Ray9
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2016
- 2,707
- 4,486
- 1,970
- Banned
- #1
Since Sar's Cov-2 was around long before many Americans suspected, there is a good chance infection rates and recovery are higher in the population than previously known by experts. This poses a dilemma for the people because many may have antibodies already on board against the virus. There is a concern shared by experts that a hyperactive immune response similar to the cytokine storm that killed millions during the Spanish Flu outbreak in 1918 could wreak havoc among the population particularly with lethal blood clotting that is not being widely reported.
Mass inoculation by the government could be more dangerous to recovered individuals than the virus itself. A safer policy would be to test all for antibodies first. Why is this not being done? What are we not being told?
Mass inoculation by the government could be more dangerous to recovered individuals than the virus itself. A safer policy would be to test all for antibodies first. Why is this not being done? What are we not being told?
Former Pfizer VP: ‘No need for vaccines,’ ‘the pandemic is effectively over’ - LifeSite
Dr. Mike Yeadon, Pfizer's former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory, states that the drive for a universal vaccine has 'the whiff of evil' which he 'will oppose … vigorously.'
www.lifesitenews.com
WhatsApp Forward on French Virologist Claiming 'Vaccinated People Will Die in 2 Years' is Fake News - News18
WhatsApp forward doing the rounds says French virologist and Nobel Prize Winner Luc Montagnier has called mass vaccination an 'unacceptable mistake' and that 'all vaccinated people will die in 2 years.'
www.news18.com