Why the hate on Hillary? BS hate propaganda PERIOD.

Stop Pretending You Don't Know Why People Hate Hillary Clinton | Huffington Post

When the Bush administration was discovered to have erased millions of emails illegally sent by 22 administration officials through private, RNC-owned accounts, in order to thwart an investigation into the politically motivated firing of eight US attorneys, just one talk show covered it that Sunday.

When Mitt Romney wiped servers, sold government hard drives to his closest aides and spent $100,000 in taxpayer money to destroy his administration’s emails, it was barely an issue.

When Hillary Clinton asked Colin Powell how he managed to use a Blackberry while serving as Secretary of State, he replied by detailing his method of intentionally bypassing federal record-keeping laws:





I didn’t have a Blackberry. What I did do was have a personal computer that was hooked up to a private phone line (sounds ancient.) So I could communicate with a wide range of friends directly without it going through the State Department servers. I even used it to do business with some foreign leaders and some of the senior folks in the Department on their personal email accounts. I did the same thing on the road in hotels.

... There is a real danger. If it is public that you have a BlackBerry and it it [sic] government and you are using it, government or not, to do business, it may become an official record and subject to the law.





Yet the fact that Hillary Clinton emailed through a private server anddidn’t use it to cover anything up is somehow the defining issue of her campaign. “My God,” people cry, “anyone else would be in jail!”

Or is the real scandal that her family runs but does not profit from a charitable foundation awarded an A grade by Charity Watch, a four out of four star rating by Charity Navigator and responsible for helping 435 million people in 180 countries get things like clean drinking water and HIV medication? Because the AP seems super concerned that she encountered people who donated to it—specifically Nobel Peace Prize-winning economist Muhammad Yunus—in her official capacity as Secretary of State.

It should at this point be observed that her opponent is a shameless con artist who has built an empire bilking people with fake businesses, fake universities, fake charities and, now, a fake campaign. Last week, he told a lie every three minutes and fifteen seconds. Oh, and did we mention that he, (like so many of his online “supporters,”) is a goddamnRussian stooge? I tried to list all of the dumb, awful stuff that he does every day and I cannot come close to keeping up.

Voters, it seems, are his easiest marks yet.

And it isn’t just Republicans. The double standards are even more transparent on the left.

Back in the mid-90s, Clinton’s persistent unwillingness to hide the fact that she was a thinking human female really freaked the center-left establishment out. Michael Moore observed that, “[Maureen Dowd] is fixated on trashing Hillary Rodham in the way liberals love to do, to prove they’re not really liberal.” The bashing slowly morphed into a creepy, extraordinary sort of policing.

Since then, Clinton racked up a Senate voting record more liberal than any nominee since Mondale. Her 2008 platform was slightly to Obama’s left on domestic issues. Her 2016 platform was barely to the right of self-proclaimed socialist Bernie Sanders.

Yet, we have all heard and seen countless liberal posers passionately decrying her “far right voting record,” untrustworthy promises or ever-changing policy positions. Jon Stewart recently called Clinton, “A bright woman without the courage of her convictions, because I don’t know what they even are.” Because if he doesn’t know, she must not have any, right?

In fact, there is a very lengthy trail of public records all pointing in the same direction. If you can’t figure out which, maybe the problem is you.

Yet, many on the left who gladly voted for John Kerry, two years after hevoted to authorize the Iraq war, now say they couldn’t possibly vote for Clinton, because she did, too.

And view her with contempt for opposing same-sex marriage in 2008, while fawning over men like Barack Obama and Bernie Sanders, who held the same position at the same time.

It’s time to stop pretending that this is about substance. This is about an eagerness to believe that a woman who seeks power will say or do anything to get it. This is about a Lady MacBeth stereotype that, frankly, should never have existed in the first place. This is about the one thing no one wants to admit it’s about.

Consider, for a moment, two people. One, as a young woman at the beginning of a promising legal career, went door to door searching for ways to guarantee an education to the countless disabled and disadvantaged children who had fallen through the cracks. The other, as a young millionaire, exacted revenge on his recently deceased brother’s family by cutting off the medical insurance desperately needed by his nephew’s newborn son, who at eighteen months of age was suffering from violent seizures brought on by a rare neurological disorder.

What kind of a society treats these two people as equal in any way? What kind of society even considers the latter over the former for its highest office?

Generations from now, people will shake their heads at this moment in time, when the first female major party presidential nominee—competent, qualified and more thoroughly vetted than any non-incumbent candidate in history—endured the humiliation of being likened to such an obvious grifter, ignoramus and hate monger.

We deserve the shame that we will bear.



The GOP propaganda machine, and the cowardly corporate media and politicians that allow this to pass are a disgrace.
She’s a loopy Kunt...
 
And she was spot on.

And she lost :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:
It was Americas loss
Republicans are dancing on Americas grave

^^^ more proof the unstable left should not be in charge.
35 years now of the middle class and America's infrastructure going to hell so that the rich don't have to pay their fair share... All they have now on the GOP side is total BS and hateful propaganda. Seems to work with you morons... Luckily now we have Trump spouting the same crap and people are getting the picture...
What people? Lazy ass society-sucking leftist traitors? Quit your damn crying already. Be a big boy now.
 
Stop Pretending You Don't Know Why People Hate Hillary Clinton | Huffington Post

When the Bush administration was discovered to have erased millions of emails illegally sent by 22 administration officials through private, RNC-owned accounts, in order to thwart an investigation into the politically motivated firing of eight US attorneys, just one talk show covered it that Sunday.

When Mitt Romney wiped servers, sold government hard drives to his closest aides and spent $100,000 in taxpayer money to destroy his administration’s emails, it was barely an issue.

When Hillary Clinton asked Colin Powell how he managed to use a Blackberry while serving as Secretary of State, he replied by detailing his method of intentionally bypassing federal record-keeping laws:





I didn’t have a Blackberry. What I did do was have a personal computer that was hooked up to a private phone line (sounds ancient.) So I could communicate with a wide range of friends directly without it going through the State Department servers. I even used it to do business with some foreign leaders and some of the senior folks in the Department on their personal email accounts. I did the same thing on the road in hotels.

... There is a real danger. If it is public that you have a BlackBerry and it it [sic] government and you are using it, government or not, to do business, it may become an official record and subject to the law.





Yet the fact that Hillary Clinton emailed through a private server anddidn’t use it to cover anything up is somehow the defining issue of her campaign. “My God,” people cry, “anyone else would be in jail!”

Or is the real scandal that her family runs but does not profit from a charitable foundation awarded an A grade by Charity Watch, a four out of four star rating by Charity Navigator and responsible for helping 435 million people in 180 countries get things like clean drinking water and HIV medication? Because the AP seems super concerned that she encountered people who donated to it—specifically Nobel Peace Prize-winning economist Muhammad Yunus—in her official capacity as Secretary of State.

It should at this point be observed that her opponent is a shameless con artist who has built an empire bilking people with fake businesses, fake universities, fake charities and, now, a fake campaign. Last week, he told a lie every three minutes and fifteen seconds. Oh, and did we mention that he, (like so many of his online “supporters,”) is a goddamnRussian stooge? I tried to list all of the dumb, awful stuff that he does every day and I cannot come close to keeping up.

Voters, it seems, are his easiest marks yet.

And it isn’t just Republicans. The double standards are even more transparent on the left.

Back in the mid-90s, Clinton’s persistent unwillingness to hide the fact that she was a thinking human female really freaked the center-left establishment out. Michael Moore observed that, “[Maureen Dowd] is fixated on trashing Hillary Rodham in the way liberals love to do, to prove they’re not really liberal.” The bashing slowly morphed into a creepy, extraordinary sort of policing.

Since then, Clinton racked up a Senate voting record more liberal than any nominee since Mondale. Her 2008 platform was slightly to Obama’s left on domestic issues. Her 2016 platform was barely to the right of self-proclaimed socialist Bernie Sanders.

Yet, we have all heard and seen countless liberal posers passionately decrying her “far right voting record,” untrustworthy promises or ever-changing policy positions. Jon Stewart recently called Clinton, “A bright woman without the courage of her convictions, because I don’t know what they even are.” Because if he doesn’t know, she must not have any, right?

In fact, there is a very lengthy trail of public records all pointing in the same direction. If you can’t figure out which, maybe the problem is you.

Yet, many on the left who gladly voted for John Kerry, two years after hevoted to authorize the Iraq war, now say they couldn’t possibly vote for Clinton, because she did, too.

And view her with contempt for opposing same-sex marriage in 2008, while fawning over men like Barack Obama and Bernie Sanders, who held the same position at the same time.

It’s time to stop pretending that this is about substance. This is about an eagerness to believe that a woman who seeks power will say or do anything to get it. This is about a Lady MacBeth stereotype that, frankly, should never have existed in the first place. This is about the one thing no one wants to admit it’s about.

Consider, for a moment, two people. One, as a young woman at the beginning of a promising legal career, went door to door searching for ways to guarantee an education to the countless disabled and disadvantaged children who had fallen through the cracks. The other, as a young millionaire, exacted revenge on his recently deceased brother’s family by cutting off the medical insurance desperately needed by his nephew’s newborn son, who at eighteen months of age was suffering from violent seizures brought on by a rare neurological disorder.

What kind of a society treats these two people as equal in any way? What kind of society even considers the latter over the former for its highest office?

Generations from now, people will shake their heads at this moment in time, when the first female major party presidential nominee—competent, qualified and more thoroughly vetted than any non-incumbent candidate in history—endured the humiliation of being likened to such an obvious grifter, ignoramus and hate monger.

We deserve the shame that we will bear.



The GOP propaganda machine, and the cowardly corporate media and politicians that allow this to pass are a disgrace.
She’s a loopy Kunt...
You have a deep and meaningful understanding of the issues and what is needed
 
If Hillary had won America would be devastated right now.

I know, because they claimed that if Trump won, we would be living on the Venezuelan diet. They always project...


What Maoists like Dragon Lady care about is revenge against those who have done better than they. She is willing to suffer any hardship so long as she can inflict pain and misery on those who worked harder and succeeded more.
 
I can’t speak for anyone else but me. I hate Hillary for many many reasons:

Progressive.
Corrupt.
Liar.
Ignorant.
Evil.
Nasty.
Hateful.
Soulless.
Egotistical.
Screeching harpy.
Bad dresser.
Hypocrite.
Greedy.
 
If Hillary had won America would be devastated right now.

I know, because they claimed that if Trump won, we would be living on the Venezuelan diet. They always project...


What Maoists like Dragon Lady care about is revenge against those who have done better than they. She is willing to suffer any hardship so long as she can inflict pain and misery on those who worked harder and succeeded more.
And people like you blame Obama for not succeeding?? You're a joke
 
I can’t speak for anyone else but me. I hate Hillary for many many reasons:

Progressive.
Corrupt.
Liar.
Ignorant.
Evil.
Nasty.
Hateful.
Soulless.
Egotistical.
Screeching harpy.
Bad dresser.
Hypocrite.
Greedy.
Yeah I thought she could dress better too All the rest are BS
 
I can’t speak for anyone else but me. I hate Hillary for many many reasons:

Progressive.
Corrupt.
Liar.
Ignorant.
Evil.
Nasty.
Hateful.
Soulless.
Egotistical.
Screeching harpy.
Bad dresser.
Hypocrite.
Greedy.
Yeah I thought she could dress better too All the rest are BS

I provide the facts, I can’t force you to believe them.
 
I can’t speak for anyone else but me. I hate Hillary for many many reasons:

Progressive.
Corrupt.
Liar.
Ignorant.
Evil.
Nasty.
Hateful.
Soulless.
Egotistical.
Screeching harpy.
Bad dresser.
Hypocrite.
Greedy.
Yeah I thought she could dress better too All the rest are BS

I provide the facts, I can’t force you to believe them.
And I can't convince you that outside of tax reform Trump can't hold Hillaries panties as far as being presidential goes
 
And I can't convince you that outside of tax reform Trump can't hold Hillaries panties as far as being presidential goes
You're one sick old guy. Doubtless worse than the Weiner/Weinstein variety. I mean dried out old hags? Really sick!
Me sick ? married to one lady for 37 years and never cheated on her and you support a vile scumbag ..2 of them ?
 
And I can't convince you that outside of tax reform Trump can't hold Hillaries panties as far as being presidential goes
You're one sick old guy. Doubtless worse than the Weiner/Weinstein variety. I mean dried out old hags? Really sick!
Me sick ? married to one lady for 37 years and never cheated on her and you support a vile scumbag ..2 of them ?
Does your wife know you fantasize about Hillary's panties?

You're one sick puppy even to think about them, as you obviously do.
 
[
And people like you blame Obama for not succeeding?? You're a joke

Obama became president. Albeit the worst president in history; still simply making that office means he was a success.

I blame him for being a shitty president, but I acknowledge he was successful in his life.
What about 4.7% unemployment and 75 straight months of 6 digit employment don't you like?
 
[
And people like you blame Obama for not succeeding?? You're a joke

Obama became president. Albeit the worst president in history; still simply making that office means he was a success.

I blame him for being a shitty president, but I acknowledge he was successful in his life.
What about 4.7% unemployment and 75 straight months of 6 digit employment don't you like?

Oh. Trump is great.

Obama's 12% unemployment sucked though.
 
I can’t speak for anyone else but me. I hate Hillary for many many reasons:

Progressive.
Corrupt.
Liar.
Ignorant.
Evil.
Nasty.
Hateful.
Soulless.
Egotistical.
Screeching harpy.
Bad dresser.
Hypocrite.
Greedy.
Yeah I thought she could dress better too All the rest are BS

I provide the facts, I can’t force you to believe them.
And I can't convince you that outside of tax reform Trump can't hold Hillaries panties as far as being presidential goes
D540F23F-383A-4B75-A340-CA5E15572DB2.jpeg
 
[
And people like you blame Obama for not succeeding?? You're a joke

Obama became president. Albeit the worst president in history; still simply making that office means he was a success.

I blame him for being a shitty president, but I acknowledge he was successful in his life.
What about 4.7% unemployment and 75 straight months of 6 digit employment don't you like?

Oh. Trump is great.

Obama's 12% unemployment sucked though.
All part of repubs great recession Couldn't get repub mistakes turned around instantly
 
I voted for Donald J. Trump, for -- like many other people -- I did not imagine that he could win, and I could not in good conscience vote for Hillary R. Clinton.

I feel that Secretary Clinton is not the kind of person that I want to be our president:

1. I have just heard that in 2008 it was Ms. Clinton's supporters who started the rumors about Senator Obama's birthplace. (I do NOT know whether she was aware of what some of her supporters were doing.)

2. I believe that she has been very patronizing toward African Americans.

a. In 2016, she pandered to them by constantly talking about white privilege.
b. In 2008 and perhaps at other times, she would try to use a Southern accent.
c. She is the person who referred to "super predators."

3. I think that even Democrats now admit that the nominating process in 2016 was stacked against Senator Sanders.

4. She publicly said that 50% of Candidate Trump's supporters were the "deplorables." To the best of my knowledge, few politicians have ever used that word to describe an opponent's supporters.

5. She was obviously using the gender card during the campaign.

Those are some of the reasons why I feel that she did not have the required character to be president of ALL Americans -- regardless of ethnicity, gender, religion, etc.

I do believe that President Trump, although certainly no saint, is -- comparatively speaking -- more sincere and less bigoted than some of his Democratic critics.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top