Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
In fact, unless you're gay, need an abortion, or your housing project has rats, they're
a generally worthless organization actually.
As freedoms vanish across the country the ACLU has filed dozens of lawsuits,
none protecting the Bill of Rights.
Standing up for civil liberties, like they claim they do.So what is the ACLU not doing that it should do? What are the objections to its activities?
No specifics? Who has a case that s/he will bring to the ACLU and is it viable enough to litigate?Standing up for civil liberties, like they claim they do.So what is the ACLU not doing that it should do? What are the objections to its activities?
States have shit all over the bill of rights the last couple months.
The ACLU decisions to represent people and groups are inconsistent, they exist to protect freedom and Liberty, but too often they support those who are in America illegally.
The ACLU’s Selective Compassion
Robert Knight
Posted: Oct 24, 2017
Excerpt:
Under the Trump Administration, the federal government no longer wants to be complicit in abortions performed on under-age teens who enter the country illegally.
To the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), refusing to facilitate the killing of these unborn children is “unprecedented, it’s unconstitutional, and it’s also unconscionable,” according to Brigitte Amiri, a senior ACLU staff lawyer.
Last Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Tanya A. Chutkan, an Obama appointee, sided with the ACLU by ruling that a pregnant girl from Central America has a constitutional right to an abortion. The unborn child’s right to life? Nonexistent, despite the fact that at nearly 15 weeks, babies are little human beings with a head, neck, arms and legs, organs and sensitivity to light, not to mention a unique DNA. That’s just “tissue,” we’re told. There is no right to life under the ACLU’s – and the post-Roe v. Wade law’s – selective compassion.
LINK
=====
What an insane decision!
The ACLU decisions to represent people and groups are inconsistent, they exist to protect freedom and Liberty, but too often they support those who are in America illegally.
The ACLU’s Selective Compassion
Robert Knight
Posted: Oct 24, 2017
Excerpt:
Under the Trump Administration, the federal government no longer wants to be complicit in abortions performed on under-age teens who enter the country illegally.
To the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), refusing to facilitate the killing of these unborn children is “unprecedented, it’s unconstitutional, and it’s also unconscionable,” according to Brigitte Amiri, a senior ACLU staff lawyer.
Last Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Tanya A. Chutkan, an Obama appointee, sided with the ACLU by ruling that a pregnant girl from Central America has a constitutional right to an abortion. The unborn child’s right to life? Nonexistent, despite the fact that at nearly 15 weeks, babies are little human beings with a head, neck, arms and legs, organs and sensitivity to light, not to mention a unique DNA. That’s just “tissue,” we’re told. There is no right to life under the ACLU’s – and the post-Roe v. Wade law’s – selective compassion.
LINK
=====
What an insane decision!
There is nothing "insane" about this decision. She is being held against her will and time is a factor in having an abortion. The current shitty excuse of an administration is trying to force her to continue her pregnancy when she does not choose to. Rights should not depend on satisfying the religious demands of strangers whose religion one does not follow. There is nothing wrong with people not choosing your religion.
She does have rights. This has been litigated over and over. The government is not entitled to enslave her. It should not be in the religion business at all.The ACLU decisions to represent people and groups are inconsistent, they exist to protect freedom and Liberty, but too often they support those who are in America illegally.
The ACLU’s Selective Compassion
Robert Knight
Posted: Oct 24, 2017
Excerpt:
Under the Trump Administration, the federal government no longer wants to be complicit in abortions performed on under-age teens who enter the country illegally.
To the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), refusing to facilitate the killing of these unborn children is “unprecedented, it’s unconstitutional, and it’s also unconscionable,” according to Brigitte Amiri, a senior ACLU staff lawyer.
Last Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Tanya A. Chutkan, an Obama appointee, sided with the ACLU by ruling that a pregnant girl from Central America has a constitutional right to an abortion. The unborn child’s right to life? Nonexistent, despite the fact that at nearly 15 weeks, babies are little human beings with a head, neck, arms and legs, organs and sensitivity to light, not to mention a unique DNA. That’s just “tissue,” we’re told. There is no right to life under the ACLU’s – and the post-Roe v. Wade law’s – selective compassion.
LINK
=====
What an insane decision!
There is nothing "insane" about this decision. She is being held against her will and time is a factor in having an abortion. The current shitty excuse of an administration is trying to force her to continue her pregnancy when she does not choose to. Rights should not depend on satisfying the religious demands of strangers whose religion one does not follow. There is nothing wrong with people not choosing your religion.
You seem to overlook the part where she has ZERO rights, when she entered the country as an illegal alien, she isn't a citizen, thus doesn't have constitutional rights. She should be DEPORTED back to her native country.
She does have rights. This has been litigated over and over. The government is not entitled to enslave her. It should not be in the religion business at all.The ACLU decisions to represent people and groups are inconsistent, they exist to protect freedom and Liberty, but too often they support those who are in America illegally.
The ACLU’s Selective Compassion
Robert Knight
Posted: Oct 24, 2017
Excerpt:
Under the Trump Administration, the federal government no longer wants to be complicit in abortions performed on under-age teens who enter the country illegally.
To the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), refusing to facilitate the killing of these unborn children is “unprecedented, it’s unconstitutional, and it’s also unconscionable,” according to Brigitte Amiri, a senior ACLU staff lawyer.
Last Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Tanya A. Chutkan, an Obama appointee, sided with the ACLU by ruling that a pregnant girl from Central America has a constitutional right to an abortion. The unborn child’s right to life? Nonexistent, despite the fact that at nearly 15 weeks, babies are little human beings with a head, neck, arms and legs, organs and sensitivity to light, not to mention a unique DNA. That’s just “tissue,” we’re told. There is no right to life under the ACLU’s – and the post-Roe v. Wade law’s – selective compassion.
LINK
=====
What an insane decision!
There is nothing "insane" about this decision. She is being held against her will and time is a factor in having an abortion. The current shitty excuse of an administration is trying to force her to continue her pregnancy when she does not choose to. Rights should not depend on satisfying the religious demands of strangers whose religion one does not follow. There is nothing wrong with people not choosing your religion.
You seem to overlook the part where she has ZERO rights, when she entered the country as an illegal alien, she isn't a citizen, thus doesn't have constitutional rights. She should be DEPORTED back to her native country.
