Not at all, I'm saying that it wasn't as accurate as some believe, Stephens himself said the reporters article was inaccurate in some of the things he said. To better understand what Stephens was speaking about is to better understand the man himself. He actually voted against secession in the convention, he believed that whites were superior and subordination was natural and normal. He believed it was the duty of the superior race to provide work, food, and housing for blacks. Almost every one of his slaves chose to remain working for him after emancipation for little or no money and these servants stayed with him until his death.
Ooops! Stephens not only said they were fighting over slavery, Stephens actually doubled down on his cornerstone speech. His issue was was not with the reporter. He was concerned that it made it seem like he speaking badly about the founding fathers. You stay looking like an idiot.
Alexander Stephens Reinforces The Cornerstone CIVIL WAR MEMORY
Here is where he doubles down on saying slavery was the reason the losers went to war.
"The order of subordination was nature’s great law; philosophy taught that order as the normal condition of the African amongst European races. Upon this recognized principle of a proper subordination, let it be called slavery or what not, our State institutions were formed and rested. The new Confederation was entered into with this distinct understanding."