Why we have to redistribute income through taxes

[The Rabbi]

and since the competition in Labor includes the GLOBAL market the past few decades, where lots of cheap labor is available there has been no need to compensate the US worker because business can just go overseas and get cheaper labor to make their widgets... competition and free trade has obviously hurt the American worker, but helped the Chinese, the Indonesians, the Vietnamese etc

the chart in the op shows the US worker is producing more widgets per hour, and more profit dollars for the business but are not getting paid more for producing more....

The chart is a lie.
But yeah, all work is sent overseas. No one is working in America anymore.

The chart isn't a lie. Wages are easily historically on the BLS website. So can productivity measures by the DoL.

But with your statement... You would be real pissed at Reagan if it were true, for selling us down the river.

Yeah I can tell you're lying because posts with your name appear.
The chart does not show wages.

 

[The Rabbi]

and since the competition in Labor includes the GLOBAL market the past few decades, where lots of cheap labor is available there has been no need to compensate the US worker because business can just go overseas and get cheaper labor to make their widgets... competition and free trade has obviously hurt the American worker, but helped the Chinese, the Indonesians, the Vietnamese etc

the chart in the op shows the US worker is producing more widgets per hour, and more profit dollars for the business but are not getting paid more for producing more....

The chart is a lie.
But yeah, all work is sent overseas. No one is working in America anymore.

you are such as dufas!


the chart is not a lie, it's a KNOWN fact with lots and lots of statistics to back it up....

productivity(what the worker produces per hour for the employer) of the American worker has gone up, while wages have not proportionately.

that's a fact, jack.

The chart doesnt show wages.
You are so incredibly stupid I dont know how you manage to breathe unassisted. You fall for every piece of liberal garbage talking point there is and then continue the most absurd contortions when called on it. Wasnt it you suggesting Lois Lerner was really a GOP plant?

 

[Shanty]

 

[The Rabbi]

Another idiot who cant read charts.
OK, genius. Tell me what you think this chart represents.

 

[Shanty]

The chart is a lie.
But yeah, all work is sent overseas. No one is working in America anymore.

The chart isn't a lie. Wages are easily historically on the BLS website. So can productivity measures by the DoL.

But with your statement... You would be real pissed at Reagan if it were true, for selling us down the river.

Yeah I can tell you're lying because posts with your name appear.
The chart does not show wages.

You know, every time you continue on with your lies, you look dumber to everyone here.

Maybe you don't care how dumb you look to everyone. That's something you can be proud of.

 

[Shanty]

Another idiot who cant read charts.
OK, genius. Tell me what you think this chart represents.

It shows flat compensation since 1970.

If you like, I can show the differences between tax brackets, and quintiles and include top income earners and wealth disparity.

See, I can produce information. You can't produce anything except feeble bullshit. But, I'll teach you how to read a chart if I feel like helping you.

 

[The Rabbi]

The chart isn't a lie. Wages are easily historically on the BLS website. So can productivity measures by the DoL.

But with your statement... You would be real pissed at Reagan if it were true, for selling us down the river.

Yeah I can tell you're lying because posts with your name appear.
The chart does not show wages.

You know, every time you continue on with your lies, you look dumber to everyone here.

Maybe you don't care how dumb you look to everyone. That's something you can be proud of.

You appear to be the stupid one here. Go back to the chart and see what it purports to show. "Wages" is nowhere on there.

 

[The Rabbi]

Another idiot who cant read charts.
OK, genius. Tell me what you think this chart represents.

It shows flat compensation since 1970.

If you like, I can show the differences between tax brackets, and quintiles and include top income earners and wealth disparity.

See, I can produce information. You can't produce anything except feeble bullshit. But, I'll teach you how to read a chart if I feel like helping you.

No actually it does not.
Do you honestly think people who have been working since 1970 are making the same money today as they did 40 years ago?

 

[Shanty]

Another idiot who cant read charts.
OK, genius. Tell me what you think this chart represents.

It shows flat compensation since 1970.

If you like, I can show the differences between tax brackets, and quintiles and include top income earners and wealth disparity.

See, I can produce information. You can't produce anything except feeble bullshit. But, I'll teach you how to read a chart if I feel like helping you.

No actually it does not.
Do you honestly think people who have been working since 1970 are making the same money today as they did 40 years ago?

Do you need the concept of wages adjusted for inflation spelled out for you? You're really floundering here, dude.

 

[The Rabbi]

It shows flat compensation since 1970.

If you like, I can show the differences between tax brackets, and quintiles and include top income earners and wealth disparity.

See, I can produce information. You can't produce anything except feeble bullshit. But, I'll teach you how to read a chart if I feel like helping you.

No actually it does not.
Do you honestly think people who have been working since 1970 are making the same money today as they did 40 years ago?

Do you need the concept of wages adjusted for inflation spelled out for you? You're really floundering here, dude.

Do you need the idea of average spelled out for you?
You make look yourself look stupider by the post.
Again, do you really think people who entered the work force in 1970 are making the same money today, even adjusted for inflation?

 

[Shanty]

Poor Rabbi... Home schooling left him behind...

.

 

[The Rabbi]

Poor Rabbi... Home schooling left him behind...

.

Poor Shanty. Stupid dumbfuck can't read charts, can't defend what he writes.
Are you still pushing that the original chart posted showed wages? I want to hear you say it. Were those wages?

 

[Shanty]

No actually it does not.
Do you honestly think people who have been working since 1970 are making the same money today as they did 40 years ago?

Do you need the concept of wages adjusted for inflation spelled out for you? You're really floundering here, dude.

Do you need the idea of average spelled out for you?
You make look yourself look stupider by the post.
Again, do you really think people who entered the work force in 1970 are making the same money today, even adjusted for inflation?

LOL.

Looks like you're unable to read a chart still.

If you want to take average out and go to median, you're argument falls apart worse. ALL TOO EASY... LOL.

 

[The Rabbi]

Do you need the concept of wages adjusted for inflation spelled out for you? You're really floundering here, dude.

Do you need the idea of average spelled out for you?
You make look yourself look stupider by the post.
Again, do you really think people who entered the work force in 1970 are making the same money today, even adjusted for inflation?

LOL.

Looks like you're unable to read a chart still.

If you want to take average out and go to median, you're argument falls apart worse. ALL TOO EASY... LOL.

Uh, median is average, dumbfuck.
Wow you are waaay out of your depth here.
Again, do you think people who entered the workforce in 1970 are making the same wage, even adjusted for inflation?

 

[Shanty]

Poor Rabbi... Home schooling left him behind...

.

Poor Shanty. Stupid dumbfuck can't read charts, can't defend what he writes.
Are you still pushing that the original chart posted showed wages? I want to hear you say it. Were those wages?

Point is, by every measure, you're still flailing like a dope clinging to a losing argument.

Now, try real hard, with all your might and come up with something relevant, dimwit. I know you were teased a lot by your teacher in the home school, but I have faith you might come up with something relevant.

It's probably misplaced hope, because you got a lot of dope to overcome.

 

[ilia25]

Now I am never for forced redistribution, clever taxing schemes for redistribution or even reparations of any kind on such things like that, but I am for shaming companies who treat and abuse the American workers badly, and especially for the reasons of GREED in which they do it.

You cannot shame a company for paying millions to its CEO. This is a valid business decision -- the companies have to attract the best and brightest. As long as we have a free-market based economy, which we should, it will create inequality. Sometimes it would create way more than it is necessary for simply giving people right motivations.

When it happens, the government should intervene by redistributing incomes from the rich to the poor.

It's such a wonderfully simple concept, Ilia...yet so naive.

The government shouldn't be in the "redistribution" business...what they should be doing is providing an environment for those who are poor to become part of the middle class.

What you suggest is impossible. We can't all become CEOs. Even if everyone would get a college degree, some of us would have to work at McDonalds.

The income distribution is defined by the level of technological progress. As machines replace workers, inequality increases -- middle class jobs are replaced by a few very high paying ones and much more low income, low skilled jobs. That is why we have to engage in income redistribution if only to maintain the status quo -- more if we want to decrease inequality.

 

[Shanty]

Do you need the idea of average spelled out for you?
You make look yourself look stupider by the post.
Again, do you really think people who entered the work force in 1970 are making the same money today, even adjusted for inflation?

LOL.

Looks like you're unable to read a chart still.

If you want to take average out and go to median, you're argument falls apart worse. ALL TOO EASY... LOL.

Uh, median is average, dumbfuck.
Wow you are waaay out of your depth here.
Again, do you think people who entered the workforce in 1970 are making the same wage, even adjusted for inflation?

Man... You fail and come back with more fail...

What a maroon. I bet you wore that dunce cap with pride.
mean vs. median vs. average : Choose Your Words : Vocabulary.com

 

[The Rabbi]

Poor Rabbi... Home schooling left him behind...

.

Poor Shanty. Stupid dumbfuck can't read charts, can't defend what he writes.
Are you still pushing that the original chart posted showed wages? I want to hear you say it. Were those wages?

Point is, by every measure, you're still flailing like a dope clinging to a losing argument.

Now, try real hard, with all your might and come up with something relevant, dimwit. I know you were teased a lot by your teacher in the home schooling, but I have faith you might come up with something relevant.

It's probably misplaced hope, because you got a lot of dope to overcome.

I can tell you're losing the argument. Deflection, insults.
OK, let me remind you that "average" can be three different things: mean, media, and mode. Your idiotic chart that you dont understand doesnt reference which it is. It actually doesnt tell you anything. Thats part of what makes it useless, except to show that morons like you cant read charts.
Additionally a growing labor workforce of younger workers will push down the average wages, even as those longer in the workforce make more. Did that happen? Yes it did.
So here's your lesson for today, sonny. Read the chart and don't assume. Because when you assume you make an ass out of yourself.

 

[Shanty]

Poor Shanty. Stupid dumbfuck can't read charts, can't defend what he writes.
Are you still pushing that the original chart posted showed wages? I want to hear you say it. Were those wages?

Point is, by every measure, you're still flailing like a dope clinging to a losing argument.

Now, try real hard, with all your might and come up with something relevant, dimwit. I know you were teased a lot by your teacher in the home schooling, but I have faith you might come up with something relevant.

It's probably misplaced hope, because you got a lot of dope to overcome.

I can tell you're losing the argument. Deflection, insults.
OK, let me remind you that "average" can be three different things: mean, media, and mode. Your idiotic chart that you dont understand doesnt reference which it is. It actually doesnt tell you anything. Thats part of what makes it useless, except to show that morons like you cant read charts.
Additionally a growing labor workforce of younger workers will push down the average wages, even as those longer in the workforce make more. Did that happen? Yes it did.
So here's your lesson for today, sonny. Read the chart and don't assume. Because when you assume you make an ass out of yourself.

Ahh.. So when you started off with deflection and insults, that meant what exactly?

Yeah. Now tuck your tail dude. As I said, by any measurement, you're losing the argument.
http://www.middleclasspoliticaleconomist.com/2012/03/basics-real-wages-remain-below-their.html

Silly rabbi. He got no Trix, but wishes he had some. Awesome fail on the average versus median thing. Poor wing nuts. Ideology blinds them to even the definition of words.

 

[The Rabbi]

Point is, by every measure, you're still flailing like a dope clinging to a losing argument.

Now, try real hard, with all your might and come up with something relevant, dimwit. I know you were teased a lot by your teacher in the home schooling, but I have faith you might come up with something relevant.

It's probably misplaced hope, because you got a lot of dope to overcome.

I can tell you're losing the argument. Deflection, insults.
OK, let me remind you that "average" can be three different things: mean, media, and mode. Your idiotic chart that you dont understand doesnt reference which it is. It actually doesnt tell you anything. Thats part of what makes it useless, except to show that morons like you cant read charts.
Additionally a growing labor workforce of younger workers will push down the average wages, even as those longer in the workforce make more. Did that happen? Yes it did.
So here's your lesson for today, sonny. Read the chart and don't assume. Because when you assume you make an ass out of yourself.

Ahh.. So when you started off with deflection and insults, that meant what exactly?

Yeah. Now tuck your tail dude. As I said, by any measurement, you're losing the argument.
Middle Class Political Economist: Basics: Real Wages Remain Below Their Peak for 39th Straight Year

Silly rabbi. He got no Trix, but wishes he had some. Awesome fail on the average versus median thing. Poor wing nuts. Ideology blinds them to even the definition of words.

You post a blog that shows no more intelligence in statistics than you have. What a shock.
You have been thoroughly, and I mean thoroughly, debunked and defrocked here. You have no experience in business, other than buying stuff from them. You dont know anything about stats. You can't read a graph. You can't respond to an argument. You can't defend your own argument.
You are thoroughly worthless. Another poseur liberal pretending he knows something.
You're dismissed.