Open up a dictionary and look up "Uncontrollable rage". Stop spouting shit.
Open up a dictionary and look up "Ass Hat" ...Oh look, it has a picture of you!
Look... if you are sick and have "uncontrollable rage" then you need to be locked up in a mental institution away from the public so you can't hurt people. As a citizen concerned with public safety, I am okay with a portion of my tax money being devoted to such a facility because I am pro-life and don't believe in euthanizing you. What I am NOT okay with is turning our beautiful and great free enterprise, free market capitalist, constitutional republic into a commie-socialist shithole.
I used one extreme. But the point is without socialized medicine I would be in a mental institution.
I took a call from a pharmacist. He thought his monitor was the computer. He couldn't figure out why it wouldn't turn on. His asst turned off the computer under the counter. He couldn't bend his legs to look under the counter to turn it back on, even when I told him to do so on the phone. Some people are too stupid to help themselves. Some people are too stupid to compete. Do we kill them or let them starve?
My nephew can't graduate high school. He's 24. He's too dumb. When you try to explain stuff too him he gets all panicky and runs. Or he has an anxiety attack. Should he starve without medial care, food, and/or shelter, because he's too stupid to exist?
Maybe we should make an institute to store stupid people like we do the mentally ill?
And MY point is, you don't have "socialized medicine", you have the VA. I understand many people make the mistake of calling the VA a form of socialized medicine and in a purely generic sense, I can see where they get that idea. However, if we apply "socialist" in the generic sense, ALL government can be said to be Socialist. So where can there be any debate if by the very act of having government, it makes you Socialists? Obviously, I reject this nonsense on the more specific and less generic context that Socialism is a specific kind of government. ALL government is NOT Socialist.
When we examine the definition of Socialism, we see that it's a set of social or economic principles whereby government controls means of production. So you say, great... this proves that the VA is socialized medicine because government controls means of production. But the problem is, in OUR form of government we have a Constitution which enumerates specific powers to government and everything else is governed by the people (as opposed to the government). The VA is the result of free people who self-govern, allowing government to administer health care for veterans because they've served our country. This same principle applies to federal highway departments, military branches. on a state and local level-- fire and police services. These are not "Socialist" because the government is "by the people" in our system. There is no autonomous entity called "the government" which controls anything because "we the people" are the government. Now, we can certainly vote to cede our control and power over to a central authority and become a Socialist government. That's where the debate is.
As for your argument about what we do about stupid people... I see your point. Back in the old days we kind of had a "self-cleaning" society... stupid people would hang out behind a kicking mule or look down the barrel of their loaded six-shooter and pull the trigger to see if it was loaded. Later on, they'd drop their electric fans in the bathtub or step in front of a bus. Slowly but surely, progressives built a society where we protect the stupid from themselves and they have procreated. Even progressive icons like Margaret Sanger saw this problem and suggested we put these stupid people on farms and sterilize them... that idea fell out of favor and we settled on abortion instead. But, I digress.
You're right, we have to come to terms as a society what to do with the stupid among us. I wish I knew of a solution because if we continue to placate them and set up safety nets so they continue to procreate and thrive, eventually our nation will be comprised of mostly idiots. We seem to be getting there at a rapid rate. Perhaps Margaret Sanger was on to something? But.... I would like to think that most "stupid people" have something within them, deep down inside, that is capable of success. It becomes a matter of restoring their confidence in their ability to compete. Encouraging them and motivating them... sometimes using a "tough love" strategy if needed. Yeah, I know it may sound cruel but an empty stomach is a great motivator. You'd be surprised what people can do whenever the alternative is starving.
And let's be clear on something else... This Socialist Utopia the leftists dream of... whenever it fails (and it will) there will be starving people. In Venezuela, where just a few short years ago the American progressives lauded Hugo Chavez, a nation rich in natural oil reserves, the people are literally fighting over dogs and cats to eat. That's where Socialism leads... it always has and always will.