We don't object (as a general tenet) to free speech, intellectual freedom, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, freedom of the press, etc. yet when it comes to economic freedom some vociferously oppose it on the grounds that it leads to exploitation. Yet exploitation is not possible when there is choice, it can only occur when force is brought into the equation.
The alternative to a free market is crony capitalism, a political economy directed by special interests. Instead of creating capital via production the masses divide into factions fighting for the spoils. Large, entrenched interests run the show in collusion with the political class and woe to anyone who seeks to disrupt the established order. You'll quickly find yourself lost in a maze of regulations and taxes purposefully designed to thwart newcomers.
How does voluntary trading between two individuals constitute a threat to the social order or a potential for exploitation? Neither one is beholden to the other, each is free to do business elsewhere. This is especially manifest in the internet age where consumer ratings are extremely effective in curbing bad business practices.
If you are going to make the case that economic freedom is harmful then you must accept the proposition that all freedoms are demonstrably dangerous. How many people lost their lives to religion or new ideologies (with the objective of creating a perfect society) in the last 500 years?
The alternative to a free market is crony capitalism, a political economy directed by special interests. Instead of creating capital via production the masses divide into factions fighting for the spoils. Large, entrenched interests run the show in collusion with the political class and woe to anyone who seeks to disrupt the established order. You'll quickly find yourself lost in a maze of regulations and taxes purposefully designed to thwart newcomers.
How does voluntary trading between two individuals constitute a threat to the social order or a potential for exploitation? Neither one is beholden to the other, each is free to do business elsewhere. This is especially manifest in the internet age where consumer ratings are extremely effective in curbing bad business practices.
If you are going to make the case that economic freedom is harmful then you must accept the proposition that all freedoms are demonstrably dangerous. How many people lost their lives to religion or new ideologies (with the objective of creating a perfect society) in the last 500 years?