Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
and they were NOT of similar constructionsimilar fires experienced in other tall buildings caused an extraordinary event. Heating of floor beams and girders caused a critical support column to fail, initiating a fire-induced progressive collapse that brought the building down.
NIST Tech Beat - November 20, 2008
and they were NOT of similar constructionsimilar fires experienced in other tall buildings caused an extraordinary event. Heating of floor beams and girders caused a critical support column to fail, initiating a fire-induced progressive collapse that brought the building down.
NIST Tech Beat - November 20, 2008
again, those OTHER BUILDINGS were not of similar constructionand they were NOT of similar constructionsimilar fires experienced in other tall buildings caused an extraordinary event. Heating of floor beams and girders caused a critical support column to fail, initiating a fire-induced progressive collapse that brought the building down.
NIST Tech Beat - November 20, 2008
the design of WTC 7 in the 1980s was generally consistent with the New York City building code in effect at that time
Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation
another strawmanSo provide a link were NIST condemned this building designs or building codes that create building that will collapse if you impaired the sprinklers and lit a pile of newspapers on fire
another strawmanSo provide a link were NIST condemned this building designs or building codes that create building that will collapse if you impaired the sprinklers and lit a pile of newspapers on fire
the buildings design didnt need to be condemned
first you show me where i said it wasanother strawmanSo provide a link were NIST condemned this building designs or building codes that create building that will collapse if you impaired the sprinklers and lit a pile of newspapers on fire
the buildings design didnt need to be condemned
show me were building 7 is cited as a radical deign ..there are hundreds of buildings of similar design that could potentially collapse from fire...show me any changes made to building code due to wtc 7
first you show me where i said it wasanother strawman
the buildings design didnt need to be condemned
show me were building 7 is cited as a radical deign ..there are hundreds of buildings of similar design that could potentially collapse from fire...show me any changes made to building code due to wtc 7
LOL you are fucking pathetic
take a reading for comprehension class first
no, i said that the building COULD have been radical and still met the codesfirst you show me where i said it wasshow me were building 7 is cited as a radical deign ..there are hundreds of buildings of similar design that could potentially collapse from fire...show me any changes made to building code due to wtc 7
LOL you are fucking pathetic
take a reading for comprehension class first
no you never say anything ..you imply the building deign was radical and at issue
you try anything to distract from the fact according to NIST impairing the sprinkler systems and lighting a fire in the corner would cause the collapse wtc 7 or similar buildings or the failure of a single column by any means
no, i said that the building COULD have been radical and still met the codesfirst you show me where i said it was
LOL you are fucking pathetic
take a reading for comprehension class first
no you never say anything ..you imply the building deign was radical and at issue
you try anything to distract from the fact according to NIST impairing the sprinkler systems and lighting a fire in the corner would cause the collapse wtc 7 or similar buildings or the failure of a single column by any means
i never said it was, nor did i imply it was
another strawman lie
...
and the fires were MASSIVE and involved on SEVERAL floors
that looks pretty fucking massive to meno, i said that the building COULD have been radical and still met the codesno you never say anything ..you imply the building deign was radical and at issue
you try anything to distract from the fact according to NIST impairing the sprinkler systems and lighting a fire in the corner would cause the collapse wtc 7 or similar buildings or the failure of a single column by any means
i never said it was, nor did i imply it was
another strawman lie
...
and the fires were MASSIVE and involved on SEVERAL floors
the fires were not massive
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hx8oOVm7zvg&feature=related[/ame]
and as you've been told NUMEROUS times before, dipshit, that is if completely DIFFERENT CONSTRUCTION
and as you've been told numerous times before, dipshit, that is if completely different construction
no, i said that the building COULD have been radical and still met the codesno you never say anything ..you imply the building deign was radical and at issue
you try anything to distract from the fact according to NIST impairing the sprinkler systems and lighting a fire in the corner would cause the collapse wtc 7 or similar buildings or the failure of a single column by any means
i never said it was, nor did i imply it was
another strawman lie
...
and the fires were MASSIVE and involved on SEVERAL floors
the fires were not massive
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hx8oOVm7zvg&feature=related[/ame]
Why is it truthers feel the need to lie?
Everyone lies. Governments lie. It is the size of the lie that matters and who believes it.
Why is it truthers feel the need to lie?
Everyone lies. Governments lie. It is the size of the lie that matters and who believes it.
no, i said that the building COULD have been radical and still met the codes
i never said it was, nor did i imply it was
another strawman lie
...
and the fires were MASSIVE and involved on SEVERAL floors
the fires were not massive
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hx8oOVm7zvg&feature=related[/ame]
Thank you, so your video shows that even though the firemen were still working around bldg 7 they already knew it was not secure..... Hmmm!
