Will the release of the Karmelo Anthony video end the politics over the murder or increase the political divide?

No you are just whining over being exposed as a liar with every post

Address the facts boy
We've been over the facts.

Rittenhouse fantasized about shooting people, went to a place where he could find trouble, and shot three people.

And because of an inept prosecutor, a senile judge, and some really unethical lawyers, he got away with it.
 
You tried to claim the jury refused to consider it.
No, they weren't allowed to consider NEGLIGENT manslaughter.

They were allowed to consider manslaughter and murder.

Unlike Caysen Allison, who got a consideration for negligent manslaughter and only got 10 years.

Because White privilege is a thing in this country.
 
We've been over the facts.

Rittenhouse fantasized about shooting people, went to a place where he could find trouble, and shot three people.

And because of an inept prosecutor, a senile judge, and some really unethical lawyers, he got away with it.
Yes we have and YOU keep lying about the facts

The HOMELESS guy was NOT half the size of Rittenhouse. Yet You keep claiming he was.

HOMELESS people are often dangerous violent criminal so his being HOMELESS is irrelevant

The HOMELESS guy attemoted to take Rittenhouse gun which means being unarmed is irrelevant

The judge was alert and correct. THAT IS FACT. He was not senile THAT IS A FACT The prosecution never had a case. THAT IS A FACT.The lawyers did nothing unethical at all and Rittenouse acted correctly in self defense. TJOSE ARE ******* FACTS

THOSE ARE FACTS

You have lied repeatedly that Rittenhouse shot into the crowd he did not whatsoever

You have lied like a pig repeatedly that they were trying to apprehend him THEY WERE ATTACKING HIM

You ar ea dishonest coward and sack of shit with no integrity

This is how we KNOW you are a stolen valor scum who never served
 
if he kept his fat ass in Antioch, that wouldn't have been an issue.

Of course most of the people he shot were trying to hold him for the police after he shot the first guy.
If the mob of criminals who tried to beat him to death had stayed home those criminals would be alive.

See how that works?
 
No, they weren't allowed to consider NEGLIGENT manslaughter.

They were allowed to consider manslaughter and murder.

Unlike Caysen Allison, who got a consideration for negligent manslaughter and only got 10 years.

Because White privilege is a thing in this country.
That charge is for killing people with a motor vehicle or the like. Ya know, accidents. Your murderer didn’t accidentally shove his knife into the heart of the other kid, Dumbass.

Stop whining about a charge that wouldn’t apply. Furthermore, the jury decided it was murder. They rejected a lesser charge.


Your murderer made several bad decisions.
 
No, they weren't allowed to consider NEGLIGENT manslaughter.

They were allowed to consider manslaughter and murder.

Unlike Caysen Allison, who got a consideration for negligent manslaughter and only got 10 years.

Because White privilege is a thing in this country.
Because negligent homicide doesn't apply, Dumbass.
 
No, they weren't allowed to consider NEGLIGENT manslaughter.

They were allowed to consider manslaughter and murder.

Unlike Caysen Allison, who got a consideration for negligent manslaughter and only got 10 years.

Because White privilege is a thing in this country.
Actually, what you said was:

"Um, yeah, when you intentionally exclude black people from a jury, and then let the jury refuse to consider lesser charges, that's pretty racist. About one step above a lynching."

You tried to claim the jury refused to consider lesser charges. That's not their job.
 
No, they weren't allowed to consider NEGLIGENT manslaughter.

They were allowed to consider manslaughter and murder.
.
And they rejected the lesser charge due to the overwhelming evidence he was guilty of murder.

Next?
 
We've been over the facts.

Rittenhouse fantasized about shooting people, went to a place where he could find trouble, and shot three people.

And because of an inept prosecutor, a senile judge, and some really unethical lawyers, he got away with it.
Link to his fantasies JoeB131 ?
 
The race baiting black people who support Karmelo do not care even a little about the facts. They just know "one of their own" is going to jail and they have to protect them against "white supremacy" . Apparently it is racist to go to jail for a crime. Warped way of thinking.
 
if he kept his fat ass in Antioch, that wouldn't have been an issue.

Of course most of the people he shot were trying to hold him for the police after he shot the first guy.
You mean the ones clubbing Rittenhouse with a five-foot-long skateboard shaped club and the other who repeatedly pointed a pistol that as a convicted felon he wasn't allowed to possess at Rittenhouse before being shot in the shoulder?
 
We've been over the facts.

Rittenhouse fantasized about shooting people, went to a place where he could find trouble, and shot three people.

And because of an inept prosecutor, a senile judge, and some really unethical lawyers, he got away with it.
Link to these fantasies>
 
No, they weren't allowed to consider NEGLIGENT manslaughter.

They were allowed to consider manslaughter and murder.

Unlike Caysen Allison, who got a consideration for negligent manslaughter and only got 10 years.

Because White privilege is a thing in this country.
Okay, here's the thing. You're big mad because the jury was not instructed to consider a charge LESSER than that which they were instructed to consider. Pay attention, because I'm going to destroy one of your favorite gripes and complaints about this trial. Given two choices, the jury went with the GREATER of the charges they were instructed to consider. Therefore, if they were given the choice of a LESSER charge, they obviously would not have gone with it because they went with the GREATER charge. Are you now willing to admit you've been blowing smoke this whole time? You're complaining the trial wasn't fair because the jury wasn't allowed to consider a charge they would not have gone with in the first place. You might as well be mad they weren't instructed to consider jaywalking.

I won't hold my breath.
 
No, they weren't allowed to consider NEGLIGENT manslaughter.

They were allowed to consider manslaughter and murder.

Unlike Caysen Allison, who got a consideration for negligent manslaughter and only got 10 years.

Because White privilege is a thing in this country.
Nope

There is no such tthing as white privilege no matter how much you screech that there is
 
15th post
if he kept his fat ass in Antioch, that wouldn't have been an issue.

Of course most of the people he shot were trying to hold him for the police after he shot the first guy.
Listen carefully you disgusting punk

You keep repeating this lie and everytime you do you PROVE what a low life scum you are

NO ONE tried to ghold him for police you dishonest ************ they ATTACKED him

This is why we know you are a dsishonest scum bag who never served , you are a failure in life and a ******* incel
 
Yes we have and YOU keep lying about the facts

The HOMELESS
Wow, you finally learned how to spell the word properly. Those special ed classes must be working.

You mean the ones clubbing Rittenhouse with a five-foot-long skateboard shaped club and the other who repeatedly pointed a pistol that as a convicted felon he wasn't allowed to possess at Rittenhouse before being shot in the shoulder?

Actually, he was shot in the arm.
Also, never convicted of felonies. Most of his "crimes" were petty kid stuff.
 
Wow, you finally learned how to spell the word properly. Those special ed classes must be working.



Actually, he was shot in the arm.
Also, never convicted of felonies. Most of his "crimes" were petty kid stuff.
Except for carrying the pistol for which his registration to conceal carry had expired. Everybody bitched and lied about Rittenhouse and how he got the rifle but Grosskreutz was the one who broke firearm laws.
 
Except for carrying the pistol for which his registration to conceal carry had expired. Everybody bitched and lied about Rittenhouse and how he got the rifle but Grosskreutz was the one who broke firearm laws.
Because Grosskreutz didn't shoot three people.

The ironic thing was that if he did put a bullet in Rittenhouse during his rampage, the usual suspects would be praising him as a "Good guy with a gun who stopped a mass shooting".
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom