Why no antibody test first? What are we not being told?

Ray9

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2016
2,707
4,467
1,970
Since Sar's Cov-2 was around long before many Americans suspected, there is a good chance infection rates and recovery are higher in the population than previously known by experts. This poses a dilemma for the people because many may have antibodies already on board against the virus. There is a concern shared by experts that a hyperactive immune response similar to the cytokine storm that killed millions during the Spanish Flu outbreak in 1918 could wreak havoc among the population particularly with lethal blood clotting that is not being widely reported.

Mass inoculation by the government could be more dangerous to recovered individuals than the virus itself. A safer policy would be to test all for antibodies first. Why is this not being done? What are we not being told?


 
This "lethal blood clotting" is still, on average, about 20-25 folk in every 100-thousand and that's just develop these clots let alone die from it.

File under conspiracy nonsense.
 
Mass inoculation by the government could be more dangerous to recovered individuals than the virus itself.
1622545246996.png

~S~
 
Why don't people who have antibodies from having had COVID get an all clear card like people who are fully vaccinated? How many additional booster shots will they be pushing? The Democrat party and the pharmaceuticals owe a lot to the virus and I don't see either of those ever admitting the pandemic is over.
 

Forum List

Back
Top