Why the hatred.

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

The individuals of January 6th at the Capitol however were there for the stated purpose of INTERFERING with government business with the stated objective of preventing Joe Biden from being certified as president of the United States. That's why they're referred to as insurrectionists and not protestors, two entirely different things, least of which is protesting is protected by the 1st Amendment and insurrection is a federal crime punishable by up to 10 years in prison

See? This is what I am talking about? The paradigm you are weaving is exactly what I have spelled out in my first post in this thread, dishonest reporting, and double standards.

This is due to your consumption of certain media that TELL you this is so. . . and? You believe this. Of course, this is not the truth, far from it.

Very few of those Trump protestors actually went there to interfere with the government business. Just as very few BLM protestors took part in looting and rioting.

Both of these scenarios is identical, IDENTICAL.

They're not identical by any stretch of the imagination. I heard there were maybe 10,000 people who showed up for Trump's rally/speech and of those people about 1,000 traveled on to the Capitol. That's not "very few" and right now I believe around 500 of them have been identified and have had charges filed against them.

I haven't been TOLD anything in regards to how to view this incident, I saw for myself what they did and said, including those who believed it was their duty to "stop the steal". Shouts of 'Hang Mike Pence' and calls out of 'Nancy where are you? We're looking for you' while unlawfully being in restricted areas, vandalizing offices of the Capitol, stealing government property, etc. doesn't meet the definition of peaceable assembly, particularly when you add in the following

Threatening government officials of the United States is a felony under federal law. Threatening the President of the United States is a felony under 18 U.S.C. § 871, punishable by up to 5 years of imprisonment, that is investigated by the United States Secret Service.[1] Threatening other officials is a Class D or C felony, usually carrying maximum penalties of 5 or 10 years under 18 U.S.C. § 875, 18 U.S.C. § 876 and other statutes, that is investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. When national boundaries are transcended by such a threat, it is considered a terrorist threat.[2]​

Our vice president and congressional members were fleeing, in fear for their lives.

Marching in the streets to create a presence in order to draw attention to injustices being carried out each day comes no where close to storming the Capitol where our representatives, including the vice president of the United States were in attendance in order to certify the next president of the United States. They said they were there to "stop the steal" and they did indeed stop it momentarily but they couldn't prevent it.

But? Because of folks IN-GROUP/OUT-GROUP identification. . . they are too close to it to see it. If I told you any other research or narrative that explains in common sense with facts, than the one you are being fed, you would object. Twain said, it is harder to undo a falsehood that it is to weave one in the first place.

I'm telling you, these two instances are identical. If you don't see it, it is because your Out-Group is affecting your view of ethics.

I am a trained analyst among other things. I do my own research, and I use various sources but one of things I never do, is attribute certain behaviors to people based on their political affiliation. That is one of the dumbest things I have ever seen and I somehow feel that it's just the latest "slur" used to demean others since people can get in trouble if they use the one they really want to say, JMHO

I'd say my ethics are in better shape than half this board.

Not all of them had the intent when they went there to storm the capitol. It is your POV and the media you are consuming that have you believing this.

Only a few dozen wanted to do this. When the Capitol Police were given orders to stand down, and they just stood aside. . . these folks just walked right in.

LOLOL

Yeah, they were invited in.

They might as well have been.

The establishment knew what was coming and did nothing to prevent it. That is the same as an invitation. And when they came, they did nothing to prevent them from coming right on in, they just opened the gates.

So if a woman gets raped, the fact that she wasn't wearing a chastity belt means she invited the rape because she did nothing to prevent it?

 

[StormAl]

The hatred by republicans against democrats is breathtaking on here. We are spoken of as a type of malignant tumour against society for no reason. They have never threatened the country with a communist overthrow, never. Never a communist like POTUS has ever been elected but they label every dissenter to the conservative view as a commie.

Where is the patriotism of the country and its ability to overcome problems when the divide is so blatant. The born to rule attitude of republicans is the epitome of a divided nation and it increased further under trump. Its like they resent democracy if it failed to present them with power.

The pathetic delusion it was stolen from them, the disgraceful attitude towards democrats, the silly childish names they give their opponents, the total disrespect of the president because he is a Democrat, accusations of Harris as a whore etc with no evidence whatsoever.

A simple opinion by a Democrat is vigorously attacked with bile and venom dripping from your mouths. What is wrong with you people? Why the hatred?

The far right are quite similar to the Nazis in Germany before they took power, accusing everyone who opposed them as socialists or commies.

Unlike the Nazis, the far right here will never take power.

 

[Faun]

The individuals of January 6th at the Capitol however were there for the stated purpose of INTERFERING with government business with the stated objective of preventing Joe Biden from being certified as president of the United States. That's why they're referred to as insurrectionists and not protestors, two entirely different things, least of which is protesting is protected by the 1st Amendment and insurrection is a federal crime punishable by up to 10 years in prison

See? This is what I am talking about? The paradigm you are weaving is exactly what I have spelled out in my first post in this thread, dishonest reporting, and double standards.

This is due to your consumption of certain media that TELL you this is so. . . and? You believe this. Of course, this is not the truth, far from it.

Very few of those Trump protestors actually went there to interfere with the government business. Just as very few BLM protestors took part in looting and rioting.

Both of these scenarios is identical, IDENTICAL.

They're not identical by any stretch of the imagination. I heard there were maybe 10,000 people who showed up for Trump's rally/speech and of those people about 1,000 traveled on to the Capitol. That's not "very few" and right now I believe around 500 of them have been identified and have had charges filed against them.

I haven't been TOLD anything in regards to how to view this incident, I saw for myself what they did and said, including those who believed it was their duty to "stop the steal". Shouts of 'Hang Mike Pence' and calls out of 'Nancy where are you? We're looking for you' while unlawfully being in restricted areas, vandalizing offices of the Capitol, stealing government property, etc. doesn't meet the definition of peaceable assembly, particularly when you add in the following

Threatening government officials of the United States is a felony under federal law. Threatening the President of the United States is a felony under 18 U.S.C. § 871, punishable by up to 5 years of imprisonment, that is investigated by the United States Secret Service.[1] Threatening other officials is a Class D or C felony, usually carrying maximum penalties of 5 or 10 years under 18 U.S.C. § 875, 18 U.S.C. § 876 and other statutes, that is investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. When national boundaries are transcended by such a threat, it is considered a terrorist threat.[2]​

Our vice president and congressional members were fleeing, in fear for their lives.

Marching in the streets to create a presence in order to draw attention to injustices being carried out each day comes no where close to storming the Capitol where our representatives, including the vice president of the United States were in attendance in order to certify the next president of the United States. They said they were there to "stop the steal" and they did indeed stop it momentarily but they couldn't prevent it.

But? Because of folks IN-GROUP/OUT-GROUP identification. . . they are too close to it to see it. If I told you any other research or narrative that explains in common sense with facts, than the one you are being fed, you would object. Twain said, it is harder to undo a falsehood that it is to weave one in the first place.

I'm telling you, these two instances are identical. If you don't see it, it is because your Out-Group is affecting your view of ethics.

I am a trained analyst among other things. I do my own research, and I use various sources but one of things I never do, is attribute certain behaviors to people based on their political affiliation. That is one of the dumbest things I have ever seen and I somehow feel that it's just the latest "slur" used to demean others since people can get in trouble if they use the one they really want to say, JMHO

I'd say my ethics are in better shape than half this board.

Not all of them had the intent when they went there to storm the capitol. It is your POV and the media you are consuming that have you believing this.

Only a few dozen wanted to do this. When the Capitol Police were given orders to stand down, and they just stood aside. . . these folks just walked right in.

LOLOL

Yeah, they were invited in.

They might as well have been.

The establishment knew what was coming and did nothing to prevent it. That is the same as an invitation. And when they came, they did nothing to prevent them from coming right on in, they just opened the gates.

While a few cops who were overwhelmed by the massive and aggressive mob confronting them chose personal safety and stepped aside rather than fight a losing battle, that doesn't mean they were invited in or even welcome. And as the video I posted showed, many cops did try to fight to keep them out. And many were injured. That was an insurrection and I won't be surprised to see some get charged with sedition.

 

[MisterBeale]

The individuals of January 6th at the Capitol however were there for the stated purpose of INTERFERING with government business with the stated objective of preventing Joe Biden from being certified as president of the United States. That's why they're referred to as insurrectionists and not protestors, two entirely different things, least of which is protesting is protected by the 1st Amendment and insurrection is a federal crime punishable by up to 10 years in prison

See? This is what I am talking about? The paradigm you are weaving is exactly what I have spelled out in my first post in this thread, dishonest reporting, and double standards.

This is due to your consumption of certain media that TELL you this is so. . . and? You believe this. Of course, this is not the truth, far from it.

Very few of those Trump protestors actually went there to interfere with the government business. Just as very few BLM protestors took part in looting and rioting.

Both of these scenarios is identical, IDENTICAL.

They're not identical by any stretch of the imagination. I heard there were maybe 10,000 people who showed up for Trump's rally/speech and of those people about 1,000 traveled on to the Capitol. That's not "very few" and right now I believe around 500 of them have been identified and have had charges filed against them.

I haven't been TOLD anything in regards to how to view this incident, I saw for myself what they did and said, including those who believed it was their duty to "stop the steal". Shouts of 'Hang Mike Pence' and calls out of 'Nancy where are you? We're looking for you' while unlawfully being in restricted areas, vandalizing offices of the Capitol, stealing government property, etc. doesn't meet the definition of peaceable assembly, particularly when you add in the following

Threatening government officials of the United States is a felony under federal law. Threatening the President of the United States is a felony under 18 U.S.C. § 871, punishable by up to 5 years of imprisonment, that is investigated by the United States Secret Service.[1] Threatening other officials is a Class D or C felony, usually carrying maximum penalties of 5 or 10 years under 18 U.S.C. § 875, 18 U.S.C. § 876 and other statutes, that is investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. When national boundaries are transcended by such a threat, it is considered a terrorist threat.[2]​

Our vice president and congressional members were fleeing, in fear for their lives.

Marching in the streets to create a presence in order to draw attention to injustices being carried out each day comes no where close to storming the Capitol where our representatives, including the vice president of the United States were in attendance in order to certify the next president of the United States. They said they were there to "stop the steal" and they did indeed stop it momentarily but they couldn't prevent it.

But? Because of folks IN-GROUP/OUT-GROUP identification. . . they are too close to it to see it. If I told you any other research or narrative that explains in common sense with facts, than the one you are being fed, you would object. Twain said, it is harder to undo a falsehood that it is to weave one in the first place.

I'm telling you, these two instances are identical. If you don't see it, it is because your Out-Group is affecting your view of ethics.

I am a trained analyst among other things. I do my own research, and I use various sources but one of things I never do, is attribute certain behaviors to people based on their political affiliation. That is one of the dumbest things I have ever seen and I somehow feel that it's just the latest "slur" used to demean others since people can get in trouble if they use the one they really want to say, JMHO

I'd say my ethics are in better shape than half this board.

Not all of them had the intent when they went there to storm the capitol. It is your POV and the media you are consuming that have you believing this.

Only a few dozen wanted to do this. When the Capitol Police were given orders to stand down, and they just stood aside. . . these folks just walked right in.

LOLOL

Yeah, they were invited in.

They might as well have been.

The establishment knew what was coming and did nothing to prevent it. That is the same as an invitation. And when they came, they did nothing to prevent them from coming right on in, they just opened the gates.

So if a woman gets raped, the fact that she wasn't wearing a chastity belt means she invited the rape because she did nothing to prevent it?

Wow.

When you have to start throwing out false equivalency fallacies in order to defend the purposeful manipulations of the Deep State, to not only demonize the political right, but to enact a Domestic Terror legislation which was written even before this event eve occured. . . IOW, looking for that excuse. . . That? Which will affect BLM and Antifa folks just as much, then you can't see who your real oppressor is.

We, you and I, are on the same side here, but your identification with your particular In-Group/Out-Group identity has made you completely blind to what is going on.

 

[my2¢]

Those on the right and left that hate one another place political thought over and above Christian thought,

 

[MisterBeale]

The individuals of January 6th at the Capitol however were there for the stated purpose of INTERFERING with government business with the stated objective of preventing Joe Biden from being certified as president of the United States. That's why they're referred to as insurrectionists and not protestors, two entirely different things, least of which is protesting is protected by the 1st Amendment and insurrection is a federal crime punishable by up to 10 years in prison

See? This is what I am talking about? The paradigm you are weaving is exactly what I have spelled out in my first post in this thread, dishonest reporting, and double standards.

This is due to your consumption of certain media that TELL you this is so. . . and? You believe this. Of course, this is not the truth, far from it.

Very few of those Trump protestors actually went there to interfere with the government business. Just as very few BLM protestors took part in looting and rioting.

Both of these scenarios is identical, IDENTICAL.

They're not identical by any stretch of the imagination. I heard there were maybe 10,000 people who showed up for Trump's rally/speech and of those people about 1,000 traveled on to the Capitol. That's not "very few" and right now I believe around 500 of them have been identified and have had charges filed against them.

I haven't been TOLD anything in regards to how to view this incident, I saw for myself what they did and said, including those who believed it was their duty to "stop the steal". Shouts of 'Hang Mike Pence' and calls out of 'Nancy where are you? We're looking for you' while unlawfully being in restricted areas, vandalizing offices of the Capitol, stealing government property, etc. doesn't meet the definition of peaceable assembly, particularly when you add in the following

Threatening government officials of the United States is a felony under federal law. Threatening the President of the United States is a felony under 18 U.S.C. § 871, punishable by up to 5 years of imprisonment, that is investigated by the United States Secret Service.[1] Threatening other officials is a Class D or C felony, usually carrying maximum penalties of 5 or 10 years under 18 U.S.C. § 875, 18 U.S.C. § 876 and other statutes, that is investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. When national boundaries are transcended by such a threat, it is considered a terrorist threat.[2]​

Our vice president and congressional members were fleeing, in fear for their lives.

Marching in the streets to create a presence in order to draw attention to injustices being carried out each day comes no where close to storming the Capitol where our representatives, including the vice president of the United States were in attendance in order to certify the next president of the United States. They said they were there to "stop the steal" and they did indeed stop it momentarily but they couldn't prevent it.

But? Because of folks IN-GROUP/OUT-GROUP identification. . . they are too close to it to see it. If I told you any other research or narrative that explains in common sense with facts, than the one you are being fed, you would object. Twain said, it is harder to undo a falsehood that it is to weave one in the first place.

I'm telling you, these two instances are identical. If you don't see it, it is because your Out-Group is affecting your view of ethics.

I am a trained analyst among other things. I do my own research, and I use various sources but one of things I never do, is attribute certain behaviors to people based on their political affiliation. That is one of the dumbest things I have ever seen and I somehow feel that it's just the latest "slur" used to demean others since people can get in trouble if they use the one they really want to say, JMHO

I'd say my ethics are in better shape than half this board.

Not all of them had the intent when they went there to storm the capitol. It is your POV and the media you are consuming that have you believing this.

Only a few dozen wanted to do this. When the Capitol Police were given orders to stand down, and they just stood aside. . . these folks just walked right in.

LOLOL

Yeah, they were invited in.

They might as well have been.

The establishment knew what was coming and did nothing to prevent it. That is the same as an invitation. And when they came, they did nothing to prevent them from coming right on in, they just opened the gates.

While a few cops who were overwhelmed by the massive and aggressive mob confronting them chose personal safety and stepped aside rather than fight a losing battle, that doesn't mean they were invited in or even welcome. And as the video I posted showed, many cops did try to fight to keep them out. And many were injured. That was an insurrection and I won't be surprised to see some get charged with sedition.

You can make up all the lies and excuses you want.

Everyone knows now that the establishment not only knew what was coming, it had a domestic terror bill written before hand and needed a "good crises," to push the paradigm.

There was no insurrection, just a staged for TEE VEE production with a world record number of patsies and dupes who are fed up with a phony election system.

 

[Faun]

The individuals of January 6th at the Capitol however were there for the stated purpose of INTERFERING with government business with the stated objective of preventing Joe Biden from being certified as president of the United States. That's why they're referred to as insurrectionists and not protestors, two entirely different things, least of which is protesting is protected by the 1st Amendment and insurrection is a federal crime punishable by up to 10 years in prison

See? This is what I am talking about? The paradigm you are weaving is exactly what I have spelled out in my first post in this thread, dishonest reporting, and double standards.

This is due to your consumption of certain media that TELL you this is so. . . and? You believe this. Of course, this is not the truth, far from it.

Very few of those Trump protestors actually went there to interfere with the government business. Just as very few BLM protestors took part in looting and rioting.

Both of these scenarios is identical, IDENTICAL.

They're not identical by any stretch of the imagination. I heard there were maybe 10,000 people who showed up for Trump's rally/speech and of those people about 1,000 traveled on to the Capitol. That's not "very few" and right now I believe around 500 of them have been identified and have had charges filed against them.

I haven't been TOLD anything in regards to how to view this incident, I saw for myself what they did and said, including those who believed it was their duty to "stop the steal". Shouts of 'Hang Mike Pence' and calls out of 'Nancy where are you? We're looking for you' while unlawfully being in restricted areas, vandalizing offices of the Capitol, stealing government property, etc. doesn't meet the definition of peaceable assembly, particularly when you add in the following

Threatening government officials of the United States is a felony under federal law. Threatening the President of the United States is a felony under 18 U.S.C. § 871, punishable by up to 5 years of imprisonment, that is investigated by the United States Secret Service.[1] Threatening other officials is a Class D or C felony, usually carrying maximum penalties of 5 or 10 years under 18 U.S.C. § 875, 18 U.S.C. § 876 and other statutes, that is investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. When national boundaries are transcended by such a threat, it is considered a terrorist threat.[2]​

Our vice president and congressional members were fleeing, in fear for their lives.

Marching in the streets to create a presence in order to draw attention to injustices being carried out each day comes no where close to storming the Capitol where our representatives, including the vice president of the United States were in attendance in order to certify the next president of the United States. They said they were there to "stop the steal" and they did indeed stop it momentarily but they couldn't prevent it.

But? Because of folks IN-GROUP/OUT-GROUP identification. . . they are too close to it to see it. If I told you any other research or narrative that explains in common sense with facts, than the one you are being fed, you would object. Twain said, it is harder to undo a falsehood that it is to weave one in the first place.

I'm telling you, these two instances are identical. If you don't see it, it is because your Out-Group is affecting your view of ethics.

I am a trained analyst among other things. I do my own research, and I use various sources but one of things I never do, is attribute certain behaviors to people based on their political affiliation. That is one of the dumbest things I have ever seen and I somehow feel that it's just the latest "slur" used to demean others since people can get in trouble if they use the one they really want to say, JMHO

I'd say my ethics are in better shape than half this board.

Not all of them had the intent when they went there to storm the capitol. It is your POV and the media you are consuming that have you believing this.

Only a few dozen wanted to do this. When the Capitol Police were given orders to stand down, and they just stood aside. . . these folks just walked right in.

LOLOL

Yeah, they were invited in.

They might as well have been.

The establishment knew what was coming and did nothing to prevent it. That is the same as an invitation. And when they came, they did nothing to prevent them from coming right on in, they just opened the gates.

While a few cops who were overwhelmed by the massive and aggressive mob confronting them chose personal safety and stepped aside rather than fight a losing battle, that doesn't mean they were invited in or even welcome. And as the video I posted showed, many cops did try to fight to keep them out. And many were injured. That was an insurrection and I won't be surprised to see some get charged with sedition.

You can make up all the lies and excuses you want.

Everyone knows now that the establishment not only knew what was coming, it had a domestic terror bill written before hand and needed a "good crises," to push the paradigm.

There was no insurrection, just a staged for TEE VEE production with a world record number of patsies and dupes who are fed up with a phony election system.

 

[$ecular#eckler]

accusations of Harris as a whore etc with no evidence whatsoever.

A simple opinion by a Democrat is vigorously attacked with bile and venom dripping from your mouths. What is wrong with you people? Why the hatred?

Fuck you - stupid commie.

 

[Colin norris]

accusations of Harris as a whore etc with no evidence whatsoever.

A simple opinion by a Democrat is vigorously attacked with bile and venom dripping from your mouths. What is wrong with you people? Why the hatred?

Fuck you - stupid commie.

That was a massive intellectual input. Did it take you long to think it?
Same old diatribe of baseless communist crap because someone disagrees with you.
Get over it and refute the facts.

 

[$ecular#eckler]

accusations of Harris as a whore etc with no evidence whatsoever.

A simple opinion by a Democrat is vigorously attacked with bile and venom dripping from your mouths. What is wrong with you people? Why the hatred?

Fuck you - stupid commie.

That was a massive intellectual input. Did it take you long to think it?
Same old diatribe of baseless communist crap because someone disagrees with you.
Get over it and refute the facts.

Fuck you

 

[Colin norris]

accusations of Harris as a whore etc with no evidence whatsoever.

A simple opinion by a Democrat is vigorously attacked with bile and venom dripping from your mouths. What is wrong with you people? Why the hatred?

Fuck you - stupid commie.

That was a massive intellectual input. Did it take you long to think it?
Same old diatribe of baseless communist crap because someone disagrees with you.
Get over it and refute the facts.

Fuck you

Is that the best you've got? Yet you call me a stupid commie. You know nothing and never will. Get some facts.

 

[MisterBeale]

The individuals of January 6th at the Capitol however were there for the stated purpose of INTERFERING with government business with the stated objective of preventing Joe Biden from being certified as president of the United States. That's why they're referred to as insurrectionists and not protestors, two entirely different things, least of which is protesting is protected by the 1st Amendment and insurrection is a federal crime punishable by up to 10 years in prison

See? This is what I am talking about? The paradigm you are weaving is exactly what I have spelled out in my first post in this thread, dishonest reporting, and double standards.

This is due to your consumption of certain media that TELL you this is so. . . and? You believe this. Of course, this is not the truth, far from it.

Very few of those Trump protestors actually went there to interfere with the government business. Just as very few BLM protestors took part in looting and rioting.

Both of these scenarios is identical, IDENTICAL.

They're not identical by any stretch of the imagination. I heard there were maybe 10,000 people who showed up for Trump's rally/speech and of those people about 1,000 traveled on to the Capitol. That's not "very few" and right now I believe around 500 of them have been identified and have had charges filed against them.

I haven't been TOLD anything in regards to how to view this incident, I saw for myself what they did and said, including those who believed it was their duty to "stop the steal". Shouts of 'Hang Mike Pence' and calls out of 'Nancy where are you? We're looking for you' while unlawfully being in restricted areas, vandalizing offices of the Capitol, stealing government property, etc. doesn't meet the definition of peaceable assembly, particularly when you add in the following

Threatening government officials of the United States is a felony under federal law. Threatening the President of the United States is a felony under 18 U.S.C. § 871, punishable by up to 5 years of imprisonment, that is investigated by the United States Secret Service.[1] Threatening other officials is a Class D or C felony, usually carrying maximum penalties of 5 or 10 years under 18 U.S.C. § 875, 18 U.S.C. § 876 and other statutes, that is investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. When national boundaries are transcended by such a threat, it is considered a terrorist threat.[2]​

Our vice president and congressional members were fleeing, in fear for their lives.

Marching in the streets to create a presence in order to draw attention to injustices being carried out each day comes no where close to storming the Capitol where our representatives, including the vice president of the United States were in attendance in order to certify the next president of the United States. They said they were there to "stop the steal" and they did indeed stop it momentarily but they couldn't prevent it.

But? Because of folks IN-GROUP/OUT-GROUP identification. . . they are too close to it to see it. If I told you any other research or narrative that explains in common sense with facts, than the one you are being fed, you would object. Twain said, it is harder to undo a falsehood that it is to weave one in the first place.

I'm telling you, these two instances are identical. If you don't see it, it is because your Out-Group is affecting your view of ethics.

I am a trained analyst among other things. I do my own research, and I use various sources but one of things I never do, is attribute certain behaviors to people based on their political affiliation. That is one of the dumbest things I have ever seen and I somehow feel that it's just the latest "slur" used to demean others since people can get in trouble if they use the one they really want to say, JMHO

I'd say my ethics are in better shape than half this board.

Not all of them had the intent when they went there to storm the capitol. It is your POV and the media you are consuming that have you believing this.

Only a few dozen wanted to do this. When the Capitol Police were given orders to stand down, and they just stood aside. . . these folks just walked right in.

LOLOL

Yeah, they were invited in.

They might as well have been.

The establishment knew what was coming and did nothing to prevent it. That is the same as an invitation. And when they came, they did nothing to prevent them from coming right on in, they just opened the gates.

While a few cops who were overwhelmed by the massive and aggressive mob confronting them chose personal safety and stepped aside rather than fight a losing battle, that doesn't mean they were invited in or even welcome. And as the video I posted showed, many cops did try to fight to keep them out. And many were injured. That was an insurrection and I won't be surprised to see some get charged with sedition.

You can make up all the lies and excuses you want.

Everyone knows now that the establishment not only knew what was coming, it had a domestic terror bill written before hand and needed a "good crises," to push the paradigm.

There was no insurrection, just a staged for TEE VEE production with a world record number of patsies and dupes who are fed up with a phony election system.

 

[Faun]

The individuals of January 6th at the Capitol however were there for the stated purpose of INTERFERING with government business with the stated objective of preventing Joe Biden from being certified as president of the United States. That's why they're referred to as insurrectionists and not protestors, two entirely different things, least of which is protesting is protected by the 1st Amendment and insurrection is a federal crime punishable by up to 10 years in prison

See? This is what I am talking about? The paradigm you are weaving is exactly what I have spelled out in my first post in this thread, dishonest reporting, and double standards.

This is due to your consumption of certain media that TELL you this is so. . . and? You believe this. Of course, this is not the truth, far from it.

Very few of those Trump protestors actually went there to interfere with the government business. Just as very few BLM protestors took part in looting and rioting.

Both of these scenarios is identical, IDENTICAL.

They're not identical by any stretch of the imagination. I heard there were maybe 10,000 people who showed up for Trump's rally/speech and of those people about 1,000 traveled on to the Capitol. That's not "very few" and right now I believe around 500 of them have been identified and have had charges filed against them.

I haven't been TOLD anything in regards to how to view this incident, I saw for myself what they did and said, including those who believed it was their duty to "stop the steal". Shouts of 'Hang Mike Pence' and calls out of 'Nancy where are you? We're looking for you' while unlawfully being in restricted areas, vandalizing offices of the Capitol, stealing government property, etc. doesn't meet the definition of peaceable assembly, particularly when you add in the following

Threatening government officials of the United States is a felony under federal law. Threatening the President of the United States is a felony under 18 U.S.C. § 871, punishable by up to 5 years of imprisonment, that is investigated by the United States Secret Service.[1] Threatening other officials is a Class D or C felony, usually carrying maximum penalties of 5 or 10 years under 18 U.S.C. § 875, 18 U.S.C. § 876 and other statutes, that is investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. When national boundaries are transcended by such a threat, it is considered a terrorist threat.[2]​

Our vice president and congressional members were fleeing, in fear for their lives.

Marching in the streets to create a presence in order to draw attention to injustices being carried out each day comes no where close to storming the Capitol where our representatives, including the vice president of the United States were in attendance in order to certify the next president of the United States. They said they were there to "stop the steal" and they did indeed stop it momentarily but they couldn't prevent it.

But? Because of folks IN-GROUP/OUT-GROUP identification. . . they are too close to it to see it. If I told you any other research or narrative that explains in common sense with facts, than the one you are being fed, you would object. Twain said, it is harder to undo a falsehood that it is to weave one in the first place.

I'm telling you, these two instances are identical. If you don't see it, it is because your Out-Group is affecting your view of ethics.

I am a trained analyst among other things. I do my own research, and I use various sources but one of things I never do, is attribute certain behaviors to people based on their political affiliation. That is one of the dumbest things I have ever seen and I somehow feel that it's just the latest "slur" used to demean others since people can get in trouble if they use the one they really want to say, JMHO

I'd say my ethics are in better shape than half this board.

Not all of them had the intent when they went there to storm the capitol. It is your POV and the media you are consuming that have you believing this.

Only a few dozen wanted to do this. When the Capitol Police were given orders to stand down, and they just stood aside. . . these folks just walked right in.

LOLOL

Yeah, they were invited in.

They might as well have been.

The establishment knew what was coming and did nothing to prevent it. That is the same as an invitation. And when they came, they did nothing to prevent them from coming right on in, they just opened the gates.

While a few cops who were overwhelmed by the massive and aggressive mob confronting them chose personal safety and stepped aside rather than fight a losing battle, that doesn't mean they were invited in or even welcome. And as the video I posted showed, many cops did try to fight to keep them out. And many were injured. That was an insurrection and I won't be surprised to see some get charged with sedition.

You can make up all the lies and excuses you want.

Everyone knows now that the establishment not only knew what was coming, it had a domestic terror bill written before hand and needed a "good crises," to push the paradigm.

There was no insurrection, just a staged for TEE VEE production with a world record number of patsies and dupes who are fed up with a phony election system.

LOL

Posting I don't give a fuck after I scoffed at the fuck you gave arrives too late to be worth a fuck.

 

[OKTexas]

The hatred by republicans against democrats is breathtaking on here. We are spoken of as a type of malignant tumour against society for no reason. They have never threatened the country with a communist overthrow, never. Never a communist like POTUS has ever been elected but they label every dissenter to the conservative view as a commie.

Where is the patriotism of the country and its ability to overcome problems when the divide is so blatant. The born to rule attitude of republicans is the epitome of a divided nation and it increased further under trump. Its like they resent democracy if it failed to present them with power.

The pathetic delusion it was stolen from them, the disgraceful attitude towards democrats, the silly childish names they give their opponents, the total disrespect of the president because he is a Democrat, accusations of Harris as a whore etc with no evidence whatsoever.

A simple opinion by a Democrat is vigorously attacked with bile and venom dripping from your mouths. What is wrong with you people? Why the hatred?

exactly!

Republican politicians always threaten and talk shit about Democratic voters, the people. At least Democrats are respectful to Republicans voters and don’t single them out. Instead democrat politicians only focus on other Republican politicians.

Gosh, republicans are a bunch of inbreed morons destroying this country with their hatred. I just wish they acted like human beings and were able to have a civil conversation

I bet you're so stupid you don't realize you proved yourself a liar in two sentences. LMAO

.

 

[MisterBeale]

The individuals of January 6th at the Capitol however were there for the stated purpose of INTERFERING with government business with the stated objective of preventing Joe Biden from being certified as president of the United States. That's why they're referred to as insurrectionists and not protestors, two entirely different things, least of which is protesting is protected by the 1st Amendment and insurrection is a federal crime punishable by up to 10 years in prison

See? This is what I am talking about? The paradigm you are weaving is exactly what I have spelled out in my first post in this thread, dishonest reporting, and double standards.

This is due to your consumption of certain media that TELL you this is so. . . and? You believe this. Of course, this is not the truth, far from it.

Very few of those Trump protestors actually went there to interfere with the government business. Just as very few BLM protestors took part in looting and rioting.

Both of these scenarios is identical, IDENTICAL.

They're not identical by any stretch of the imagination. I heard there were maybe 10,000 people who showed up for Trump's rally/speech and of those people about 1,000 traveled on to the Capitol. That's not "very few" and right now I believe around 500 of them have been identified and have had charges filed against them.

I haven't been TOLD anything in regards to how to view this incident, I saw for myself what they did and said, including those who believed it was their duty to "stop the steal". Shouts of 'Hang Mike Pence' and calls out of 'Nancy where are you? We're looking for you' while unlawfully being in restricted areas, vandalizing offices of the Capitol, stealing government property, etc. doesn't meet the definition of peaceable assembly, particularly when you add in the following

Threatening government officials of the United States is a felony under federal law. Threatening the President of the United States is a felony under 18 U.S.C. § 871, punishable by up to 5 years of imprisonment, that is investigated by the United States Secret Service.[1] Threatening other officials is a Class D or C felony, usually carrying maximum penalties of 5 or 10 years under 18 U.S.C. § 875, 18 U.S.C. § 876 and other statutes, that is investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. When national boundaries are transcended by such a threat, it is considered a terrorist threat.[2]​

Our vice president and congressional members were fleeing, in fear for their lives.

Marching in the streets to create a presence in order to draw attention to injustices being carried out each day comes no where close to storming the Capitol where our representatives, including the vice president of the United States were in attendance in order to certify the next president of the United States. They said they were there to "stop the steal" and they did indeed stop it momentarily but they couldn't prevent it.

But? Because of folks IN-GROUP/OUT-GROUP identification. . . they are too close to it to see it. If I told you any other research or narrative that explains in common sense with facts, than the one you are being fed, you would object. Twain said, it is harder to undo a falsehood that it is to weave one in the first place.

I'm telling you, these two instances are identical. If you don't see it, it is because your Out-Group is affecting your view of ethics.

I am a trained analyst among other things. I do my own research, and I use various sources but one of things I never do, is attribute certain behaviors to people based on their political affiliation. That is one of the dumbest things I have ever seen and I somehow feel that it's just the latest "slur" used to demean others since people can get in trouble if they use the one they really want to say, JMHO

I'd say my ethics are in better shape than half this board.

Not all of them had the intent when they went there to storm the capitol. It is your POV and the media you are consuming that have you believing this.

Only a few dozen wanted to do this. When the Capitol Police were given orders to stand down, and they just stood aside. . . these folks just walked right in.

LOLOL

Yeah, they were invited in.

They might as well have been.

The establishment knew what was coming and did nothing to prevent it. That is the same as an invitation. And when they came, they did nothing to prevent them from coming right on in, they just opened the gates.

While a few cops who were overwhelmed by the massive and aggressive mob confronting them chose personal safety and stepped aside rather than fight a losing battle, that doesn't mean they were invited in or even welcome. And as the video I posted showed, many cops did try to fight to keep them out. And many were injured. That was an insurrection and I won't be surprised to see some get charged with sedition.

You can make up all the lies and excuses you want.

Everyone knows now that the establishment not only knew what was coming, it had a domestic terror bill written before hand and needed a "good crises," to push the paradigm.

There was no insurrection, just a staged for TEE VEE production with a world record number of patsies and dupes who are fed up with a phony election system.

LOL

Posting I don't give a fuck after I scoffed at the fuck you gave arrives too late to be worth a fuck.

No, you silly.

I know who you are, and you post illogical shit immune to reason, thus, I don't care about your gibberish.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

We are spoken of as a type of malignant tumour against society

If the shoe fits....

 

[MarcATL]

nobody thought it was funny & her career tanked after that stunt.

ted nugent had gigs & interviews all over the place with his repulsive remarks - the rwing nutters still love him.

Nobody, with sense, took her as a legitimate threat.

She got canceled by the American rightwing for expressing her first amendment rights.

She took a hit, but she'll eventually come back on top.

 

[zaangalewa]

... Oh so now you've injected a bit of God into it. You godbotherers appealed for divine intervention in November. That worked well. Over 400000 who died of covid believed in God and assumed he would protect them. ...

And all others? Why did they die? Because they did not believe in god? And how many survived in the USA because children of migrants from Turkey lived the "american dream" in Germany and were the first who made a vaccine against the virus Sars-CoV-2? They did do so with the help of god and also with the help of the German education sector and people from more than 60 different "racial", cultural and national backgrounds. Possible that also an atheist was under all this people.

-----
A flood was going to ravage a city, and most people saw the alert and evacuated. One lady, however, decided that if God really loved her, He would save her from the flood. So she climbs up onto the roof of her apartment building and waits.
The flood begins to rise and a rescue helicopter flies over. A man stands on the side and yells to her: "We're going to save you!"
The woman stubbornly replies: "No, I'm waiting for God to save me."
They try a little harder, but it's obvious that she isn't going to go, and they fly off to go save other people.
The flood rises higher, and a boat drives by her building. The people inside tell her that they can save her, but she gives them the same reply. "I'm waiting for God to save me."
They drive off.
Now the flood is almost at the top of the building, where she is, and another boat drives by. They yell: "This is your last opportunity! Get on! "
To which the woman yells back: "I'm waiting for God to save me!"
They realize nothing can be done, so they shake their heads and drive off.
The flood rises up to the top, and the woman drowns.
At the gates of heaven, she complains to Peter: "I waited for God to save me, but he didn't. He doesn't love me."
Peter frowns. "He sent you two boats and a helicopter, what are you complaining about?"
-----

I heard that 40% of the political followers of the republican party don't like to make a vaccination against covid-19. If this has something to do with the Christains rebound in god then let me say to all this people: For me personally it is totally clear that it is a duty of all Christians to take a vaccine against covid-19; not only on reason to save the own life and/or health - also on reason to minimize the number of all possible infections and to try to help others not to get covid-19. Some few exceptions confirm this rule - for example on reason of allergy or other health problems. May god enlighten everyone to be able to find the best ways what to do for the own life and the own people and for all others in the world.

 

[Rigby5]

The hatred by republicans against democrats is breathtaking on here. We are spoken of as a type of malignant tumour against society for no reason. They have never threatened the country with a communist overthrow, never. Never a communist like POTUS has ever been elected but they label every dissenter to the conservative view as a commie.

Where is the patriotism of the country and its ability to overcome problems when the divide is so blatant. The born to rule attitude of republicans is the epitome of a divided nation and it increased further under trump. Its like they resent democracy if it failed to present them with power.

The pathetic delusion it was stolen from them, the disgraceful attitude towards democrats, the silly childish names they give their opponents, the total disrespect of the president because he is a Democrat, accusations of Harris as a whore etc with no evidence whatsoever.

A simple opinion by a Democrat is vigorously attacked with bile and venom dripping from your mouths. What is wrong with you people? Why the hatred?

The far right are quite similar to the Nazis in Germany before they took power, accusing everyone who opposed them as socialists or commies.

Unlike the Nazis, the far right here will never take power.

I disagree.
I think the far right has always had power and has been in control in the US.
In early days, it was slavery, the Trail of Tears, etc., that showed the wealthy elite were in control.
It never changed.
The Spanish American war was a fake hoax based on the USS Maine blowing up all by itself.
WWI was incredibly corrupt and evil.
So was the Korean war, Vietnam, the invasion of Panama, the invasion of Grenada, the invasion of Iraq, the murder of Qaddafi, etc.
Prohibition, the War on Drugs, 3 strikes, asset forfeiture, federal gun control, etc., are all massively illegal.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

The hatred by republicans against democrats is breathtaking on here. We are spoken of as a type of malignant tumour against society for no reason. They have never threatened the country with a communist overthrow, never. Never a communist like POTUS has ever been elected but they label every dissenter to the conservative view as a commie.

Where is the patriotism of the country and its ability to overcome problems when the divide is so blatant. The born to rule attitude of republicans is the epitome of a divided nation and it increased further under trump. Its like they resent democracy if it failed to present them with power.

The pathetic delusion it was stolen from them, the disgraceful attitude towards democrats, the silly childish names they give their opponents, the total disrespect of the president because he is a Democrat, accusations of Harris as a whore etc with no evidence whatsoever.

A simple opinion by a Democrat is vigorously attacked with bile and venom dripping from your mouths. What is wrong with you people? Why the hatred?

I read you're tired of having your ass handed to you because your thought patterns are fucked up and don't know a way out.

If PROGs aren't projecting they're melting. In your case both.