Why people like me say the MSM biases the news...

[sealybobo]

The following excerpt is regarding this headline:
Judge sides with Senate, says Maricopa must turn over election materials for audit

Judge sides with Senate, says Maricopa must turn over election materials for audit

The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors must turn over ballots and tabulation machines to Senate Republican leaders so they can conduct an audit of the 2020 general election, a judge ruled.

www.azmirror.com

What these means is Maricopa county must abide by an audit of the 2.1 million votes in the 2020 election.

NOW here is how we know the MSM including this Arizona Mirror "objective" "professional" "journalist" presents the news...

"They sought to conduct an audit of the election in response to the baseless fraud allegations and conspiracy theories espoused by former President Donald Trump and many of his supporters, including some Senate Republicans, after President Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election."

Please explain to me how a reader would come away with an opinion the election fraud is not true? "BASELESS"? Why does this idiot hack writer then use the term if a JUDGE has ordered an audit? If it was "BASELESS" then why did the judge do that? BIASED JUDGE? Yea that's the ticket. So is that why SCOTUS refused to hear the PA lawsuit? BIASED???

So far his allegations ar3 all baseless.

If telling the truth is liberal then so be it. It’s harder to con people when the media points out exactly where the politicians are lying.

I guess fact checking is liberal?

I can't believe the MSM when the facts show this.
The MSM donated 96% of their donations in 2016 to Hillary and were so angry they spent the next 4 years putting out false news...like the above example. The MSM then donated 90% to Biden, et.al. Democrats in 2020 supporting with money and more importantly BIASED news their HATRED for Trump. Broadcast coverage of Trump 95% negative, according to new study.
“I’ve been studying the news media and elections for more than 35 years. Trust me — there’s never been anything like it,” said Rich Noyes, research director for the conservative press watchdog.

Broadcast coverage of Trump 95% negative, according to new study

Negative press coverage of President Trump has worsened. Since 2016, previous studies from analysts at the Media Research Center revealed that press coverage of Mr. Trump on major broadcast networks was 91% negative. It has gotten worse. A new study released Monday found that the coverage is now...

www.washingtontimes.com

View attachment 462341

You don’t know who they are giving most of their money to. With citizens United they can donate secretly as much as they want to political action committees.

They want to seem liberal. so you can say they are liberal so no one believes them.

Check out this site and again look at the links in the file I attached:

Journalists shower Hillary Clinton with campaign cash

New Yorker television critic Emily Nussbaum, a newly minted Pulitzer Prize winner, spent the Republican National Convention pen-pricking presidential nominee Donald Trump as a misogynist shyster running an “ugly and xenophobic campaign.” What Nussbaum didn’t disclose in her dispatches: she...

publicintegrity.org

90% of media political donations to Biden, Sanders, AOC, Democrats: Report - Washington Examiner

Reporters and other members of the media have donated at least $110,000 to candidates and parties in the upcoming election, with over 90% going to Democrats including, Joe Biden, Sen. Bernie Sanders, and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, according to a new deep-dive report."Journalists at The New...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Individual Contributions - FEC.gov

Guide on researching Individual Contributions in Federal Elections.

www.fec.gov

You don’t know how much the media corporations donate. It’s dark money.

 

[healthmyths]

The following excerpt is regarding this headline:
Judge sides with Senate, says Maricopa must turn over election materials for audit

Judge sides with Senate, says Maricopa must turn over election materials for audit

The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors must turn over ballots and tabulation machines to Senate Republican leaders so they can conduct an audit of the 2020 general election, a judge ruled.

www.azmirror.com

What these means is Maricopa county must abide by an audit of the 2.1 million votes in the 2020 election.

NOW here is how we know the MSM including this Arizona Mirror "objective" "professional" "journalist" presents the news...

"They sought to conduct an audit of the election in response to the baseless fraud allegations and conspiracy theories espoused by former President Donald Trump and many of his supporters, including some Senate Republicans, after President Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election."

Please explain to me how a reader would come away with an opinion the election fraud is not true? "BASELESS"? Why does this idiot hack writer then use the term if a JUDGE has ordered an audit? If it was "BASELESS" then why did the judge do that? BIASED JUDGE? Yea that's the ticket. So is that why SCOTUS refused to hear the PA lawsuit? BIASED???

So far his allegations ar3 all baseless.

If telling the truth is liberal then so be it. It’s harder to con people when the media points out exactly where the politicians are lying.

I guess fact checking is liberal?

I can't believe the MSM when the facts show this.
The MSM donated 96% of their donations in 2016 to Hillary and were so angry they spent the next 4 years putting out false news...like the above example. The MSM then donated 90% to Biden, et.al. Democrats in 2020 supporting with money and more importantly BIASED news their HATRED for Trump. Broadcast coverage of Trump 95% negative, according to new study.
“I’ve been studying the news media and elections for more than 35 years. Trust me — there’s never been anything like it,” said Rich Noyes, research director for the conservative press watchdog.

Broadcast coverage of Trump 95% negative, according to new study

Negative press coverage of President Trump has worsened. Since 2016, previous studies from analysts at the Media Research Center revealed that press coverage of Mr. Trump on major broadcast networks was 91% negative. It has gotten worse. A new study released Monday found that the coverage is now...

www.washingtontimes.com

View attachment 462341

You don’t know who they are giving most of their money to. With citizens United they can donate secretly as much as they want to political action committees.

They want to seem liberal. so you can say they are liberal so no one believes them.

Check out this site and again look at the links in the file I attached:

Journalists shower Hillary Clinton with campaign cash

New Yorker television critic Emily Nussbaum, a newly minted Pulitzer Prize winner, spent the Republican National Convention pen-pricking presidential nominee Donald Trump as a misogynist shyster running an “ugly and xenophobic campaign.” What Nussbaum didn’t disclose in her dispatches: she...

publicintegrity.org

90% of media political donations to Biden, Sanders, AOC, Democrats: Report - Washington Examiner

Reporters and other members of the media have donated at least $110,000 to candidates and parties in the upcoming election, with over 90% going to Democrats including, Joe Biden, Sen. Bernie Sanders, and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, according to a new deep-dive report."Journalists at The New...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Individual Contributions - FEC.gov

Guide on researching Individual Contributions in Federal Elections.

www.fec.gov

You don’t know how much the media corporations donate. It’s dark money.

Why would CNN be so quick to declare Hillary Clinton the winner of Tuesday’s Democratic debate, when the majority of online polls crowned Bernie Sanders?
Well, it could have something to do with the fact that Time Warner Cable owns CNN. Time Warner, of course, has donated over $400,000 to Hillary Clinton’s campaigns.

Money Talks: Why CNN Wants You to Believe That Hillary Clinton Won the Democratic Debate

Why would CNN be so quick to declare Hillary Clinton the winner of Tuesday's Democratic debate, when the majority of online polls crowned Bernie Sanders?

www.huffpost.com

The Lead host Jake Tapper highlighted a shocking Associated Press report that revealed that Hillary Clinton held more than 75 meetings with foreign Clinton Foundation donors that were wiped from then-Secretary Clinton’s official State Department schedule. Tapper linked the new revelations about Clinton and her family foundation to questions currently being raised by Donald Trump concerning the aforementioned donation

CNN Botches Proven Fact About Clinton Foundation Donations

CNN investigative correspondent Drew Griffin narrated a segment Friday detailing various donations the Clinton Foundation had accepted from foreign governments prior to Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state, but he completely botched the repeatedly proven fact that the Clinton...

www.breitbart.com

 

[sartre play]

All major watched TV POLITICAL stations use conflict, propaganda, & hype to keep the hate & money flowing. few of us are interested in watching unbiased fact based reporting.