Will Republicans ever admit the mess they left President Obama?

[healthmyths]

That's all other "cable" networks, Faun...get your facts straight!

My facts were perfectly straight. Thanks for checking though.

Fox is a cable news network... who did you think I was referring to when I boxed their competitors in with, "their competitors?"

Because ABC,CBS, NBC are all network news which combined have more fewer then the "fair and balanced" Fox. I used that term because see unlike
the rest of the biased media for the most part Fox is a journalistic professional group versus the above mentioned networks that and again facts support my
point:
The MSM in 2008 over 85% of media donated money to Democrats!
1,160 (85%) of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters

Plus here you have a "professional journalist"???

This same MSM that LOVES Obama so much that here in the words of a MSM publication says it all!
The Editor of NewsWeek, Evan Thomas was once asked about George Bush and this is his response.
"our job is to bash the president[Bush], that's what we do." Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington, February 2, 2007.He-Could-Go-All-The-Way: 'Today' Cheers Obama's Football Play

RIGHT HIS job was to BASH Bush. He is a journalist. Unbiased. Objective. Professional. RIGHT??

But when it came to Obama???
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist- Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’
A professional NEWS editor calling a mortal man "sort of God"??? That's not reporting, that's gushing!

So again tell me the MSM is not biased?

Research on Media Bias - Discover the Networks

• In 1964, 94% of media professionals voted for Democrat Lyndon Johnson over Republican Barry Goldwater.
• In 1968, 86% voted for Democrat Hubert Humphrey over Republican Richard Nixon.
• In 1972, 81% voted for Democrat George McGovern over the incumbent Nixon.
• In 1976, 81% voted for Democrat Jimmy Carter over Republican Gerald Ford.
• In 1980, twice as many cast their ballots for Carter rather than for Republican Ronald Reagan.
• In 1984, 58% supported Democrat Walter Mondale, whom Reagan defeated in the biggest landslide in presidential election history.
• In 1988, White House correspondents from various major newspapers, television networks, magazines, and news services supported Democrat Michael Dukakis over Republican George H.W. Bush by a ratio of 12-to-1.
• In 1992, those same correspondents supported Democrat Bill Clinton over the incumbent Bush by a ratio of 9 to 2.
• Among Washington bureau chiefs and congressional correspondents, the disparity was 89% vs. 7%, in Clinton’s favor.
• In a 2004 poll of campaign journalists, those based outside of Washington, DC supported Democrat John Kerry over Republican George W. Bush by a ratio of 3-to-1. Those based inside the Beltway favored Kerry by a 12-to-1 ratio.
• In a 2008 survey of 144 journalists nationwide, journalists were 8 times likelier to make campaign contributions to Democrats than to Republicans.
• A 2008 Investors Business Daily study put the campaign donation ratio at 11.5-to-1, in favor of Democrats.
• In terms of total dollars given, the ratio was 15-to-1.
• In a 1981 study of 240 journalists nationwide, 65% identified themselves as liberals, 17% as conservatives.In a 1983 study of news reporters, executives, and staffers, 32% identified themselves as liberals, 11% as conservatives.
• In a 1992 study of more than 1,400 journalists, 44% identified themselves as liberals, 22% as conservatives.
• In a 1996 study of Washington bureau chiefs and congressional correspondents, 61% identified themselves as liberals, 9% as conservatives.
• In a 1996 study of 1,037 journalists, the respondents identified themselves as liberals 4 times more frequently than as conservatives. Among journalists working for newspapers with circulations exceeding 50,000, the ratio of liberals to conservatives was 5.4 to 1.
• In a 2004 Pew Research Center study of journalists and media executives, the ratio of self-identified liberals to conservatives was 4.9 to 1.
• In a 2007 Pew Research Center study of journalists and news executives, the ratio was 4 liberals for each conservative.
  

 

[Faun]

That's all other "cable" networks, Faun...get your facts straight!

My facts were perfectly straight. Thanks for checking though.

Fox is a cable news network... who did you think I was referring to when I boxed their competitors in with, "their competitors?"

Because ABC,CBS, NBC are all network news which combined have more fewer then the "fair and balanced" Fox. I used that term because see unlike
the rest of the biased media for the most part Fox is a journalistic professional group versus the above mentioned networks that and again facts support my
point:
The MSM in 2008 over 85% of media donated money to Democrats!
1,160 (85%) of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters

Plus here you have a "professional journalist"???

This same MSM that LOVES Obama so much that here in the words of a MSM publication says it all!
The Editor of NewsWeek, Evan Thomas was once asked about George Bush and this is his response.
"our job is to bash the president[Bush], that's what we do." Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington, February 2, 2007.He-Could-Go-All-The-Way: 'Today' Cheers Obama's Football Play

RIGHT HIS job was to BASH Bush. He is a journalist. Unbiased. Objective. Professional. RIGHT??

But when it came to Obama???
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist- Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’
A professional NEWS editor calling a mortal man "sort of God"??? That's not reporting, that's gushing!

So again tell me the MSM is not biased?

Research on Media Bias - Discover the Networks

• In 1964, 94% of media professionals voted for Democrat Lyndon Johnson over Republican Barry Goldwater.
• In 1968, 86% voted for Democrat Hubert Humphrey over Republican Richard Nixon.
• In 1972, 81% voted for Democrat George McGovern over the incumbent Nixon.
• In 1976, 81% voted for Democrat Jimmy Carter over Republican Gerald Ford.
• In 1980, twice as many cast their ballots for Carter rather than for Republican Ronald Reagan.
• In 1984, 58% supported Democrat Walter Mondale, whom Reagan defeated in the biggest landslide in presidential election history.
• In 1988, White House correspondents from various major newspapers, television networks, magazines, and news services supported Democrat Michael Dukakis over Republican George H.W. Bush by a ratio of 12-to-1.
• In 1992, those same correspondents supported Democrat Bill Clinton over the incumbent Bush by a ratio of 9 to 2.
• Among Washington bureau chiefs and congressional correspondents, the disparity was 89% vs. 7%, in Clinton’s favor.
• In a 2004 poll of campaign journalists, those based outside of Washington, DC supported Democrat John Kerry over Republican George W. Bush by a ratio of 3-to-1. Those based inside the Beltway favored Kerry by a 12-to-1 ratio.
• In a 2008 survey of 144 journalists nationwide, journalists were 8 times likelier to make campaign contributions to Democrats than to Republicans.
• A 2008 Investors Business Daily study put the campaign donation ratio at 11.5-to-1, in favor of Democrats.
• In terms of total dollars given, the ratio was 15-to-1.

Again, we now live in the Internet age where people have a wide variety of news outlets to choose from. Your unfair Liberal media whine no longer cuts it.

And so what if those journalists donated to Democrats? Donald Trump donated to Democrats and he's vying for the Republican nomination to be president.

 

[healthmyths]

In the evening, an average of 22.1 million people watched one of the three commercial broadcast news programs on ABC, CBS or NBC in 2012, down 1.9% from 22.5 million in 2011.
» Network: By the Numbers
Fox News:
Combined, Fox News, CNN and MSNBC averaged 1.8 million viewers total-day (down 5% from 2013) and 2.85 million in primetime (down 4%).

5 facts about Fox News
In case some idiots can figure out.. Green is negative blue is positive.
Fox was tougher then CNN/MSNBC on Obama... but love and kisses from CNN/MSNBC for Obama while mostly negative stories for Romney.
Again MSM at work and you idiots that don't believe it is because well frankly you are IDIOTS!

 

[healthmyths]

That's all other "cable" networks, Faun...get your facts straight!

My facts were perfectly straight. Thanks for checking though.

Fox is a cable news network... who did you think I was referring to when I boxed their competitors in with, "their competitors?"

Because ABC,CBS, NBC are all network news which combined have more fewer then the "fair and balanced" Fox. I used that term because see unlike
the rest of the biased media for the most part Fox is a journalistic professional group versus the above mentioned networks that and again facts support my
point:
The MSM in 2008 over 85% of media donated money to Democrats!
1,160 (85%) of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters

Plus here you have a "professional journalist"???

This same MSM that LOVES Obama so much that here in the words of a MSM publication says it all!
The Editor of NewsWeek, Evan Thomas was once asked about George Bush and this is his response.
"our job is to bash the president[Bush], that's what we do." Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington, February 2, 2007.He-Could-Go-All-The-Way: 'Today' Cheers Obama's Football Play

RIGHT HIS job was to BASH Bush. He is a journalist. Unbiased. Objective. Professional. RIGHT??

But when it came to Obama???
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist- Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’
A professional NEWS editor calling a mortal man "sort of God"??? That's not reporting, that's gushing!

So again tell me the MSM is not biased?

Research on Media Bias - Discover the Networks

• In 1964, 94% of media professionals voted for Democrat Lyndon Johnson over Republican Barry Goldwater.
• In 1968, 86% voted for Democrat Hubert Humphrey over Republican Richard Nixon.
• In 1972, 81% voted for Democrat George McGovern over the incumbent Nixon.
• In 1976, 81% voted for Democrat Jimmy Carter over Republican Gerald Ford.
• In 1980, twice as many cast their ballots for Carter rather than for Republican Ronald Reagan.
• In 1984, 58% supported Democrat Walter Mondale, whom Reagan defeated in the biggest landslide in presidential election history.
• In 1988, White House correspondents from various major newspapers, television networks, magazines, and news services supported Democrat Michael Dukakis over Republican George H.W. Bush by a ratio of 12-to-1.
• In 1992, those same correspondents supported Democrat Bill Clinton over the incumbent Bush by a ratio of 9 to 2.
• Among Washington bureau chiefs and congressional correspondents, the disparity was 89% vs. 7%, in Clinton’s favor.
• In a 2004 poll of campaign journalists, those based outside of Washington, DC supported Democrat John Kerry over Republican George W. Bush by a ratio of 3-to-1. Those based inside the Beltway favored Kerry by a 12-to-1 ratio.
• In a 2008 survey of 144 journalists nationwide, journalists were 8 times likelier to make campaign contributions to Democrats than to Republicans.
• A 2008 Investors Business Daily study put the campaign donation ratio at 11.5-to-1, in favor of Democrats.
• In terms of total dollars given, the ratio was 15-to-1.

Again, we now live in the Internet age where people have a wide variety of news outlets to choose from. Your unfair Liberal media whine no longer cuts it.

And so what if those journalists donated to Democrats? Donald Trump donated to Democrats and he's vying for the Republican nomination to be president.

RIGHT but we are talking about influencing voters i.e. Boston Globe phony story about Trump will INFlUENCE idiots like you!
And YES that is what is so cool about TRUMP! He donated to Democrats and he knows what he got for it!
So yes he is a selfish greedy person and admits... versus you pompous ignorant idiots with your "Hope and Change" agenda just don't understand how
the world works. Enough of you selfish idiots.
Trump has made billions. So why is he going to all this trouble and effort to spend millions for the Presidency? What will he gain?
Well I for one like his selfish motive! He wants to keep what he has earned for his progeny! Without his selfish efforts, people like he and I will not see our
children prosper and live long lives! With Obama/Sanders agenda the USA as a land of opportunity will be destroyed unless Trump and people like me stand up!
Enough of this political correct bull crap.

 

[healthmyths]

You guys on the left hate Fox News because it's one of the few conservative outlets that exists on television!

Personally, I don't watch Fox News because they lie as much as they do.

So here you are making a "judgement about Fox News" and you don't watch it!
And what other way would you be watching other than "personal"? GEEZ you pompous butts have such ignorance!
You obviously are NOT PAID to watch TV news! Idiot.

 

[Oldstyle]

That's all other "cable" networks, Faun...get your facts straight!

My facts were perfectly straight. Thanks for checking though.

Fox is a cable news network... who did you think I was referring to when I boxed their competitors in with, "their competitors?"

Because ABC,CBS, NBC are all network news which combined have more fewer then the "fair and balanced" Fox. I used that term because see unlike
the rest of the biased media for the most part Fox is a journalistic professional group versus the above mentioned networks that and again facts support my
point:
The MSM in 2008 over 85% of media donated money to Democrats!
1,160 (85%) of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters

Plus here you have a "professional journalist"???

This same MSM that LOVES Obama so much that here in the words of a MSM publication says it all!
The Editor of NewsWeek, Evan Thomas was once asked about George Bush and this is his response.
"our job is to bash the president[Bush], that's what we do." Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington, February 2, 2007.He-Could-Go-All-The-Way: 'Today' Cheers Obama's Football Play

RIGHT HIS job was to BASH Bush. He is a journalist. Unbiased. Objective. Professional. RIGHT??

But when it came to Obama???
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist- Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’
A professional NEWS editor calling a mortal man "sort of God"??? That's not reporting, that's gushing!

So again tell me the MSM is not biased?

Research on Media Bias - Discover the Networks

• In 1964, 94% of media professionals voted for Democrat Lyndon Johnson over Republican Barry Goldwater.
• In 1968, 86% voted for Democrat Hubert Humphrey over Republican Richard Nixon.
• In 1972, 81% voted for Democrat George McGovern over the incumbent Nixon.
• In 1976, 81% voted for Democrat Jimmy Carter over Republican Gerald Ford.
• In 1980, twice as many cast their ballots for Carter rather than for Republican Ronald Reagan.
• In 1984, 58% supported Democrat Walter Mondale, whom Reagan defeated in the biggest landslide in presidential election history.
• In 1988, White House correspondents from various major newspapers, television networks, magazines, and news services supported Democrat Michael Dukakis over Republican George H.W. Bush by a ratio of 12-to-1.
• In 1992, those same correspondents supported Democrat Bill Clinton over the incumbent Bush by a ratio of 9 to 2.
• Among Washington bureau chiefs and congressional correspondents, the disparity was 89% vs. 7%, in Clinton’s favor.
• In a 2004 poll of campaign journalists, those based outside of Washington, DC supported Democrat John Kerry over Republican George W. Bush by a ratio of 3-to-1. Those based inside the Beltway favored Kerry by a 12-to-1 ratio.
• In a 2008 survey of 144 journalists nationwide, journalists were 8 times likelier to make campaign contributions to Democrats than to Republicans.
• A 2008 Investors Business Daily study put the campaign donation ratio at 11.5-to-1, in favor of Democrats.
• In terms of total dollars given, the ratio was 15-to-1.

Again, we now live in the Internet age where people have a wide variety of news outlets to choose from. Your unfair Liberal media whine no longer cuts it.

And so what if those journalists donated to Democrats? Donald Trump donated to Democrats and he's vying for the Republican nomination to be president.

Donald Trump donated to people like Hillary because he was buying political favors...not because he thinks her policies are so wonderful! How naive are you?

 

[eddiew]

That's all other "cable" networks, Faun...get your facts straight!

My facts were perfectly straight. Thanks for checking though.

Fox is a cable news network... who did you think I was referring to when I boxed their competitors in with, "their competitors?"

Because ABC,CBS, NBC are all network news which combined have more fewer then the "fair and balanced" Fox. I used that term because see unlike
the rest of the biased media for the most part Fox is a journalistic professional group versus the above mentioned networks that and again facts support my
point:
The MSM in 2008 over 85% of media donated money to Democrats!
1,160 (85%) of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters

Plus here you have a "professional journalist"???

This same MSM that LOVES Obama so much that here in the words of a MSM publication says it all!
The Editor of NewsWeek, Evan Thomas was once asked about George Bush and this is his response.
"our job is to bash the president[Bush], that's what we do." Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington, February 2, 2007.He-Could-Go-All-The-Way: 'Today' Cheers Obama's Football Play

RIGHT HIS job was to BASH Bush. He is a journalist. Unbiased. Objective. Professional. RIGHT??

But when it came to Obama???
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist- Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’
A professional NEWS editor calling a mortal man "sort of God"??? That's not reporting, that's gushing!

So again tell me the MSM is not biased?

Research on Media Bias - Discover the Networks

• In 1964, 94% of media professionals voted for Democrat Lyndon Johnson over Republican Barry Goldwater.
• In 1968, 86% voted for Democrat Hubert Humphrey over Republican Richard Nixon.
• In 1972, 81% voted for Democrat George McGovern over the incumbent Nixon.
• In 1976, 81% voted for Democrat Jimmy Carter over Republican Gerald Ford.
• In 1980, twice as many cast their ballots for Carter rather than for Republican Ronald Reagan.
• In 1984, 58% supported Democrat Walter Mondale, whom Reagan defeated in the biggest landslide in presidential election history.
• In 1988, White House correspondents from various major newspapers, television networks, magazines, and news services supported Democrat Michael Dukakis over Republican George H.W. Bush by a ratio of 12-to-1.
• In 1992, those same correspondents supported Democrat Bill Clinton over the incumbent Bush by a ratio of 9 to 2.
• Among Washington bureau chiefs and congressional correspondents, the disparity was 89% vs. 7%, in Clinton’s favor.
• In a 2004 poll of campaign journalists, those based outside of Washington, DC supported Democrat John Kerry over Republican George W. Bush by a ratio of 3-to-1. Those based inside the Beltway favored Kerry by a 12-to-1 ratio.
• In a 2008 survey of 144 journalists nationwide, journalists were 8 times likelier to make campaign contributions to Democrats than to Republicans.
• A 2008 Investors Business Daily study put the campaign donation ratio at 11.5-to-1, in favor of Democrats.
• In terms of total dollars given, the ratio was 15-to-1.

Again, we now live in the Internet age where people have a wide variety of news outlets to choose from. Your unfair Liberal media whine no longer cuts it.

And so what if those journalists donated to Democrats? Donald Trump donated to Democrats and he's vying for the Republican nomination to be president.

RIGHT but we are talking about influencing voters i.e. Boston Globe phony story about Trump will INFlUENCE idiots like you!
And YES that is what is so cool about TRUMP! He donated to Democrats and he knows what he got for it!
So yes he is a selfish greedy person and admits... versus you pompous ignorant idiots with your "Hope and Change" agenda just don't understand how
the world works. Enough of you selfish idiots.
Trump has made billions. So why is he going to all this trouble and effort to spend millions for the Presidency? What will he gain?
Well I for one like his selfish motive! He wants to keep what he has earned for his progeny! Without his selfish efforts, people like he and I will not see our
children prosper and live long lives! With Obama/Sanders agenda the USA as a land of opportunity will be destroyed unless Trump and people like me stand up!
Enough of this political correct bull crap.

You ask what will he gain???? lol that Scum will double his net worth if you give him 8 years in office He does nothing unless it brings money to his account

 

[Faun]

In the evening, an average of 22.1 million people watched one of the three commercial broadcast news programs on ABC, CBS or NBC in 2012, down 1.9% from 22.5 million in 2011.
» Network: By the Numbers
Fox News:
Combined, Fox News, CNN and MSNBC averaged 1.8 million viewers total-day (down 5% from 2013) and 2.85 million in primetime (down 4%).

5 facts about Fox News
In case some idiots can figure out.. Green is negative blue is positive.
Fox was tougher then CNN/MSNBC on Obama... but love and kisses from CNN/MSNBC for Obama while mostly negative stories for Romney.
Again MSM at work and you idiots that don't believe it is because well frankly you are IDIOTS!
View attachment 70876

Now you're comparing the number of viewers in the evening only while Fox News is on the air most of the day. Even while they're airing "entertainment" shows like O'Reilly and Hannity (which typically discusses stories reported in the news), they still have news crawlers throughout.

And again... we live in the Internet age. More people get their news from the Internet than from TV.

 

[Faun]

That's all other "cable" networks, Faun...get your facts straight!

My facts were perfectly straight. Thanks for checking though.

Fox is a cable news network... who did you think I was referring to when I boxed their competitors in with, "their competitors?"

Because ABC,CBS, NBC are all network news which combined have more fewer then the "fair and balanced" Fox. I used that term because see unlike
the rest of the biased media for the most part Fox is a journalistic professional group versus the above mentioned networks that and again facts support my
point:
The MSM in 2008 over 85% of media donated money to Democrats!
1,160 (85%) of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters

Plus here you have a "professional journalist"???

This same MSM that LOVES Obama so much that here in the words of a MSM publication says it all!
The Editor of NewsWeek, Evan Thomas was once asked about George Bush and this is his response.
"our job is to bash the president[Bush], that's what we do." Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington, February 2, 2007.He-Could-Go-All-The-Way: 'Today' Cheers Obama's Football Play

RIGHT HIS job was to BASH Bush. He is a journalist. Unbiased. Objective. Professional. RIGHT??

But when it came to Obama???
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist- Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’
A professional NEWS editor calling a mortal man "sort of God"??? That's not reporting, that's gushing!

So again tell me the MSM is not biased?

Research on Media Bias - Discover the Networks

• In 1964, 94% of media professionals voted for Democrat Lyndon Johnson over Republican Barry Goldwater.
• In 1968, 86% voted for Democrat Hubert Humphrey over Republican Richard Nixon.
• In 1972, 81% voted for Democrat George McGovern over the incumbent Nixon.
• In 1976, 81% voted for Democrat Jimmy Carter over Republican Gerald Ford.
• In 1980, twice as many cast their ballots for Carter rather than for Republican Ronald Reagan.
• In 1984, 58% supported Democrat Walter Mondale, whom Reagan defeated in the biggest landslide in presidential election history.
• In 1988, White House correspondents from various major newspapers, television networks, magazines, and news services supported Democrat Michael Dukakis over Republican George H.W. Bush by a ratio of 12-to-1.
• In 1992, those same correspondents supported Democrat Bill Clinton over the incumbent Bush by a ratio of 9 to 2.
• Among Washington bureau chiefs and congressional correspondents, the disparity was 89% vs. 7%, in Clinton’s favor.
• In a 2004 poll of campaign journalists, those based outside of Washington, DC supported Democrat John Kerry over Republican George W. Bush by a ratio of 3-to-1. Those based inside the Beltway favored Kerry by a 12-to-1 ratio.
• In a 2008 survey of 144 journalists nationwide, journalists were 8 times likelier to make campaign contributions to Democrats than to Republicans.
• A 2008 Investors Business Daily study put the campaign donation ratio at 11.5-to-1, in favor of Democrats.
• In terms of total dollars given, the ratio was 15-to-1.

Again, we now live in the Internet age where people have a wide variety of news outlets to choose from. Your unfair Liberal media whine no longer cuts it.

And so what if those journalists donated to Democrats? Donald Trump donated to Democrats and he's vying for the Republican nomination to be president.

Donald Trump donated to people like Hillary because he was buying political favors...not because he thinks her policies are so wonderful! How naive are you?

Not naive at all. Here we have you flinging bullshit again by lying about my position again. I never offered reasons why Trump donated to Democrats yet here you are assuming I believe it was for reasons others than for political favors.

When do you stop bullshitting?

Ever??

Just like your repeated accusations that I inferred Clinton's tax hike caused the economic boom; when in fact, I clearly posted I am not saying his tax hike caused the economic boom.

You don't argue with what people actually say -- you argue with what you think they say.

 

[Faun]

That's all other "cable" networks, Faun...get your facts straight!

My facts were perfectly straight. Thanks for checking though.

Fox is a cable news network... who did you think I was referring to when I boxed their competitors in with, "their competitors?"

Because ABC,CBS, NBC are all network news which combined have more fewer then the "fair and balanced" Fox. I used that term because see unlike
the rest of the biased media for the most part Fox is a journalistic professional group versus the above mentioned networks that and again facts support my
point:
The MSM in 2008 over 85% of media donated money to Democrats!
1,160 (85%) of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters

Plus here you have a "professional journalist"???

This same MSM that LOVES Obama so much that here in the words of a MSM publication says it all!
The Editor of NewsWeek, Evan Thomas was once asked about George Bush and this is his response.
"our job is to bash the president[Bush], that's what we do." Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington, February 2, 2007.He-Could-Go-All-The-Way: 'Today' Cheers Obama's Football Play

RIGHT HIS job was to BASH Bush. He is a journalist. Unbiased. Objective. Professional. RIGHT??

But when it came to Obama???
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist- Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’
A professional NEWS editor calling a mortal man "sort of God"??? That's not reporting, that's gushing!

So again tell me the MSM is not biased?

Research on Media Bias - Discover the Networks

• In 1964, 94% of media professionals voted for Democrat Lyndon Johnson over Republican Barry Goldwater.
• In 1968, 86% voted for Democrat Hubert Humphrey over Republican Richard Nixon.
• In 1972, 81% voted for Democrat George McGovern over the incumbent Nixon.
• In 1976, 81% voted for Democrat Jimmy Carter over Republican Gerald Ford.
• In 1980, twice as many cast their ballots for Carter rather than for Republican Ronald Reagan.
• In 1984, 58% supported Democrat Walter Mondale, whom Reagan defeated in the biggest landslide in presidential election history.
• In 1988, White House correspondents from various major newspapers, television networks, magazines, and news services supported Democrat Michael Dukakis over Republican George H.W. Bush by a ratio of 12-to-1.
• In 1992, those same correspondents supported Democrat Bill Clinton over the incumbent Bush by a ratio of 9 to 2.
• Among Washington bureau chiefs and congressional correspondents, the disparity was 89% vs. 7%, in Clinton’s favor.
• In a 2004 poll of campaign journalists, those based outside of Washington, DC supported Democrat John Kerry over Republican George W. Bush by a ratio of 3-to-1. Those based inside the Beltway favored Kerry by a 12-to-1 ratio.
• In a 2008 survey of 144 journalists nationwide, journalists were 8 times likelier to make campaign contributions to Democrats than to Republicans.
• A 2008 Investors Business Daily study put the campaign donation ratio at 11.5-to-1, in favor of Democrats.
• In terms of total dollars given, the ratio was 15-to-1.

Again, we now live in the Internet age where people have a wide variety of news outlets to choose from. Your unfair Liberal media whine no longer cuts it.

And so what if those journalists donated to Democrats? Donald Trump donated to Democrats and he's vying for the Republican nomination to be president.

RIGHT but we are talking about influencing voters i.e. Boston Globe phony story about Trump will INFlUENCE idiots like you!
And YES that is what is so cool about TRUMP! He donated to Democrats and he knows what he got for it!
So yes he is a selfish greedy person and admits... versus you pompous ignorant idiots with your "Hope and Change" agenda just don't understand how
the world works. Enough of you selfish idiots.
Trump has made billions. So why is he going to all this trouble and effort to spend millions for the Presidency? What will he gain?
Well I for one like his selfish motive! He wants to keep what he has earned for his progeny! Without his selfish efforts, people like he and I will not see our
children prosper and live long lives! With Obama/Sanders agenda the USA as a land of opportunity will be destroyed unless Trump and people like me stand up!
Enough of this political correct bull crap.

What does Trump stand to gain by becoming president?

For one, hundreds of millions of dollars by crafting a tax holiday to repatriate his fortune overseas.

 

[JimH52]

The failed economy.
The Iraq debacle.
The deficit creating Bush Tax Cuts.
The millions of jobs moved oversea.
The over 40,000 factories closed.
Medical bills becoming the number one cause of bankruptcy.
Not getting Bin Laden.

Republicans were able to use reconciliation three times which shows they controlled the entire government.
Will they ever take any responsibility for what happened on their watch?

No they won't. As a matter if fact, they now want another chance to screw up what Obama has put on the right road. The RW Loons are clueless.

 

[JimH52]

Thankfully they have Phrump. He is the greatest gift the DNC has received in years.

 

[Faun]

You guys on the left hate Fox News because it's one of the few conservative outlets that exists on television!

Personally, I don't watch Fox News because they lie as much as they do.

So here you are making a "judgement about Fox News" and you don't watch it!
And what other way would you be watching other than "personal"? GEEZ you pompous butts have such ignorance!
You obviously are NOT PAID to watch TV news! Idiot.

Again, I don't watch it because they've been caught telling lies. From portraying Republicans caught in scandals as Democrats to claiming there were no terrorist attacks on U.S. soil while Bush was president.

But even worse for your insanity... why would any rational person get their news from a news outlet with an ideological bent?

 

[healthmyths]

You guys on the left hate Fox News because it's one of the few conservative outlets that exists on television!

Personally, I don't watch Fox News because they lie as much as they do.

So here you are making a "judgement about Fox News" and you don't watch it!
And what other way would you be watching other than "personal"? GEEZ you pompous butts have such ignorance!
You obviously are NOT PAID to watch TV news! Idiot.

Again, I don't watch it because they've been caught telling lies. From portraying Republicans caught in scandals as Democrats to claiming there were no terrorist attacks on U.S. soil while Bush was president.

But even worse for your insanity... why would any rational person get their news from a news outlet with an ideological bent?

That's it? two incidents that YOU declare a LIE??? FACTS where are your facts? See not only is your credibility at question when YOU won't supply any
LINKS to substantiate your subjective opinion BUT by using YOUR standard, i.e. you get your news from Proven BIASED sources you are insane!
Refute these sources for their statements regarding BIASED MSM! Please refute them!
Research on Media Bias - Discover the Networks
In 1964, 94% of media professionals voted for Democrat Lyndon Johnson over Republican Barry Goldwater.
In 1968, 86% voted for Democrat Hubert Humphrey over Republican Richard Nixon.
In 1972, 81% voted for Democrat George McGovern over the incumbent Nixon.
In 1976, 81% voted for Democrat Jimmy Carter over Republican Gerald Ford.
In 1980, twice as many cast their ballots for Carter rather than for Republican Ronald Reagan.
In 1984, 58% supported Democrat Walter Mondale, whom Reagan defeated in the biggest landslide in presidential election history.
In 1988, White House correspondents from various major newspapers, television networks, magazines, and news services supported Democrat Michael Dukakis over Republican George H.W. Bush by a ratio of 12-to-1.
In 1992, those same correspondents supported Democrat Bill Clinton over the incumbent Bush by a ratio of 9 to 2.
Among Washington bureau chiefs and congressional correspondents, the disparity was 89% vs. 7%, in Clinton’s favor.
In a 2004 poll of campaign journalists, those based outside of Washington, DC supported Democrat John Kerry over Republican George W. Bush by a ratio of 3-to-1. Those based inside the Beltway favored Kerry by a 12-to-1 ratio.
In a 2008 survey of 144 journalists nationwide, journalists were 8 times likelier to make campaign contributions to Democrats than to Republicans.
A 2008 Investors Business Daily study put the campaign donation ratio at 11.5-to-1, in favor of Democrats.
In terms of total dollars given, the ratio was 15-to-1.

 

[JimH52]

You guys on the left hate Fox News because it's one of the few conservative outlets that exists on television!

Personally, I don't watch Fox News because they lie as much as they do.

So here you are making a "judgement about Fox News" and you don't watch it!
And what other way would you be watching other than "personal"? GEEZ you pompous butts have such ignorance!
You obviously are NOT PAID to watch TV news! Idiot.

Again, I don't watch it because they've been caught telling lies. From portraying Republicans caught in scandals as Democrats to claiming there were no terrorist attacks on U.S. soil while Bush was president.

But even worse for your insanity... why would any rational person get their news from a news outlet with an ideological bent?

That's it? two incidents that YOU declare a LIE??? FACTS where are your facts? See not only is your credibility at question when YOU won't supply any
LINKS to substantiate your subjective opinion BUT by using YOUR standard, i.e. you get your news from Proven BIASED sources you are insane!
Refute these sources for their statements regarding BIASED MSM! Please refute them!
Research on Media Bias - Discover the Networks
In 1964, 94% of media professionals voted for Democrat Lyndon Johnson over Republican Barry Goldwater.
In 1968, 86% voted for Democrat Hubert Humphrey over Republican Richard Nixon.
In 1972, 81% voted for Democrat George McGovern over the incumbent Nixon.
In 1976, 81% voted for Democrat Jimmy Carter over Republican Gerald Ford.
In 1980, twice as many cast their ballots for Carter rather than for Republican Ronald Reagan.
In 1984, 58% supported Democrat Walter Mondale, whom Reagan defeated in the biggest landslide in presidential election history.
In 1988, White House correspondents from various major newspapers, television networks, magazines, and news services supported Democrat Michael Dukakis over Republican George H.W. Bush by a ratio of 12-to-1.
In 1992, those same correspondents supported Democrat Bill Clinton over the incumbent Bush by a ratio of 9 to 2.
Among Washington bureau chiefs and congressional correspondents, the disparity was 89% vs. 7%, in Clinton’s favor.
In a 2004 poll of campaign journalists, those based outside of Washington, DC supported Democrat John Kerry over Republican George W. Bush by a ratio of 3-to-1. Those based inside the Beltway favored Kerry by a 12-to-1 ratio.
In a 2008 survey of 144 journalists nationwide, journalists were 8 times likelier to make campaign contributions to Democrats than to Republicans.
A 2008 Investors Business Daily study put the campaign donation ratio at 11.5-to-1, in favor of Democrats.
In terms of total dollars given, the ratio was 15-to-1.

Really? You need to get a life.

 

[Oldstyle]

That's all other "cable" networks, Faun...get your facts straight!

My facts were perfectly straight. Thanks for checking though.

Fox is a cable news network... who did you think I was referring to when I boxed their competitors in with, "their competitors?"

Because ABC,CBS, NBC are all network news which combined have more fewer then the "fair and balanced" Fox. I used that term because see unlike
the rest of the biased media for the most part Fox is a journalistic professional group versus the above mentioned networks that and again facts support my
point:
The MSM in 2008 over 85% of media donated money to Democrats!
1,160 (85%) of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters

Plus here you have a "professional journalist"???

This same MSM that LOVES Obama so much that here in the words of a MSM publication says it all!
The Editor of NewsWeek, Evan Thomas was once asked about George Bush and this is his response.
"our job is to bash the president[Bush], that's what we do." Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington, February 2, 2007.He-Could-Go-All-The-Way: 'Today' Cheers Obama's Football Play

RIGHT HIS job was to BASH Bush. He is a journalist. Unbiased. Objective. Professional. RIGHT??

But when it came to Obama???
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist- Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’
A professional NEWS editor calling a mortal man "sort of God"??? That's not reporting, that's gushing!

So again tell me the MSM is not biased?

Research on Media Bias - Discover the Networks

• In 1964, 94% of media professionals voted for Democrat Lyndon Johnson over Republican Barry Goldwater.
• In 1968, 86% voted for Democrat Hubert Humphrey over Republican Richard Nixon.
• In 1972, 81% voted for Democrat George McGovern over the incumbent Nixon.
• In 1976, 81% voted for Democrat Jimmy Carter over Republican Gerald Ford.
• In 1980, twice as many cast their ballots for Carter rather than for Republican Ronald Reagan.
• In 1984, 58% supported Democrat Walter Mondale, whom Reagan defeated in the biggest landslide in presidential election history.
• In 1988, White House correspondents from various major newspapers, television networks, magazines, and news services supported Democrat Michael Dukakis over Republican George H.W. Bush by a ratio of 12-to-1.
• In 1992, those same correspondents supported Democrat Bill Clinton over the incumbent Bush by a ratio of 9 to 2.
• Among Washington bureau chiefs and congressional correspondents, the disparity was 89% vs. 7%, in Clinton’s favor.
• In a 2004 poll of campaign journalists, those based outside of Washington, DC supported Democrat John Kerry over Republican George W. Bush by a ratio of 3-to-1. Those based inside the Beltway favored Kerry by a 12-to-1 ratio.
• In a 2008 survey of 144 journalists nationwide, journalists were 8 times likelier to make campaign contributions to Democrats than to Republicans.
• A 2008 Investors Business Daily study put the campaign donation ratio at 11.5-to-1, in favor of Democrats.
• In terms of total dollars given, the ratio was 15-to-1.

Again, we now live in the Internet age where people have a wide variety of news outlets to choose from. Your unfair Liberal media whine no longer cuts it.

And so what if those journalists donated to Democrats? Donald Trump donated to Democrats and he's vying for the Republican nomination to be president.

Donald Trump donated to people like Hillary because he was buying political favors...not because he thinks her policies are so wonderful! How naive are you?

Not naive at all. Here we have you flinging bullshit again by lying about my position again. I never offered reasons why Trump donated to Democrats yet here you are assuming I believe it was for reasons others than for political favors.

When do you stop bullshitting?

Ever??

Just like your repeated accusations that I inferred Clinton's tax hike caused the economic boom; when in fact, I clearly posted I am not saying his tax hike caused the economic boom.

You don't argue with what people actually say -- you argue with what you think they say.

My point...which went right over your head...was that Donald Trump contributed to anyone he thought could be courted for political favors. THAT is the only reason he did so! Politics had little to nothing to do with it.

 

[Faun]

You guys on the left hate Fox News because it's one of the few conservative outlets that exists on television!

Personally, I don't watch Fox News because they lie as much as they do.

So here you are making a "judgement about Fox News" and you don't watch it!
And what other way would you be watching other than "personal"? GEEZ you pompous butts have such ignorance!
You obviously are NOT PAID to watch TV news! Idiot.

Again, I don't watch it because they've been caught telling lies. From portraying Republicans caught in scandals as Democrats to claiming there were no terrorist attacks on U.S. soil while Bush was president.

But even worse for your insanity... why would any rational person get their news from a news outlet with an ideological bent?

That's it? two incidents that YOU declare a LIE??? FACTS where are your facts? See not only is your credibility at question when YOU won't supply any
LINKS to substantiate your subjective opinion BUT by using YOUR standard, i.e. you get your news from Proven BIASED sources you are insane!
Refute these sources for their statements regarding BIASED MSM! Please refute them!
Research on Media Bias - Discover the Networks
In 1964, 94% of media professionals voted for Democrat Lyndon Johnson over Republican Barry Goldwater.
In 1968, 86% voted for Democrat Hubert Humphrey over Republican Richard Nixon.
In 1972, 81% voted for Democrat George McGovern over the incumbent Nixon.
In 1976, 81% voted for Democrat Jimmy Carter over Republican Gerald Ford.
In 1980, twice as many cast their ballots for Carter rather than for Republican Ronald Reagan.
In 1984, 58% supported Democrat Walter Mondale, whom Reagan defeated in the biggest landslide in presidential election history.
In 1988, White House correspondents from various major newspapers, television networks, magazines, and news services supported Democrat Michael Dukakis over Republican George H.W. Bush by a ratio of 12-to-1.
In 1992, those same correspondents supported Democrat Bill Clinton over the incumbent Bush by a ratio of 9 to 2.
Among Washington bureau chiefs and congressional correspondents, the disparity was 89% vs. 7%, in Clinton’s favor.
In a 2004 poll of campaign journalists, those based outside of Washington, DC supported Democrat John Kerry over Republican George W. Bush by a ratio of 3-to-1. Those based inside the Beltway favored Kerry by a 12-to-1 ratio.
In a 2008 survey of 144 journalists nationwide, journalists were 8 times likelier to make campaign contributions to Democrats than to Republicans.
A 2008 Investors Business Daily study put the campaign donation ratio at 11.5-to-1, in favor of Democrats.
In terms of total dollars given, the ratio was 15-to-1.

Umm... I only mentioned two.

But again, since you didn't answer.... why would any rational person get their news from an outlet with an ideological bent?

 

[healthmyths]

You guys on the left hate Fox News because it's one of the few conservative outlets that exists on television!

Personally, I don't watch Fox News because they lie as much as they do.

So here you are making a "judgement about Fox News" and you don't watch it!
And what other way would you be watching other than "personal"? GEEZ you pompous butts have such ignorance!
You obviously are NOT PAID to watch TV news! Idiot.

Again, I don't watch it because they've been caught telling lies. From portraying Republicans caught in scandals as Democrats to claiming there were no terrorist attacks on U.S. soil while Bush was president.

But even worse for your insanity... why would any rational person get their news from a news outlet with an ideological bent?

That's it? two incidents that YOU declare a LIE??? FACTS where are your facts? See not only is your credibility at question when YOU won't supply any
LINKS to substantiate your subjective opinion BUT by using YOUR standard, i.e. you get your news from Proven BIASED sources you are insane!
Refute these sources for their statements regarding BIASED MSM! Please refute them!
Research on Media Bias - Discover the Networks
In 1964, 94% of media professionals voted for Democrat Lyndon Johnson over Republican Barry Goldwater.
In 1968, 86% voted for Democrat Hubert Humphrey over Republican Richard Nixon.
In 1972, 81% voted for Democrat George McGovern over the incumbent Nixon.
In 1976, 81% voted for Democrat Jimmy Carter over Republican Gerald Ford.
In 1980, twice as many cast their ballots for Carter rather than for Republican Ronald Reagan.
In 1984, 58% supported Democrat Walter Mondale, whom Reagan defeated in the biggest landslide in presidential election history.
In 1988, White House correspondents from various major newspapers, television networks, magazines, and news services supported Democrat Michael Dukakis over Republican George H.W. Bush by a ratio of 12-to-1.
In 1992, those same correspondents supported Democrat Bill Clinton over the incumbent Bush by a ratio of 9 to 2.
Among Washington bureau chiefs and congressional correspondents, the disparity was 89% vs. 7%, in Clinton’s favor.
In a 2004 poll of campaign journalists, those based outside of Washington, DC supported Democrat John Kerry over Republican George W. Bush by a ratio of 3-to-1. Those based inside the Beltway favored Kerry by a 12-to-1 ratio.
In a 2008 survey of 144 journalists nationwide, journalists were 8 times likelier to make campaign contributions to Democrats than to Republicans.
A 2008 Investors Business Daily study put the campaign donation ratio at 11.5-to-1, in favor of Democrats.
In terms of total dollars given, the ratio was 15-to-1.

Umm... I only mentioned two.

But again, since you didn't answer.... why would any rational person get their news from an outlet with an ideological bent?

Yes WHY would you get all your news from the above biased MSM!
Their bias is proven by the above statistics.
Bias proven by this graph:

Tell me you get your news from CNN maybe?
You obviously won't spot this biased news from CNN!
What possible journalistic integrity is evident by CNN news clip that glaringly, with great bias still blames the cop while ignoring the
fact Michael Brown was attacking the cop? Saying Brown was unarmed was NOT true.

These were the FACTS yet you and CNN continually like all Black Lives matter criminals as Bill Clinton calls you, ignore these FEDERAL FINDINGS!
Wednesday’s report said minor injuries to Wilson’s face and the officer’s DNA being found on one of Brown’s hands indicated that the 18-year-old had, indeed, reached into Wilson’s patrol vehicle during a struggle between the two.

The investigators also agreed that blood trail showed that after fleeing the confrontation, Brown “turned around and came back toward Wilson”. The officer alleged that he fired when Brown refused to stop charging at him. While witness accounts differed over whether Brown was stumbling after being shot or moving threateningly, federal officials sided with the latter.
Darren Wilson will not face federal charges in Michael Brown shooting

Prove me wrong but you are biased. You are also uninformed. And more importantly really a dumb f...k!

Definitely your biased opinion from this group for sure!

 

[JimH52]

Personally, I don't watch Fox News because they lie as much as they do.

So here you are making a "judgement about Fox News" and you don't watch it!
And what other way would you be watching other than "personal"? GEEZ you pompous butts have such ignorance!
You obviously are NOT PAID to watch TV news! Idiot.

Again, I don't watch it because they've been caught telling lies. From portraying Republicans caught in scandals as Democrats to claiming there were no terrorist attacks on U.S. soil while Bush was president.

But even worse for your insanity... why would any rational person get their news from a news outlet with an ideological bent?

That's it? two incidents that YOU declare a LIE??? FACTS where are your facts? See not only is your credibility at question when YOU won't supply any
LINKS to substantiate your subjective opinion BUT by using YOUR standard, i.e. you get your news from Proven BIASED sources you are insane!
Refute these sources for their statements regarding BIASED MSM! Please refute them!
Research on Media Bias - Discover the Networks
In 1964, 94% of media professionals voted for Democrat Lyndon Johnson over Republican Barry Goldwater.
In 1968, 86% voted for Democrat Hubert Humphrey over Republican Richard Nixon.
In 1972, 81% voted for Democrat George McGovern over the incumbent Nixon.
In 1976, 81% voted for Democrat Jimmy Carter over Republican Gerald Ford.
In 1980, twice as many cast their ballots for Carter rather than for Republican Ronald Reagan.
In 1984, 58% supported Democrat Walter Mondale, whom Reagan defeated in the biggest landslide in presidential election history.
In 1988, White House correspondents from various major newspapers, television networks, magazines, and news services supported Democrat Michael Dukakis over Republican George H.W. Bush by a ratio of 12-to-1.
In 1992, those same correspondents supported Democrat Bill Clinton over the incumbent Bush by a ratio of 9 to 2.
Among Washington bureau chiefs and congressional correspondents, the disparity was 89% vs. 7%, in Clinton’s favor.
In a 2004 poll of campaign journalists, those based outside of Washington, DC supported Democrat John Kerry over Republican George W. Bush by a ratio of 3-to-1. Those based inside the Beltway favored Kerry by a 12-to-1 ratio.
In a 2008 survey of 144 journalists nationwide, journalists were 8 times likelier to make campaign contributions to Democrats than to Republicans.
A 2008 Investors Business Daily study put the campaign donation ratio at 11.5-to-1, in favor of Democrats.
In terms of total dollars given, the ratio was 15-to-1.

Umm... I only mentioned two.

But again, since you didn't answer.... why would any rational person get their news from an outlet with an ideological bent?

Yes WHY would you get all your news from the above biased MSM!
Their bias is proven by the above statistics.
Bias proven by this graph:
View attachment 70901
Tell me you get your news from CNN maybe?
You obviously won't spot this biased news from CNN!
What possible journalistic integrity is evident by CNN news clip that glaringly, with great bias still blames the cop while ignoring the
fact Michael Brown was attacking the cop? Saying Brown was unarmed was NOT true.

These were the FACTS yet you and CNN continually like all Black Lives matter criminals as Bill Clinton calls you, ignore these FEDERAL FINDINGS!
Wednesday’s report said minor injuries to Wilson’s face and the officer’s DNA being found on one of Brown’s hands indicated that the 18-year-old had, indeed, reached into Wilson’s patrol vehicle during a struggle between the two.

The investigators also agreed that blood trail showed that after fleeing the confrontation, Brown “turned around and came back toward Wilson”. The officer alleged that he fired when Brown refused to stop charging at him. While witness accounts differed over whether Brown was stumbling after being shot or moving threateningly, federal officials sided with the latter.
Darren Wilson will not face federal charges in Michael Brown shooting

Prove me wrong but you are biased. You are also uninformed. And more importantly really a dumb f...k!
View attachment 70899
Definitely your biased opinion from this group for sure!

Maybe cause...

Fact Checker Finds 60% Of Fox News Statements To Either Be Mostly False Or A Lie

 

[Faun]

Personally, I don't watch Fox News because they lie as much as they do.

So here you are making a "judgement about Fox News" and you don't watch it!
And what other way would you be watching other than "personal"? GEEZ you pompous butts have such ignorance!
You obviously are NOT PAID to watch TV news! Idiot.

Again, I don't watch it because they've been caught telling lies. From portraying Republicans caught in scandals as Democrats to claiming there were no terrorist attacks on U.S. soil while Bush was president.

But even worse for your insanity... why would any rational person get their news from a news outlet with an ideological bent?

That's it? two incidents that YOU declare a LIE??? FACTS where are your facts? See not only is your credibility at question when YOU won't supply any
LINKS to substantiate your subjective opinion BUT by using YOUR standard, i.e. you get your news from Proven BIASED sources you are insane!
Refute these sources for their statements regarding BIASED MSM! Please refute them!
Research on Media Bias - Discover the Networks
In 1964, 94% of media professionals voted for Democrat Lyndon Johnson over Republican Barry Goldwater.
In 1968, 86% voted for Democrat Hubert Humphrey over Republican Richard Nixon.
In 1972, 81% voted for Democrat George McGovern over the incumbent Nixon.
In 1976, 81% voted for Democrat Jimmy Carter over Republican Gerald Ford.
In 1980, twice as many cast their ballots for Carter rather than for Republican Ronald Reagan.
In 1984, 58% supported Democrat Walter Mondale, whom Reagan defeated in the biggest landslide in presidential election history.
In 1988, White House correspondents from various major newspapers, television networks, magazines, and news services supported Democrat Michael Dukakis over Republican George H.W. Bush by a ratio of 12-to-1.
In 1992, those same correspondents supported Democrat Bill Clinton over the incumbent Bush by a ratio of 9 to 2.
Among Washington bureau chiefs and congressional correspondents, the disparity was 89% vs. 7%, in Clinton’s favor.
In a 2004 poll of campaign journalists, those based outside of Washington, DC supported Democrat John Kerry over Republican George W. Bush by a ratio of 3-to-1. Those based inside the Beltway favored Kerry by a 12-to-1 ratio.
In a 2008 survey of 144 journalists nationwide, journalists were 8 times likelier to make campaign contributions to Democrats than to Republicans.
A 2008 Investors Business Daily study put the campaign donation ratio at 11.5-to-1, in favor of Democrats.
In terms of total dollars given, the ratio was 15-to-1.

Umm... I only mentioned two.

But again, since you didn't answer.... why would any rational person get their news from an outlet with an ideological bent?

Yes WHY would you get all your news from the above biased MSM!
Their bias is proven by the above statistics.
Bias proven by this graph:
View attachment 70901
Tell me you get your news from CNN maybe?
You obviously won't spot this biased news from CNN!
What possible journalistic integrity is evident by CNN news clip that glaringly, with great bias still blames the cop while ignoring the
fact Michael Brown was attacking the cop? Saying Brown was unarmed was NOT true.

These were the FACTS yet you and CNN continually like all Black Lives matter criminals as Bill Clinton calls you, ignore these FEDERAL FINDINGS!
Wednesday’s report said minor injuries to Wilson’s face and the officer’s DNA being found on one of Brown’s hands indicated that the 18-year-old had, indeed, reached into Wilson’s patrol vehicle during a struggle between the two.

The investigators also agreed that blood trail showed that after fleeing the confrontation, Brown “turned around and came back toward Wilson”. The officer alleged that he fired when Brown refused to stop charging at him. While witness accounts differed over whether Brown was stumbling after being shot or moving threateningly, federal officials sided with the latter.
Darren Wilson will not face federal charges in Michael Brown shooting

Prove me wrong but you are biased. You are also uninformed. And more importantly really a dumb f...k!
View attachment 70899
Definitely your biased opinion from this group for sure!

Imbecile.... Fox News is also biased. And I don't get my news from TV. Network or cable.

Oh... and Brown wasn't armed. WTF is wrong with you? Lemme guess.... you watch Fox News?