Why No Shame?

It is in the video. You are lying.

Nope, you're lying. The video shows police fighting with the crowd. Why on Earth would they bother fighting with an unconscious woman when a mob is attacking them?
 
Nope, you're lying. The video shows police fighting with the crowd. Why on Earth would they bother fighting with an unconscious woman when a mob is attacking them?
Because they were told to.
 
Because they were told to.
Prove it.
If you cannot prove it.....then your remark is irresponsible slander against the uniform police who swore an oath to protect the people we elected to represent us and our voice in the Congress of the United States of America.

So, with that said, good poster Lastamender.......how do you know "they were told" to beat a prone woman? And does that same source that you rely upon inform you on who instructed these police?

Show us what you have.
If you cannot.....then you may very well not be qualified to discuss adult things on a forum such as this.

Good luck. And thanks in advance.
 
Prove it.
If you cannot prove it.....then your remark is irresponsible slander against the uniform police who swore an oath to protect the people we elected to represent us and our voice in the Congress of the United States of America.

So, with that said, good poster Lastamender.......how do you know "they were told" to beat a prone woman? And does that same source that you rely upon inform you on who instructed these police?

Show us what you have.
If you cannot.....then you may very well not be qualified to discuss adult things on a forum such as this.

Good luck. And thanks in advance.
I will the same thing to your useless ass. Prove they were not.
 
You said they were told. Seems you lied again as it seems you can't prove they were told that. What a piece-of-shit you are, FruitLoops.
That is not how you prove they were not. Try again, Assflap.

I wonder they were not told to stand down like they are when the cities are burning. After all DC is a Democratic shithole.
 
That's not an attack on the U.S. government.

....


It was a formal and explicit rebellion against the authority and territory of the United States government.

Your denial here is just you stonewalling.
 
Funny how you said the formal insurrection had clear support from local and state government.

That would be impossible.


We could see the mayors order the police to respect the borders of the new territory, in real time. The Governors, who in a sane would, would have been ordering the national guard to mobilize to take them down, did nothing.

The city police did nothing. The state police did nothing.


Your claim of "impossible" is thus refuted.
 
That is not how you prove they were not. Try again, Assflap.

I wonder they were not told to stand down like they are when the cities are burning. After all DC is a Democratic shithole.

Poor FruitLoops... YOU asserted they were told. Now you reveal you can't prove your claim. Sucks to be you.

:dance:
 
It was a formal and explicit rebellion against the authority and territory of the United States government.

Your denial here is just you stonewalling.

Nope, it was an act of rebellion on a local town in Washington state. That make it a state crime, not a federal crime.

Are you ever not an idiot?

Ever??
 

Forum List

Back
Top