Publius1787
Gold Member
- Jan 11, 2011
- 6,211
- 676
- 190
- Thread starter
- #41
That would be both funny and awesome. Obama loves his NLRB and has nominated some pretty radical people to the board.
Won't happen. When the NLRB is re-ratified next month, the Senate will note the previous decisions are good, but to make sure, the NLRB will merely ratify them again before SCOTUS opines.
Oh, my dear Starkey; the gift of ignorance that keeps on giving. Your simple mindedness is funny, but not necessary. Your argument lies within the "De Facto Officer Doctrine." Look it up. Isn't it a shame that you are so ill-equipped to debate me on this issue that I need to throw you a bone of knowledge so as to make up for your ignorance? Here you go ol simple minded one. >>> De Facto Officer Law & Legal Definition
De Facto Officer refers to an officer holding a colorable right or title to the office accompanied by possession. The lawful acts of an officer de facto, so far as the rights of third persons are concerned, when done within the scope and by the apparent authority of office, are valid and binding.
The de facto officer doctrine confers validity upon acts performed by a person acting under the color of official title even though it is later discovered that the legality of that persons appointment or election to office is deficient.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0]Billy Madison - Ultimate Insult (Academic Decathlon)[Forum Weapon][How To Troll][Ignorance Is Bliss] - YouTube[/ame]
.
Oh please @JakeStarkey, I await your enlightened reply.