Will Speaker Pelosi withhold articles of impeachment from Senate until guaranteed a fair trial?

Liar, she never had that kind of approval rating.
icon_rolleyes.gif

You have never been correct, but at least your streak of stupid is perfect

One Year Ago Today The HuffPo Gave Hillary A 98% Chance Of Being President

The man who predicted 49 out of 50 states in 2012 has said who will win on Tuesday
Dumbfuck, that's not an approval rating.

face-palm-gif.278959

Wrong again they were election predictions, fake news and lies

Were u born dumb oar dud u stubdy
Dumbfuck, an election prediction is not an approval rating. That was your idiotic claim.

face-palm-gif.278959

Hopefully you pick better stocks than you pick candidates...……………..

How is your Pokémon collection working out

I picked GOOG

Alphabet Inc. Cl C

Cant wait until the feds break them up
What does that have to do with Pelosi stringing Impeached Trump along...?
 
What a nice Christmas, yesCHRISTMAS, present from Miss Nancy to drop the ball and not complete the process
Between that and the Christmas reference the left must be apopletic
 
The Articles of Impeachment DO NOT EXPIRE - not next year; not next Congress; not ever.

They will expire when McConnell sets the trial date. Once Pisslosi doesn’t turn over the required paperwork, vote to dismiss. Case closed.
And Impeached Trump will still be impeached.

:dance:

Not if your cowardly leaders (and you know cowards wing one yourself) don’t send it to the Senate fuckwad. Process NOT complete no matter how much you cry dipshit.:fu:
 
Up and away to less than 50%?

Why do you want your taxes tripled so that illegal immigrants can get stuff they did not work for that you pay for?

Try and answer without being retarded

I didn't say I want that.

But I don't like Trump. And the majority of people don't like him either. Your "up up and away" bullshit is just stupid.
Certainly more people like his results, than like him. Personally I get a kick out of him, but, I understand that he grates on a fair number of folks.

If he would shut the fuck up, his approval rating would be way higher.
He intends to piss off morons like you.

You can leave anytime

Try Argentina or Cuba shitface

No thanks.
 
I didn't say I want that.

But I don't like Trump. And the majority of people don't like him either. Your "up up and away" bullshit is just stupid.
Certainly more people like his results, than like him. Personally I get a kick out of him, but, I understand that he grates on a fair number of folks.

If he would shut the fuck up, his approval rating would be way higher.
He has as much right to speak his mind as you and I do. Everyone is getting pretty damn sick of the Left trying to shut up everyone that disagrees with them. We damn well WILL SPEAK UP ANY DAMN TIME WE FEEL LIKE IT AND BELIEVE ANYTHING WE WANT AND SAY WHAT WE LIKE WHETHER YOU APPROVE OR NOT AND WE WHOLEHEARTEDLY SUPPORT YOUR RIGHT TO DO THE SAME!

You all like those petting zoo Republicans that fold and cower before the fake news media. Trump stands up and fights and pulls big bleeding chucks of meat out of your asses, which is EXACTLY why we elected him, and will REELECT HIM.

6w-3.jpg

Go ahead and pick a fight with Trump, he fights!

I didn't question his right to speak his mind.

I said that his approval rating is inversely related to him speaking his mind.

Hillary had a 98 percent approval rating from the fake media

SHE LOST

Trump is WINNING

What exactly does that have to do with my post?
 
Whenever anyone asks what Republicans are afraid of regarding exposing and publicizing facts abour Trump's criminal misdeeds, a response of funny :eusa_drool: face is used as a response.

Well idiot, that is because it’s YOU morons who won’t move things forward. What are you afraid of of? Oh that’s right, you have no case and will be dismissed in about 30 seconds.
 
The Democrats have worn people out on their non sense. "Mueller Time" is over folks.

It doesn't matter what Pelosi does now. She should have told the radicals to pound sand and walked before getting stuck with this as her legacy. It is an embarrassment. Attempting to remove a President on a totally party line vote? She knew better. She said so herself early in the year.

There is a good chance she just tables these Articles and never sends them to the Senate. Pelosi has no leverage over the Senate and they will quickly deal with this mess and put an end to it.
 
Trump will be IMPOTUS (iMpeached President of the United States) forever.
 
...There is no trial, please pay attention
There is no trial? I do not know what you mean by that, quite honestly.
There is no trial, no judge, no jury. Do you see any of that?...
No. I do not see that. There will be a trial in the US Senate.

On the other hand we already know that you do not know ANYTHING
Irrelevant. Unnecessary. Incorrect.
A trial has a judge and 12 impartial jurors.

That said the senate has no judge and ZERO impartial jurors

But if you want to call it a trial you may, however it would not be legal in any US court

So it is not a trial
 
Some House Democrats push Pelosi to withhold impeachment articles, delaying Senate trial

When will Speaker Pelosi send Articles of Impeachment to the Senate for trial? Apparently that is her choice if/when she sends them over for trial. It sounds like she is strategically waiting for feedback from McConnell about the rules/procedures - and FAIRNESS. If she thinks it's just going to be a sham trial - she may not send them over. The Articles of Impeachment DO NOT EXPIRE - not next year; not next Congress; not ever.

What do you think?

Ah, but the peoples appitite for this moronic behavior from Democrats does expire....Pelosi continues to show that she, and Democrats in general should NEVER be near the levers of power.
 
...There is no trial, please pay attention
There is no trial? I do not know what you mean by that, quite honestly.
There is no trial, no judge, no jury. Do you see any of that?...
No. I do not see that. There will be a trial in the US Senate.

On the other hand we already know that you do not know ANYTHING
Irrelevant. Unnecessary. Incorrect.
A trial has a judge and 12 impartial jurors.

That said the senate has no judge and ZERO impartial jurors

But if you want to call it a trial you may, however it would not be legal in any US court
Sigh... you don't do very well with functional metaphors, do you? :21:
Who is the presiding judge over the trial?
Who picks the impartial jurors?
Or are you stupid enough to claim that sitting US senators are impartial?

There will be no trial

Just a fact
 
Why do you want your taxes tripled so that illegal immigrants can get stuff they did not work for that you pay for?

Try and answer without being retarded

I didn't say I want that.

But I don't like Trump. And the majority of people don't like him either. Your "up up and away" bullshit is just stupid.

You either want that or will vote for Trump, or not vote. If you are here you value your opinion and your vote as you should.

So,

Why do you want your taxes tripled so that illegal immigrants can get stuff they did not work for that you pay for?

You can't answer, no one can they just go into Trump tantrums like you just did.

If you thought about this and tried to answer you would vote for Trump like MLKs niece Alveda did

I did answer. Here, I'll repeat it for you. "I didn't say I want that." Maybe you should read that again.

I'll vote anyone over Trump.

You have 2 choices, vote so that you pay for illegal immigrants healthcare or vote for Trump. Your only other choice is not to vote.

See you seem to be demanding a candidate that wants what you do and it does not work that way.

So you vote for Trump or you want your taxes tripled so that illegal immigrants can get stuff they did not work for that you pay for?

Might not be fair but socialism and communism leaves you with no rights

MAGA or die

I'm going to vote for the one that I like most or despise less. This isn't rocket science.

Just because I vote for someone doesn't necessarily mean that I endorse every single thing on their agenda. I think Trump is a narcissistic asshole who is completely unfit for office. I would vote for just about anyone over him.

So you're going with the Communists, then.
 
Trump will be IMPOTUS (iMpeached President of the United States) forever.

So what if Trump is impeached? He will be re-elected easily and replace RBG, how does that grab ya?
Then he will replace Breyer, then I hope he will also replace Thomas if he wants his seat to be saved by a young conservative and retires.

Being impeached just gets Trump's name in the history books more often, and it fits with his "bad boy" reputation.
 
Some House Democrats push Pelosi to withhold impeachment articles, delaying Senate trial

When will Speaker Pelosi send Articles of Impeachment to the Senate for trial? Apparently that is her choice if/when she sends them over for trial. It sounds like she is strategically waiting for feedback from McConnell about the rules/procedures - and FAIRNESS. If she thinks it's just going to be a sham trial - she may not send them over. The Articles of Impeachment DO NOT EXPIRE - not next year; not next Congress; not ever.

What do you think?

Yeah um she can wait forever... unfortunately though that won't work..
If they keep the house the articles will stay active....if they lose it....probably will....they will be rescinded. If she waits too long they may be nullified by the federal court's.... See what she can't do is to force the Senate to do what she wants it to do. She's not the majority leader of the Senate and 2020 looks pretty good for keeping the Senate in GOP hands. Hell she can keep them for the next 6 years....she might as well.....don't think she's going to keep her gavel though.

Jo
 
...There is no trial, please pay attention
There is no trial? I do not know what you mean by that, quite honestly.
There is no trial, no judge, no jury. Do you see any of that?...
No. I do not see that. There will be a trial in the US Senate.

On the other hand we already know that you do not know ANYTHING
Irrelevant. Unnecessary. Incorrect.
A trial has a judge and 12 impartial jurors.

That said the senate has no judge and ZERO impartial jurors

But if you want to call it a trial you may, however it would not be legal in any US court

So it is not a trial

OMG, listen up. I'm only going to post this once:

1 The senate will have Supreme Court Justice Roberts presiding, so there is a "judge"
2. The senate rules are that a simple majority vote can overrule a Roberts decision
3. This will be an "impeachment trial" as prescribed in the US Constitution. If Nancy ever forwards the Articles to the Senate

4. U.S. Senate: Impeachment

"In impeachment proceedings, the House of Representatives charges an official of the federal government by approving, by majority vote, articles of impeachment. A committee of representatives, called “managers,” acts as prosecutors before the Senate. The Senate sits as a High Court of Impeachment in which senators consider evidence, hear witnesses, and vote to acquit or convict the impeached official. In the case of presidential impeachment trials, the chief justice of the United States presides. The Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached official upon conviction is removal from office. In some cases, the Senate has also disqualified such officials from holding public offices in the future. There is no appeal. Since 1789, about half of Senate impeachment trials have resulted in conviction and removal from office."

5. Article Two of the United States Constitution - Wikipedia
Section 4: Impeachment
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

The Constitution also allows for involuntary removal from office of the president, vice president, Cabinet secretaries, and other executive officers, as well as judges, who may be impeached by the House of Representatives and tried in the Senate.

Any official convicted by the Senate is immediately removed from office, and the Senate may also order, by a simple majority, that the removed official be forever disqualified from holding any federal office.[49][50][51]

While no other punishments may be inflicted pursuant to the impeachment proceeding, the convicted party remains liable to trial and punishment in the courts for civil and criminal charges
 
...There is no trial, please pay attention
There is no trial? I do not know what you mean by that, quite honestly.
There is no trial, no judge, no jury. Do you see any of that?...
No. I do not see that. There will be a trial in the US Senate.

On the other hand we already know that you do not know ANYTHING
Irrelevant. Unnecessary. Incorrect.
A trial has a judge and 12 impartial jurors.

That said the senate has no judge and ZERO impartial jurors

But if you want to call it a trial you may, however it would not be legal in any US court

So it is not a trial

OMG, listen up. I'm only going to post this once:

1 The senate will have Supreme Court Justice Roberts presiding, so there is a "judge"
2. The senate rules are that a simple majority vote can overrule a Roberts decision
3. This will be an "impeachment trial" as prescribed in the US Constitution. If Nancy ever forwards the Articles to the Senate

4. U.S. Senate: Impeachment

"In impeachment proceedings, the House of Representatives charges an official of the federal government by approving, by majority vote, articles of impeachment. A committee of representatives, called “managers,” acts as prosecutors before the Senate. The Senate sits as a High Court of Impeachment in which senators consider evidence, hear witnesses, and vote to acquit or convict the impeached official. In the case of presidential impeachment trials, the chief justice of the United States presides. The Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached official upon conviction is removal from office. In some cases, the Senate has also disqualified such officials from holding public offices in the future. There is no appeal. Since 1789, about half of Senate impeachment trials have resulted in conviction and removal from office."

5. Article Two of the United States Constitution - Wikipedia
Section 4: Impeachment
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

The Constitution also allows for involuntary removal from office of the president, vice president, Cabinet secretaries, and other executive officers, as well as judges, who may be impeached by the House of Representatives and tried in the Senate.

Any official convicted by the Senate is immediately removed from office, and the Senate may also order, by a simple majority, that the removed official be forever disqualified from holding any federal office.[49][50][51]

While no other punishments may be inflicted pursuant to the impeachment proceeding, the convicted party remains liable to trial and punishment in the courts for civil and criminal charges

Again any trial must have an impartial jury of ones peers. The sitting senate can not in any way and under any circumstance pass a jury questionnaire of impartiality. So without an impartial jury the system would not be legal in any court. I have been a jury foreman, it's not rocket science unless I get technical that is

Bye the way genius in any real court Roberts would have to disqualify himself, so there is no legit judge presiding. LOL if shitomayor was the chief justice and having said that no honkey like Trump could ever have the wisdom of a wise Latina judge was the judge would that be fair.

It's a fucking joke
 
Last edited:
Some House Democrats push Pelosi to withhold impeachment articles, delaying Senate trial

When will Speaker Pelosi send Articles of Impeachment to the Senate for trial? Apparently that is her choice if/when she sends them over for trial. It sounds like she is strategically waiting for feedback from McConnell about the rules/procedures - and FAIRNESS. If she thinks it's just going to be a sham trial - she may not send them over. The Articles of Impeachment DO NOT EXPIRE - not next year; not next Congress; not ever.

What do you think?

Yeah um she can wait forever... unfortunately though that won't work..
If they keep the house the articles will stay active....if they lose it....probably will....they will be rescinded. If she waits too long they may be nullified by the federal court's.... See what she can't do is to force the Senate to do what she wants it to do. She's not the majority leader of the Senate and 2020 looks pretty good for keeping the Senate in GOP hands. Hell she can keep them for the next 6 years....she might as well.....don't think she's going to keep her gavel though.

Jo
Pelosi will be dead in 3 years tops...……….
 
Speaker Pelosi refused to answer that question a few minutes ago.

Its because she is inebriated...

She doesn't drink alcohol. Stop lying.

Speaker Pelosi doesn't drink alcohol

Funny that her daughter calls her "speaker Pelosi".

Maybe Speaker Pelosi doesn't drink, but her mama Pelosi certainly does.

Based on her recent decisions, it seems that alcohol is her primary political and spiritual adviser.

upload_2019-12-22_16-51-11.png
 
Speaker Pelosi refused to answer that question a few minutes ago.

Its because she is inebriated...

She doesn't drink alcohol. Stop lying.

Speaker Pelosi doesn't drink alcohol

Funny that her daughter calls her "speaker Pelosi".

Maybe Speaker Pelosi doesn't drink, but her mama Pelosi certainly does.

Based on her recent decisions, it seems that alcohol is her primary political and spiritual adviser.

Speaker Pelosi doesn't drink alcohol. Her daughter even confirmed that fact.

A self-described satirical website made up a story about House Speaker Nancy Pelosi being kicked out of an event after a “drunken outburst.” That bogus story since has been posted on other websites without being labeled as satire.

This is not the first time that Pelosi has been the target of false claims about alcohol, even though Pelosi’s office has told FactCheck.org on two other occasions that she does not drink alcohol: once in 2010, amid accusations of Pelosi spending taxpayer dollars on partying during air travel, and again in May, when two videos were manipulated to make Pelosi’s words sound slurred.

Another Bogus Claim About Nancy Pelosi

tom-pantsonfire.gif


Claim about Nancy Pelosi bar tab is baseless
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top