I would argue any third-party candidate is a better choice for 80%-90% of Americans than either of the duopoly's choices:
What The Heck Is The Two-Party Duopoly?
"A monopoly is defined as 'the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.'
"An entity has such a grip on an industry that it is the only supplier of goods and services within that industry and competitors cannot emerge to challenge it.
"A duopoly is the same, just with two entities instead of one."
The Internet has made it possible to convince tens of millions of US voters to make their House and Senate choices from established third-party candidates.
Should such a long-shot occur, Americans would wake the morning after a major election to the news hundreds of incumbents have been FLUSHED from DC in a single news cycle.
That change would be Revolutionary, and it would not require shedding a single drop of blood.
