Why Republicans need to crush the Tea Party by electing Hillary Clinton.

The Tea Party has shattered the Republican party into pieces. There is no Unity. You have the majority that are moderate Republicans--then you've got the right or should I say Reich wing of the party that has cost Republicans the election in 2012 and now 2016. It's out of ignorance of what government can and cannot do.

A great article describing why Mitt Romney lost in 2012 is here:
Why Romney Lost And Republicans Keep Losing

In 2012 the Evangelical wing of the party decided to make their platform about abortion. Of course abortion is a 45 year old settled U.S. Supreme court issue, but for some reason they still think it's a political one. This of course then went into who's not going to pay for birth control pills, and what was legal legitimate rape questions, that were always answered by an ancient white male Republican. This sent women, the largest voting block in this country, running into Barack Obama's column by double digits, younger women by 36 points. Basically they were "offended" into giving Barack Obama a 2nd term.
The GOP's woman problem goes beyond Trump
Gender Gap in 2012 Vote Is Largest in Gallup's History

In 2016, it's another large voting block that Republicans need, Hispanics. 17% of the population or 23 million Latino's have been "offended" into voting for Hillary Clinton. Of course in 2012, one of the platform topics was immigration/deporation and Romney only captured 27% of this block. The last Republican President to win was G. W Bush and he captured 44% of this block. The GOP nominee, since Reagan has had to capture at least 40% of this block to win the White House. This year it's 46%. Trump is polling at a Negative 80% with this block.
GOP Win Will Need More Than 40 Percent Of Latino 2016 Vote, Says Study
Latino conservatives: If Donald Trump is the nominee, we will not work to elect him
Poll: 75% of Latinos Have Negative View of Donald Trump

The Tea Party, is lead by Mr. Talent on loan from Gawwwwddd-d Rush Limbaugh and all the other right wing talk show hosts that fill their audiences with 3 or more daily hours of right wing hyperbole for political entertainment and profits. They promote candidates based on this hyperbole, such as Ted Cruz a Canadian born candidate, that would be certain to be challenged on his eligibility. He is too far right to win a National election. Women nor Independents would vote for him. They have promoted Donald Trump to their audiences, another one that could not possibly win the White House, and is really only good at driving people off. These right wing talk shows hosts have incited this anger within the Republican party, and exploited this ignorance and bigotry.

In order to save the Republican party, the Tea Party and their leaders must be crushed. Hillary Clinton must win in a landslide election. Otherwise the next Republican President hasn't been born yet.
I’ll Take Hillary Clinton Over Donald Trump

tea_party_teenager.jpg


images




Yeah, right and the GOP leadership should put their balls in a vice and wind it till they cant turn it any more.

But then again, DeLay left Washington with the last GOP pair, so thats not a real concern for them these days.
 
So you think it's cool to have a couple of thousand classified documents, some holding compartmented information, on an insecure server and it doesn't endanger national security? If you can in any way rationalize that then you're a lost cause.
A coulple of thousand? When, why and by whom were they classified? Context matters.

Actually context in the way you're asking doesn't matter, she had documents containing classified information on an insecure system, that alone constitutes a violation of law. As far as I know they haven't released exactly which agencies are doing the review, so it's impossible to answer who said they were classified. They have reported that about 140 of those documents were generated by the hildabitch herself. The law says it doesn't matter if it was done intentionally or by neglect, it's still a violation.
Who is "they"? link?

That would be State and DOJ, have you been living under a freaking rock?

State has said that none were classified at the time.


State is not the one to make that determination, the agency that originated the information is responsible for it's classification. Some of the emails actually had verbatim excerpts from Top Secret documents, according to reports.

“What I have seen is the excerpting and maybe verbatim copying” of classified information, he said, adding that the nature of the information describes is “clearly SCI material.”

Farrell said his investigation of the matter indicates that Clinton aides likely read classified documents and then digested and excerpted the material into the unclassified email system.

Watchdog: Two National Security Laws Appear Broken in Clinton Email Scandal
 
A coulple of thousand? When, why and by whom were they classified? Context matters.

Actually context in the way you're asking doesn't matter, she had documents containing classified information on an insecure system, that alone constitutes a violation of law. As far as I know they haven't released exactly which agencies are doing the review, so it's impossible to answer who said they were classified. They have reported that about 140 of those documents were generated by the hildabitch herself. The law says it doesn't matter if it was done intentionally or by neglect, it's still a violation.

Ahh but it does. I understand your unwillingness to address it as it would destroy your narrative. Suppose those mails you referenced were only classified later as a result of a judicial order that would make them public years after her tenure at state. Is that a violation of any law? Context is everything unless you're not interested in the truth.

Of course you have a link.

Of course your house of cards just fell. How do you say what you do without knowing this? What do you suppose " not classified at the time" means? If the Secretary of State emails the president or his staff during routine duties, do you believe anyone would release those without classification and redaction? Remember, none of those emails, let alone all of them, were ever meant to be public.

Once again your ignorance is showing. Every work related email sent/received by every government official is require by law to be archived. Try taking a look at the Federal Records Keeping Act. In fact here's a little piece of it:

§ 3106. Unlawful removal, destruction of records

(a) FEDERAL AGENCY NOTIFICATION.—The head of each Federal agency shall notify the Archivist of any actual, impending, or threatened unlawful removal, defacing, alteration, corruption, deletion, erasure, or other destruction of records in the custody of the agency, and with the assistance of the Archivist shall initiate action through the Attorney General for the recovery of records the head of the Federal agency knows or has reason to believe have been unlawfully removed from that agency, or from another Federal agency whose records have been transferred to the legal custody of that Federal agency.

(b) ARCHIVIST NOTIFICATION.—In any case in which the head of the Federal agency does not initiate an action for such recovery or other redress within a reasonable period of time after being notified of any such unlawful action described in subsection (a), or is participating in, or believed to be participating in any such unlawful action, the Archivist shall request the Attorney General to initiate such an action, and shall notify the Congress when such a request has been made.

Records Management by Federal Agencies (44 U.S.C. Chapter 31

That's exactly right there chief. So to say that someone is criminal because they have archived emails that are later classified is totally bonkers. Under your view, anyone could be subject to prosecution anytime a subject is later classified.
 
The Tea Party has shattered the Republican party into pieces. There is no Unity. You have the majority that are moderate Republicans--then you've got the right or should I say Reich wing of the party that has cost Republicans the election in 2012 and now 2016. It's out of ignorance of what government can and cannot do.

A great article describing why Mitt Romney lost in 2012 is here:
Why Romney Lost And Republicans Keep Losing

In 2012 the Evangelical wing of the party decided to make their platform about abortion. Of course abortion is a 45 year old settled U.S. Supreme court issue, but for some reason they still think it's a political one. This of course then went into who's not going to pay for birth control pills, and what was legal legitimate rape questions, that were always answered by an ancient white male Republican. This sent women, the largest voting block in this country, running into Barack Obama's column by double digits, younger women by 36 points. Basically they were "offended" into giving Barack Obama a 2nd term.
The GOP's woman problem goes beyond Trump
Gender Gap in 2012 Vote Is Largest in Gallup's History

In 2016, it's another large voting block that Republicans need, Hispanics. 17% of the population or 23 million Latino's have been "offended" into voting for Hillary Clinton. Of course in 2012, one of the platform topics was immigration/deporation and Romney only captured 27% of this block. The last Republican President to win was G. W Bush and he captured 44% of this block. The GOP nominee, since Reagan has had to capture at least 40% of this block to win the White House. This year it's 46%. Trump is polling at a Negative 80% with this block.
GOP Win Will Need More Than 40 Percent Of Latino 2016 Vote, Says Study
Latino conservatives: If Donald Trump is the nominee, we will not work to elect him
Poll: 75% of Latinos Have Negative View of Donald Trump

The Tea Party, is lead by Mr. Talent on loan from Gawwwwddd-d Rush Limbaugh and all the other right wing talk show hosts that fill their audiences with 3 or more daily hours of right wing hyperbole for political entertainment and profits. They promote candidates based on this hyperbole, such as Ted Cruz a Canadian born candidate, that would be certain to be challenged on his eligibility. He is too far right to win a National election. Women nor Independents would vote for him. They have promoted Donald Trump to their audiences, another one that could not possibly win the White House, and is really only good at driving people off. These right wing talk shows hosts have incited this anger within the Republican party, and exploited this ignorance and bigotry.

In order to save the Republican party, the Tea Party and their leaders must be crushed. Hillary Clinton must win in a landslide election. Otherwise the next Republican President hasn't been born yet.
I’ll Take Hillary Clinton Over Donald Trump

tea_party_teenager.jpg


images




You left wing nut jobs never get smarter do you?

Everyone should be crushed but them. you notice that?
they do a good job of crushing themselves. they can't ever Accept they are the REASON their party is LOSING. along with that THUG Obama they put in office. they won't ACCEPT: the American people are SICK and tired of them all. so it's the same ole same ole put the blame on the others in this country for their poor choices and thugs they put in office over us.
 
Last edited:
A coulple of thousand? When, why and by whom were they classified? Context matters.

Actually context in the way you're asking doesn't matter, she had documents containing classified information on an insecure system, that alone constitutes a violation of law. As far as I know they haven't released exactly which agencies are doing the review, so it's impossible to answer who said they were classified. They have reported that about 140 of those documents were generated by the hildabitch herself. The law says it doesn't matter if it was done intentionally or by neglect, it's still a violation.
Who is "they"? link?

That would be State and DOJ, have you been living under a freaking rock?

State has said that none were classified at the time.


State is not the one to make that determination, the agency that originated the information is responsible for it's classification. Some of the emails actually had verbatim excerpts from Top Secret documents, according to reports.

“What I have seen is the excerpting and maybe verbatim copying” of classified information, he said, adding that the nature of the information describes is “clearly SCI material.”

Farrell said his investigation of the matter indicates that Clinton aides likely read classified documents and then digested and excerpted the material into the unclassified email system.

Watchdog: Two National Security Laws Appear Broken in Clinton Email Scandal
FreeBeacon? :lol: OKTexas :eusa_shhh: :itsok:

The Washington Free Beacon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The site is noted for its aggressive, ideologically driven reporting, modeled after liberal counterparts in the media such as Think Progress and Talking Points Memo.
 
Actually context in the way you're asking doesn't matter, she had documents containing classified information on an insecure system, that alone constitutes a violation of law. As far as I know they haven't released exactly which agencies are doing the review, so it's impossible to answer who said they were classified. They have reported that about 140 of those documents were generated by the hildabitch herself. The law says it doesn't matter if it was done intentionally or by neglect, it's still a violation.

Ahh but it does. I understand your unwillingness to address it as it would destroy your narrative. Suppose those mails you referenced were only classified later as a result of a judicial order that would make them public years after her tenure at state. Is that a violation of any law? Context is everything unless you're not interested in the truth.

Of course you have a link.

Of course your house of cards just fell. How do you say what you do without knowing this? What do you suppose " not classified at the time" means? If the Secretary of State emails the president or his staff during routine duties, do you believe anyone would release those without classification and redaction? Remember, none of those emails, let alone all of them, were ever meant to be public.

Once again your ignorance is showing. Every work related email sent/received by every government official is require by law to be archived. Try taking a look at the Federal Records Keeping Act. In fact here's a little piece of it:

§ 3106. Unlawful removal, destruction of records

(a) FEDERAL AGENCY NOTIFICATION.—The head of each Federal agency shall notify the Archivist of any actual, impending, or threatened unlawful removal, defacing, alteration, corruption, deletion, erasure, or other destruction of records in the custody of the agency, and with the assistance of the Archivist shall initiate action through the Attorney General for the recovery of records the head of the Federal agency knows or has reason to believe have been unlawfully removed from that agency, or from another Federal agency whose records have been transferred to the legal custody of that Federal agency.

(b) ARCHIVIST NOTIFICATION.—In any case in which the head of the Federal agency does not initiate an action for such recovery or other redress within a reasonable period of time after being notified of any such unlawful action described in subsection (a), or is participating in, or believed to be participating in any such unlawful action, the Archivist shall request the Attorney General to initiate such an action, and shall notify the Congress when such a request has been made.

Records Management by Federal Agencies (44 U.S.C. Chapter 31

That's exactly right there chief. So to say that someone is criminal because they have archived emails that are later classified is totally bonkers. Under your view, anyone could be subject to prosecution anytime a subject is later classified.

That has nothing to do with classification, the hildabitch didn't turn over her emails to be archived until a court ordered her to release them under a FOIA order. She was already violating the records keeping act. Having classified information on an insecure system falls under a totally different law.
 
Actually context in the way you're asking doesn't matter, she had documents containing classified information on an insecure system, that alone constitutes a violation of law. As far as I know they haven't released exactly which agencies are doing the review, so it's impossible to answer who said they were classified. They have reported that about 140 of those documents were generated by the hildabitch herself. The law says it doesn't matter if it was done intentionally or by neglect, it's still a violation.
Who is "they"? link?

That would be State and DOJ, have you been living under a freaking rock?

State has said that none were classified at the time.


State is not the one to make that determination, the agency that originated the information is responsible for it's classification. Some of the emails actually had verbatim excerpts from Top Secret documents, according to reports.

“What I have seen is the excerpting and maybe verbatim copying” of classified information, he said, adding that the nature of the information describes is “clearly SCI material.”

Farrell said his investigation of the matter indicates that Clinton aides likely read classified documents and then digested and excerpted the material into the unclassified email system.

Watchdog: Two National Security Laws Appear Broken in Clinton Email Scandal
FreeBeacon? :lol: OKTexas :eusa_shhh: :itsok:

The Washington Free Beacon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The site is noted for its aggressive, ideologically driven reporting, modeled after liberal counterparts in the media such as Think Progress and Talking Points Memo.

Poor baby, is that really all you've got. I didn't chose the article for who wrote it, but who they were quoting. The same has also been reported in the MSM.
 
The Tea Party has shattered the Republican party into pieces. There is no Unity. You have the majority that are moderate Republicans--then you've got the right or should I say Reich wing of the party that has cost Republicans the election in 2012 and now 2016. It's out of ignorance of what government can and cannot do.

A great article describing why Mitt Romney lost in 2012 is here:
Why Romney Lost And Republicans Keep Losing

In 2012 the Evangelical wing of the party decided to make their platform about abortion. Of course abortion is a 45 year old settled U.S. Supreme court issue, but for some reason they still think it's a political one. This of course then went into who's not going to pay for birth control pills, and what was legal legitimate rape questions, that were always answered by an ancient white male Republican. This sent women, the largest voting block in this country, running into Barack Obama's column by double digits, younger women by 36 points. Basically they were "offended" into giving Barack Obama a 2nd term.
The GOP's woman problem goes beyond Trump
Gender Gap in 2012 Vote Is Largest in Gallup's History

In 2016, it's another large voting block that Republicans need, Hispanics. 17% of the population or 23 million Latino's have been "offended" into voting for Hillary Clinton. Of course in 2012, one of the platform topics was immigration/deporation and Romney only captured 27% of this block. The last Republican President to win was G. W Bush and he captured 44% of this block. The GOP nominee, since Reagan has had to capture at least 40% of this block to win the White House. This year it's 46%. Trump is polling at a Negative 80% with this block.
GOP Win Will Need More Than 40 Percent Of Latino 2016 Vote, Says Study
Latino conservatives: If Donald Trump is the nominee, we will not work to elect him
Poll: 75% of Latinos Have Negative View of Donald Trump

The Tea Party, is lead by Mr. Talent on loan from Gawwwwddd-d Rush Limbaugh and all the other right wing talk show hosts that fill their audiences with 3 or more daily hours of right wing hyperbole for political entertainment and profits. They promote candidates based on this hyperbole, such as Ted Cruz a Canadian born candidate, that would be certain to be challenged on his eligibility. He is too far right to win a National election. Women nor Independents would vote for him. They have promoted Donald Trump to their audiences, another one that could not possibly win the White House, and is really only good at driving people off. These right wing talk shows hosts have incited this anger within the Republican party, and exploited this ignorance and bigotry.

In order to save the Republican party, the Tea Party and their leaders must be crushed. Hillary Clinton must win in a landslide election. Otherwise the next Republican President hasn't been born yet.
I’ll Take Hillary Clinton Over Donald Trump

tea_party_teenager.jpg


images





Fiorina endorsed Cruz.

Now go the fuck home, cry into your pillow, and leave the election process to the emotionally stable.

 
The Tea Party has shattered the Republican party into pieces. There is no Unity. You have the majority that are moderate Republicans--then you've got the right or should I say Reich wing of the party that has cost Republicans the election in 2012 and now 2016. It's out of ignorance of what government can and cannot do.

A great article describing why Mitt Romney lost in 2012 is here:
Why Romney Lost And Republicans Keep Losing

In 2012 the Evangelical wing of the party decided to make their platform about abortion. Of course abortion is a 45 year old settled U.S. Supreme court issue, but for some reason they still think it's a political one. This of course then went into who's not going to pay for birth control pills, and what was legal legitimate rape questions, that were always answered by an ancient white male Republican. This sent women, the largest voting block in this country, running into Barack Obama's column by double digits, younger women by 36 points. Basically they were "offended" into giving Barack Obama a 2nd term.
The GOP's woman problem goes beyond Trump
Gender Gap in 2012 Vote Is Largest in Gallup's History

In 2016, it's another large voting block that Republicans need, Hispanics. 17% of the population or 23 million Latino's have been "offended" into voting for Hillary Clinton. Of course in 2012, one of the platform topics was immigration/deporation and Romney only captured 27% of this block. The last Republican President to win was G. W Bush and he captured 44% of this block. The GOP nominee, since Reagan has had to capture at least 40% of this block to win the White House. This year it's 46%. Trump is polling at a Negative 80% with this block.
GOP Win Will Need More Than 40 Percent Of Latino 2016 Vote, Says Study
Latino conservatives: If Donald Trump is the nominee, we will not work to elect him
Poll: 75% of Latinos Have Negative View of Donald Trump

The Tea Party, is lead by Mr. Talent on loan from Gawwwwddd-d Rush Limbaugh and all the other right wing talk show hosts that fill their audiences with 3 or more daily hours of right wing hyperbole for political entertainment and profits. They promote candidates based on this hyperbole, such as Ted Cruz a Canadian born candidate, that would be certain to be challenged on his eligibility. He is too far right to win a National election. Women nor Independents would vote for him. They have promoted Donald Trump to their audiences, another one that could not possibly win the White House, and is really only good at driving people off. These right wing talk shows hosts have incited this anger within the Republican party, and exploited this ignorance and bigotry.

In order to save the Republican party, the Tea Party and their leaders must be crushed. Hillary Clinton must win in a landslide election. Otherwise the next Republican President hasn't been born yet.
I’ll Take Hillary Clinton Over Donald Trump

tea_party_teenager.jpg


images



Actually, wouldn't electing, and perhaps just nominating Trump do this, as well as crushing the elite's notion that it can buy off republican voting wage earning stiffs with crap about gay marriage and abortion? And that's why I voted for him earlier this week.
 
I don't think the Tea Party has done much of anything, and are moot.


The Tea Party in their efforts to get a non-Establishment candidate have rino'd the Republican Party right into a Hillary Clinton Presidency, a probable loss of the Senate and a ton of seats in the house. I have never witnessed such ineptitude and ignorance coming out of any political group in my many years. They managed to fly over the rose bushes and land on a cow turd with Donald Trump.

Tea-Party-agenda-GOP.jpg
 
And keep with the insanity of career politicians?? Dumbasses

All of your B.S. doesn't mean a thing unless you can win a National election.

images

Republicans kicked the asses of the Democrats in BOTH mid-term national elections what in the hell is wrong with you people? Obama screwed the democrat party more than any Republican ever could. Again, you need to correct you behavior and select actual true talking points.

I have no problem with a tea party that your side decided was enemy number one. An enemy you can invent all sorts of BS about as you have in the OP.

I do have a problem with Mrs. Tulza Clinton who, with Obama, bombs the crap out of a country then forgets about 4 men who died because of the bombing. That is how sick and twisted is the liar Mrs Tulza Clinton. And you support that? Again, What is wrong with you people?
 
Hitlery is inevitably going to wind up being yanked from the election, and she'll be lucky not to wind up in prison. She better hope and pray the muslim in the white mosque gives her a pardon. She's a non threat to the tea party, the republican party, or the beer party going on down the street.


That argument is already over

Benghazi is over.
Email scandal is over.

Now you're stuck with the Chimpanzee nominee, and you're going to go down with him.

Delaware-Tea-Party.jpg
 
The two things Republicans did that killed the Republican Party and has damaged our democracy badly.

-Pushing for Citizens United
-Allowing the rise of the dopey Tea Party

We now have unlimited money supporting unlimited stupid.
 

Forum List

Back
Top