Why is it truthers feel the need to lie?

[HUGGY]

Divey.... There are a couple of stupid fucks that follow you around like puppies sniffing your ass. I informed both of them that I don't respond to assholes...especially the "he wanzta be a she" variety. If you want to take it upon yourself to present me with your minions questions I will answer YOUR questions..They have already been told I am done with them. Tell your stupid fan club I will not respond to them directly as I have already made up my mind on that point.

 

[DiveCon]

Well I guess it isn't only WIKI that gets scrubbed. I know there are several here that will not believe me but being a pilot I was VERY curious about how the ATC handled 9/11 on 9/11... not months later. The "mishandling of the tape" occurred the same day. I never heard about some months later "error" in the handling of the tapes. The way I heard it was that a supervisor took reels off a recorder and pulled the tape off of them into a waste basket at the complete surprise of the attending co-workers on the afternoon of 9/11. I have never read the 9/11 report. I am bringing what I know just from my own personal memory of the events of 9/11/01. Take it or leave it. The report of a vague months later incident is a fucking lie and a cover up. This I swear on my grandfathers and fathers grave.

My memory recalls the knowledge of the tape fiasco coming to light no more than 48 hours after 9/11. It was on the news and all over the internet at the time. Where did this info go? Do you really think the worlds best hackers and computers do not belong to the government?

um huggy, the whole internet is "scrubbed" in some way or another
when a legit news source finds they have made errors in a report, they will CORRECT those errors
the reports you might have seen in the hours and days after 9/11 could have been error filled reports, thus they would be removed and replaced by CORRECT reports
this is not a new thing to understand, at least not for those that have been on the internet for over a decade

 

[DiveCon]

Divey.... There are a couple of stupid fucks that follow you around like puppies sniffing your ass. I informed both of them that I don't respond to assholes...especially the "he wanzta be a she" variety. If you want to take it upon yourself to present me with your minions questions I will answer YOUR questions..They have already been told I am done with them. Tell your stupid fan club I will not respond to them directly as I have already made up my mind on that point.

you will need to be a bit more specific as i dont have "minions" at least not to my knowledge

 

[HUGGY]

Well I guess it isn't only WIKI that gets scrubbed. I know there are several here that will not believe me but being a pilot I was VERY curious about how the ATC handled 9/11 on 9/11... not months later. The "mishandling of the tape" occurred the same day. I never heard about some months later "error" in the handling of the tapes. The way I heard it was that a supervisor took reels off a recorder and pulled the tape off of them into a waste basket at the complete surprise of the attending co-workers on the afternoon of 9/11. I have never read the 9/11 report. I am bringing what I know just from my own personal memory of the events of 9/11/01. Take it or leave it. The report of a vague months later incident is a fucking lie and a cover up. This I swear on my grandfathers and fathers grave.

My memory recalls the knowledge of the tape fiasco coming to light no more than 48 hours after 9/11. It was on the news and all over the internet at the time. Where did this info go? Do you really think the worlds best hackers and computers do not belong to the government?

um huggy, the whole internet is "scrubbed" in some way or another
when a legit news source finds they have made errors in a report, they will CORRECT those errors
the reports you might have seen in the hours and days after 9/11 could have been error filled reports, thus they would be removed and replaced by CORRECT reports
this is not a new thing to understand, at least not for those that have been on the internet for over a decade

Sure... What do you think the chances of ALMOST the same exact story showing up much later in the official dialog would be? I already know you are not going to believe me. I already know that what I said is how and WHEN it happened. Like I said earlier it was very much "pilot related" as I have talked directly to ATC HUNDREDS of times. They are like the undisputed GODS of air traffic control. They are ALWAYS cool calm and collected under ALL circumstance. The idea that they just made an "oopsie" is rediculous beyond the pale. It happened when and how I relayed it. Just the fact that this "story" that is new to me is plastered all over a google search for the info I know to be true is way past suspicious all by itself. Don't bother yourself trying to prove or disprove my statement. I'm not obsessed like some others here. No one is going to get into my brain and scrub THAT so just log it as something no one will ever talk me out of. I will not attempt to convince you or anyone what they do not want to know.

 

[HUGGY]

Divey.... There are a couple of stupid fucks that follow you around like puppies sniffing your ass. I informed both of them that I don't respond to assholes...especially the "he wanzta be a she" variety. If you want to take it upon yourself to present me with your minions questions I will answer YOUR questions..They have already been told I am done with them. Tell your stupid fan club I will not respond to them directly as I have already made up my mind on that point.

you will need to be a bit more specific as i dont have "minions" at least not to my knowledge

Fine.....We can leave it at that.

 

[DiveCon]

Well I guess it isn't only WIKI that gets scrubbed. I know there are several here that will not believe me but being a pilot I was VERY curious about how the ATC handled 9/11 on 9/11... not months later. The "mishandling of the tape" occurred the same day. I never heard about some months later "error" in the handling of the tapes. The way I heard it was that a supervisor took reels off a recorder and pulled the tape off of them into a waste basket at the complete surprise of the attending co-workers on the afternoon of 9/11. I have never read the 9/11 report. I am bringing what I know just from my own personal memory of the events of 9/11/01. Take it or leave it. The report of a vague months later incident is a fucking lie and a cover up. This I swear on my grandfathers and fathers grave.

My memory recalls the knowledge of the tape fiasco coming to light no more than 48 hours after 9/11. It was on the news and all over the internet at the time. Where did this info go? Do you really think the worlds best hackers and computers do not belong to the government?

um huggy, the whole internet is "scrubbed" in some way or another
when a legit news source finds they have made errors in a report, they will CORRECT those errors
the reports you might have seen in the hours and days after 9/11 could have been error filled reports, thus they would be removed and replaced by CORRECT reports
this is not a new thing to understand, at least not for those that have been on the internet for over a decade

Sure... What do you think the chances of ALMOST the same exact story showing up much later in the official dialog would be? I already know you are not going to believe me. I already know that what I said is how and WHEN it happened. Like I said earlier it was very much "pilot related" as I have talked directly to ATC HUNDREDS of times. They are like the undisputed GODS of air traffic control. They are ALWAYS cool calm and collected under ALL circumstance. The idea that they just made an "oopsie" is rediculous beyond the pale. It happened when and how I relayed it. Just the fact that this "story" that is new to me is plastered all over a google search for the info I know to be true is way past suspicious all by itself. Don't bother yourself trying to prove or disprove my statement. I'm not obsessed like some others here. No one is going to get into my brain and scrub THAT so just log it as something no one will ever talk me out of. I will not attempt to convince you or anyone what they do not want to know.

the guy that screwed up ISNT an ATC
that might be why you arent getting this
and ANYONE can make mistakes
ATC included

edited to address the bold: so, getting better info wont change your mind that something you believed to be true that actually isnt, wont change your mind?

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Divey.... There are a couple of stupid fucks that follow you around like puppies sniffing your ass. I informed both of them that I don't respond to assholes...especially the "he wanzta be a she" variety. If you want to take it upon yourself to present me with your minions questions I will answer YOUR questions..They have already been told I am done with them. Tell your stupid fan club I will not respond to them directly as I have already made up my mind on that point.

you will need to be a bit more specific as i dont have "minions" at least not to my knowledge

You can always borrow mine

 

[HUGGY]

um huggy, the whole internet is "scrubbed" in some way or another
when a legit news source finds they have made errors in a report, they will CORRECT those errors
the reports you might have seen in the hours and days after 9/11 could have been error filled reports, thus they would be removed and replaced by CORRECT reports
this is not a new thing to understand, at least not for those that have been on the internet for over a decade

Sure... What do you think the chances of ALMOST the same exact story showing up much later in the official dialog would be? I already know you are not going to believe me. I already know that what I said is how and WHEN it happened. Like I said earlier it was very much "pilot related" as I have talked directly to ATC HUNDREDS of times. They are like the undisputed GODS of air traffic control. They are ALWAYS cool calm and collected under ALL circumstance. The idea that they just made an "oopsie" is rediculous beyond the pale. It happened when and how I relayed it. Just the fact that this "story" that is new to me is plastered all over a google search for the info I know to be true is way past suspicious all by itself. Don't bother yourself trying to prove or disprove my statement. I'm not obsessed like some others here. No one is going to get into my brain and scrub THAT so just log it as something no one will ever talk me out of. I will not attempt to convince you or anyone what they do not want to know.

the guy that screwed up ISNT an ATC
that might be why you arent getting this
and ANYONE can make mistakes
ATC included

edited to address the bold: so, getting better info wont change your mind that something you believed to be true that actually isnt, wont change your mind?

I can't comment on the facts of the "replacement" story. I just saw THAT version today 9 years after the fact. Like I said..what I am talking about was reported as an ATC supervisor AT THE TME by several media outlets including the television. No..I did not get any retraction at the time and I will not accept one now. Or do I mean "yes"... whatever..

 

[eots]

Capt. Daniel Davis, U.S. Army – Former U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director. Decorated with the Bronze Star and the Soldiers Medal for bravery under fire and the Purple Heart for injuries sustained in Viet Nam. Also served in the Army Air Defense Command as Nike Missile Battery Control Officer for the Chicago-Milwaukee Defense Area. Founder and former CEO of Turbine Technology Services Corp., a turbine (jet engine) services and maintenance company (15 years). Former Senior Manager at General Electric Turbine (jet) Engine Division (15 years). Private pilot.



Statement to this website 3/23/07: "As a former General Electric Turbine engineering specialist and manager and then CEO of a turbine engineering company, I can guarantee that none of the high tech, high temperature alloy engines on any of the four planes that crashed on 9/11 would be completely destroyed, burned, shattered or melted in any crash or fire. Wrecked, yes, but not destroyed. Where are all of those engines, particularly at the Pentagon? If jet powered aircraft crashed on 9/11, those engines, plus wings and tail assembly, would be there.

Additionally, in my experience as an officer in NORAD as a Tactical Director for the Chicago-Milwaukee Air Defense and as a current private pilot, there is no way that an aircraft on instrument flight plans (all commercial flights are IFR) would not be intercepted when they deviate from their flight plan, turn off their transponders, or stop communication with Air Traffic Control. No way! With very bad luck, perhaps one could slip by, but no there's no way all four of them could!

Finally, going over the hill and highway and crashing into the Pentagon right at the wall/ground interface is nearly impossible for even a small slow single engine airplane and no way for a 757. Maybe the best pilot in the world could accomplish that but not these unskilled "terrorists".

Attempts to obscure facts by calling them a "Conspiracy Theory" does not change the truth. It seems, "Something is rotten in the State

[http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/

 

[Patriot911]

Capt. Daniel Davis, U.S. Army – Former U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director. Decorated with the Bronze Star and the Soldiers Medal for bravery under fire and the Purple Heart for injuries sustained in Viet Nam. Also served in the Army Air Defense Command as Nike Missile Battery Control Officer for the Chicago-Milwaukee Defense Area. Founder and former CEO of Turbine Technology Services Corp., a turbine (jet engine) services and maintenance company (15 years). Former Senior Manager at General Electric Turbine (jet) Engine Division (15 years). Private pilot.



Statement to this website 3/23/07: "As a former General Electric Turbine engineering specialist and manager and then CEO of a turbine engineering company, I can guarantee that none of the high tech, high temperature alloy engines on any of the four planes that crashed on 9/11 would be completely destroyed, burned, shattered or melted in any crash or fire. Wrecked, yes, but not destroyed. Where are all of those engines, particularly at the Pentagon? If jet powered aircraft crashed on 9/11, those engines, plus wings and tail assembly, would be there.

Additionally, in my experience as an officer in NORAD as a Tactical Director for the Chicago-Milwaukee Air Defense and as a current private pilot, there is no way that an aircraft on instrument flight plans (all commercial flights are IFR) would not be intercepted when they deviate from their flight plan, turn off their transponders, or stop communication with Air Traffic Control. No way! With very bad luck, perhaps one could slip by, but no there's no way all four of them could!

Finally, going over the hill and highway and crashing into the Pentagon right at the wall/ground interface is nearly impossible for even a small slow single engine airplane and no way for a 757. Maybe the best pilot in the world could accomplish that but not these unskilled "terrorists".

Attempts to obscure facts by calling them a "Conspiracy Theory" does not change the truth. It seems, "Something is rotten in the State

[Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

That site is full of proven liars and traitors. While I am not surprised you would fall for their bullshit, eots, you really should try to associate yourself with a better level of people.

 

[eots]

Capt. Daniel Davis, U.S. Army – Former U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director. Decorated with the Bronze Star and the Soldiers Medal for bravery under fire and the Purple Heart for injuries sustained in Viet Nam. Also served in the Army Air Defense Command as Nike Missile Battery Control Officer for the Chicago-Milwaukee Defense Area. Founder and former CEO of Turbine Technology Services Corp., a turbine (jet engine) services and maintenance company (15 years). Former Senior Manager at General Electric Turbine (jet) Engine Division (15 years). Private pilot.



Statement to this website 3/23/07: "As a former General Electric Turbine engineering specialist and manager and then CEO of a turbine engineering company, I can guarantee that none of the high tech, high temperature alloy engines on any of the four planes that crashed on 9/11 would be completely destroyed, burned, shattered or melted in any crash or fire. Wrecked, yes, but not destroyed. Where are all of those engines, particularly at the Pentagon? If jet powered aircraft crashed on 9/11, those engines, plus wings and tail assembly, would be there.

Additionally, in my experience as an officer in NORAD as a Tactical Director for the Chicago-Milwaukee Air Defense and as a current private pilot, there is no way that an aircraft on instrument flight plans (all commercial flights are IFR) would not be intercepted when they deviate from their flight plan, turn off their transponders, or stop communication with Air Traffic Control. No way! With very bad luck, perhaps one could slip by, but no there's no way all four of them could!

Finally, going over the hill and highway and crashing into the Pentagon right at the wall/ground interface is nearly impossible for even a small slow single engine airplane and no way for a 757. Maybe the best pilot in the world could accomplish that but not these unskilled "terrorists".

Attempts to obscure facts by calling them a "Conspiracy Theory" does not change the truth. It seems, "Something is rotten in the State

[Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

That site is full of proven liars and traitors. While I am not surprised you would fall for their bullshit, eots, you really should try to associate yourself with a better level of people.

REALLY ? care to elaborate on your slanderous allegations


Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer, MS Aeronautical Science, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Retired U.S. Air Force command fighter pilot. Former instructor; U.S. Air Force Fighter Weapons School and NATO’s Tactical Leadership Program. As an Air Force weapons effects expert was responsible for wartime tasking of most appropriate aircraft/munition for target destruction to include steel and concrete superstructures. Former aeronautical structures flight test engineer with McDonnell Douglas, working on advanced DC-9 autopilot systems and DC-10 flight envelope expansion stress and flutter analysis. Tactical aircraft flown: General Dynamics F-111 Aardvark fighter/bomber, McDonnell Douglas F-15E Strike Eagle, General Dynamics / Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon, McDonnell Douglas F-18 Hornet, Boeing B-1 Bomber, MiG-29 (Russian fighter), and Su-22 (Russian fighter/bomber). 3,000+ fighter hours. Combat time over Iraq. 20-year Air Force career.


Statement to this website 3/25/07: "After 4+ years of research since retirement in 2002, I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned, organized, and committed by treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government. It is now time to take our country back.

The "collapse" of WTC Building 7 shows beyond any doubt that the demolitions were pre-planned. There is simply no way to demolish a 47-story building (on fire) over a coffee break. It is also impossible to report the building’s collapse before it happened, as BBC News did, unless it was pre-planned. Further damning evidence is Larry Silverstein's video taped confession in which he states "they made that decision to pull [WTC 7] and we watched the building collapse." [Editor's note: WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories. It would have been the tallest building in 33 states. Although it was not hit by an airplane, it completely collapsed into a pile of rubble in less than 7 seconds at 5:20 p.m. on 9/11, seven hours after the collapses of the Twin Towers. However, no mention of its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's "full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Watch the collapse video here. And six years after 9/11, the Federal government has yet to publish its promised final report that explains the cause of its collapse.]

We cannot let the pursuit of justice fail. Those of us in the military took an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic". Just because we have retired does not make that oath invalid, so it is not just our responsibility, it is our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, or how much we have to suffer to do it.

We owe it to those who have gone before us who executed that same oath, and who are doing the same thing in Iraq and Afghanistan right now. Those of us who joined the military and faithfully executed orders that were given us had to trust our leaders. The violation and abuse of that trust is not only heinous, but ultimately the most accurate definition of treason!"

Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

 

[PhysicsExist]

Capt. Daniel Davis, U.S. Army – Former U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director. Decorated with the Bronze Star and the Soldiers Medal for bravery under fire and the Purple Heart for injuries sustained in Viet Nam. Also served in the Army Air Defense Command as Nike Missile Battery Control Officer for the Chicago-Milwaukee Defense Area. Founder and former CEO of Turbine Technology Services Corp., a turbine (jet engine) services and maintenance company (15 years). Former Senior Manager at General Electric Turbine (jet) Engine Division (15 years). Private pilot.



Statement to this website 3/23/07: "As a former General Electric Turbine engineering specialist and manager and then CEO of a turbine engineering company, I can guarantee that none of the high tech, high temperature alloy engines on any of the four planes that crashed on 9/11 would be completely destroyed, burned, shattered or melted in any crash or fire. Wrecked, yes, but not destroyed. Where are all of those engines, particularly at the Pentagon? If jet powered aircraft crashed on 9/11, those engines, plus wings and tail assembly, would be there.

Additionally, in my experience as an officer in NORAD as a Tactical Director for the Chicago-Milwaukee Air Defense and as a current private pilot, there is no way that an aircraft on instrument flight plans (all commercial flights are IFR) would not be intercepted when they deviate from their flight plan, turn off their transponders, or stop communication with Air Traffic Control. No way! With very bad luck, perhaps one could slip by, but no there's no way all four of them could!

Finally, going over the hill and highway and crashing into the Pentagon right at the wall/ground interface is nearly impossible for even a small slow single engine airplane and no way for a 757. Maybe the best pilot in the world could accomplish that but not these unskilled "terrorists".

Attempts to obscure facts by calling them a "Conspiracy Theory" does not change the truth. It seems, "Something is rotten in the State

[Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

That site is full of proven liars and traitors. While I am not surprised you would fall for their bullshit, eots, you really should try to associate yourself with a better level of people.

REALLY ? care to elaborate on your slanderous allegations



Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer, MS Aeronautical Science, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Retired U.S. Air Force command fighter pilot. Former instructor; U.S. Air Force Fighter Weapons School and NATO’s Tactical Leadership Program. As an Air Force weapons effects expert was responsible for wartime tasking of most appropriate aircraft/munition for target destruction to include steel and concrete superstructures. Former aeronautical structures flight test engineer with McDonnell Douglas, working on advanced DC-9 autopilot systems and DC-10 flight envelope expansion stress and flutter analysis. Tactical aircraft flown: General Dynamics F-111 Aardvark fighter/bomber, McDonnell Douglas F-15E Strike Eagle, General Dynamics / Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon, McDonnell Douglas F-18 Hornet, Boeing B-1 Bomber, MiG-29 (Russian fighter), and Su-22 (Russian fighter/bomber). 3,000+ fighter hours. Combat time over Iraq. 20-year Air Force career.


Statement to this website 3/25/07: "After 4+ years of research since retirement in 2002, I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned, organized, and committed by treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government. It is now time to take our country back.

The "collapse" of WTC Building 7 shows beyond any doubt that the demolitions were pre-planned. There is simply no way to demolish a 47-story building (on fire) over a coffee break. It is also impossible to report the building’s collapse before it happened, as BBC News did, unless it was pre-planned. Further damning evidence is Larry Silverstein's video taped confession in which he states "they made that decision to pull [WTC 7] and we watched the building collapse." [Editor's note: WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories. It would have been the tallest building in 33 states. Although it was not hit by an airplane, it completely collapsed into a pile of rubble in less than 7 seconds at 5:20 p.m. on 9/11, seven hours after the collapses of the Twin Towers. However, no mention of its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's "full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Watch the collapse video here. And six years after 9/11, the Federal government has yet to publish its promised final report that explains the cause of its collapse.]

We cannot let the pursuit of justice fail. Those of us in the military took an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic". Just because we have retired does not make that oath invalid, so it is not just our responsibility, it is our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, or how much we have to suffer to do it.

We owe it to those who have gone before us who executed that same oath, and who are doing the same thing in Iraq and Afghanistan right now. Those of us who joined the military and faithfully executed orders that were given us had to trust our leaders. The violation and abuse of that trust is not only heinous, but ultimately the most accurate definition of treason!"

Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

 

[Patriot911]

REALLY ? care to elaborate on your slanderous allegations

Sure. How about Wittenberg. Care to defend his lies? Nobody else has been able to.

 

[Patriot911]

You would think you could find a slightly better and more credible person to bury your head up their ass. Does he pull on your strings to make you clap, or does he actually have a remote control?

 

[DiveCon]

Capt. Daniel Davis, U.S. Army – Former U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director. Decorated with the Bronze Star and the Soldiers Medal for bravery under fire and the Purple Heart for injuries sustained in Viet Nam. Also served in the Army Air Defense Command as Nike Missile Battery Control Officer for the Chicago-Milwaukee Defense Area. Founder and former CEO of Turbine Technology Services Corp., a turbine (jet engine) services and maintenance company (15 years). Former Senior Manager at General Electric Turbine (jet) Engine Division (15 years). Private pilot.



Statement to this website 3/23/07: "As a former General Electric Turbine engineering specialist and manager and then CEO of a turbine engineering company, I can guarantee that none of the high tech, high temperature alloy engines on any of the four planes that crashed on 9/11 would be completely destroyed, burned, shattered or melted in any crash or fire. Wrecked, yes, but not destroyed. Where are all of those engines, particularly at the Pentagon? If jet powered aircraft crashed on 9/11, those engines, plus wings and tail assembly, would be there.

Additionally, in my experience as an officer in NORAD as a Tactical Director for the Chicago-Milwaukee Air Defense and as a current private pilot, there is no way that an aircraft on instrument flight plans (all commercial flights are IFR) would not be intercepted when they deviate from their flight plan, turn off their transponders, or stop communication with Air Traffic Control. No way! With very bad luck, perhaps one could slip by, but no there's no way all four of them could!

Finally, going over the hill and highway and crashing into the Pentagon right at the wall/ground interface is nearly impossible for even a small slow single engine airplane and no way for a 757. Maybe the best pilot in the world could accomplish that but not these unskilled "terrorists".

Attempts to obscure facts by calling them a "Conspiracy Theory" does not change the truth. It seems, "Something is rotten in the State

[Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

That site is full of proven liars and traitors. While I am not surprised you would fall for their bullshit, eots, you really should try to associate yourself with a better level of people.

REALLY ? care to elaborate on your slanderous allegations

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/

do you even know what "slander" is?

 

[slackjawed]

from;
Slander | Define Slander at Dictionary.com

"slan·der
   /ˈslændər/ Show Spelled[slan-der] Show IPA
–noun
1.
defamation; calumny: rumors full of slander.
2.
a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report: a slander against his good name.
3.
Law . defamation by oral utterance rather than by writing, pictures, etc.
–verb (used with object)
4.
to utter slander against; defame.
–verb (used without object)
5.
to utter or circulate slander.
Use slander in a Sentence
See images of slander
Search slander on the Web
Origin:
1250&#8211;1300; (n.) ME s ( c ) laundre < AF esclaundre, OF esclandre, alter. of escandle < LL scandalum cause of offense, snare ( see scandal); (v.) ME s ( c ) laundren to cause to lapse morally, bring to disgrace, discredit, defame < OF esclandrer, deriv. of esclandre

&#8212;Related forms
slan·der·er, noun
slan·der·ing·ly, adverb
slan·der·ous, adjective
slan·der·ous·ly, adverb
slan·der·ous·ness, noun
non·slan·der·ous, adjective
outslander, verb (used with object)
qua·si-slan·der·ous, adjective
qua·si-slan·der·ous·ly, adverb
re·slan·der, verb (used with object)
un·slan·dered, adjective
un·slan·der·ous, adjective
un·slan·der·ous·ly, adverb
un·slan·der·ous·ness, noun

&#8212;Can be confused: &#8194;1. defamation, liable, libel, slander (see usage note at liable); 2. defame, libel, slander ; 3. libel, slander .

&#8212;Synonyms
4. malign, vilify, revile.
"



and that, ladies and gentlemen, proves eots has no fucking idea what slander is!