it is class warfare, you just have the sides wrong.
So I say to you and all the authoritarian followers and worshipers of the despot Walkers of the world...it will not stop with schoolteachers, nurses, EMT's, snowplow drivers or unions...
When the Nazis came for the schoolteachers,
I remained silent;
I was not a schoolteacher.
Actually, if the Nazi's ever do show up again, and go after idiots like you, I will be tempted to cheer them on. I hope that I will not, but I will honestly be tempted to do so, the world would be just a little more bearable without your constant whining.