Why the hate on Hillary? BS hate propaganda PERIOD.

[eddiew37]

Hillary is the most hated woman in America.

Bar none.

She'll never make it to the White House.

Never ever.

Your POS Greene is way ahead A fine example of republican scum

 

[Uncensored2008]

Your POS Greene is way ahead A fine example of republican scum

Oh, do fuck off, Nazi.

 

[scruffy]

Your POS Greene is way ahead A fine example of republican scum

Aw come on. Almost no one knows who she even is, except the stalwart partisans on both sides.

But everyone knows who Hillary is. And what she done.

 

[scruffy]

B*******, super dupe. None of the charges against Hillary on the GOP propaganda machine are anywhere near facts or a courtroom.

lol

Hillary has not only three strikes, she has like eighteen.

Her big three are that she's corrupt, a Neo-Lib, and a globalist.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Stop Pretending You Don't Know Why People Hate Hillary Clinton | Huffington Post

When the Bush administration was discovered to have erased millions of emails illegally sent by 22 administration officials through private, RNC-owned accounts, in order to thwart an investigation into the politically motivated firing of eight US attorneys, just one talk show covered it that Sunday.

When Mitt Romney wiped servers, sold government hard drives to his closest aides and spent $100,000 in taxpayer money to destroy his administration’s emails, it was barely an issue.

When Hillary Clinton asked Colin Powell how he managed to use a Blackberry while serving as Secretary of State, he replied by detailing his method of intentionally bypassing federal record-keeping laws:





I didn’t have a Blackberry. What I did do was have a personal computer that was hooked up to a private phone line (sounds ancient.) So I could communicate with a wide range of friends directly without it going through the State Department servers. I even used it to do business with some foreign leaders and some of the senior folks in the Department on their personal email accounts. I did the same thing on the road in hotels.

... There is a real danger. If it is public that you have a BlackBerry and it it [sic] government and you are using it, government or not, to do business, it may become an official record and subject to the law.





Yet the fact that Hillary Clinton emailed through a private server anddidn’t use it to cover anything up is somehow the defining issue of her campaign. “My God,” people cry, “anyone else would be in jail!”

Or is the real scandal that her family runs but does not profit from a charitable foundation awarded an A grade by Charity Watch, a four out of four star rating by Charity Navigator and responsible for helping 435 million people in 180 countries get things like clean drinking water and HIV medication? Because the AP seems super concerned that she encountered people who donated to it—specifically Nobel Peace Prize-winning economist Muhammad Yunus—in her official capacity as Secretary of State.

It should at this point be observed that her opponent is a shameless con artist who has built an empire bilking people with fake businesses, fake universities, fake charities and, now, a fake campaign. Last week, he told a lie every three minutes and fifteen seconds. Oh, and did we mention that he, (like so many of his online “supporters,”) is a goddamnRussian stooge? I tried to list all of the dumb, awful stuff that he does every day and I cannot come close to keeping up.

Voters, it seems, are his easiest marks yet.

And it isn’t just Republicans. The double standards are even more transparent on the left.

Back in the mid-90s, Clinton’s persistent unwillingness to hide the fact that she was a thinking human female really freaked the center-left establishment out. Michael Moore observed that, “[Maureen Dowd] is fixated on trashing Hillary Rodham in the way liberals love to do, to prove they’re not really liberal.” The bashing slowly morphed into a creepy, extraordinary sort of policing.

Since then, Clinton racked up a Senate voting record more liberal than any nominee since Mondale. Her 2008 platform was slightly to Obama’s left on domestic issues. Her 2016 platform was barely to the right of self-proclaimed socialist Bernie Sanders.

Yet, we have all heard and seen countless liberal posers passionately decrying her “far right voting record,” untrustworthy promises or ever-changing policy positions. Jon Stewart recently called Clinton, “A bright woman without the courage of her convictions, because I don’t know what they even are.” Because if he doesn’t know, she must not have any, right?

In fact, there is a very lengthy trail of public records all pointing in the same direction. If you can’t figure out which, maybe the problem is you.

Yet, many on the left who gladly voted for John Kerry, two years after hevoted to authorize the Iraq war, now say they couldn’t possibly vote for Clinton, because she did, too.

And view her with contempt for opposing same-sex marriage in 2008, while fawning over men like Barack Obama and Bernie Sanders, who held the same position at the same time.

It’s time to stop pretending that this is about substance. This is about an eagerness to believe that a woman who seeks power will say or do anything to get it. This is about a Lady MacBeth stereotype that, frankly, should never have existed in the first place. This is about the one thing no one wants to admit it’s about.

Consider, for a moment, two people. One, as a young woman at the beginning of a promising legal career, went door to door searching for ways to guarantee an education to the countless disabled and disadvantaged children who had fallen through the cracks. The other, as a young millionaire, exacted revenge on his recently deceased brother’s family by cutting off the medical insurance desperately needed by his nephew’s newborn son, who at eighteen months of age was suffering from violent seizures brought on by a rare neurological disorder.

What kind of a society treats these two people as equal in any way? What kind of society even considers the latter over the former for its highest office?

Generations from now, people will shake their heads at this moment in time, when the first female major party presidential nominee—competent, qualified and more thoroughly vetted than any non-incumbent candidate in history—endured the humiliation of being likened to such an obvious grifter, ignoramus and hate monger.

We deserve the shame that we will bear.



The GOP propaganda machine, and the cowardly corporate media and politicians that allow this to pass are a disgrace.

Private servers get hacked all the time. Look up FISMA and try to understand Federal information security standards. Hilary had an unmanaged server containing government data that was sent unclear text as opposed to encrypted over the internet. Talk to any IT Security professional to challenge what I just said.

 

[francoHFW]

Private servers get hacked all the time. Look up FISMA and try to understand Federal information security standards. Hilary had an unmanaged server containing government data that was sent unclear text as opposed to encrypted over the internet. Talk to any IT Security professional to challenge what I just said.

nothing there, nobody cares, won the election for gop swine....

 

[francoHFW]

lol

Hillary has not only three strikes, she has like eighteen.

Her big three are that she's corrupt, a Neo-Lib, and a globalist.

Yeah, who needs evidence lol...

 

[francoHFW]

Private servers get hacked all the time. Look up FISMA and try to understand Federal information security standards. Hilary had an unmanaged server containing government data that was sent unclear text as opposed to encrypted over the internet. Talk to any IT Security professional to challenge what I just said.

And she had about the only server that wasn't hacked....

 

[iceberg]

2 wrongs don't make a right, hack boi.
Go after all of them.
If there is one thing we need the most from our government, it is ACCOUNTABILITY.

hey, if both guitly, arrest em both. I ain't plain favorites.

 

[scruffy]

Yeah, who needs evidence lol...

There's plenty of evidence in the public domain

Hillary should be in an orange jump suit

And even if that weren't the case, she's still lower than a slug.

Who would hire a FOREIGN SPY to dig up dirt on their political opponent?

Hillary is a Queen Bitch, she's right up there with Nancy Pelousy.

 

[francoHFW]

There's plenty of evidence in the public domain

Hillary should be in an orange jump suit

And even if that weren't the case, she's still lower than a slug.

Who would hire a FOREIGN SPY to dig up dirt on their political opponent?

Hillary is a Queen Bitch, she's right up there with Nancy Pelousy.

GOP competitors of trump started that, it hasn't been discredited, and she never used it. Typical politics, it is just that trump's a total scumbag lol....

 

[LeftofLeft]

nothing there, nobody cares, won the election for gop swine....

You don’t know what you are talking about. Rank and file people who do what she did go to jail. The worst thing to happen to her was she lost an election….. again.

 

[LeftofLeft]

And she had about the only server that wasn't hacked....

Did you see the forensics or are you brainwashed by what you were told?

 

[miketx]

Your POS Greene is way ahead A fine example of republican scum

Die.

 

[francoHFW]

You don’t know what you are talking about. Rank and file people who do what she did go to jail. The worst thing to happen to her was she lost an election….. again.

Total horse patoot. She did NOTHING. Change the gd channel....

 

[francoHFW]

Did you see the forensics or are you brainwashed by what you were told?

I go with experts, law enforcement, journalists, our court system, all wonderful. You go with your proven scumbag liars...

 

[francoHFW]

There's plenty of evidence in the public domain

Hillary should be in an orange jump suit

And even if that weren't the case, she's still lower than a slug.

Who would hire a FOREIGN SPY to dig up dirt on their political opponent?

Hillary is a Queen Bitch, she's right up there with Nancy Pelousy.

An example lol?

 

[eddiew37]

Oh, do fuck off, Nazi.

Yes herr censored anything your nazi republican ass wants

 

[LeftofLeft]

I go with experts, law enforcement, journalists, our court system, all wonderful. You go with your proven scumbag liars...

What expert said her private server was not hacked? Law Enforcement, journalists, and court system is only valid with you people when you are being told something you want to hear.

 

[miketx]

Stop Pretending You Don't Know Why People Hate Hillary Clinton | Huffington Post

When the Bush administration was discovered to have erased millions of emails illegally sent by 22 administration officials through private, RNC-owned accounts, in order to thwart an investigation into the politically motivated firing of eight US attorneys, just one talk show covered it that Sunday.

When Mitt Romney wiped servers, sold government hard drives to his closest aides and spent $100,000 in taxpayer money to destroy his administration’s emails, it was barely an issue.

When Hillary Clinton asked Colin Powell how he managed to use a Blackberry while serving as Secretary of State, he replied by detailing his method of intentionally bypassing federal record-keeping laws:





I didn’t have a Blackberry. What I did do was have a personal computer that was hooked up to a private phone line (sounds ancient.) So I could communicate with a wide range of friends directly without it going through the State Department servers. I even used it to do business with some foreign leaders and some of the senior folks in the Department on their personal email accounts. I did the same thing on the road in hotels.

... There is a real danger. If it is public that you have a BlackBerry and it it [sic] government and you are using it, government or not, to do business, it may become an official record and subject to the law.





Yet the fact that Hillary Clinton emailed through a private server anddidn’t use it to cover anything up is somehow the defining issue of her campaign. “My God,” people cry, “anyone else would be in jail!”

Or is the real scandal that her family runs but does not profit from a charitable foundation awarded an A grade by Charity Watch, a four out of four star rating by Charity Navigator and responsible for helping 435 million people in 180 countries get things like clean drinking water and HIV medication? Because the AP seems super concerned that she encountered people who donated to it—specifically Nobel Peace Prize-winning economist Muhammad Yunus—in her official capacity as Secretary of State.

It should at this point be observed that her opponent is a shameless con artist who has built an empire bilking people with fake businesses, fake universities, fake charities and, now, a fake campaign. Last week, he told a lie every three minutes and fifteen seconds. Oh, and did we mention that he, (like so many of his online “supporters,”) is a goddamnRussian stooge? I tried to list all of the dumb, awful stuff that he does every day and I cannot come close to keeping up.

Voters, it seems, are his easiest marks yet.

And it isn’t just Republicans. The double standards are even more transparent on the left.

Back in the mid-90s, Clinton’s persistent unwillingness to hide the fact that she was a thinking human female really freaked the center-left establishment out. Michael Moore observed that, “[Maureen Dowd] is fixated on trashing Hillary Rodham in the way liberals love to do, to prove they’re not really liberal.” The bashing slowly morphed into a creepy, extraordinary sort of policing.

Since then, Clinton racked up a Senate voting record more liberal than any nominee since Mondale. Her 2008 platform was slightly to Obama’s left on domestic issues. Her 2016 platform was barely to the right of self-proclaimed socialist Bernie Sanders.

Yet, we have all heard and seen countless liberal posers passionately decrying her “far right voting record,” untrustworthy promises or ever-changing policy positions. Jon Stewart recently called Clinton, “A bright woman without the courage of her convictions, because I don’t know what they even are.” Because if he doesn’t know, she must not have any, right?

In fact, there is a very lengthy trail of public records all pointing in the same direction. If you can’t figure out which, maybe the problem is you.

Yet, many on the left who gladly voted for John Kerry, two years after hevoted to authorize the Iraq war, now say they couldn’t possibly vote for Clinton, because she did, too.

And view her with contempt for opposing same-sex marriage in 2008, while fawning over men like Barack Obama and Bernie Sanders, who held the same position at the same time.

It’s time to stop pretending that this is about substance. This is about an eagerness to believe that a woman who seeks power will say or do anything to get it. This is about a Lady MacBeth stereotype that, frankly, should never have existed in the first place. This is about the one thing no one wants to admit it’s about.

Consider, for a moment, two people. One, as a young woman at the beginning of a promising legal career, went door to door searching for ways to guarantee an education to the countless disabled and disadvantaged children who had fallen through the cracks. The other, as a young millionaire, exacted revenge on his recently deceased brother’s family by cutting off the medical insurance desperately needed by his nephew’s newborn son, who at eighteen months of age was suffering from violent seizures brought on by a rare neurological disorder.

What kind of a society treats these two people as equal in any way? What kind of society even considers the latter over the former for its highest office?

Generations from now, people will shake their heads at this moment in time, when the first female major party presidential nominee—competent, qualified and more thoroughly vetted than any non-incumbent candidate in history—endured the humiliation of being likened to such an obvious grifter, ignoramus and hate monger.

We deserve the shame that we will bear.



The GOP propaganda machine, and the cowardly corporate media and politicians that allow this to pass are a disgrace.

It's just mind boggling how you gd idiots swallow everything the media tells you when you want to hear it. Why do I dislike Clinton?

Here's just one valid reason, commie!