WHY Is It So Important For The Biden Administration To Hide The Identity Of The police Officer Who Shot/Killed Ashli Bobbitt?

[Lesh]

Immediately after the attack Pelosi was quoted calling the violent protestors'criminals who attempted to block the certification of the election.

Because they WERE criminals

 

[Natural Citizen]

Should anyone be surprised that the same Intel Agencies and FBI that participated in Barry's failed coup attempt - tge same FBI the FISA Court proved has been illegally spying on Americans for decades and is still doing it - were involved in the 6 Jan event?

I think not.

Nope. Not one bit.

I'd only add that elevated, critical discussion with regard to the trail of events is very important to keep alive, versus keeping the smut that drives the more desired narrative at the top of the board.

I don't come around here much anymore, and the only reason I'm blowing time on here now is that the better half is in Bible study with her study group, but flipping through the board I did notice that some of the resident brown-shirts are suddenly getting vocal about removing old threads/content. This is no coincidence.

Protect your content from them.

Because they'd like nothing better than to have genuinely critical discussion with regard to the course of events that brought us to this point removed in favor of keeping the circus-like smut dictating the terms of controversy on your board in order to interject in any kind of serious discourse with regard to these very important goings on.

Particularly given that you do have at least one full-blown communist who has weaseled its way into a position at the controls that I'm personally confident placates these requests to delete or relocate certain content under the radar. All one needs to do is pay close attention to open dialogue to see it going on, and then know where to go look.

Really have to keep an eye on your old content. Particularly given its relevance to current goings on, as I said. There's a reason they want to target certain old content. They want to control the terms of controversy. If you let them, they will.

 

[BlindBoo]

Because the TrumpyCult is full of crazy fucks?

So is BLM, but it doesn't stop local governments from releasing the names of every officer that kills a black person, does it.

If she was killed during a traffic stop rather than trying to storm Congress during a Joint Session where they were ceremonially counting the EC votes for the next president, you might have a point.

He did his duty and shouldn't be punished by the TrumpyCult.

My point stands regardless and several of these officers who have shot black people were also doing their duty and shouldn't be punished by the race shysters, but again, that doesn't stop you, does it?

I don't believe it does. None of those killed by LEOs were participating in a BLM inspired mob rebellion against the Congress with the backing of an aggrieved President and his Party. In the summer the deaths were the cause of the protests and subsequent violence. Whereas the Trump Rally and March on Congress inspired the violent mob to attack Congress while it was in the special session and she was tragically shot and killed while participating in that attack.

 

[Coyote]

Because you violent assholes will probably send your Brown Shirt patriots to put a bounty on his head and threaten him and his family....like you’ve been doing to election workers.

Since you are a Mod I assume you are rational, intelligent, and can be counted on to act responsible and intelligently....

So for once let's put the irrational, emotion-driven immature BS aside.

FACT:
President Trump has legitimately held hundreds of public addresses and rallies without EVER having even 1 (One) violent acts/ riots caused by his supporters....

FACT:
The only violence at a Trump rally before he became President or during was back In 2016 when it was exposed that DEMOCRAT HILLARY CLINTON'S campaign had hired thugs to bear and bloody Yrumpvsuppoeters attending the Trump Rally.

FACT:
A self-proclaimed Marxist admittedly started the BLM 'project to make herself rich, which she confessed to not long ago. (Link was provided in a separate thread on this issue, but snowflakes would not even believe her when she said it in a live TV interview). The BLM Founder CONNED millions of Americans, bought 4 man'sions & millions in real estate while she violently divided the nation and set the country ablaze, was exposed, and then announced she was just going to walk away to seek other profitable projects, that included writing a 2nd book and negotiating a TV deal.

FACT:
Her movement and the domestic terrorists who flocked to her movement violently looted, rioted, damaged, destroyed, divided, created a relationship war, assaulted, murdered, attempted to burn local police and federal agents alive, destroyed minority-owned businnesses and districts in DEMOCRAT-RUN communities all over the US while causing literally BILLIONS of dollars in damage.

FACT:
These were NOT conservatives or Truml supporters doing this.

FACT:
DEMOCRATS supported, financed, defended, protected, and even quickly bailed out of jail these violent Marxist-created domestic terrorists. They even called upon them to continue their violence after the election, which they did.

FACT:
While Democrat-supported domestic terrorists divided the nation and set the country in fire Conservatives and Trump supporters, again, were not the ones committing these acts of terrorism and causing literally BILLIONS of dollars in damage, destroying communities they did not even live in - they were bussed in...and while perpetrating this terrorism Democrats, fake news media, and snowflakes spewed 'White supremacists' threat BS as a distraction

FACT:
In the weeks/months leading up to 6 Jan terrorist Antida and BLM violence became so bad that the Mayor if DC made the decision to put in new security fencing....however, the area was filled with violent protestors / terrorists.

FACT:
Once the terrorist violence became so bad that it threatened the WH and the security & safety of the Presisent and his family, so much so that they were rushed into the bunker in the WH while FBI Agents, DHS agents, local police, Secret Service members had to fight the violent terrorist mob back. 14 Secret Service members were injured.
- YOU WANT TO LEGITIMATELY TALK ABOUT AN 'INSURRECTION', THERE YOU GO: ARNED, VIOLENT MARXUST-BASED TERRORISTS KNOWN FOR DESTRUCTION, VIOLENCE, & CALLING FOR TGE US GOVT TO BE BURNT DOWN ENDANGERED THE PRESIDENT & HIS FAMILY'S LIFE, FBI, DHS, SECRET SERVICE, & LOCAL POLICE JOINED FORCES TO PUSH TGE TERRORISTS BACK - 14 SS MEMBERS GET INJURED, & DEMOCRATS & FAKE BEWS NEDIA/SOCIAL MEDIA BLACK IT OUT / REFUSE TO REPORT IT. 6 JAN WAS NITHING COMPARED TO THIS.

FACT:
As a result of this terrorist Antifa/BLM event THE DC MAYOR ordered the police to clear out the violent mob so they could install tge new security fencing. During that DC MAYOR-ORDERED OPERATION the police gassed thd mob to get them out. Despite having nothing to fo with it the Democrats, fake news media, and snowflakes STILL spread the lie, which the IG just debunked, that President Trump had ordered it do he could have a photo op.

Now let's get back / move on to 6 Jan....

FACT;
It has been proven in another thread (with multiple links) I started that President Trump DID suggest the National Guard be on hand on 6 January....but it was both the House and Senate Sergeants at Arms that said 'NO' because they decided the OPTICS WOULD LOOK BAD.

FACT:
A bipartisan committee recently released their report on 6 Jan....and they HAMMERED the Capitol Police:

DESPITE THE FBI HAVING WARNED PELOSI & THE CAPITOL POLICE OF PENDING VIOLENCE the Capitol Police did not call in all their officers, did not prepare, did not coordinate thoroughly with either the DC National Guard or local police, had never trained with either, had no leadership, no guidance, no plan - the Committee faulted the Capitol Police.

FACT:
Unlike the Democrat-supported terrorists whose violence caused the President & family to be rushed to the WH bunker, the protestors on 6 Jan were NOT armed, did not set Capitol on fire, and at no time did they try to set police officers on fire.

FACT:
The 6 Jan protestors did NOT kill a police officer, despite the debunked lie President Biden repeated at the G7 Summitt.

Back to where we began:

FACT:
President Trump has held hundreds of rallies attended by hundreds of thousands of supporters / Americans without even 1 incident of violence we have seen and continue to see from violent leftist extremists and Democrat-supportef domestic terrotists....

...and suddenly we are supposed to believe the same fake news media that participated in Barry's proven bogus 'Russian Collusion failed coup attempt when they claim UNARMED conservatives / Trump supporters initiated a violent 'insurrection' in which they stormed the Capitol, led through it by Capitol Police officers, wandered around, & took selfies & souveneirs?!
....and compared to the billions of dollars in domestic terrorist violence that BLM and Antifa - who were in the Capitol on 6 Jan - have perpetrated in the past, you seriously try to call the 6 Jan event an 'insurrection'?

REALLY?

I am totally against what happened on 6 Jan but it was no where in the same league as the Marxist insurrection Antifa and BLM have perpetrated all over the US, to include in DC when they threatened the lives of the 1st family, a violent event that left 14 Secret Service Members injured.

So again, please put the childish, irrational hate-driven, partisan EMOTION aside, and let's stick to the facts!

You lost me at the “irrational, emotion-driven immature BS”....which pretty much describes your post.

When you draw false moral equivalencies, and completely misrepresent the riots as a “Marxist insurrection” as well as marginalizing an attack on the Nation’s capital on January 6th, that left over 149 officers injured, some badly, two woh committed suicide shortly after, and one who died, possibly from a stroke caused by Bear spray, you are offering nothing more than partisan B.S.

 

[westwall]

Why?

Because Republicans will kill him

Another pearl of wisdom from the Island of the living brain dead.

Trump has killed before he will do it again

Clinton's got a huge head start

 

[easyt65]

You lost me at the “irrational, emotion-driven immature BS”....which pretty much describes your post.

Dude, stop - your post sounded like a whiny, emotional bitch throwing a tantrum, completely void of facts. Now this post is a waste of time consisting of denial and projection.

I went down fact after proven, substantiated fact, attempting to treat you like an intelligent, mature adult capable of legitimate discussion.

You responded Ike an immature child....

'Nuh-uh....YOU are emotional.'



Thank you for proving you are incapable if discussing substantiated fact and prefer to be ruled by emotion...and that trying to treat you like a rational adult is a waste if time.

 

[Coyote]

You lost me at the “irrational, emotion-driven immature BS”....which pretty much describes your post.

Dude, stop - your post sounded like a whiny, emotional bitch throwing a tantrum, completely void of facts. Now this post is a waste of time consisting of denial and projection.

I went down fact after proven, substantiated fact, attempting to treat you like an intelligent, mature adult capable of legitimate discussion.

You responded Ike an immature child....

'Nuh-uh....YOU are emotional.'



Thank you for proving you are incapable if discussing substantiated fact and prefer to be ruled by emotion...and that trying to treat you like a rational adult is a waste if time.

There you are getting all emotional again. Your “substantiated” facts are less than factual and in many cases avoid making meaningful connections, seeming more like flinging mud and hoping some sticks.

FACT:
Unlike the Democrat-supported terrorists whose violence caused the President & family to be rushed to the WH bunker, the protestors on 6 Jan were NOT armed, did not set Capitol on fire, and at no time did they try to set police officers on fire.

It was stated that at no time was the president in danger or even close (and those protesters were not armed). Unlike when your mob stormed the Capital...lawmakers were there as the roamed the halls Looking for them.

On the other hand...why is being armed a sticking point for you? You do realize people can kill and damage other people completely free of firearms, right? I think you do, you just trumpet it in an attempt to minimize an event you claim to oppose. While they didn’t try to set police on fire they sure did their damndest to kill them. They came armed with bear spray and items that could easily be turned into weapons like metal poles and used them to drag down police and beat the shit out of them. They injured over 140, some severely, with head injuries and fractured vertebra. Nearby, one car was loaded with Molotov cocktails and another with guns and ammo.

You make a point of highlighting the violence at some of the many protests yet ignore the presence of rightwing provocateurs in some of them, instigatIng violence (also a fact).

None of it compares to a violent mob, storming the capital and trying to overturn an election.

Can you see why I am not very impressed with your “facts”?

(probably not)

 

[easyt65]

You lost me at the “irrational, emotion-driven immature BS”....which pretty much describes your post.

Dude, stop - your post sounded like a whiny, emotional bitch throwing a tantrum, completely void of facts. Now this post is a waste of time consisting of denial and projection.

I went down fact after proven, substantiated fact, attempting to treat you like an intelligent, mature adult capable of legitimate discussion.

You responded Ike an immature child....

'Nuh-uh....YOU are emotional.'



Thank you for proving you are incapable if discussing substantiated fact and prefer to be ruled by emotion...and that trying to treat you like a rational adult is a waste if time.

There you are getting all emotional again. Your “substantiated” facts are less than factual and in many cases avoid making meaningful connections, seeming more like flinging mud and hoping some sticks.

FACT:
Unlike the Democrat-supported terrorists whose violence caused the President & family to be rushed to the WH bunker, the protestors on 6 Jan were NOT armed, did not set Capitol on fire, and at no time did they try to set police officers on fire.

It was stated that at no time was the president in danger or even close (and those protesters were not armed). Unlike when your mob stormed the Capital...lawmakers were there as the roamed the halls Looking for them.

On the other hand...why is being armed a sticking point for you? You do realize people can kill and damage other people completely free of firearms, right? I think you do, you just trumpet it in an attempt to minimize an event you claim to oppose. While they didn’t try to set police on fire they sure did their damndest to kill them. They came armed with bear spray and items that could easily be turned into weapons like metal poles and used them to drag down police and beat the shit out of them. They injured over 140, some severely, with head injuries and fractured vertebra. Nearby, one car was loaded with Molotov cocktails and another with guns and ammo.

You make a point of highlighting the violence at some of the many protests yet ignore the presence of rightwing provocateurs in some of them, instigatIng violence (also a fact).

None of it compares to a violent mob, storming the capital and trying to overturn an election.

Can you see why I am not very impressed with your “facts”?

(probably not)

Too little too late, Lil emotional snowflake

 

[Coyote]

You lost me at the “irrational, emotion-driven immature BS”....which pretty much describes your post.

Dude, stop - your post sounded like a whiny, emotional bitch throwing a tantrum, completely void of facts. Now this post is a waste of time consisting of denial and projection.

I went down fact after proven, substantiated fact, attempting to treat you like an intelligent, mature adult capable of legitimate discussion.

You responded Ike an immature child....

'Nuh-uh....YOU are emotional.'



Thank you for proving you are incapable if discussing substantiated fact and prefer to be ruled by emotion...and that trying to treat you like a rational adult is a waste if time.

There you are getting all emotional again. Your “substantiated” facts are less than factual and in many cases avoid making meaningful connections, seeming more like flinging mud and hoping some sticks.

FACT:
Unlike the Democrat-supported terrorists whose violence caused the President & family to be rushed to the WH bunker, the protestors on 6 Jan were NOT armed, did not set Capitol on fire, and at no time did they try to set police officers on fire.

It was stated that at no time was the president in danger or even close (and those protesters were not armed). Unlike when your mob stormed the Capital...lawmakers were there as the roamed the halls Looking for them.

On the other hand...why is being armed a sticking point for you? You do realize people can kill and damage other people completely free of firearms, right? I think you do, you just trumpet it in an attempt to minimize an event you claim to oppose. While they didn’t try to set police on fire they sure did their damndest to kill them. They came armed with bear spray and items that could easily be turned into weapons like metal poles and used them to drag down police and beat the shit out of them. They injured over 140, some severely, with head injuries and fractured vertebra. Nearby, one car was loaded with Molotov cocktails and another with guns and ammo.

You make a point of highlighting the violence at some of the many protests yet ignore the presence of rightwing provocateurs in some of them, instigatIng violence (also a fact).

None of it compares to a violent mob, storming the capital and trying to overturn an election.

Can you see why I am not very impressed with your “facts”?

(probably not)

Too little too late, Lil emotional snowflake

Meh, your fragile emotional state and it’s freelance association with the real world is not my concern.

 

[bripat9643]

Why?

Because Republicans will kill him

That didn't stop the police from release Darren Chauvin's name.

 

[otto105]

The obvious reason they haven't released the guy's name is that his life would be in direct danger from the jihadis.

What I'm not sure about is whether it's supposed to be public record, or whether withholding his name is proper protocol.

But, whatever keeps the flock angry, I guess.

Well let's say your daughter was the one that got killed. Would you want to know the name of the officer.

Don't tell me she should not have gone or some other 40 hr a week dust breather bullshit.

Would you want to know who brutally shot your daughter. Imagine her screaming...Daddy Daddy help me

Picture your daughters face now. Cold lifeless. Blood squirting everywhere. Picture her with some guts hanging out

would you want to know

I highly doubt youare fertile and can produce any offspring that would live past birth. This is just an example

How about you image that your George Floyd's Mother.

How about the image of the pregnant woman who had a gun to her swollen belly and told she would have an abortion on the wall if she didn't hand over the drugs

Ok.....

How about this guy in Alabama who was given back his gun back and then proceeded to murder this women...

 

[easyt65]

You lost me at the “irrational, emotion-driven immature BS”....which pretty much describes your post.

Dude, stop - your post sounded like a whiny, emotional bitch throwing a tantrum, completely void of facts. Now this post is a waste of time consisting of denial and projection.

I went down fact after proven, substantiated fact, attempting to treat you like an intelligent, mature adult capable of legitimate discussion.

You responded Ike an immature child....

'Nuh-uh....YOU are emotional.'



Thank you for proving you are incapable if discussing substantiated fact and prefer to be ruled by emotion...and that trying to treat you like a rational adult is a waste if time.

There you are getting all emotional again. Your “substantiated” facts are less than factual and in many cases avoid making meaningful connections, seeming more like flinging mud and hoping some sticks.

FACT:
Unlike the Democrat-supported terrorists whose violence caused the President & family to be rushed to the WH bunker, the protestors on 6 Jan were NOT armed, did not set Capitol on fire, and at no time did they try to set police officers on fire.

It was stated that at no time was the president in danger or even close (and those protesters were not armed). Unlike when your mob stormed the Capital...lawmakers were there as the roamed the halls Looking for them.

On the other hand...why is being armed a sticking point for you? You do realize people can kill and damage other people completely free of firearms, right? I think you do, you just trumpet it in an attempt to minimize an event you claim to oppose. While they didn’t try to set police on fire they sure did their damndest to kill them. They came armed with bear spray and items that could easily be turned into weapons like metal poles and used them to drag down police and beat the shit out of them. They injured over 140, some severely, with head injuries and fractured vertebra. Nearby, one car was loaded with Molotov cocktails and another with guns and ammo.

You make a point of highlighting the violence at some of the many protests yet ignore the presence of rightwing provocateurs in some of them, instigatIng violence (also a fact).

None of it compares to a violent mob, storming the capital and trying to overturn an election.

Can you see why I am not very impressed with your “facts”?

(probably not)

Too little too late, Lil emotional snowflake

Meh, your fragile emotional state and it’s freelance association with the real world is not my concern.

Again, too little too late, lil emotional snowflake.

 

[otto105]

The obvious reason they haven't released the guy's name is that his life would be in direct danger from the jihadis.

What I'm not sure about is whether it's supposed to be public record, or whether withholding his name is proper protocol.

But, whatever keeps the flock angry, I guess.

Well let's say your daughter was the one that got killed. Would you want to know the name of the officer.

Don't tell me she should not have gone or some other 40 hr a week dust breather bullshit.

Would you want to know who brutally shot your daughter. Imagine her screaming...Daddy Daddy help me

Picture your daughters face now. Cold lifeless. Blood squirting everywhere. Picture her with some guts hanging out

would you want to know

I highly doubt youare fertile and can produce any offspring that would live past birth. This is just an example

How about you image that your George Floyd's Mother.

Mamma Floyd raised a drug addicted, felon. A convict. A thug. A woman abuser. A drain on society. Mamma Floyd is a failure as a parent. Because of that her son is dead.

Momma Babbitt raised a target too

 

[bripat9643]

Why?

Because Republicans will kill him

Another pearl of wisdom from the Island of the living brain dead.

Trump has killed before he will do it again

Who has he killed?

 

[XponentialChaos]

She fucked around and she found out.

That’s all there is to it.

 

[bodecea]

Why would they even tell the executive branch who it was?

Considering you idiots think the insurrection that wasn't is like 9/11 and the Civil War combined why wouldn't they?

So...30JUN21, right?

I believe all the machines will be tested and all 2 mil ballots photographed by June 30th when the lease runs out.

A report has to be written so I think the they said a week or 2

If everything comes clean I'll be satisfied. However I don't think you would do the same if it was a schlonging up the pooper shooter elecion....Right??

Another one believing in 30JUN21......

 

[IM2]

Why can't the Biden Administration Be Transparent And Officially Release The name Of The Capitol Police Officer Who Shot & Killed Ashli Babbitt on 6 January Inside the US Capitol?

I have read several articles from several different Internet sites and several different Media Sources, but there is no definitive evidence or unified agreement 'THIS is The Officer Who Killed Babbitt'.

Was / Is it US Capitol Special Agent David Bailey, a Brazilian immigrant and Black Lives Matter militant who 'REPEATEDLY THREATENED TO KILL TRUMP SUPPORTERS ON FACEBOOK FOR MONTHS'?

Or was it Capitol Police Officer Michael Leroy Byrd, an officer who was reportedly investigated in 2019 for leaving his weapon in the Capitol Visitor Center's bathroom?

One thing is for sure - House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, head of the Capitol police, Joe Biden, and the Biden administration know. So why have they refused to be transparent, to relase the information, and have refused to allow the Capitol Video footage to be released?

​

US Capitol Special Agent David Bailey Who Murdered Ashli Babbitt is a Brazilian Immigrant and Black Lives Matter Militant — HE REPEATEDLY THREATENED TO KILL TRUMP SUPPORTERS ON FACEBOOK FOR MONTHS! - Nwo Report

The Capitol Police absolutely refused to release the name of the officer. The media didn’t ask for a name and diverted all attention away from his murderous crime. The foreign newspaper The Sun even spit on Ashli’s grave by releasing a clickbait headline “Who shot Ashli Babbitt, the woman who...

nworeport.me

Capitol Cop Who Murdered Ashli Babbitt Identified as Michael Leroy Byrd – THE FOXHOLE

sfcmac.com

Capitol Police Officer Who Fatally Shot Ashli Babbitt Won’t Face Charges

The U.S. Capitol police officer who fatally shot Ashli Babbitt during the U.S. Capitol riots in January has been cleared of criminal wrongdoing and will not face charges, the Department of Justice announced Wednesday. Authorities found there was insufficient evidence to support a criminal...

news.yahoo.com

Why is it so important for you to know his name?

The video of Babbit trying to break into the speakers chamber has been out for a long time.

 

[IM2]

Why can't the Biden Administration Be Transparent And Officially Release The name Of The Capitol Police Officer Who Shot & Killed Ashli Babbitt on 6 January Inside the US Capitol?

I have read several articles from several different Internet sites and several different Media Sources, but there is no definitive evidence or unified agreement 'THIS is The Officer Who Killed Babbitt'.

Was / Is it US Capitol Special Agent David Bailey, a Brazilian immigrant and Black Lives Matter militant who 'REPEATEDLY THREATENED TO KILL TRUMP SUPPORTERS ON FACEBOOK FOR MONTHS'?

Or was it Capitol Police Officer Michael Leroy Byrd, an officer who was reportedly investigated in 2019 for leaving his weapon in the Capitol Visitor Center's bathroom?

One thing is for sure - House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, head of the Capitol police, Joe Biden, and the Biden administration know. So why have they refused to be transparent, to relase the information, and have refused to allow the Capitol Video footage to be released?

​

US Capitol Special Agent David Bailey Who Murdered Ashli Babbitt is a Brazilian Immigrant and Black Lives Matter Militant — HE REPEATEDLY THREATENED TO KILL TRUMP SUPPORTERS ON FACEBOOK FOR MONTHS! - Nwo Report

The Capitol Police absolutely refused to release the name of the officer. The media didn’t ask for a name and diverted all attention away from his murderous crime. The foreign newspaper The Sun even spit on Ashli’s grave by releasing a clickbait headline “Who shot Ashli Babbitt, the woman who...

nworeport.me

Capitol Cop Who Murdered Ashli Babbitt Identified as Michael Leroy Byrd – THE FOXHOLE

sfcmac.com

Capitol Police Officer Who Fatally Shot Ashli Babbitt Won’t Face Charges

The U.S. Capitol police officer who fatally shot Ashli Babbitt during the U.S. Capitol riots in January has been cleared of criminal wrongdoing and will not face charges, the Department of Justice announced Wednesday. Authorities found there was insufficient evidence to support a criminal...

news.yahoo.com

No reason to keep the name secret; the officer should, at the very least, receive a Medal of Freedom for wiping out an insurrectionist attempting the overthrow of the government of the United States of America! Bigly!!!

Condoning murder is an epidemic with you morons. What a bunch of miserable bastards you are.

That wasn't a murder. It's time you right wing idiots stopped lying to yourselves.

 

[IM2]

I have heard that the murderous cop is well known online, and that he is heavily involved with the democratic party and BLM, that is why the thug has not been id'd, because it was an act of naked political murder by a naked fascist thug who apparently has a well established online presence!

Babbitt was the thug.

 

[IM2]

There must be a strong FBI connection, if not outright FBI.
This crap isn't rocket science.

If she behaved like a normal person she would be alive.

So you are saying that she was a weapon-less threat to life? How?

The bitch was with a violent mob trying to bust into the speakers chamber. Babbitt decided she couldn't wait for the door to be busted down so she decided she woul go through the busted window. And she was stopped. Quit lying to yourself about this.