1. Romney's essentially endorsed the Ryan plan,
Good point and an excellent reason to vote for Romney.
which effectively destroys both Medicare and Social Security Insurance while ramping up spending for the military.
Unsupported.
Edited.
Even with the dramatic cuts in social programs, Ryan's budget still scores high deficit spending because of massive tax cuts.
False.
Edited.
The fact is that the Ryan plan spend the same on Social Security as Obama proposed. The demagoguery you post is simply false.
{Of the $5 trillion in savings in the Ryan plan’s ten-year spending projections, compared with Obama’s, $352 billion would come from discretionary programs, $2.5 trillion from so-called entitlements, and $514 billion from interest costs. A big chunk of the savings would come from the repeal of the president’s health-care law ($1.6 trillion). As you can see, Social Security ($10.5 trillion) is untouched in the PTP.}
Obama's Entrepreneurial Communist Manifesto - Chuck Norris - Page 2
2. Romney foreign policy and national defense chops were put on display at several different times and came up extremely lacking.
Oh?
Did he fail to bow to Arab dictators?
Aside from his Olympic kerfuffle which really should have been a piece of cake for Romney, his cold war orientation toward Russia and China could prove as dangerous as Bush's. Even more so given the geopolitical climate. The middle east has changed in some very dramatic ways and the support of nations that sit on the security council is key to furthering American interests in the region.
Ah yes, Obama complaining of outsourcing to China is good, since he attacks American business and American entrepreneurs.
But Romney naming China an economic threat is "cold war rhetoric" since he fails to pillory America.
That and he was critical of Obama's statement that he would go after Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan. Until after Bin Laden was dead. Then Romney "evolved".
It's funny how the left speaks of "international law," until Dear Leader violates it and the sovereignty of a supposed ally - then it is of no concern.
Nixon violating the border of Cambodia? Impeachable.
Obama violating the border of Pakistan? Impeccable.
Edited.
3. Romney's business "acumen" seems to be the notion of "creative destruction". He was one of the architects of the outsourcing and offshoring that went up like gang busters during the Bush administration.
It appears that falsehood and demagoguery is literally the extent of your arguments.
He was a proponent of letting the Auto industry die (Until he again "evolved).
You mean, letting the UAW fail?
The industry was in no danger. Hyundai as owner of GM is actually more appealing to me than a fascist coalition of the UAW and the Federal Government.
This might have been turned to his advantage had he pointed out that he knows exactly what conditions send jobs overseas and knows how to change them in order to keep jobs here. But he basically just denied having anything to do with outsourcing.
Ah, a false dichotomy formed around a straw man.
Edited.
4. Romney's time as governor shows a man that was interested in the job for 2 years..then got tired of it. His last 2 years..he didn't do much but explore the possiblities of his next steps. His approval rating was so low in Massachusettes, he decided not to run again, focusing his sites on a Presidential run. And his record in Massachusettes is mixed at best. But his crowing achievement, RomneyCare, he's basically disowned.
Shows to whom? A die hard partisan with zero objectivity?
(teasing)
