Why isn't there a Dept of U.S. innovation?

[Sherlock Holmes]

Do you know what "innovations I have offered"? YES,- but you don't know they come from me inspiring or relayed by someone else (or group of people) you know. And I'm not just talking about Science & Tech.

You were just talking about science and technology, all the people you cited are associated with science and technology, Michio Kaku, Elon Musk etc.

As I said, when it comes to science and technology we have DARPA, they innovate and have done for many years.

We'd be better off as a nation if we added philosophy to the school curricula here in the US as is the case in France, Germany, Spain etc. Then our young mind would be better equipped to THINK and until one can do that they have no hope of innovating.

 

[HaShev]

You were just talking about science and technology, all the people you cited are associated with science and technology, Michio Kaku, Elon Musk etc.

As I said, when it comes to science and technology we have DARPA, they innovate and have done for many years.

We'd be better off as a nation if we added philosophy to the school curricula here in the US as is the case in France, Germany, Spain etc. Then our young mind would be better equipped to THINK and until one can do that they have no hope of innovating.

And what is Musk involved in that I discussed?
My letter to the FCC carbon coppied sent to 2 congressmen about gov't waste and efficiency only a few months ago might have helped inspire some of the tasks of the newly formed "Doge"(dept of gov't efficiency).

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

And what is Musk involved in that I discussed?

You mentioned Musk in your OP.

My letter to the FCC carbon coppied sent to 2 congressmen about gov't waste and efficiency only a few months ago might have helped inspire some of the tasks of the newly formed "Doge"(dept of gov't efficiency).

You can share that letter here, I'm sure many of us are interested in what you had to say...

 

[HaShev]

You mentioned Musk in your OP.

You can share that letter here, I'm sure many of us are interested in what you had to say...

I have to be carefull what I divulge as it can be misused so I'm gonna censor/*redact which agency I was talking about and remove the beginning personal identifiers: Also to understand the complaint, this agency requires validation by showing w2's, or Soc. security payment records papers, but many people like retired or investment income stock traders don't have w2s so the agency discriminates against them and I pointed out disabled people are being discriminated against as well.
They would always reject the documents that they claim they use to validate and it was unecessary if rhe Gov't had the IRS validate directly without a third party agency that discriminated and made it difficult.

• How is **** funded? By Gov't contract or by money in the Budget?
  I ask because if you look at the Better Business Bureau complaints, others have had the same discrimination and behavior complaints against the service company process and staff.
  
  To the 2 congressional house members I added to this email:
  
  I reported the system waste and issues with our **** registration process to the fcc inspector general as per proper procedure, and did so to help slimline wasteful & innaffective processes in our Gov't.​
  Seems most all the complaints to better business are similar to mine getting the same automated system run around are mostly all disabled people, so the process is inadvertantly (not intentionally) discriminating against people who don't have w-2 forms to produce and alternative verification which is not being accepted when they fit the requested criteria. Also the data asked for these fixed income & disabled people is putting people at risk and unease,
• big paragraph redacted part
  There's a better more affordable way to verify and validate recipients and that's to automate and integrate it into the IRS itself, but the agency (****) getting gov't funding will not admit this because they feed off the(wasted) gov't funds which in my opinion is being misappropriated by poor process and execution of it's objectives. To many people who qualify get rejected and reabused, while to many illegitimate benefactors are milking those failed processes.
  Hope my evaluation and recommendations help solve these issues many are having, and cut down on our wasted expenses.
  

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

I have to be carefull what I divulge as it can be misused so I'm gonna censor/*redact which agency I was talking about and remove the beginning personal identifiers: Also to understand the complaint, this agency requires validation by showing w2's, or Soc. security payment records papers, but many people like retired or investment income stock traders don't have w2s so the agency discriminates against them and I pointed out disabled people are being discriminated against as well.
They would always reject the documents that they claim they use to validate and it was unecessary if rhe Gov't had the IRS validate directly without a third party agency that discriminated and made it difficult.

• How is **** funded? By Gov't contract or by money in the Budget?
  I ask because if you look at the Better Business Bureau complaints, others have had the same discrimination and behavior complaints against the service company process and staff.
  
  To the 2 congressional house members I added to this email:
  
  I reported the system waste and issues with our **** registration process to the fcc inspector general as per proper procedure, and did so to help slimline wasteful & innaffective processes in our Gov't.​
  Seems most all the complaints to better business are similar to mine getting the same automated system run around are mostly all disabled people, so the process is inadvertantly (not intentionally) discriminating against people who don't have w-2 forms to produce and alternative verification which is not being accepted when they fit the requested criteria. Also the data asked for these fixed income & disabled people is putting people at risk and unease,
• big paragraph redacted part
  There's a better more affordable way to verify and validate recipients and that's to automate and integrate it into the IRS itself, but the agency (****) getting gov't funding will not admit this because they feed off the(wasted) gov't funds which in my opinion is being misappropriated by poor process and execution of it's objectives. To many people who qualify get rejected and reabused, while to many illegitimate benefactors are milking those failed processes.
  Hope my evaluation and recommendations help solve these issues many are having, and cut down on our wasted expenses.

I'm sure Trump will make it all better.