It was not sarcasm, it was a legitimate question. But not one of you on the left has been able to give a cogent reply.
Oh poster please.
"When did you stop beating your wife". Don't sit here and insult everybody's intelligence.
ok hoppy, tell us when anyone on the right has blocked traffic, caused a riot, destroyed public and private property, prevented a leftist from speaking, called for attacks on democrats in restaurants and their homes, spewed hateful rhetoric 24/7 about a duly elected president.
Yes, there is much more hate coming from the left, it you cant see or admit it just shows that you are one of the haters. I feel sorry for you and for our great country because this is destroying it.
Once AGAIN your premise right there in the first phrase of your post, is fatally erroneous.
There is
NO SUCH THING as anyone "on the right". Or "on the left". People simply do not live in these fake comic books you make up because you can't be bothered with individuality. And in the same way there is no restaurant where you're obliged to declare a political party, just as there was never a lynching that required one, a riot, a Klan, a crime, a flag-burning, a sex scandal, or any of the other lump-fallacies purveyed on this board in a puerile attempt at demonization of one's imaginary lump-grouped adversaries. A limp lump-fallacy that, I might add, also requires the infantilistic dichotomy-think that imagines everybody in the world as automatically falling into one of two "camps", again just because you can't be bothered.
I already schooled you on this shit; these are fallacy
crutches that you use to blanket people. Fallacies are still fallacies, and that booboo doesn't heal when you pick at it.
And soon as we speak cometh a perfect example in a new thread:
Maxine Waters Has Had Death Threats
There's no link so I don't know if it's factual or not but for the sake of argument let's say it is and Waters has been threatened....
Shall we now
ass-sume that because Waters is a Democrat, her threat must have come from a "Republican"?
Shall we now
ass-sume that because Waters is "on the left", her threat must have come from someone "on the right"?
Shall we now
ass-sume that because Waters is a woman, her threat must have come from a man?
Shall we now
ass-sume that because Waters is a politician, her threat must have come from someone interested in politics?
Shall we now
ass-sume that because Waters is black, her threat must have come from someone white?
Shall we now
ass-sume that because Waters is a Rump critic, her threat must have come from a Rump supporter?
Shall we now
ass-sume that because Waters is old, her threat must have come from someone young?
Shall we now
ass-sume that because Waters is in Los Angeles, her threat must have come from a Giants fan?
Why is it necessary to contrive these fake dichotomies at all?