- Jul 25, 2018
- Reaction score
Ok.For one thing, a sampling of ten states does not a survey make. Second, you ignore the fact that Hillary also barely won some states like Virginia. Third, the popular vote still does not mean a thing, but if nothing else, you are proving my point that Hillary's "popular vote victory" was mainly a function of TWO states, New York and California, and that is EXACTLY the very thing the Founders sought to avoid--- --- --- a president being elected which only represented one special, local group ignoring the rest of the country.Like I said, it's not mathematically impossible. It kind of actually happened...
But more important, like all Libs, you are trying to again deflect from the real point of the topic here, that the claim that Trump's states were all empty is a bald faced lie. Other than ONE STATE, California, in every other state ranking each candidate won, Trump's state was more populous than Hillary's.
View attachment 284929
And the final point of mine you are helping to prove is that it isn't the Right that is brainwashed but the Left. Your very figures show that a preponderance of Hillary's votes came from TWO SMALL AREAS: around NYC and SanFran / LA. Now STATISTICALLY, there is almost a zero random chance that literally MILLIONS of people in a given small area should all vote the same way! UNLESS, there was some external force steering them to do so.
So thanks for proving the point that:
- Leftards are brainwashed, controlled zombies who get plugged into the central thinknet of huge megalopolises strictly controlled by the Democrats.
- And that the Founder's system worked, in keeping your mobs of radical socialists from usurping power from the other 99% of the nation.
You're arguing that Hillary won some states by small margins, that the popular vote does not mean anything, that the intentions of the founding fathers were to avoid catering to densely populated areas, that liberals claim Trump's states were empty, that there are external forces causing people to think alike in the same region.
You're all over the place. None of this has anything to do with the specific statement of yours that I have countered. Once again, here is the single isolated statement of yours that I am countering:
"SO THE QUESTION BECOMES: Facts do not lie. How does Trump win THIRTY states, win the popular vote in each, and nearly all of his states were more populated than the concomitant state won by Hillary in the first place, yet STILL COME OUT LOSING THE NATIONAL POPULAR COUNT by 2.8 million? Heads up: THAT IS MATHEMATICALLY IMPOSSIBLE."
There is nothing in that quoted statement of yours about founding fathers intentions, central thinknets, empty states, or anything else you brought up in this diatribe of yours. I'm not sure if you're having a difficult time focusing on it or if you're intentionally trying to throw in unrelated statements, but I'll once again direct you to the specific quote of yours above that I have countered. My argument is with that specific statement and my argument with that is a mathematical argument - not based on rhetoric about group-think or founding fathers.
I mathematically disproved that specific quoted claim of yours. Twice.