There are facts you have not considered, and you guys are watching an edited video. Stop using videos with ac pepe to argue your racist opinions about Anthony as a person.
First, talk to ME about ME. I am not "you guys". That's a tactic you like to use to throw off the entire discourse.
The main fact you miss is that the Matthew twins had no authority to tell anybody to leave, and Anthony did not just walk up to Matthws and stab him as racists want to believe. There was no malice and forethought in this act.
That's your interpretation of what happened, based on what, a few headlines and your overwhelming need to believe a narrative? You do like to just state something as if it was fact when you weren't there and are only going off an opinion written by someone else who also wasn't there. The question you are carefully avoiding is, why bring a knife to a school function? He should have been summarily kicked out of the stadium for that alone. This isn't like going into a live riot to protect property where there's a good chance an outraged liberal will attack you, this is a school function where weapons are not allowed.
Secondly, the matter of the all-white jury.
The jury was not all-white, as you would know if you bothered to look past the panting headlines:
"Of the 18 total jurors and alternates, six were members of minority groups. Among the 12 jurors who ultimately heard the case and participated in deliberations, three were minorities, including individuals of Asian and Indian descent. The panel was also diverse in terms of gender, consisting of eight women and four men."
Fact Check: Karmelo Anthony’s Father Claims Jury Was ‘All-White,’ But Court Records Show a More Diverse Panel – [your]NEWS
Third, the judge and the prosecutor were friends and business associates of Matthew's father, and things were left out.
Such as? Like I said, if you have evidence the defense failed to present, why didn't you send it to them?
Fourth, the history of bullying of th Matthews brothers.
There will be an appeal, and you guys are going to be pissed at the outcome.
Like I said, I won't be very worried about it either way. If he can make a better case and get a reduced sentence, good, he got a better deal. If he cannot and stays in prison the entire length of this sentence, so be it, he couldn't make a stronger case for leniency or a reduced sentence. Either way, I'm not going to be outraged. You, OTOH, most certainly will.
Things did not happen as you want to believe.
And what is it I want to believe? Remember, we're talking about ME, not a vague cloud of poorly defined stereotypes generated from your fevered imagination. Put on the foil helmet and try real hard to read my mind. Failing that, as I know you will, feel free to ask me what I want to believe.
It IS funny how th jury is always right to you when someone white does harm to a black person when there are questionable circumstances, but if a black person is foun to be right, then there's something wrong.
Feel free as always to quote me on that. Sounds like once again you're attempting to make something up about me out of nothing. You have a bad habit of doing that, and I keep calling you on it.
The history of this country, vn mor pcificaly th stat of Tx, givs all lvk popl the right t question this cs and th procedus on uing th cu of the trial.
Of course, we all have the right to question the outcome of every trial, but we also have the responsibility to acknowledge that most of the time, the jury has access to more than just headlines and media quotes. You're starting to slide into incoherence.
Yuguys cannot vn conciv f a cnaio when the Maatthws brths cou walk up on Anthony n t aa cfrotation, which is more than likely what happened, and there are videos showing this to be the case
Th
That last was completely incoherent. Would you care to restate it in English?