Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 68,333
- 17,519
- 2,190
Definitely take the money back. That’s a stupid example though. Why don’t you ask about trespassing? It’s much more relevant to this debate. Damn man, don’t make me give you talking points, that’s pathetic.What if someone robs $100,000 from a bank do you allow them to keep the money they stole? What penalty is appropriate, and how does it not qualify as what you call "an eye for an eye?If somebody steals and eats a piece of bread do you gag them and make them throw it up or do you arrest them?As I said, if the so-called "penalty" allows the perp to retain the benefit of committing his crime, then it's not a penalty. "Comprehensive immigration reform" is amnesty.Amnesty is a pardon without penalty. I’m proposing penalties. You just don’t like the penalty. Stop lyingThat's still amnesty. And you have supported amnesty for the rest as well. You just call it "comprehensive immigration reform."Only for dreamers
Again. Our legal system is not eye for an eye