Wikileak'd video shows eager-to-kill troops firing on Reuters reporters and children

[CurveLight]

What the **** are you talking about?

Who the fuk you think Einstein? There isn't much evidence for weapons and from what we know there were possibly 3 identified. That means out of a group of 12 people that got shot 75% were unarmed.

When Mao fought his revolution, most of his soldiers were unarmed. It was said that there was one rifle for every 3-5 men.

Does that mean that the men waiting to pick up the weapon, who were shot during fights against the KMT, were murdered innocents as well?

Did you stretch first? Reaching that far can tear tendons unless you properly warm up.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

If CurveLight was in charge of recruiting this is what the Armed Forces would look like...

 

[eots]

If CurveLight was in charge of recruiting this is what the Armed Forces would look like...

more of patackophillas homosexual projections I see

 

[CurveLight]

If CurveLight was in charge of recruiting this is what the Armed Forces would look like...

Gosh you are so cool.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

If CurveLight was in charge of recruiting this is what the Armed Forces would look like...

more of patackophillas homosexual projections I see

Whatever bossy bottom.

 

[CurveLight]

If CurveLight was in charge of recruiting this is what the Armed Forces would look like...

more of patackophillas homosexual projections I see

This is where all threads end for punks like pp, radioasswipe and crimsoncunt because at the end of the day that is all they have to offer.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

If CurveLight was in charge of recruiting this is what the Armed Forces would look like...

more of patackophillas homosexual projections I see

This is where all threads end for punks like pp, radioasswipe and crimsoncunt because at the end of the day that is all they have to offer.

EEEEWWWWWWW.....shoot over there...we want to warn the terrorists.... EEEEEEWWWWWWW...I just hate all that blood...EEEEWWWWWW!!!!!

 

[CurveLight]

If CurveLight was in charge of recruiting this is what the Armed Forces would look like...

more of patackophillas homosexual projections I see

Whatever bossy bottom.

I can't believe someone with your genius let's others read your posts for free. It is so generous and kind.

 

[CrimsonWhite]

If CurveLight was in charge of recruiting this is what the Armed Forces would look like...

more of patackophillas homosexual projections I see

This is where all threads end for punks like pp, radioasswipe and crimsoncunt because at the end of the day that is all they have to offer.

**** off. You have been bested all over this thread. You are simply too ******* stupid to realize it.

 

[eots]

more of patackophillas homosexual projections I see

This is where all threads end for punks like pp, radioasswipe and crimsoncunt because at the end of the day that is all they have to offer.

EEEEWWWWWWW.....shoot over there...we want to warn the terrorists.... EEEEEEWWWWWWW...I just hate all that blood...EEEEWWWWWW!!!!!

freak

 

[CurveLight]

more of patackophillas homosexual projections I see

This is where all threads end for punks like pp, radioasswipe and crimsoncunt because at the end of the day that is all they have to offer.

EEEEWWWWWWW.....shoot over there...we want to warn the terrorists.... EEEEEEWWWWWWW...I just hate all that blood...EEEEWWWWWW!!!!!

Even your strawmen are mentally challenged.

 

[☭proletarian☭]

Who the fuk you think Einstein? There isn't much evidence for weapons and from what we know there were possibly 3 identified. That means out of a group of 12 people that got shot 75% were unarmed.

When Mao fought his revolution, most of his soldiers were unarmed. It was said that there was one rifle for every 3-5 men.

Does that mean that the men waiting to pick up the weapon, who were shot during fights against the KMT, were murdered innocents as well?

Did you stretch first? Reaching that far can tear tendons unless you properly warm up.

So being among a group of armed insurgents with nothing to identify yourself as anything but another insurgent ready to pick up the next man's rifle doesn't mean that you're also liable to get shot when the group is fired upon?

 

[CurveLight]

more of patackophillas homosexual projections I see

This is where all threads end for punks like pp, radioasswipe and crimsoncunt because at the end of the day that is all they have to offer.

**** off. You have been bested all over this thread. You are simply too ******* stupid to realize it.

Really? You whined early on about an unedited version so I posted the 38 minute version and you.....kept on whining. You haven't done anything in this thread but suck dick, make false claims, backpedal on claims, and ignored all the facts as we know them. You have the fuxxing video smack in your face but you choose to hide behind bullshit blogs that make absurd claims. I'm sure it pisses you off that I pwn Nationalists like yourself on a regular basis and while the pom pom crowd eases the burn nothing can reach deep enough to assuage the anguish of your honesty on permanent vacation.

 

[Liability]

When Mao fought his revolution, most of his soldiers were unarmed. It was said that there was one rifle for every 3-5 men.

Does that mean that the men waiting to pick up the weapon, who were shot during fights against the KMT, were murdered innocents as well?

Did you stretch first? Reaching that far can tear tendons unless you properly warm up.

So being among a group of armed insurgents with nothing to identify yourself as anything but another insurgent ready to pick up the next man's rifle doesn't mean that you're also liable to get shot when the group is fired upon?

You just earned yourself a red card, Mister.

Don't you grasp that bent tight cannot digest such obvious, clear, honest and reasonable logic?

 

[PatekPhilippe]

This is where all threads end for punks like pp, radioasswipe and crimsoncunt because at the end of the day that is all they have to offer.

**** off. You have been bested all over this thread. You are simply too ******* stupid to realize it.

Really? You whined early on about an unedited version so I posted the 38 minute version and you.....kept on whining. You haven't done anything in this thread but suck dick, make false claims, backpedal on claims, and ignored all the facts as we know them. You have the fuxxing video smack in your face but you choose to hide behind bullshit blogs that make absurd claims. I'm sure it pisses you off that I pwn Nationalists like yourself on a regular basis and while the pom pom crowd eases the burn nothing can reach deep enough to assuage the anguish of your honesty on permanent vacation.

Translation from tardspeak to english...WWWWAAAAAAHHHHHHHH I'm a whiny Code Pink fat ass who can't get laid!!!!! I moved back in with my momma because I can't make it in the real world!!!!! Please be nice to me because the internet is the nexus of my social life. Without any of you I will be all alone.

 

[☭proletarian☭]

**** off. You have been bested all over this thread. You simply too ******* stupid to realize it.

Really? You whined early on about an unedited version so I posted the 38 minute version and you.....kept on whining. You haven't done anything in this thread but suck dick, make false claims, backpedal on claims, and ignored all the facts as we know them. You have the fuxxing video smack in your face but you choose to hide behind bullshit blogs that make absurd claims. I'm sure it pisses you off that I pwn Nationalists like yourself on a regular basis and while the pom pom crowd eases the burn nothing can reach deep enough to assuage the anguish of your honesty on permanent vacation.

Translation from tardspeak to english...WWWWAAAAAAHHHHHHHH I'm a whiny Code Pink fat ass who can't get laid!!!!! I moved back in with my momma because I can't make it in the real world!!!!! Please be nice to me because the internet is the nexus of my social life. Without any of you I will be all alone.

Very mature and well-spoken...

 

[PatekPhilippe]

Really? You whined early on about an unedited version so I posted the 38 minute version and you.....kept on whining. You haven't done anything in this thread but suck dick, make false claims, backpedal on claims, and ignored all the facts as we know them. You have the fuxxing video smack in your face but you choose to hide behind bullshit blogs that make absurd claims. I'm sure it pisses you off that I pwn Nationalists like yourself on a regular basis and while the pom pom crowd eases the burn nothing can reach deep enough to assuage the anguish of your honesty on permanent vacation.

Translation from tardspeak to english...WWWWAAAAAAHHHHHHHH I'm a whiny Code Pink fat ass who can't get laid!!!!! I moved back in with my momma because I can't make it in the real world!!!!! Please be nice to me because the internet is the nexus of my social life. Without any of you I will be all alone.

Very mature and well-spoken...

Why thank you ... I strive for accurate translations.

 

[CurveLight]

When Mao fought his revolution, most of his soldiers were unarmed. It was said that there was one rifle for every 3-5 men.

Does that mean that the men waiting to pick up the weapon, who were shot during fights against the KMT, were murdered innocents as well?

Did you stretch first? Reaching that far can tear tendons unless you properly warm up.

So being among a group of armed insurgents with nothing to identify yourself as anything but another insurgent ready to pick up the next man's rifle doesn't mean that you're also liable to get shot when the group is fired upon?

From the time we invaded iraq there have never been insurgents. Do you know what the definition is or have you allowed the MSM to sell you a dishonest term?

What is the evidence the group was a threat? I have yet to see any solid evidence they had weapons. We already know a camera was mistaken for a rpg.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

Did you stretch first? Reaching that far can tear tendons unless you properly warm up.

So being among a group of armed insurgents with nothing to identify yourself as anything but another insurgent ready to pick up the next man's rifle doesn't mean that you're also liable to get shot when the group is fired upon?

From the time we invaded iraq there have never been insurgents. Do you know what the definition is or have you allowed the MSM to sell you a dishonest term?

What is the evidence the group was a threat? I have yet to see any solid evidence they had weapons. We already know a camera was mistaken for a rpg.

Yeah...the terrorists fighting against the U.S. were just magical little creatures that popped out of little holes in the ground from time to time...and hit our soldiers with their shillelagh's.

You've got bats in your ******* bellfry ass wipe!!!!

 

[☭proletarian☭]

From the time we invaded iraq there have never been insurgents.

...



are you daft?

Do you know what the definition is or have you allowed the MSM to sell you a dishonest term?

WordNet Search - 3.0 - WordNet home page - Glossary - Help
Word to search for: Display Options: (Select option to change) Hide Example Sentences Hide Glosses Show Frequency Counts Show Database Locations Show Lexical File Info Show Lexical File Numbers Show Sense Keys Show Sense Numbers Key: "S:" = Show Synset (semantic) relations, "W:" = Show Word (lexical) relations
Noun

• S: (n) insurgent, insurrectionist, freedom fighter, rebel (a person who takes part in an armed rebellion against the constituted authority (especially in the hope of improving conditions))
• S: (n) guerrilla, guerilla, irregular, insurgent (a member of an irregular armed force that fights a stronger force by sabotage and harassment)

Adjective

• S: (adj) insurgent, seditious, subversive (in opposition to a civil authority or government)

WordNet home page

What is the evidence the group was a threat?

They were believed to be in possession of automatic weapons (and later, before shooting, they were believed to have an RPG) in close proximity to US troops in a warzone.

I have yet to see any solid evidence they had weapons.

I don't care whether they had weapons or not. In examining the actions of the crew, you must examine the actions they took with the information available to them. The best information available was that they appeared armed and traveling together in a war zone in close proximity to US ground forces in an area where guerrilla attacks by groups of such description are quite common.

We already know a camera was mistaken for a rpg.

So the information somehow travels back in time so the gun crew knows that it's a camera?

If a man shoots a masked man in his house at night because he has a knife in his hand and is standing over hi,, is he just?

Now it turns out that it was his brother and it was actually a pie cutter and he was about to surprise him with a birthday party.

Do the man's actions somehow become unjust and inexcusable or must they be considered in light of what information was available to the man at the time?