No... You can't free something you don't have in your possession to free.... sorry.... can't be done.
...
Yet he did. Lincoln also signed the law in 1862 that gave freedom to all the slaves in D.C.
All the areas your map shows where slaves were freed is CSA territory which was not under Lincoln's control until the CSA was defeated.
It was Union territory all the time.
And the Union controlled those areas defeated by force of arms.
And yes, the slaves were freed.
Answer my question now... Why did Lincoln not free the slaves held in West Virginia?
Part of the deal with being allowed into the Union as a new state was on the condition West Virginia emancipate their slaves.
You are clueless on the Constitution and history. I seriously doubt there were many slaves in D.C. but it's not a state so there is the statutory difference. The president could abolish slavery in DC, just as many other states had done... any state could have voted to abolish slavery and be a free state. If they did and you wanted to have and keep slaves, you'd have to take them elsewhere.
No... the slaves WEREN'T freed... and we can keep repeating these lines to each other like 7-year-olds if you like, you're not going to bully me. Because Lincoln issued a piece of paper that said slaves in the South were free, did not mean the slave owners in the South rushed out to unchain their slaves! If that's what you think... you must be about 7 years old..