Wikileak'd video shows eager-to-kill troops firing on Reuters reporters and children

[geauxtohell]

You just proved you will edit my posts to suit your needs. If an honest person asks I will gladly answer.

You are such a chickenshit. Fine, I'll post around you.

Lol...it would be pretty stoopid to expect honesty from you after you just proved your dishonesty. It's not being chickenshit to point out you're a dishonest ****.

If you are going to ignore my posts, then be a man of your word and do it.

Refusing to acknowledge any of the substantive issues I post while taunting just makes you look like a *****.

BTW, long before you had to grasp at straws for a reason to dismiss what I am saying (without refuting it) I caught and called you on your dishonesty.

I didn't whine about it incessantly, because I don't need rhetorical crutches.

You obviously do.

 

[CurveLight]

Hey shit for brains, it's not a "huge" issue because the pilots were cleared in two 15-6 investigations.

You can ***** about it all you want. Your opinion on the matter is meaningless. The matter doesn't suddenly become "criminal" because it's goes in front of the American public.

My opinion carries enough weight that it scares you into rewriting my posts to fit your desires.

I didn't re-write shit, you **** wit. Nor did I change the context of your post by editing it.

Your opinion is irrelevant on the matter. (Just as it is on the 9-11 issue). Thus, you are relegated to standing in the corner and throwing a hissy fit.

Why keep proving you are dishonest? You purposefully edited my post....that is rewriting it you useless ****.

 

[geauxtohell]

They positively identified at least 2 AK47's and identified one person crouching behind a building and pointing what appeared to be a RPG at infantry troops a block away. Sorry for them but that is as positive as you need to be when troops lives are in the balance.

Why is it everyone who disagrees with you is a dumfuk? And just what is a dumfuk anyway? I mean we understand that you are one dumb ******, but ; never mind.

This is like trying to explain quantum physics to a pre-schooler. CL doesn't understand the ROE and continually makes idiotic statements that in no way reflect any sort of operational reality. He seems to be under the illusions that the pilots have to wait for suspected insurgents to engage/kill soldiers before they can fire on them (thus negating the role of CAS) or that they should utilize their magic powers to discern who is and isn't bad. He has failed to read/comprehend the 15-6 that fully explains the situation on the ground, that details that Bushmaster had been in contact and when crazyhorse checked on, they were actively looking for elements that were attacking bushmaster or might be trying to re-inforce.

He has claims that he has some special knowledge of these types of situations, but in reality he was a REMF that has never remotely even been in a situation like this.

He's an angry little man, so when his stupidity is pointed out, he responds in an angry manner.

From my post #116

"I know it pisses people off they can't ignore my opinion based on the "you have not been there" defense and I'm guessing some are so desperately pathetic they will accuse me of lying. It only shows the depths of your denial."

'nuff said.

LMAO. Which was only an issue, because you tried to embellish the details of your combat experience.

You got called on it.

Now, ironically, you are running around and calling others liars.

 

[geauxtohell]

Why keep proving you are dishonest? You purposefully edited my post....that is rewriting it you useless ****.

Seriously. It must be hard work to act so ******* retarded.

 

[CurveLight]

You are such a chickenshit. Fine, I'll post around you.

Lol...it would be pretty stoopid to expect honesty from you after you just proved your dishonesty. It's not being chickenshit to point out you're a dishonest ****.

If you are going to ignore my posts, then be a man of your word and do it.

Refusing to acknowledge any of the substantive issues I post while taunting just makes you look like a *****.

BTW, long before you had to grasp at straws for a reason to dismiss what I am saying (without refuting it) I caught and called you on your dishonesty.

I didn't whine about it incessantly, because I don't need rhetorical crutches.

You obviously do.

Never said I was going to ignore your posts. But I'm grateful for you repeatedly proving your dishonesty.

 

[geauxtohell]

Lol...it would be pretty stoopid to expect honesty from you after you just proved your dishonesty. It's not being chickenshit to point out you're a dishonest ****.

If you are going to ignore my posts, then be a man of your word and do it.

Refusing to acknowledge any of the substantive issues I post while taunting just makes you look like a *****.

BTW, long before you had to grasp at straws for a reason to dismiss what I am saying (without refuting it) I caught and called you on your dishonesty.

I didn't whine about it incessantly, because I don't need rhetorical crutches.

You obviously do.

Never said I was going to ignore your posts. But I'm grateful for you repeatedly proving your dishonesty.

So why don't you tell us all about this "similar situation" that you were in, Curvelight?

Since we are on the issue of honesty.

Because as it stands, weighing to decision to shoot or hand out MREs to surrendering Iraqi soldiers isn't quite the same thing.

And you ******* know it.

 

[CurveLight]

This is like trying to explain quantum physics to a pre-schooler. CL doesn't understand the ROE and continually makes idiotic statements that in no way reflect any sort of operational reality. He seems to be under the illusions that the pilots have to wait for suspected insurgents to engage/kill soldiers before they can fire on them (thus negating the role of CAS) or that they should utilize their magic powers to discern who is and isn't bad. He has failed to read/comprehend the 15-6 that fully explains the situation on the ground, that details that Bushmaster had been in contact and when crazyhorse checked on, they were actively looking for elements that were attacking bushmaster or might be trying to re-inforce.

He has claims that he has some special knowledge of these types of situations, but in reality he was a REMF that has never remotely even been in a situation like this.

He's an angry little man, so when his stupidity is pointed out, he responds in an angry manner.

From my post #116

"I know it pisses people off they can't ignore my opinion based on the "you have not been there" defense and I'm guessing some are so desperately pathetic they will accuse me of lying. It only shows the depths of your denial."

'nuff said.

LMAO. Which was only an issue, because you tried to embellish the details of your combat experience.

You got called on it.

Now, ironically, you are running around and calling others liars.

Know what's sad? People are so fuxxing immature they don't care combat vets are accused of lying if they don't like the Vet's opinions. I'm at odds with ollie on a bunch of issues but when people tried to be dishonest about his service I smacked em down for that bullshit.

 

[CurveLight]

If you are going to ignore my posts, then be a man of your word and do it.

Refusing to acknowledge any of the substantive issues I post while taunting just makes you look like a *****.

BTW, long before you had to grasp at straws for a reason to dismiss what I am saying (without refuting it) I caught and called you on your dishonesty.

I didn't whine about it incessantly, because I don't need rhetorical crutches.

You obviously do.

Never said I was going to ignore your posts. But I'm grateful for you repeatedly proving your dishonesty.

So why don't you tell us all about this "similar situation" that you were in, Curvelight?

Since we are on the issue of honesty.

Because as it stands, weighing to decision to shoot or hand out MREs to surrendering Iraqi soldiers isn't quite the same thing.

And you ******* know it.

Quote the post where I said I handed out mre's to surrendering iraqi troops you lying ****.

 

[☭proletarian☭]

It gets done with the 30mm you dumfuk.

Wrong dumb ass *****....those are exploding rounds filled with anti personnel shrapnel or specifically designed to fragment into many pieces to KILL ANYTHING within a certain range...that's why in the video you see a round hit about 5 feet away from the heavily armed terrorist and he dropped like a sack of potatos...more than likely caused by his head intercepting a large piece of lead....

What were they supposed to do when they fired a warning shot...shoot into a house a few blocks away?

The more you post...the stupider everyone thinks you are....just shut up until you come back into reality.

I already posted a link showing it has been used to fire warning shots you dumfuk. What else you got? If you look at the video you can see open areas around the group.....there was plenty of room to pop off a couple of shots.

You fire warning shots to disperse an angry crowd, not at suspected enemy forces

 

[PatekPhilippe]

So why don't you tell us all about this "similar situation" that you were in, Curvelight?

This ought to be good.....

 

[Nonelitist]

Ok... now that Curvelight has been totally schooled....

Something else is bothering me. It is very likely that these dudes that got killed by the Apache were engaging United States military.

Why were Reuters photographers with them? Does that bother anyone else? The military investigation, I believe, found that they were not wearing anythign that identified them as photographers.

I am not claiming they deserved to die. But are photographers and reporters photographing and reporting from the side of the enemy?

 

[PatekPhilippe]

Ok... now that Curvelight has been totally schooled....

Something else is bothering me. It is very likely that these dudes that got killed by the Apache were engaging United States military.

Why were Reuters photographers with them? Does that bother anyone else? The military investigation, I believe, found that they were not wearing anythign that identified them as photographers.

I am not claiming they deserved to die. But are photographers and reporters photographing and reporting from the side of the enemy?

It was either an Al Qaeda recruiting video being made or, knowing Reuters, they were making an anti-American/the evil military piece for some liberal MSM outlet in the U.S.A.

 

[CurveLight]

Wrong dumb ass *****....those are exploding rounds filled with anti personnel shrapnel or specifically designed to fragment into many pieces to KILL ANYTHING within a certain range...that's why in the video you see a round hit about 5 feet away from the heavily armed terrorist and he dropped like a sack of potatos...more than likely caused by his head intercepting a large piece of lead....

What were they supposed to do when they fired a warning shot...shoot into a house a few blocks away?

The more you post...the stupider everyone thinks you are....just shut up until you come back into reality.

I already posted a link showing it has been used to fire warning shots you dumfuk. What else you got? If you look at the video you can see open areas around the group.....there was plenty of room to pop off a couple of shots.

You fire warning shots to disperse an angry crowd, not at suspected enemy forces

Then you don't know the EOF protocol in Iraq.

 

[Nonelitist]

I already posted a link showing it has been used to fire warning shots you dumfuk. What else you got? If you look at the video you can see open areas around the group.....there was plenty of room to pop off a couple of shots.

You fire warning shots to disperse an angry crowd, not at suspected enemy forces

Then you don't know the EOF protocol in Iraq.

Curve... people are pretty much ignoring what you say now, so move on to another topic where you can hate America.

 

[CurveLight]

Ok... now that Curvelight has been totally schooled....

Something else is bothering me. It is very likely that these dudes that got killed by the Apache were engaging United States military.

Why were Reuters photographers with them? Does that bother anyone else? The military investigation, I believe, found that they were not wearing anythign that identified them as photographers.

I am not claiming they deserved to die. But are photographers and reporters photographing and reporting from the side of the enemy?

Where is the documentation showing who they were?

 

[Nonelitist]

Ok... now that Curvelight has been totally schooled....

Something else is bothering me. It is very likely that these dudes that got killed by the Apache were engaging United States military.

Why were Reuters photographers with them? Does that bother anyone else? The military investigation, I believe, found that they were not wearing anythign that identified them as photographers.

I am not claiming they deserved to die. But are photographers and reporters photographing and reporting from the side of the enemy?

Where is the documentation showing who they were?

I don't understand your question. Who are you referring to?

 

[CrimsonWhite]

Ok... now that Curvelight has been totally schooled....

Something else is bothering me. It is very likely that these dudes that got killed by the Apache were engaging United States military.

Why were Reuters photographers with them? Does that bother anyone else? The military investigation, I believe, found that they were not wearing anythign that identified them as photographers.

I am not claiming they deserved to die. But are photographers and reporters photographing and reporting from the side of the enemy?

Where is the documentation showing who they were?

What the **** are you talking about?

 

[Liability]

Ok... now that Curvelight has been totally schooled....

Something else is bothering me. It is very likely that these dudes that got killed by the Apache were engaging United States military.

Why were Reuters photographers with them? Does that bother anyone else? The military investigation, I believe, found that they were not wearing anythign that identified them as photographers.

I am not claiming they deserved to die. But are photographers and reporters photographing and reporting from the side of the enemy?

Where is the documentation showing who they were?

I don't understand your question. Who are you referring to?

bent tight hasn't mastered the use of the indefinite pronoun.

But I can translate some of his gibberish into English sometimes.

It looks like he's trying to ask you for some documentary evidence that the guys HE claims were just innocent civilians and/or journalists were, instead, guys in the middle of attempting to engage U.S. military forces.

He apparently thinks these guys carry passports and official I.D. cards.

 

[CurveLight]

You fire warning shots to disperse an angry crowd, not at suspected enemy forces

Then you don't know the EOF protocol in Iraq.

Curve... people are pretty much ignoring what you say now, so move on to another topic where you can hate America.

Dikwad ***** like you ignore any information you don like and replace available facts with fantasies. You just proved that by saying it is "likely these guys were engaging US military" when.....not only do you have no evidence of that...but while we have actual video showing they were casually walking around when they got shot! You fuxxing dumass! Keep ignoring that with your middle school tactics of "nobody likes you."

 

[Nonelitist]

Then you don't know the EOF protocol in Iraq.

Curve... people are pretty much ignoring what you say now, so move on to another topic where you can hate America.

Dikwad ***** like you ignore any information you don like and replace available facts with fantasies. You just proved that by saying it is "likely these guys were engaging US military" when.....not only do you have no evidence of that...but while we have actual video showing they were casually walking around when they got shot! You fuxxing dumass! Keep ignoring that with your middle school tactics of "nobody likes you."

Are you really this stupid?

The investigation showed that the military in the area was being engaged. These dudes had weapons and were acting in a manner that suggested they were about to engage.
They were carrying weapons.

So move on from that argument. As a human being, you are embarassing me. I know it is hard to admit that this incident isn't what you had hoped it would be. Just admit it and move on. There will be other instances where you can assume your fellow Americans are worse human beings that homocidal terrorists.